I would like to challenge that if ur running say a 4man team - and 1 guy keeps dying/underperforming while the oakensorc of your group carries. Fingers will be pointed to the guy not doing heavy attack builds.
Turtle_Bot wrote: »I would like to challenge that if ur running say a 4man team - and 1 guy keeps dying/underperforming while the oakensorc of your group carries. Fingers will be pointed to the guy not doing heavy attack builds.
Something to note here regarding this point specifically and something that makes this argument against the build shaky at best.
Those who would "point the finger" at the person who keeps dying/underperforming, will point the finger at those underperforming people regardless of whether they were running oaken HA, a meta 2 bar set-up, a niche strong but not meta build etc.
Those same people are the same second tier players that think they are up there on par with the best of the best and attempt to reinforce this idea through belittling other players that they consider below them, regardless of what build those other players use.
These people did the exact same thing back when plars were able to hit 70k+ with just jabs (another 1 button build) and they will do it again on the next "easy build/carry class/etc".
These people's opinions should not be a reason to nerf a second tier build that is still performing roughly 20-30% below what the top builds can achieve.
There's also plenty of players using "PvP" builds to clear most vet/HM dungeons (even DLCs) and old trial content who have been doing so for years because those builds allow them to be tanky while dealing sufficient damage to clear the content, often with the damage being made up for by having more DDs and less/no healers.
Where do we draw the line here? What's next after oakensoul HA builds? Do we go after the solo players builds since those are tankier and have nearly the same damage as traditional 2 bar builds for the middle of the road players and are being used to clear content such as vMA/vVH, etc? Do we go after PvP builds that are also used in PvE content because again, they are much tankier than traditional builds, have enough damage to clear majority of content and are much more forgiving and easier to play and often end up removing the need for a healer too.
Or, how about instead of worrying/being jealous of what others are doing to help them enjoy the cooperative side of the game the way they want to and clear the content how they want to, we instead focus on improving ourselves and what we can do to better enjoy the game how we want to enjoy it, whether that be via playing a "1 button" build to relax and enjoy the game for what it is, or sweating like crazy trying to play the piano to clear content like it's a second job.
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »I believe that I have listed and referenced numbers ESO Leaderboards that shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are not the best, for ESO trials and arenas.
If you cannot prove using numbers from a public source like ESO Leaderboards that I am wrong, then I will continue to say that the data shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are second best to a well played LA weaving build, and do not need to be nerfed.
I believe that ESO should continue to allow folks to "play as they want", and to be able to complete PvE group content using more than one build. I like doing trials and random dungeons, and I find that many folks I group with on PS/NA are not using a HA Oakensoul Sorcerer build for DPS.
It's OK if you don't agree with me about allowing folks to "play as they want". You can join or form a guild with folks who do not use HA Oakensoul Sorcerer builds, and only do ESO group content with your guild mates.
I think it is wrong to push for nerfs to "the other guys build" for ESO PvE group play, when "the other guys build" is second best.
I agree. I don't know why so many people are obsessed with targeting "the other guys build". Don't want to use HA or Oakensoul then don't. Why do some people care so much about what other people use? How does it harm them?
How is it fair to the players who took the time to farm gear, learn rotation, practice weaving only to be out parsed by someone who couldn't even hit 50k before Oakensoul? I parse 110k with 2 bar build but I'm FORCED to use oaken ha build in content if I don't wanna get beaten by noobs.
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »I believe that I have listed and referenced numbers ESO Leaderboards that shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are not the best, for ESO trials and arenas.
If you cannot prove using numbers from a public source like ESO Leaderboards that I am wrong, then I will continue to say that the data shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are second best to a well played LA weaving build, and do not need to be nerfed.
I believe that ESO should continue to allow folks to "play as they want", and to be able to complete PvE group content using more than one build. I like doing trials and random dungeons, and I find that many folks I group with on PS/NA are not using a HA Oakensoul Sorcerer build for DPS.
It's OK if you don't agree with me about allowing folks to "play as they want". You can join or form a guild with folks who do not use HA Oakensoul Sorcerer builds, and only do ESO group content with your guild mates.
I think it is wrong to push for nerfs to "the other guys build" for ESO PvE group play, when "the other guys build" is second best.
I agree. I don't know why so many people are obsessed with targeting "the other guys build". Don't want to use HA or Oakensoul then don't. Why do some people care so much about what other people use? How does it harm them?
How is it fair to the players who took the time to farm gear, learn rotation, practice weaving only to be out parsed by someone who couldn't even hit 50k before Oakensoul? I parse 110k with 2 bar build but I'm FORCED to use oaken ha build in content if I don't wanna get beaten by noobs.
Turtle_Bot wrote: »I would like to challenge that if ur running say a 4man team - and 1 guy keeps dying/underperforming while the oakensorc of your group carries. Fingers will be pointed to the guy not doing heavy attack builds.
Something to note here regarding this point specifically and something that makes this argument against the build shaky at best.
Those who would "point the finger" at the person who keeps dying/underperforming, will point the finger at those underperforming people regardless of whether they were running oaken HA, a meta 2 bar set-up, a niche strong but not meta build etc.
Those same people are the same second tier players that think they are up there on par with the best of the best and attempt to reinforce this idea through belittling other players that they consider below them, regardless of what build those other players use.
These people did the exact same thing back when plars were able to hit 70k+ with just jabs (another 1 button build) and they will do it again on the next "easy build/carry class/etc".
These people's opinions should not be a reason to nerf a second tier build that is still performing roughly 20-30% below what the top builds can achieve.
There's also plenty of players using "PvP" builds to clear most vet/HM dungeons (even DLCs) and old trial content who have been doing so for years because those builds allow them to be tanky while dealing sufficient damage to clear the content, often with the damage being made up for by having more DDs and less/no healers.
Where do we draw the line here? What's next after oakensoul HA builds? Do we go after the solo players builds since those are tankier and have nearly the same damage as traditional 2 bar builds for the middle of the road players and are being used to clear content such as vMA/vVH, etc? Do we go after PvP builds that are also used in PvE content because again, they are much tankier than traditional builds, have enough damage to clear majority of content and are much more forgiving and easier to play and often end up removing the need for a healer too.
Or, how about instead of worrying/being jealous of what others are doing to help them enjoy the cooperative side of the game the way they want to and clear the content how they want to, we instead focus on improving ourselves and what we can do to better enjoy the game how we want to enjoy it, whether that be via playing a "1 button" build to relax and enjoy the game for what it is, or sweating like crazy trying to play the piano to clear content like it's a second job.
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »I believe that I have listed and referenced numbers ESO Leaderboards that shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are not the best, for ESO trials and arenas.
If you cannot prove using numbers from a public source like ESO Leaderboards that I am wrong, then I will continue to say that the data shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are second best to a well played LA weaving build, and do not need to be nerfed.
I believe that ESO should continue to allow folks to "play as they want", and to be able to complete PvE group content using more than one build. I like doing trials and random dungeons, and I find that many folks I group with on PS/NA are not using a HA Oakensoul Sorcerer build for DPS.
It's OK if you don't agree with me about allowing folks to "play as they want". You can join or form a guild with folks who do not use HA Oakensoul Sorcerer builds, and only do ESO group content with your guild mates.
I think it is wrong to push for nerfs to "the other guys build" for ESO PvE group play, when "the other guys build" is second best.
I agree. I don't know why so many people are obsessed with targeting "the other guys build". Don't want to use HA or Oakensoul then don't. Why do some people care so much about what other people use? How does it harm them?
How is it fair to the players who took the time to farm gear, learn rotation, practice weaving only to be out parsed by someone who couldn't even hit 50k before Oakensoul? I parse 110k with 2 bar build but I'm FORCED to use oaken ha build in content if I don't wanna get beaten by noobs.
You answered your own question --- whether you farm Pillars of Nirn, or Oakensoul, you are still farming out the gear to get your DPS.
I have run a HA build for about 18 months, now.... a YEAR BEFORE Oakensoul ... simpler rotation than using Oakensoul, and easier, as it gives the equivelent of 6600 Health Regen.,,, I have to dodge MORE when using Oakensoul, as while the "tankiness" (a term that can't really be measured), is the same, there isn't as much healing in Oakensoul as there is in Crit Surge.
By the way, I built that character 1 month after I started playing.... so, I was a Noob..... and to be perfectly honest, my damage has been pretty consistent before and after Oakensoul..... and I tend to die MORE often with Oakensoul equipped, as I forget I then need to heal more often......
This is not new.... but I do notice that last line about beaten by noobs..... because it lends a lot of weight to the argument that this is about insecurity, and gatekeeping, more than anything else.....
People using Oakensoul are buying High Isle, paying for either DLC, or ESO plus, and then working to get it.
It is a 5 piece mythic... oh look at that, 5 pieces, just like Pillars of Nirn...
And, these people are paying subscriptions....
And you are stating that many people are doing it... do you really want to push that many paying subscriptions off to other games.....
I pay for 3 subscriptions, mine, my fiance', and my step mother... my stepmother uses Oakensoul on a 2-handed build.... because being in her 60's, she doesn't swap bars well..... I play with it, but only use it, say 10% of the time.... I haven't found a real build I like with it..... I do just as much without it, and most of my builds would be considered bar and a half builds, as I only really swap bars about 20 to 25% of the time..... I tend to build 1 bar builds that run me about 65K, which is MORE than enough to clear anything I want to clear... but also that I can consistently do, even in groups..... where I usually run 30 to 35K.
Should I be punished for my builds, because I am not hitting the swap bar on the appropriate schedule? Am I not staring at my bar hard enough doing the prescribed ritual mashing?
I am in my mid-50's... so NO, I am not going to change the way I do things..... but if the ring gets nerfed... I am pretty sure my step mother would leave.... and my fiance' and I would too... as we would all go to a game where we can run together and enjoy clearing material...... all because people seem to be upset that newer players.... oh wait... Noobs..... are learning and having fun, and it challenges their place......
I thought that attitude was something to be found in lesser games, like WOW, and tabletop wargames, where people throw tantrums and argue rules, when they get beaten, rather than just accept and enjoy the game...... guess I was wrong about that.
Auldwulfe
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »I believe that I have listed and referenced numbers ESO Leaderboards that shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are not the best, for ESO trials and arenas.
If you cannot prove using numbers from a public source like ESO Leaderboards that I am wrong, then I will continue to say that the data shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are second best to a well played LA weaving build, and do not need to be nerfed.
I believe that ESO should continue to allow folks to "play as they want", and to be able to complete PvE group content using more than one build. I like doing trials and random dungeons, and I find that many folks I group with on PS/NA are not using a HA Oakensoul Sorcerer build for DPS.
It's OK if you don't agree with me about allowing folks to "play as they want". You can join or form a guild with folks who do not use HA Oakensoul Sorcerer builds, and only do ESO group content with your guild mates.
I think it is wrong to push for nerfs to "the other guys build" for ESO PvE group play, when "the other guys build" is second best.
I agree. I don't know why so many people are obsessed with targeting "the other guys build". Don't want to use HA or Oakensoul then don't. Why do some people care so much about what other people use? How does it harm them?
How is it fair to the players who took the time to farm gear, learn rotation, practice weaving only to be out parsed by someone who couldn't even hit 50k before Oakensoul? I parse 110k with 2 bar build but I'm FORCED to use oaken ha build in content if I don't wanna get beaten by noobs.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »I think the main problem is that the current iteration of oakensorc build doesn't have any real drawbacks. Yes, you are limited to one bar, but many players actually see this as a boon. And yes, there are builds with higher dps, but they require much more practice, APM and they aren't nearly as tanky and self-sufficient.
I'm a casual sorc player, I tried this build and honestly it gives you way too much without any real downsides. It feels almost like exploiting. I also noticed that when I play as a healer, oakensorcs just ignore you and rush ahead (even in vet content) so the tankiness this ring gives you negatively affects group synergy. Being a healer feels more useless than ever when the best group composition is 3 oakensorcs.
I personally think that oakensoul ring should get the pale order treatment: just make the buffs scale with group size. This way casual solo players still get to be OP without affecting group content.
I just want to repeat here that Iam not against the setup entirely - I just believe it is vastly overtuned in its current state and will remain hard to balance due to the tankiness, trifocus and damage that I mentioned in my original post.
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »I believe that I have listed and referenced numbers ESO Leaderboards that shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are not the best, for ESO trials and arenas.
If you cannot prove using numbers from a public source like ESO Leaderboards that I am wrong, then I will continue to say that the data shows that HA Oakensoul Sorcerer Builds are second best to a well played LA weaving build, and do not need to be nerfed.
I believe that ESO should continue to allow folks to "play as they want", and to be able to complete PvE group content using more than one build. I like doing trials and random dungeons, and I find that many folks I group with on PS/NA are not using a HA Oakensoul Sorcerer build for DPS.
It's OK if you don't agree with me about allowing folks to "play as they want". You can join or form a guild with folks who do not use HA Oakensoul Sorcerer builds, and only do ESO group content with your guild mates.
I think it is wrong to push for nerfs to "the other guys build" for ESO PvE group play, when "the other guys build" is second best.
I agree. I don't know why so many people are obsessed with targeting "the other guys build". Don't want to use HA or Oakensoul then don't. Why do some people care so much about what other people use? How does it harm them?
How is it fair to the players who took the time to farm gear, learn rotation, practice weaving only to be out parsed by someone who couldn't even hit 50k before Oakensoul? I parse 110k with 2 bar build but I'm FORCED to use oaken ha build in content if I don't wanna get beaten by noobs.
You answered your own question --- whether you farm Pillars of Nirn, or Oakensoul, you are still farming out the gear to get your DPS.
I have run a HA build for about 18 months, now.... a YEAR BEFORE Oakensoul ... simpler rotation than using Oakensoul, and easier, as it gives the equivelent of 6600 Health Regen.,,, I have to dodge MORE when using Oakensoul, as while the "tankiness" (a term that can't really be measured), is the same, there isn't as much healing in Oakensoul as there is in Crit Surge.
By the way, I built that character 1 month after I started playing.... so, I was a Noob..... and to be perfectly honest, my damage has been pretty consistent before and after Oakensoul..... and I tend to die MORE often with Oakensoul equipped, as I forget I then need to heal more often......
This is not new.... but I do notice that last line about beaten by noobs..... because it lends a lot of weight to the argument that this is about insecurity, and gatekeeping, more than anything else.....
People using Oakensoul are buying High Isle, paying for either DLC, or ESO plus, and then working to get it.
It is a 5 piece mythic... oh look at that, 5 pieces, just like Pillars of Nirn...
And, these people are paying subscriptions....
And you are stating that many people are doing it... do you really want to push that many paying subscriptions off to other games.....
I pay for 3 subscriptions, mine, my fiance', and my step mother... my stepmother uses Oakensoul on a 2-handed build.... because being in her 60's, she doesn't swap bars well..... I play with it, but only use it, say 10% of the time.... I haven't found a real build I like with it..... I do just as much without it, and most of my builds would be considered bar and a half builds, as I only really swap bars about 20 to 25% of the time..... I tend to build 1 bar builds that run me about 65K, which is MORE than enough to clear anything I want to clear... but also that I can consistently do, even in groups..... where I usually run 30 to 35K.
Should I be punished for my builds, because I am not hitting the swap bar on the appropriate schedule? Am I not staring at my bar hard enough doing the prescribed ritual mashing?
I am in my mid-50's... so NO, I am not going to change the way I do things..... but if the ring gets nerfed... I am pretty sure my step mother would leave.... and my fiance' and I would too... as we would all go to a game where we can run together and enjoy clearing material...... all because people seem to be upset that newer players.... oh wait... Noobs..... are learning and having fun, and it challenges their place......
I thought that attitude was something to be found in lesser games, like WOW, and tabletop wargames, where people throw tantrums and argue rules, when they get beaten, rather than just accept and enjoy the game...... guess I was wrong about that.
Auldwulfe
Hey man, theres no need to attempt to guilt trip anyone.
If you three are leaving it may be better for everyone else, which would suck as everyone is welcome in the community but changing everything just so inclusion approaches 100% will exclude more than you are aware off.
How is your argument that your enjoyment of the game will be reduced if something gets nerfed in any way more relevant than someone who enjoys it the other way around. And once again I would suggest that people already are leaving hence you may be betting on the wrong horse friend.'
We obviously havent met online yet, so I dont know the way to play but assuming your age's are not a lie none of your worries are related to age - matter the fact is there used to be an even older player running in a score running group making for hilarious antiques between himself and those who were at times 50 years younger than him.
Sadly both said 20 year olds and the 70 year old have since left the game for various reasons.
About the gear grind Iam sort of with you. I have been suggesting for a longer time now that much of the disconnect between communities hails from the fact that every other patch the meta gets turned upside down requiring refarms for everyone. Iam not sure if you play throughout 2018 when stamina nightblade was meta for over a year with roughly the same rotation but peoples damage became alot closer back then and the gap was lessened compared to what it is today. The part that may worry you particulary that is widely overlooked by most in this discussion is the fact that the current strength of the build is not a product of careful planning but rather an accident - meaning no matter how any of us argue it may vanish tommorow either way.
I instead fear that the current bandaid solution that leads to grander issues may require a secondary and tertiary one that will make the game accessible to some but unrecognizable to many.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »I think the main problem is that the current iteration of oakensorc build doesn't have any real drawbacks. Yes, you are limited to one bar, but many players actually see this as a boon. And yes, there are builds with higher dps, but they require much more practice, APM and they aren't nearly as tanky and self-sufficient.
I'm a casual sorc player, I tried this build and honestly it gives you way too much without any real downsides. It feels almost like exploiting. I also noticed that when I play as a healer, oakensorcs just ignore you and rush ahead (even in vet content) so the tankiness this ring gives you negatively affects group synergy. Being a healer feels more useless than ever when the best group composition is 3 oakensorcs.
I personally think that oakensoul ring should get the pale order treatment: just make the buffs scale with group size. This way casual solo players still get to be OP without affecting group content.
and if that were to happen, then there is no point in maintaining 3 full ESO+ subs.......
Auldwulfe
Except Oakensoul is not the meta. Public ESO data proves this.
Look at the numbers. https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards
These numbers are the same as folks playing on PC-EU and PC-NA see while playing ESO.
First on the list Aetherian Archive. PC-EU top team for this trial has 6 dragonknights. PC-NA top team for this trial has 6 dragonknights.
Look at Dreadsail Reef, it just was released in 2022. PC-EU top team for this trial has 7 dragonknights. PC-NA top team for this trial has 5 dragonknights.
Sorcerer builds are outnumbered by other class builds on the top scoring teams.Top PvE scoring teams are not playing with all Oakensoul Sorcerer builds.
I'm fine with folks posting they don't like someone else's build, but I'm not fine with folks saying someone else's build is meta, when anyone can look the the leaderboard numbers and see that that is not true.
Also, ZOS published in the latest Update patch notes "In this update, we’re trying to keep the power of Light Attacks within a ~5% deviation at their highest production in an optimized build, while drastically increasing their performance for players who aren’t super optimized."
ZOS is actively trying to reduce the gap between top players and everyone else. Not increase it.
Nerfing a build that is not meta will increase the gap between top players and other players, and I think it is not a good idea.
Except Oakensoul is not the meta. Public ESO data proves this.
Not to mention that a build that caps out at 30% less dps is by definition not a meta build.
Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
I truly don't think you have ever played an oaken build based on this comment.
There is zero chance any DPS focused oaken build is surviving without healer support in serious content. At all.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
I truly don't think you have ever played an oaken build based on this comment.
There is zero chance any DPS focused oaken build is surviving without healer support in serious content. At all.
I don't do trial trifectas if that's what you mean by "serious content". But in vet dungeons and such it greatly reduces reliance on healers when you can just have 3 dds and a matriarch for heals.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
I truly don't think you have ever played an oaken build based on this comment.
There is zero chance any DPS focused oaken build is surviving without healer support in serious content. At all.
I don't do trial trifectas if that's what you mean by "serious content". But in vet dungeons and such it greatly reduces reliance on healers when you can just have 3 dds and a matriarch for heals.
But that isn't an Oakensoul problem. 3 DPS and a Tank is literally already the most efficient way to do things, and 3 two bar DPS are going to be far more effective at it than 1 bar builds due to having more skills to work with to support no having a healer.
And by serious, I mean anything not basegame, or normal.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
I truly don't think you have ever played an oaken build based on this comment.
There is zero chance any DPS focused oaken build is surviving without healer support in serious content. At all.
I don't do trial trifectas if that's what you mean by "serious content". But in vet dungeons and such it greatly reduces reliance on healers when you can just have 3 dds and a matriarch for heals.
PrincessOfThieves wrote: »Thank you for the detailed explanation.
You want Oakensoul Sorcerer builds nerfed because folks in mid tier are using it. Not because it is the best DPS build, because https://eso-hub.com/en/leaderboards shows that it is not.
I like doing trials and dungeons on PS/NA. I use an Oakensoul Sorcerer build because with my hands on the controller and with my internet, I produce more DPS. In the groups that I am in, I see DPS using other builds. I have seen folks in my guilds post parses on guild Discord, so I know that they are doing more DPS with their LA weaving build than I do with my Oakensoul Sorcerer build. I think they should keep doing what they are doing, and I should keep doing what I am doing. Because the trial team will do better when everyone plays their best build.
How about the rest of you? When you are a DPS, are you bringing your alt with the build that produces the most DPS for your team? If not, why not?
I do actually have this setup on my sorc right now. It is overpowered though, and I kinda feel forced to use it.
All other mythics, even the best ones, have their own niches and downsides. Kilt loses stacks if you get hit, Pale Order disables other player's healing, Thrassian stranglers make you squishy etc. Oakensoul leaves you with one bar, but a lot of people are already playing one bar builds, and in situations where you have to deal with mechanics having less skills to cast is actually a big advantage. When other builds have to take care of both rotation and mechanics, oakensorcs only have the latter to deal with, effectively removing 50% of the difficulty. So it is an extremely powerful mythic with no real downsides.
I also think that it's bad for the game's balance when one build can simultaneously do high dps, be very tanky, have infinite sustain, and do not rely on teammates for buffs. Build diversity is already a problem right now.
On top if that, oakensorc is not a team-oriented build at all. I have a healer, and when I team up with oakensorcs, they just ignore me and run ahead. At least the usual glass cannon dps builds actually need buffs and heals. ZOS nerfed pale order when it made healers useless, and I believe that we have the same situation again.
I truly don't think you have ever played an oaken build based on this comment.
There is zero chance any DPS focused oaken build is surviving without healer support in serious content. At all.