@Grizzbeorn there were never a disagree button, or you mean lol button? Then I agree with youGrizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
The LOL button was designed for funny post like this one.@Grizzbeorn there were never a disagree button, or you mean lol button? Then I agree with youGrizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
Downvoting is okey imo as long as it do not remove the post or make it less visible. Better for a healthy social environment.


It's VERY helpful when you see a back and forth on a topic and see one side constantly getting 20+ agrees and the other side getting like 4.

Grizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
EdmondDontes wrote: »This system is not necessary and it's not helpful in any way. Forum posts don't need to be ranked or approved of by other players.
@Grizzbeorn there were never a disagree button, or you mean lol button? Then I agree with youGrizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
Downvoting is okey imo as long as it do not remove the post or make it less visible. Better for a healthy social environment.
Grizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
Or they simply need to create forums that separate under 30s from over 30s so we can have fewer reddit-style abusive situations and more impactful discussions I mean come on! What kind of disgusting behaviour are you trying to encourage with downvoting into oblivion nonsense. Either articulate why you disagree or accept their opinion is valid!
Grizzbeorn wrote: »What is needed is a return of the Disagree button, and a rep system so that posts with silly opinions can be downvoted to Oblivion.
Or they simply need to create forums that separate under 30s from over 30s so we can have fewer reddit-style abusive situations and more impactful discussions I mean come on! What kind of disgusting behaviour are you trying to encourage with downvoting into oblivion nonsense. Either articulate why you disagree or accept their opinion is valid!
EdmondDontes wrote: »Doesn't anyone else think we need to get away from the social media inspired "like" and "dislike" baloney? Can't anyone have a discussion now days without the need for "likes"?
Instead of measuring the quality of a discussion based on how many people "liked" you, why don't we all just learn to have a discussion and actually base the worthiness of the discussion on the merits rather than the "likes"?
Social media has corrupted the brains of the masses, and this is one way it's done it. Being popular IS NOT the same as being right or worthy. If you're basing the worthiness of yourself or your comment based on the number of "likes", you're not thinking, you're doing it wrong.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Doesn't anyone else think we need to get away from the social media inspired "like" and "dislike" baloney? Can't anyone have a discussion now days without the need for "likes"?
Instead of measuring the quality of a discussion based on how many people "liked" you, why don't we all just learn to have a discussion and actually base the worthiness of the discussion on the merits rather than the "likes"?
Social media has corrupted the brains of the masses, and this is one way it's done it. Being popular IS NOT the same as being right or worthy. If you're basing the worthiness of yourself or your comment based on the number of "likes", you're not thinking, you're doing it wrong.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Doesn't anyone else think we need to get away from the social media inspired "like" and "dislike" baloney? Can't anyone have a discussion now days without the need for "likes"?
Instead of measuring the quality of a discussion based on how many people "liked" you, why don't we all just learn to have a discussion and actually base the worthiness of the discussion on the merits rather than the "likes"?
Social media has corrupted the brains of the masses, and this is one way it's done it. Being popular IS NOT the same as being right or worthy. If you're basing the worthiness of yourself or your comment based on the number of "likes", you're not thinking, you're doing it wrong.
Grizzbeorn wrote: »Well, I'm starting to regret the 'Insightful' reaction I gave you in the LA thread, if you are this prone to completely over-reacting.
I would think someone like you would have been able to tell that I was being tongue-in-cheek with the reference I was making to the OP with my "nonsense." But I guess I misread you, just as you did me.
The OP's imperious attitude rubbed me the wrong way, so I responded with a quip.
EdmondDontes wrote: »Doesn't anyone else think we need to get away from the social media inspired "like" and "dislike" baloney? Can't anyone have a discussion now days without the need for "likes"?
Instead of measuring the quality of a discussion based on how many people "liked" you, why don't we all just learn to have a discussion and actually base the worthiness of the discussion on the merits rather than the "likes"?
Social media has corrupted the brains of the masses, and this is one way it's done it. Being popular IS NOT the same as being right or worthy. If you're basing the worthiness of yourself or your comment based on the number of "likes", you're not thinking, you're doing it wrong.