SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »
This. As a loooong time TES franchise fan I hate this game with a passion. It's a HORRIBLE Elder Scrolls game, and even worse MMO. True TES players would agree with me, this game shouldn't even be considered part of the TES franchise.
I've been playing ES games since Arena. To me, Skyrim is by far the worst ES game, not this.
Isn't it great how people can have differing opinions?
I literally can't stand people who thinks this game is good (pve) I just don't, and if you're one of them don't talk to me because your opinion is irrelevant to me.
You seem a pleasant sort of person.
As you go through life, you will meet people who's opinions don't match your own. Deal with that little fact of life.
Nah, I ignore real life casuals too
So, would you define a casual how? How exactly is a casual measured? I for instance work a lot, have an SO to tend to, planning going back to education, and can't play for 12 hours a day every day. If having a real life makes me a casual, then I'm very proud to be a casual
I was making a joke... Ive already told you if you enjoy a single quest this game has you're a casual.
How about if I enjoy single quests and PVP and trials?
Still a casual.
You throw that word around like it carries any weight to an argument. It doesn't. It's just strawman, especially as the biggest portion of the player base is here for Elder Scrolls stories. I can however see when I've hit a brick wall with someone who believes throwing names around is a valid argument.
Enjoy your "hardcore" PVP experience in a game where it doesn't exist!
Although if they add arenas, I'll happily come and kick your toon to the planes of Oblivion!
It's amusing that once a streamer says something how many loyal followers come out of the woodwork to preach their gospel words.
The games been in a mess PvP wise for a while, just because a single streamer gets butt hurt about an update doesn't mean the end times are coming. He can go play another game and then get butt hurt about that at some point as well.
Meanwhile many of us will remain here and help ZOS build on the game accepting not everything can be magically fixed in a single patch.
Moglijuana wrote: »
SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »
This. As a loooong time TES franchise fan I hate this game with a passion. It's a HORRIBLE Elder Scrolls game, and even worse MMO. True TES players would agree with me, this game shouldn't even be considered part of the TES franchise.
I've been playing ES games since Arena. To me, Skyrim is by far the worst ES game, not this.
Isn't it great how people can have differing opinions?
I literally can't stand people who thinks this game is good (pve) I just don't, and if you're one of them don't talk to me because your opinion is irrelevant to me.
You seem a pleasant sort of person.
As you go through life, you will meet people who's opinions don't match your own. Deal with that little fact of life.
Nah, I ignore real life casuals too
So, would you define a casual how? How exactly is a casual measured? I for instance work a lot, have an SO to tend to, planning going back to education, and can't play for 12 hours a day every day. If having a real life makes me a casual, then I'm very proud to be a casual
I was making a joke... Ive already told you if you enjoy a single quest this game has you're a casual.
How about if I enjoy single quests and PVP and trials?
Still a casual.
You throw that word around like it carries any weight to an argument. It doesn't. It's just strawman, especially as the biggest portion of the player base is here for Elder Scrolls stories. I can however see when I've hit a brick wall with someone who believes throwing names around is a valid argument.
Enjoy your "hardcore" PVP experience in a game where it doesn't exist!
Although if they add arenas, I'll happily come and kick your toon to the planes of Oblivion!
Moglijuana wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »
This. As a loooong time TES franchise fan I hate this game with a passion. It's a HORRIBLE Elder Scrolls game, and even worse MMO. True TES players would agree with me, this game shouldn't even be considered part of the TES franchise.
I've been playing ES games since Arena. To me, Skyrim is by far the worst ES game, not this.
Isn't it great how people can have differing opinions?
I literally can't stand people who thinks this game is good (pve) I just don't, and if you're one of them don't talk to me because your opinion is irrelevant to me.
You seem a pleasant sort of person.
As you go through life, you will meet people who's opinions don't match your own. Deal with that little fact of life.
Nah, I ignore real life casuals too
So, would you define a casual how? How exactly is a casual measured? I for instance work a lot, have an SO to tend to, planning going back to education, and can't play for 12 hours a day every day. If having a real life makes me a casual, then I'm very proud to be a casual
I was making a joke... Ive already told you if you enjoy a single quest this game has you're a casual.
How about if I enjoy single quests and PVP and trials?
Still a casual.
You throw that word around like it carries any weight to an argument. It doesn't. It's just strawman, especially as the biggest portion of the player base is here for Elder Scrolls stories. I can however see when I've hit a brick wall with someone who believes throwing names around is a valid argument.
Enjoy your "hardcore" PVP experience in a game where it doesn't exist!
I'm pretty sure these "stories" you are speaking of are more comparable to those crossword puzzles on the back of cereal boxes...bc honestly they suck and take the mental capacity of a three year old to get through.
SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »
This. As a loooong time TES franchise fan I hate this game with a passion. It's a HORRIBLE Elder Scrolls game, and even worse MMO. True TES players would agree with me, this game shouldn't even be considered part of the TES franchise.
I've been playing ES games since Arena. To me, Skyrim is by far the worst ES game, not this.
Isn't it great how people can have differing opinions?
I literally can't stand people who thinks this game is good (pve) I just don't, and if you're one of them don't talk to me because your opinion is irrelevant to me.
You seem a pleasant sort of person.
As you go through life, you will meet people who's opinions don't match your own. Deal with that little fact of life.
Nah, I ignore real life casuals too
So, would you define a casual how? How exactly is a casual measured? I for instance work a lot, have an SO to tend to, planning going back to education, and can't play for 12 hours a day every day. If having a real life makes me a casual, then I'm very proud to be a casual
I was making a joke... Ive already told you if you enjoy a single quest this game has you're a casual.
How about if I enjoy single quests and PVP and trials?
Still a casual.
You throw that word around like it carries any weight to an argument. It doesn't. It's just strawman, especially as the biggest portion of the player base is here for Elder Scrolls stories. I can however see when I've hit a brick wall with someone who believes throwing names around is a valid argument.
Enjoy your "hardcore" PVP experience in a game where it doesn't exist!
Although if they add arenas, I'll happily come and kick your toon to the planes of Oblivion!
1v1 I would destroy you with my stamina templar that's for sure. While you've been ''saving the world'' in unchallenging quests i've been practicing, so no a fight is not an option. Also I do know there's not real pvp in this game that's the reason I left it.
starkerealm wrote: »...
starkerealm wrote: »Nothing cowardly about it. There's no point to engaging with a chorus of people who have nothing more constructive to say than, "you suck!"
So what happens when one of them has a valid point? They get ignored. Because they're standing next to twenty other people who don't, and are busy chanting, "you suck," over, and over, and over again, and have nothing of value to contribute.
starkerealm wrote: »Case in point.
I mean, here you've made a legitimate point: There are balance issues between the classes. And, you've wrapped it in a cynical and abusive tone. Which, I mean, as a content creator, I'd look at that and say, "nope, not even going to bother," and move on.
You had a legitimate point, but now it's lost, because you set it up as an insult.
starkerealm wrote: »...the AOE cap that Feng throws a borderline tantrum over is actually something that was implemented because ZOS did listen to people telling them how to fix things.
Who here remembers the unkillable vampire emperors from launch?
Yeah, that AoE cap was put in the game at player demand. Because they did listen to people telling them how to fix things. And now someone else has come along and said, "no, no, no, you listened to the wrong guys, by the way this is your fault!" Yeah... I can't imagine why ZOS might not want to listen to him.
starkerealm wrote: »That's all anyone can do really. I mean, with an MMO? It's not like a single player release. It's never going to be a static game. It may not even exist in the same form a month or two months from now. You can take what's there, you can offer your suggestions. But, when it devolves into shouting, "no, you're wrong!" it becomes non-constructive. It's not cowardice, it's just how dialog works. You said your bit. Someone else decided if you were worth listening to or not. And here we are.
Moglijuana wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »
This. As a loooong time TES franchise fan I hate this game with a passion. It's a HORRIBLE Elder Scrolls game, and even worse MMO. True TES players would agree with me, this game shouldn't even be considered part of the TES franchise.
I've been playing ES games since Arena. To me, Skyrim is by far the worst ES game, not this.
Isn't it great how people can have differing opinions?
I literally can't stand people who thinks this game is good (pve) I just don't, and if you're one of them don't talk to me because your opinion is irrelevant to me.
You seem a pleasant sort of person.
As you go through life, you will meet people who's opinions don't match your own. Deal with that little fact of life.
Nah, I ignore real life casuals too
So, would you define a casual how? How exactly is a casual measured? I for instance work a lot, have an SO to tend to, planning going back to education, and can't play for 12 hours a day every day. If having a real life makes me a casual, then I'm very proud to be a casual
I was making a joke... Ive already told you if you enjoy a single quest this game has you're a casual.
How about if I enjoy single quests and PVP and trials?
Still a casual.
You throw that word around like it carries any weight to an argument. It doesn't. It's just strawman, especially as the biggest portion of the player base is here for Elder Scrolls stories. I can however see when I've hit a brick wall with someone who believes throwing names around is a valid argument.
Enjoy your "hardcore" PVP experience in a game where it doesn't exist!
I'm pretty sure these "stories" you are speaking of are more comparable to those crossword puzzles on the back of cereal boxes...bc honestly they suck and take the mental capacity of a three year old to get through.
Actually, a lot of these side stories are far better written than most MMO's and indeed Skyrim. I prefer this to "go and get me 20 wolves tails because reasons!!"
We are leaving this thread open to continue this topic as the video and discussion itself have valid points. Criticism is welcome. However we would appreciate a single running discussion on this issue. Multiple threads are considered spamming and will take attention away from the point trying to me made of the discussion.
We also ask that you continue to keep this discussion in the realm of debate and away from insulting other players/groups. (We had to remove a few statements.) There are plenty of good examples of players making their statements on this thread without bashing one another. This is in the interest of keeping this thread open as we will close this thread like any other that violates our general forum rules.
I have been following Fengrush and some of the other hardcore streamers for a while and in his defense the frustration has simply been building up for too long. ZOS needs to understand that a simple PVP arena will solve so much of the longevity issues this game will have especially with players that have been here for so long... its such an easy thing to add and such an elementary need you will be fulfilling for so many players...
magnusthorek wrote: »I'm so glad that I'm not the only player who is not "afraid" of speak my mind and point ruthlessly what the hell is going on.
And then, something obscure and not publicly mentioned is changed requiring us to re-accept the TOS (otherwise we can't even login anymore) like if we could even compare to the older text (who is paranoid enough to keep "version control" of TOSs) and we read it carefully just to see that basically the whole Section 6 is a general [snip] off saying exactly what Feng said but with legal speech.
...
Apparently all of Zenimax Media uses the same Terms of Service so there are a lot of changes with regards to Fallout4, Mods and the new Bethesda.net site. I didn't fully go through the changes, but I'm sure if someone finds something interesting it will be pointed out in the comments.
We are leaving this thread open to continue this topic as the video and discussion itself have valid points. Criticism is welcome. However we would appreciate a single running discussion on this issue. Multiple threads are considered spamming and will take attention away from the point trying to me made of the discussion.
We also ask that you continue to keep this discussion in the realm of debate and away from insulting other players/groups. (We had to remove a few statements.) There are plenty of good examples of players making their statements on this thread without bashing one another. This is in the interest of keeping this thread open as we will close this thread like any other that violates our general forum rules.
we as a community politely if you take action on the issues raised
Also if removing the other threads make it clear within the topics title what this thread is regarding.
Shader_Shibes wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »The real question is, once VRs are gone, will we see the trial drops scaling to CR160 (or higher), or will they keep their current CR equivalent tiers of gear?
I will bet you $1000 they will be the v12/14 equivalent.
Also if removing the other threads make it clear within the topics title what this thread is regarding.
This is an excellent suggestion. Thank you for your feedback.
We had hoped that posting that the thread was temporarily locked was enough clarity, however if the lock itself alarms people we will consider editing titles as well if this is more informative.
We are leaving this thread open to continue this topic as the video and discussion itself have valid points. Criticism is welcome. However we would appreciate a single running discussion on this issue. Multiple threads are considered spamming and will take attention away from the point trying to me made of the discussion.
We also ask that you continue to keep this discussion in the realm of debate and away from insulting other players/groups. (We had to remove a few statements.) There are plenty of good examples of players making their statements on this thread without bashing one another. This is in the interest of keeping this thread open as we will close this thread like any other that violates our general forum rules.
we as a community politely if you take action on the issues raised
Also if removing the other threads make it clear within the topics title what this thread is regarding.
WalkingLegacy wrote: »I think Fengrush has no idea about how casuals play and for how long they stay in a game. He said like 3 months and then they are leaving the game - why would they possibly do that?- They have seen like nothing from this game in 3 months, because they do neither rush through the content nor would they spend a lot of time playing - if they get to play 20 hours per month that is already a lot and if they get up to 40 they hit a boundary, where their spouses will start to seriously get mad at them.
For casuals the game content will not run out anytime soon - they simply are not gamers who would consume a game like it would be melting ice cream. They do not burn through the content like being on speed and they do not run around like squirrels from quest to quest - they try to enjoy their time in Tamriel, without stress or the insane idea, that endgame would be what the game would be about - it is not - that what hardcore gamers see as a necessary evil - the PvE content - that is their game. And that Pvp content is not much more than a necessary evil, because they will most likely never get to it anyway.
This game can perfectly live on for many years to come, paid solely by casual players - they might not play a lot, they will as well not be a burden on the servers, but they are willing to keep up a subscription for years to come - because that is what they want - enjoyable entertainment to get back to, whenever they have a couple of hours. They do not seek a challenge, but entertainment, something to get away from reality for a bit - so they stay subscribed, because this is the cheapest seen long term. And that is exactky what ZOS wants as well - reliable income for years to come - so it is a win-win situation - just not for hardcore players.
You have it so backwards sometimes.I think Fengrush has no idea about how casuals play and for how long they stay in a game. He said like 3 months and then they are leaving the game - why would they possibly do that?- They have seen like nothing from this game in 3 months, because they do neither rush through the content nor would they spend a lot of time playing - if they get to play 20 hours per month that is already a lot and if they get up to 40 they hit a boundary, where their spouses will start to seriously get mad at them.
For casuals the game content will not run out anytime soon - they simply are not gamers who would consume a game like it would be melting ice cream. They do not burn through the content like being on speed and they do not run around like squirrels from quest to quest - they try to enjoy their time in Tamriel, without stress or the insane idea, that endgame would be what the game would be about - it is not - that what hardcore gamers see as a necessary evil - the PvE content - that is their game. And that Pvp content is not much more than a necessary evil, because they will most likely never get to it anyway.
This game can perfectly live on for many years to come, paid solely by casual players - they might not play a lot, they will as well not be a burden on the servers, but they are willing to keep up a subscription for years to come - because that is what they want - enjoyable entertainment to get back to, whenever they have a couple of hours. They do not seek a challenge, but entertainment, something to get away from reality for a bit - so they stay subscribed, because this is the cheapest seen long term. And that is exactky what ZOS wants as well - reliable income for years to come - so it is a win-win situation - just not for hardcore players.
so basically in a nut shell: hardcore players,pvp fanatics,and streamers picked the wrong game to invest in. not arguing just interpreting.
Of course they did - like Mr. Firor said lately, this is not the typical MMO but more of an expansive online Elder Scrolls RPG. And that is what it is going to be, you expect the wrong thing, if you think it will ever be something else.
He has said so many things, and constantly changes their agenda when they realize they can't accomplish anything. This is no different then stating their "MMO" is different than traditional MMOs. How so Matt/Lysette? Different because you're designing a single player experience but charging cash shop items that mimic an MMO?
dennissomb16_ESO wrote: »After watching the video, without meaning to pick on fengrush in particular most of what I heard was "me and other streamers want (insert whatever here)" and if you don't do it your game will fail and you suck. Some of the actual points he discussed were still very much personal preference. I can agree with some and not others. What I cannot agree with is statements like "ZOS Doesn't want feedback" or "everyone wants AOE caps removed etc. It is a huge community all with different wants that ZOS needs to balance out while they continue the game.
AOE caps as an example. Some streamers and forum warriors want it, many don't. I remember the fiasco no AOE caps had in Warhammer where two fire sorcs could kill dozens and dozens of people at a time. It was simply stupid.
You can take all the discussions around lack of class balance/nerfs/buffs, cut and paste the general concept and put them into the forums of any MMO with PvP and it will fit right in. This game is hardly unique when it comes to class balance discussions.
Every MMO forums is filled with "end of the world" posts. In the end people will play whatever game they enjoy. It may be going back to an older game, trying newer ones, or doing what they enjoy here
WalkingLegacy wrote: »I think Fengrush has no idea about how casuals play and for how long they stay in a game. He said like 3 months and then they are leaving the game - why would they possibly do that?- They have seen like nothing from this game in 3 months, because they do neither rush through the content nor would they spend a lot of time playing - if they get to play 20 hours per month that is already a lot and if they get up to 40 they hit a boundary, where their spouses will start to seriously get mad at them.
For casuals the game content will not run out anytime soon - they simply are not gamers who would consume a game like it would be melting ice cream. They do not burn through the content like being on speed and they do not run around like squirrels from quest to quest - they try to enjoy their time in Tamriel, without stress or the insane idea, that endgame would be what the game would be about - it is not - that what hardcore gamers see as a necessary evil - the PvE content - that is their game. And that Pvp content is not much more than a necessary evil, because they will most likely never get to it anyway.
This game can perfectly live on for many years to come, paid solely by casual players - they might not play a lot, they will as well not be a burden on the servers, but they are willing to keep up a subscription for years to come - because that is what they want - enjoyable entertainment to get back to, whenever they have a couple of hours. They do not seek a challenge, but entertainment, something to get away from reality for a bit - so they stay subscribed, because this is the cheapest seen long term. And that is exactky what ZOS wants as well - reliable income for years to come - so it is a win-win situation - just not for hardcore players.
You have it so backwards sometimes.I think Fengrush has no idea about how casuals play and for how long they stay in a game. He said like 3 months and then they are leaving the game - why would they possibly do that?- They have seen like nothing from this game in 3 months, because they do neither rush through the content nor would they spend a lot of time playing - if they get to play 20 hours per month that is already a lot and if they get up to 40 they hit a boundary, where their spouses will start to seriously get mad at them.
For casuals the game content will not run out anytime soon - they simply are not gamers who would consume a game like it would be melting ice cream. They do not burn through the content like being on speed and they do not run around like squirrels from quest to quest - they try to enjoy their time in Tamriel, without stress or the insane idea, that endgame would be what the game would be about - it is not - that what hardcore gamers see as a necessary evil - the PvE content - that is their game. And that Pvp content is not much more than a necessary evil, because they will most likely never get to it anyway.
This game can perfectly live on for many years to come, paid solely by casual players - they might not play a lot, they will as well not be a burden on the servers, but they are willing to keep up a subscription for years to come - because that is what they want - enjoyable entertainment to get back to, whenever they have a couple of hours. They do not seek a challenge, but entertainment, something to get away from reality for a bit - so they stay subscribed, because this is the cheapest seen long term. And that is exactky what ZOS wants as well - reliable income for years to come - so it is a win-win situation - just not for hardcore players.
so basically in a nut shell: hardcore players,pvp fanatics,and streamers picked the wrong game to invest in. not arguing just interpreting.
Of course they did - like Mr. Firor said lately, this is not the typical MMO but more of an expansive online Elder Scrolls RPG. And that is what it is going to be, you expect the wrong thing, if you think it will ever be something else.
He has said so many things, and constantly changes their agenda when they realize they can't accomplish anything. This is no different then stating their "MMO" is different than traditional MMOs. How so Matt/Lysette? Different because you're designing a single player experience but charging cash shop items that mimic an MMO?
Different as in "having no end game" - you guys are just not getting it - there is no end game and never will be - you might get an arena - another hamster cage for you to run in for a little while longer - but in fact ESO is a role playing game, an online version of an Elder Scrolls RPG - in that it is not a typical MMO. That ESO still has this hamster cage in Cyrrodil is just because it is still making some extra cash - if it will do that no longer, it might cease to be a PvP zone, who can say that now - you guys say, you will eventually leave, and think that is a threat - it is not, they might wait for you to actually do it. They cannot kick you out because you have paid for the game and are customers, but you are not the desired kind of customer, that's for certain. The whole game development is showing this.
Moglijuana wrote: »Woo! I'm glad this thread is open again. I don't really care for the arguing, I'd rather see discussions to help make this game WE ALL WANT IT TO BE. The best MMO out there!
What would help the community the most to appeal to their desires? I feel like an actual community ambassador would help ZOS tremendously. Atm they seem way too transparent for an MMO developer.