Right, so, playing Devil's Advocate a bit here... but there's a very strong reason why ZOS must forbid "naming and shaming" that no one is going to like -- liability.
Let's create a scenario.
Say that ZOS relaxes on their name-and-shame stance and allow uncensored screenshots, videos, and forum posts of people who are cheating. Forum toxicity increases a bit as these cheaters are finger-pointed at, but at least players get to vent so THEY get to feel better. I won't go into how much of a mess that alone would make for the moderators.
Now, let's say someone decides to troll a player. They run a screenshot through Photoshop to provide "evidence" and post it to the forums. This alleged cheater finds out about someone slandering their name, and is justifiably upset about it. The matter gets investigated, but in the mean time, the toxic forum being what it is, this person's friends and comrades in the game find out about it and really lets them have it, both in-game and on-forum. This person becomes upset... why would someone want to do this to them? They're just a casual/roleplayer/PvEer/whatever. And now they are suddenly getting all these hate messages.
Let's say one of this person's "friends" knows personally identifiable information about them (I won't go into the lack of wisdom of sharing that kinda info online) -- and in a fit of pique, they either whisper it behind their backs or publicly release it. Maybe the post gets deleted, but with the nature of the internet, it's too late. It's out there now. Suddenly, this person is getting hateful e-mails or text messages or other such lines of communication. The harassment starts leaking into their real life, maybe even their professional life. All because one person gamed the system -- because they "cheated" at the "name-and-shame" game with some basic photo editing.
This person becomes understandably stressed out. Maybe very much so. Perhaps ESO was their outlet, their way to mentally decompress, because real life for them has been hard. Maybe they are questioning if things are worth hanging on to, but this game is one thing that helps them cope, so they muddle through. They hang on. But not anymore... this haven from life, this sanctuary, is now abolished. This person thought they were their friends... Nothing feels safe anymore. And perhaps, they think to themselves, perhaps it's just not worth hanging onto after all...
This is just a scenario...
But because ZOS did nothing to discourage this kind of toxic behavior in a community that they are responsible for maintaining and moderating, it is possible they could be held liable for any unfortunate actions this harassed person takes. Even if they are not LEGALLY responsible, they are still MORALLY liable to the community and could soon find news outlets asking critical questions of what kind of community they are nurturing when this kind of harassment is allowed to go on without action being taken.
So now not only do you have a system in place that creates an even more toxic community, it's a system that can be abused, could potentially leak into a person's offline life, and maybe even cause them harm or anguish.
Why? Because a number of you are rotten jerks who don't care about other peoples' feelings, you just want some sense of vengeance against a transgression, and you have absolutely no sense of discretion, so you want to publicly shame them instead of directing your reports through the proper private channels.
You want people to play by the rules in the game? Then stop being such damned hypocrites and play by ZOS's rules when it comes to reports of cheating behavior! And stop feeling like YOU have to know the result when it's technically none of your damn business! Just let the people responsible for the community do their jobs as they see fit! You're not the devteam -- so you have no burden of liability or responsibility. You're just an upset player that wants their feelings assuaged.
I am not unsympathetic toward those who feel the game is being ruined because of cheaters. I understand how frustrating it is not having full transparency of action being taken. But I don't believe a can of worms can be fixed by opening a bigger can of worms.
A solution will be found. It may not be NOW. It may not even be SOON™. Just hang in there, and remember that there's humans involved in all aspects of this. You, the player, are human too, right?
My apologies for the wall of text. I hope it offers a little insight or something.
@NativeJoeWe need the education out there. Many of these people don't understand that an Elite can walk into a group of people, Mitigate a million (or millions) of damage in 2 minutes and kill everyone. and that is legit game mechanics
As long as we also educate people on how stupendously easy it is to hack the ESO client memory to allow you to "walk into a group of people, mitigate a million (or millions) of damage in 2 minutes and kill everyone" and make yourself look like you're an "elite" player.
I dont know if there is any opportunity to call anyone in PVP an 'Elite player' anymore. Admit it, any player that is competent is going to be labeled a hacker, reported and shunned. Welcome to the time of "Safe Mediocrity". I'd like to see someone who has a spare account or just dgaf anymore test to see how well this 'detection' system is. My bet is it doesn't cover all avenues and lets be honest here - if it was that easy to implement something WHY ON EARTH WAS IT NOT DONE ON RELEASE?
Well I call myself an Elite, because Many stand flabbergasted at my builds tankyness, dps, and what it takes to honestly kill straight forward kill me. I've fought the toughest people I can find, and in many cases came out on top. And I get messages from others saying all the time that I'm one of like 10 players in eso they just walk away from when they see who it is they're attacking. That and I gained somewhat of a local fame in the Arb days at the end of TG. I'm no kenapkk, and don't make people Melt instantly, but I can put up one hell of a fight, and me taking on a small group of people isn't to uncommon.
And earlier today my friends**** tried to gank me and I fought their lill zerg for minutes. they compiled the damage done and it was absolutely massive for how much it actually took to take me down. And I don't even use malubeth
I think an elite is someone thats played for a while, can clear VMA and plays pvp in a similar "there is no spoon manner". Dodge rolls perfectly, CC breaks when needed, CC's and executes damage combos to smash people quickly, and over all has a smooth sense of game play that leaves normal players with their mouths open. And plenty of those people Do exist ingame and I really don't think they're cheating. Many of them are in the dueling guilds and are active members.
The permanent bans are not being lifted. I have several of them on my friends list none have logged in since that day they were banned and hope it stays that way. I check it daily tbh. Is you have any real (verifiable) information to the contrary. Post it.
You don't know what you're talking about, so don't make such sweeping statements. Some permanent bans have been lifted, the players have been seen in-game, and @ZOS_JessicaFolsom has stated they might give permanently banned players a last chance. The thread where she posted this is locked so I can't use quote, but it's been quoted by others multiple times. Inform yourself or stop spreading misinformation please.
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »@Minalan that is some A Grade bull bleep. So he's just not supposed to use a class passive because ZOS screwed up their game? That's utterly ridiculous in just about every way. So if a Templar's burning light got screwed up by ZOS, Templar's wouldn't be able to run any of their class abilities by your logic. Everyone is running around with Malubeths, which is a known bug, but he can't run a class ability? And you're gonna claim that's cheating...?
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »@Minalan that is some A Grade bull bleep. So he's just not supposed to use a class passive because ZOS screwed up their game? That's utterly ridiculous in just about every way. So if a Templar's burning light got screwed up by ZOS, Templar's wouldn't be able to run any of their class abilities by your logic. Everyone is running around with Malubeths, which is a known bug, but he can't run a class ability? And you're gonna claim that's cheating...?
Most people put two points into it, and it works fine. But if you put just one, it *** up everything.
Then we keep it a huge secret so that ZOS doesn't find out, and they keep a HUGE advantage over other players.
Yes, I call that BS and you lower than filth for defending it.
So you just admitted to exploiting a game bug with the intention to continue to do so and you find nothing wrong with other people doing the same.SwaminoNowlino wrote: »Well the particular individual tested it to see if it worked, but doesn't run around like that. So get out of here with your saltiness, and get gud.Most people put two points into it, and it works fine. But if you put just one, it *** up everything.SwaminoNowlino wrote: »@Minalan that is some A Grade bull bleep. So he's just not supposed to use a class passive because ZOS screwed up their game? That's utterly ridiculous in just about every way. So if a Templar's burning light got screwed up by ZOS, Templar's wouldn't be able to run any of their class abilities by your logic. Everyone is running around with Malubeths, which is a known bug, but he can't run a class ability? And you're gonna claim that's cheating...?
Then we keep it a huge secret so that ZOS doesn't find out, and they keep a HUGE advantage over other players.
Yes, I call that BS and you lower than filth for defending it.
Regardless, I have a low level Stam sorc. I don't have that skill line maxed out, so I can't put two points in there. But you better believe I will run around with one until I can.
This is ridiculous that people can't see a difference between downloading software and manipulating code to enable god mode, and using abilities that ZOS programmed and are working according to how they were programmed. ZOS hasn't even acknowledged that its a bug, so get out of here with that crazy crap.
SwaminoNowlino wrote:This is ridiculous that people can't see a difference between downloading software and manipulating code to enable god mode, and using abilities that ZOS programmed and are working according to how they were programmed
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »snip from patch notes:
Nightblade
Assassination
Teleport Strike: Fixed an issue where this ability and its morphs could be used to get on top of Keep walls.
Great fix but where is the corresponding fix for DKs that are still able to get into keeps since ages?
I would really appreciate if you could discuss this with the Dev Team.
A simply question, why DKs are still allowed to jump into keeps?
It is not intended that players can completely bypass core Keep capture mechanics by leaping onto walls and into enemy Keeps. You should always have to enter enemy Keeps by taking down a door or wall - any other way is a bug. We are aware that Dragonknights have been able to do this for a while, and and are working to change it.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »
The Dragonknight wall jumping issue is a bit trickier to fix than the Nightblade one, but it is something we're looking at.
Dear ZOS,
I'm not here to do your job. I didn't buy this game to do your job. I don't pay you a monthly subscription fee for ESO+ to do your job.
So please, do your job. Put GM's in the game. We need boots on the ground NOW! EverQuest had their very successful Guide program of volunteer players who not only policed the game, and could call in a live GM at a moment's notice, but helped out players. We desperately need an ESO Guide program. However, even that won't spare you from having live GM's in the game.
It has to be done. You have to start doing your job making sure that you're running a clean game, and stop expecting your players to stop playing the game they paid, and continue to pay for, to do it for you.
They run a screenshot through Photoshop to provide "evidence" and post it to the forums. This alleged cheater finds out about someone slandering their name, and is justifiably upset about it.
Not arguing the liability bit, because that's accurate. Defamation is tricky, and often up to court to decide whether the act was a statement of fact or a statement of opinion. Rather than involve themselves in that process, ZOS just wants none of that in the first place.
But that particular Photoshop instance would be libel, not slander. Slander is spoken defamation that did not originate from a written transcript.
SwaminoNowlino wrote: »@Bromburak it's a yes/no question. Is wearing Malubeth exploiting?
Let's not get sidetracked here. In game exploits I trust ZOS will fix eventually, even if it is months away, and there I believe temporary bans and warnings to be appropriate.
It's been two days. Give 'em a week to scrounge something up.
Just finished reading up on the new posts and sadly there isn't much progress being made here from both sides (ZOS and Players)
I have said my bit here and unless I see something worth posting to debate I'm just going to /lurk this thread and watch.
I have five months before my sub expires to make a choice on in to renew it or not, this is probably the biggest issue on that for me.