That is true.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »For the overwhelming majority of people, a RNG box in a video game will NOT trigger any addictive behaviour of any sort.
But then it begs the question, why would ZOS implement this system at all? Most people are rational and wouldn't gamble on it. So who are the people who do? A few rich thrill-seekers? And maybe those who do have problems of control?
nimander99 wrote: »Gambling boxes... First real step towards a P2W game. Soon the base game will be 'free' then they will add a gold for Crown exchange and that'll be that.
Please, please do not add gambling boxes for cash to the Crown Store. I promise you all, I have seen this happen time and time again, we will slide down that slope...
nimander99 wrote: »Gambling boxes... First real step towards a P2W game. Soon the base game will be 'free' then they will add a gold for Crown exchange and that'll be that.
Please, please do not add gambling boxes for cash to the Crown Store. I promise you all, I have seen this happen time and time again, we will slide down that slope...
Hand_Bacon wrote: »adriant1978 wrote: »No, I don't suppose they really are eyeing hardcore gambling addicts and thinking "if only we could provide the cliff", but you can be sure they are eyeing people with poor impulse control and thinking "we can use RNG to make these people spend more in the Crown Store", and isn't that still a scummy thing to do?
I can empathize with that. I've bought a couple things from the store out of impulse and consider myself somebody of moderate control. This is kind of how a lot of commerce is structured. Whether its point of sale additions or the placing of items in strategic locations. If this is a daily struggle for some people I hope they find a way to cope as its an important life skill. I have a friend who is very impulsive. His wife put all of his gaming accounts on a pre-paid credit card so that there would be one more layer of resistance to spending too much at any given time.
For me, I see the random boxes as a fun way to spend those extra crowns we get with eso plus.
Hand_Bacon wrote: »noxayloxub17_ESO wrote: »This practice does not make ANYONE happy and only serves to line ZO pockets by taking advantage of people who probably can't even afford it because they are addicts.
I know what you're trying to say here, but do you really think this is ZoS aim? To take advantage of the disadvantaged in a video game through RNG lootboxes?
Honestly for those with an addiction problem in regards to gambling do you have a plan to cope or get support when things like this come up in life? Honest question because I've little experience with gambling addictions.
I don't believe ZoS is out there oogling all these poor souls and thinking "if only we could provide the cliff".
Hand_Bacon wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »If you KNOW you being ripped off and still say yes, is it still a rip off ?
True, its impossible to make oneself a victim....despite attempts to prove otherwise.
But then it begs the question, why would ZOS implement this system at all? Most people are rational and wouldn't gamble on it. So who are the people who do? A few rich thrill-seekers? And maybe those who do have problems of control?
Don't worry about it, I've said my defense piece, I'm not going to push itstarkerealm wrote: »Yeah, I got that too. I think it had to do with one of Zenimax's (the holding company not ZOS) employees, and their linkedin account, but I'm not sure.Enodoc Obviously I have not read through all the posts (so you may have seen this), but there is a quote where it says "We don't have any plans to add locked RNG boxes. " Of course, it's not a promise, and of course now everyone can say "Well at that time, they had no plans for it". So sure it's not a solid no, but it still is uneasy. LinkIf the lockboxes are guaranteed to be happening, then I think this would be the best compromise. I don't mind if they re-use limited time items, because they can still come back later. But they should not have lockbox-exclusive items. Anything that can be won in a lockbox should have a direct purchase alternative.If ZOS wants to add some "fun" gambling, then there must be one rule: Every possible drop from the RNG crate must be available for direct purchase.
This would allow people to try their luck at getting an item cheaply. But it would not leave RNG as the only way to get an item.
I do not like to gamble, I never gamble, and I would not be tempted to gamble. So these crates have absolutely zero effect on me personally. But they can and do affect people who don't have that kind of self-control. And by having items that are obtainable only through random crates--either items that are "discontinued" or items that are exclusive to the gamble boxes--they are enticing the compulsive players to gamble. And even though it doesn't affect me, it is a low tactic that elicits my disapproval.
So, ZOS, if you want to add gambling, do it right: Make everything that is in your current gamble box pool available for direct purchase. Rotate stuff in and out as you see fit, but there should never by anything in the gamble pool that cannot be direct-purchased. It's just a virtual store of bits--don't insult our intelligence by claiming "limited space". Make this change, and I will withdraw all objections. Don't, and I'll know just how far you are willing to exploit a certain segment of your customer base.Not so. The point of the post is to defend ZOS against the people who are accusing them of breaking promises or lying. I've often jumped in on threads to defend ZOS' (and anyone else's) integrity while still being neutral (and sometimes in opposition) of their decisions and opinions. They've already fallen down on their moral integrity by introducing something which encourages gambling, but I have yet to see an accusation of outright lying or broken promises that is actually valid, so I am skeptical over what was actually said vs what has been inferred.starkerealm wrote: »It actually kinda is. I'm sorry, but there's no other point to that post. Additionally, there was a "no, never" quote, probably on ESO live, I just can't be bothered to hunt it down for you because, quite frankly, at this point? I've got better things to do with my life.Disclaimer - This isn't a defense of ZOS adding lockboxes. This is a defense of the currently unfounded claim that ZOS said they never would.
If the only thing we'd gotten saying, "no lockboxes" was a mealy mouthed, "no plans at this time," I would not have come back. The quote exists out there. If you don't believe me, or want to prove me wrong, you can go prove it's never been stated.
And I'm sure you know that asking me to prove non-existence of that quote is a logical fallacy
Just for the record, MissBizz the current defense people are making of that quote is "They said no locked RNG boxes, as in no locked boxes dropped in the world that you have to buy keys for. They never said no RNG boxes directly sold in the store".
Also, I woke up to a bunch of notifications that I couldn't see because the comments were already deleted. You guys better not be flaming with my @handle while I'm out :P
Also, you're correct. The quote we can't find was specifically that we wouldn't get lockboxes, not lucky bags. Which one (*cough* Enodoc *cough*) could lawyer into saying, "well, they didn't actually promise that we'd never get any form of gamble bags."
Thing is... as an element of trust? Nope. This remains a serious body blow. The statement (and no, Enodoc, I'm not talking about the one line from Gina on reddit) left the impression that lucky bags were out. If ZOS wants to go back on that, that's fine, that's their decision. But it's not a decision I'll support.
why?
i mean ...why? the mounts are expensive enough to make enough money out of them, not?
i dont even understand how that will work?
lets say:
ice wolf in box.
i want it.
i have every other mount there is (because i bought them all)
what will i get when i dont "win"?
crown store potions? -wtf
and even if they somehow make it worth the money - i would hate the idea.
i already missed 2 mounts that i wanted to get, because i wasnt home to play the game.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »If you KNOW you being ripped off and still say yes, is it still a rip off ?
Hand_Bacon wrote: »noxayloxub17_ESO wrote: »This practice does not make ANYONE happy and only serves to line ZO pockets by taking advantage of people who probably can't even afford it because they are addicts.
I know what you're trying to say here, but do you really think this is ZoS aim? To take advantage of the disadvantaged in a video game through RNG lootboxes?
Honestly for those with an addiction problem in regards to gambling do you have a plan to cope or get support when things like this come up in life? Honest question because I've little experience with gambling addictions.
I don't believe ZoS is out there oogling all these poor souls and thinking "if only we could provide the cliff".
many posts have already been removed that clearly explain how rng boxes work
the basics are RNG loot boxes are predatory by design, so is any form of gambling, that is how it works, it is designed to target those with low self control first primarily, it then uses public awareness of 'jackpot' winners to 'tease' and get the attention of those with higher self control usually through advertisement or in games usually there is on screen splash alerts of winners its all done Psychologically and proven to be very very effective and RNG loot boxes in games are one of the most lucrative and most effective revenue generating systems there is, that is fact and very well proven.
Thevampirenight wrote: »nimander99 wrote: »Gambling boxes... First real step towards a P2W game. Soon the base game will be 'free' then they will add a gold for Crown exchange and that'll be that.
Please, please do not add gambling boxes for cash to the Crown Store. I promise you all, I have seen this happen time and time again, we will slide down that slope...
I don't think they will go full on free to play, I think they will keep the buy to play system for a long time. They are a us based company with a populer ip so yeah they would want the money from those that would buy the game. even if they did go free to play they most likely will have it limited for like a testing purpose then you would still have to buy the game, before progressing. They do sometimes have free to play weekends they have done this a couple of times I think. But yeah I don't think the current model is going to change.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »I don't need to resort to "other monotonous cliches like, you must live in your parent's basement to disagree with this feature? Or you must be 12 years old? Or other jumping-to-conclusions-with-no-proof pathetic attempts to belittle someone that doesn't care to share your opinion".
I'm pretty clear without having to do so.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »adriant1978 wrote: »There seem to be a minority of people around here who are apparently so red in tooth and claw that they think it's fine to rip people off.
I'm not saying it's fine, and I'm not in favor of those boxes.
BUT what I insist on is the fact that people are free to being ripped off or not.
Do they know they might not get what they want ? - YES, they know.
Do they know that the drop rates are not public, official or fixed, so that the result in not entirely in RNGesus hands, but also in ZOS hands ? - YES, they know.
Do they know they do HAVE TO get that thing to enjoy the game ? - YES, they know.
If people, with all this knowlegde, still buy those boxes - I say it's on them, it's their choice.
Don't push all the responsibility onto ZOS - the buyer has power and responsibility too : to buy or not to buy.
If you KNOW you being ripped off and still say yes, is it still a rip off ?
I agree!anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »What I'm saying is that if we want to live in freedom (i.e. not letting the state deciding by law about everything we should or shouldn't do in life) it means we're free to do what's good and also what's not good for us, and it's up to us to decide. If you feel RNG boxes are fine, go buy them, if you think they're a rip off, simply don't buy them. It really is as simple as that.
Elijah_Crow wrote: »
You can type in bold all you want. I don't find it intimidating at all, just an indication that you want more attention. Next time why not use all caps? Oh, you did that in places too.
I think your use of the drug lord reference is inappropriate, irresponsible, and unfounded.
I think the majority of lock box purchasers in games are rational adults who choose to purchase them because they have disposable income and don't mind spending it on a chance to procure a cosmetic item which will set them apart from others.
I think the fact that the gain is not guaranteed adds to the excitement when they get something special. If they wish to spend their earned income to enjoy this, I'm not going to tell them they shouldn't and neither should you.
In addition, every income source you listed is already in place and your response seems to confirm that you "think this is enough". Again, that's not a decision you are informed enough to make, nor have any right or responsibility to do so.
I don't need to resort to "other monotonous cliches like, you must live in your parent's basement to disagree with this feature? Or you must be 12 years old? Or other jumping-to-conclusions-with-no-proof pathetic attempts to belittle someone that doesn't care to share your opinion".
I'm pretty clear without having to do so.
Thevampirenight wrote: »Just want to hear what you folks think heres a link of what they are going to do in update 12 just so you can see for yourself what to possibly expect
https://www.reddit.com/r/elderscrollsonline/comments/4ym0yv/gamescom_update_12_info/
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »adriant1978 wrote: »There seem to be a minority of people around here who are apparently so red in tooth and claw that they think it's fine to rip people off.
I'm not saying it's fine, and I'm not in favor of those boxes.
BUT what I insist on is the fact that people are free to being ripped off or not.
Do they know they might not get what they want ? - YES, they know.
Do they know that the drop rates are not public, official or fixed, so that the result in not entirely in RNGesus hands, but also in ZOS hands ? - YES, they know.
Do they know they do HAVE TO get that thing to enjoy the game ? - YES, they know.
If people, with all this knowlegde, still buy those boxes - I say it's on them, it's their choice.
Don't push all the responsibility onto ZOS - the buyer has power and responsibility too : to buy or not to buy.
If you KNOW you being ripped off and still say yes, is it still a rip off ?
That's not how it works.
That's as if suggesting it's not taking advantage of a situation because everyone knows the odds and has an option to choose.
The whole point of this discussions is that choice is being removed. So in essence you're saying that people should know to choose not to buy anything if it's in a random box ....OK but given there's literally no other way to obtain these items, what other suggestion can you offer
Our suggestion is to not use a chance box at all but you're saying its O K to use one
That's the disagreement many of us are having with that point of view you hold.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »adriant1978 wrote: »There seem to be a minority of people around here who are apparently so red in tooth and claw that they think it's fine to rip people off.
I'm not saying it's fine, and I'm not in favor of those boxes.
BUT what I insist on is the fact that people are free to being ripped off or not.
Do they know they might not get what they want ? - YES, they know.
Do they know that the drop rates are not public, official or fixed, so that the result in not entirely in RNGesus hands, but also in ZOS hands ? - YES, they know.
Do they know they do HAVE TO get that thing to enjoy the game ? - YES, they know.
If people, with all this knowlegde, still buy those boxes - I say it's on them, it's their choice.
Don't push all the responsibility onto ZOS - the buyer has power and responsibility too : to buy or not to buy.
If you KNOW you being ripped off and still say yes, is it still a rip off ?
That's not how it works.
That's as if suggesting it's not taking advantage of a situation because everyone knows the odds and has an option to choose.
The whole point of this discussions is that choice is being removed. So in essence you're saying that people should know to choose not to buy anything if it's in a random box ....OK but given there's literally no other way to obtain these items, what other suggestion can you offer
Our suggestion is to not use a chance box at all but you're saying its O K to use one
That's the disagreement many of us are having with that point of view you hold.
This is the key issue for me. If i play the UK national lottery (I don't as I don't see the fun in gambling, but each to their own) I know the following:
The Jackpot - 6 Numbers (Typical prize: £2 million)
6 numbers are drawn at random from the set of integers between 1 and 59, which means there are 59!/(6!*(59-6)!) combinations of numbers - this means that the jackpot chance is 1 in 45,057,474 or approximately 1 in 45 million.
5 Numbers + Bonus Number (Typical prize: £50,000)
You are still matching 6 numbers from the 1 to 59 set as above, but you can now do it in 6 different ways (by dropping each of the main numbers in turn), therefore the chance is 1 in 45,057,474/6, which works out as 1 in 7,509,579.
5 Numbers (Typical prize: £1,000)
This is 52 times more likely than getting 5 numbers + the bonus number - the chance is 1 in 7,509,579/52, which evaluates to 1 in 144,415.
4 Numbers (Typical prize: £100)
Firstly, let's take the case of the first 4 of your numbers matching and the last 2 not matching.
In this single case (where each set of chances relies on the previous event occurring):
Chance that your 1st number matches a winning lottery number is 1 in 59/6.
Chance that your 2nd number matches a winning lottery number is 1 in 58/5.
Chance that your 3rd number matches a winning lottery number is 1 in 57/4.
Chance that your 4th number matches a winning lottery number is 1 in 56/3.
Chance that your 5th number doesn't match a winning number is 1 in 55/(55-2) [because there are still 2 unmatched winning numbers].
Chance that your 6th number doesn't match a winning number is 1 in 54/(54-2) [yes, still 2 unmatched winning numbers].
Now you need to accumulate all those chances by multiplying them together:
1 in (59/6)*(58/5)*(57/4)*(56/3)*(55/53)*(54/52) which is 1 in 32,697.73.
Now this is the chance for that single case occurring, but there are 15 combinations of matching 4 from 6, so you divide the answer by 15 to get 1 in 32697.73/15 or 1 in 2179.85.
3 Numbers (Constant prize: £10)
Follow exactly the same scheme as the 4 match above to get these figures:
1 in (59/6)*(58/5)*(57/4)*(56/53)*(55/52)*(54/51) (which is 1 in 1923.40) for a single case.
There are 20 combinations of 3 from 6, so the chance of a 3 match is 1 in 1923.40/20 or 1 in 96.2.
2 Numbers (Constant prize: Lucky Dip in the next draw - worth £2)
Follow exactly the same scheme as the 3 match above to get these figures:
1 in (59/6)*(58/5)*(57/53)*(56/52)*(55/51)*(54/50) (which is 1 in 153.87) for a single case.
There are 15 combinations of 2 from 6, so the chance of a 2 match is 1 in 153.87/15 or 1 in 10.3.
source for the above content and maths: http://playlotto.org.uk/
here i know what my chance would be of waking up tomorrow and not having to go to work ever again.
With random loot boxes, we have no idea on the odds of getting that mount we want. I might be 1/10, it might be 1/1b - there will be far far more lower prizes than higher. The key is we just don't know. The National Lottery is gambling but with an understanding at the start of how likely you are to win. If you consider the odds too long then you don't play. If we don't know if our chance of getting a mount is 1/100 or 1/100,000,000 then how can we decide if we consider those odds fair.
That is my issue with these things
KoshkaMurka wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Thanks for your thoughts on the upcoming Crown Crates, everyone. Just want to clarify a few points -
First, Crown Crates will be available later this year, and will only include cosmetic or convenience items. You'll find things like potions and other consumables, pets, costumes, and - yes - sometimes even mounts. This will give you a chance to try and obtain previous limited time offers, or even some very unique items as Matt mentioned. It will not include things like armor or weapons.
In the event you get an item that you already own, you can exchange it for a currency called Crown Gems which will allow you to buy a different item of your choice.
Now, Gina, show that you are honest at ZOS - and give us the chance table for these items - an honest one - this is the only thing to get an acceptance for this and to show that this is not just a blatant cash grab and preying on gambling addicts. Be honest with us and show us, that there is a reasonable chance to get these items, then we might accept it - but if it is like in Archeage with percentages of 0.1%, 0.01% and lower, then this cannot be accepted and some of us will never spend another dime on this game.
Knowing ZOS history with RNG, I expect the worst.
Well, it's their loss - it is about 180,000 crowns, which I will not spend on this game per year, and I would have played for long, but so I will leave when my ESO+ runs out in August 2017 and not spend a single US$ on this game until then - it's their loss.
Not to forget about that bunch of ESO gold edition packs, which I wanted to give as a gift to role play friends around christmas - this will as well not happen now. Nor do I need houses, and I would have bought like 12 of them - if not more - so be it - they do not want my money in a fair deal, they rather go for gamble.
I'm lucky my ESO+ is month by month so I've cancelled. Going to uninstalled tonight, which leaves loads of space for a new game. Might treat myself