jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »jedtb16_ESO wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »What Id like to know is how many approached this as being a good thing and now that theyve used it in PTS have decided otherwise.
i approached this, as you can see, as an i don't mind as long as it is just cosmetic. i had no intention, prior to them landing on the pts, of buying any. neither my experience on the pts nor anything said since has changed my view.
I wonder if youve taken into consideration its impact on future content. What will be withheld to be placed in these crates? What will take longer to roll out for us to explore and play through because they needed to focus on the next Crate Season?
Its easy to look at this and not really see much wrong with it on the surface. Because on the surface its just 400 crowns and a chance to win some shiny. Quite easy to say, do as you wish with your money. And believe me I have that attitude towards what others wish to do with their money. But this will impact the creation of future content. And that impacts all of us.
in answer to your questions....
i have no more idea than you do. nor am i going to guess, or speculate or get hysterical about it.
will things change? yes.
do i, or you or anyone else outside of zos and affiliates, know what that change will be? no.
what i do know is that i am enjoying what is offered at the moment and when that changes i will go elsewhere.
such is the history of online games...
Ive played enough MMOs with this sort of thing to know for a fact that the content will be impacted. Its not speculation. Their team is only so big. And when it comes to making content that will only make so much money versus shineys that will make money hand over fist. Theyll choose the shineys. Because a business will always choose what makes them more money in the short term. The current approach to quarterly and yearly earnings is to out do last quarter and last year. If youre not beating your last best record. Youre not doing well.
New regions of Tamriel take time and money to produce. 6+ months of development time according to ZOS. These mounts, costumes and other random things theyll put in there will take a fraction of that time.
so why did you vote 'yes' then?
This poll is very old and was made when the very first information about crown crates was released. I voted yes under the assumption that they would only contain items that had been removed from the store, not any of this crate-exclusive garbage. I imagine there are many people who wish they could change their vote in this poll.
So you got casino boxes now...what will be next? Leveled up characters for sale? Sets of stat gear? Special weapons only found in boxes you need to purchase keys to open? .
BlueViolet wrote: »Now look where the game is
The only thing is seems we can be assured of is that they're going to go back on everything they once prided themselves on NOT doing, and do it.
I wonder if it would be appropriate to create a new poll. "Now that you've had a chance to see the crates for yourself, what do you think?"
1.) Positive: "I have tested the crates, and I like the direction it's headed."
2.) Positive: "I have NOT tested the creates, and I like the idea of them."
3.) Neutral: "I have tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
4.) Neutral: "I have NOT tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
5.) Negative: "I have tested the creates and I want these crates to go away!"
6.) Negative: "I have NOT tested the crates, and don't want them in the game!"
7.) Other: "My feelings are more complex than this (comment below), or this is not applicable."
With one existing poll and one official thread, though, I'm not sure the forum moderators would feel that a new poll would be valuable. It would, since it's marking a different--though related--type of data, so the metrics would be more up-to-date as it were. But that doesn't mean the moderators would agree.
At the very least, they need to put the drop rate chance in a tooltip so that it doesn't seem quite so exploitative.
I wonder if it would be appropriate to create a new poll. "Now that you've had a chance to see the crates for yourself, what do you think?"
1.) Positive: "I have tested the crates, and I like the direction it's headed."
2.) Positive: "I have NOT tested the creates, and I like the idea of them."
3.) Neutral: "I have tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
4.) Neutral: "I have NOT tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
5.) Negative: "I have tested the creates and I want these crates to go away!"
6.) Negative: "I have NOT tested the crates, and don't want them in the game!"
7.) Other: "My feelings are more complex than this (comment below), or this is not applicable."
With one existing poll and one official thread, though, I'm not sure the forum moderators would feel that a new poll would be valuable. It would, since it's marking a different--though related--type of data, so the metrics would be more up-to-date as it were. But that doesn't mean the moderators would agree.
I wonder if it would be appropriate to create a new poll. "Now that you've had a chance to see the crates for yourself, what do you think?"
1.) Positive: "I have tested the crates, and I like the direction it's headed."
2.) Positive: "I have NOT tested the creates, and I like the idea of them."
3.) Neutral: "I have tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
4.) Neutral: "I have NOT tested the crates, and my feelings are neutral."
5.) Negative: "I have tested the creates and I want these crates to go away!"
6.) Negative: "I have NOT tested the crates, and don't want them in the game!"
7.) Other: "My feelings are more complex than this (comment below), or this is not applicable."
With one existing poll and one official thread, though, I'm not sure the forum moderators would feel that a new poll would be valuable. It would, since it's marking a different--though related--type of data, so the metrics would be more up-to-date as it were. But that doesn't mean the moderators would agree.
LegendaryTarrtarus_ESO wrote: »I doubt it will be read, but I would like to add some context for my vote and my position on these crates.
I used to purchase Crowns regularly on top of my monthly subscription for both my wife's and my own account. Every time there was a sale we would each purchase $50 worth of crowns, and also buy Crowns here and there on the side. We had no issues with purchasing limited time items that were way more expensive than the standard items. It was clear and concise. We wanted those fancy Tamriel Hero armor sets? Done. Fancy lightning panther? Done. But these gambling crates just feel like a dirty cash grab.
I am fine with them up until the point you add items that are exclusively from the crates, period. Retired items that were once in the store? Sure, I missed out, I made the choice, so now it will cost extra. I get it. But brand new mounts that will only ever be available in the shop at an exceptionally low rate is ridiculous. This is predatory marketing and is not consumer friendly. I was under the impression that ZOS was a good company and I felt comfortable spending upwards of $300 a month on your game, but this has really left a foul taste in my mouth. I purchased $50 worth of Crowns and a month's sub just before this announcement and have yet to log back into the game, or even consider spending my current Crowns or purchasing more until this plan is scrapped. Keep the loot crates if you like, just remove the permanent exclusivity and I think a lot of people would be a lot less frustrated. I get that you're a business and you have to make money, but this isn't the way to do it if you respect the relationship you have with your customers and supporters.
Think about what you are doing. As of this posting you have nearly 4,000 responses. 75,000 page views for this one thread alone. The community back-lash to these should be very apparent.
I've been on the PTS and have so far spent the equivalent of around $350 on crates.
There are 2 mounts, 3 pets, and a hat in the crown crates that I would happily buy outright.
My equivalent of $350 (in free crowns, because it's PTS) has got me 1 pet I wanted, and enough gems to buy 3 other legendary items (but insufficient to buy 1 apex item). And a load of tat that I don't want (including items that I can't use because I don't have an Argonian).
Basically the stuff I would buy is extortionately expensive this way (to the point where it seems that Zeni are deliberately targeting people who have a weakness for games of chance), and I will not be buying these crates on live.
52% say no. I agree with the majority after having played SWTOR. I would much prefer the reward items simply be purchasable directly with crowns. Despite having purchased lots of crown store items, this is one I will not be purchasing no matter how good the "Apex" item is.
nimander99 wrote: »52% say no. I agree with the majority after having played SWTOR. I would much prefer the reward items simply be purchasable directly with crowns. Despite having purchased lots of crown store items, this is one I will not be purchasing no matter how good the "Apex" item is.
Its actually 67% or 947 accounts have come to forums to vote against, I come to this statistic because two of the questions are actually against crown crates in the poll whereas the three other questions are positives and 424 accounts have voted in favor... And of those 424 I wonder how many have now changed their mind?
No one has changed there mind in favor of, and that says something.
BlueViolet wrote: »So you got casino boxes now...what will be next? Leveled up characters for sale? Sets of stat gear? Special weapons only found in boxes you need to purchase keys to open? .
Please, please don't give them ideas. This rubbish box garbage is too much already.
Despite that, personally, the only way I see this F2P crap like boxes going, is exactly the way listed above.
When this game was launched, or even before that actually, we were assured no content would ever be behind a paywall.
We were assured there would never be a cash shop, then we were assured there would be no exclusive items, or silly things like lockboxes.
Now look where the game is
The only thing is seems we can be assured of is that they're going to go back on everything they once prided themselves on NOT doing, and do it.
arasysb14_ESO wrote: »With One Tamriel, zone population density will initially increase but if zones start dying again then this time we'll know game's population is really dying.
nimander99 wrote: »Its actually 67% or 947 accounts have come to forums to vote against, I come to this statistic because two of the questions are actually against crown crates in the poll whereas the three other questions are positives and 424 accounts have voted in favor... And of those 424 I wonder how many have now changed their mind?