clayandaudrey_ESO wrote: »The only way this is ever going to be fixed is to police the game ourselves. Blacklisting known cheaters in game so they can not get group or guild invites. Outing them in other media than these forums. If the game is very unfriendly to them they will think they should have took the permaban and just shut up.
However this will never happen as people will not stick together on an effort like this. It would take guild leaders to make a stand. And of course most of these people have their followers who would do their best to derail it.
dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »clayandaudrey_ESO wrote: »The only way this is ever going to be fixed is to police the game ourselves. Blacklisting known cheaters in game so they can not get group or guild invites. Outing them in other media than these forums. If the game is very unfriendly to them they will think they should have took the permaban and just shut up.
However this will never happen as people will not stick together on an effort like this. It would take guild leaders to make a stand. And of course most of these people have their followers who would do their best to derail it.
That wouldn't make a difference. VMA is solo so no other players are needed. PvP is so versatile in how you play (not HOW it's played) that you can join up with 2-3 others who also cheat/exploit and continue to play in game while the whole map rages at you.
Bfish22090 wrote: »i want you to explain to me @ZOS_JessicaFolsom why people have been banned for cheating by video evidence, and now they have been unbanned?
If a person goes out of their way knowingly breaking rules to cheat...... they should be named and shamed! In the real world if you break the law you are fingerprinted, sent to court and publicly talked about through news outlets. If found guilty you are also punished. So far I have not seen anything close to this for those willingly breaking serious rules.
If this type of hacking continues it will create and has created an unwanted environment in the game. Learn from Trion's mistake and take action quickly and harshly to prevent a backlash.
AnnieBeGood wrote: »I don't want to know names. I don't want to know punishments.
I do want to know that the 3rd party programmes are not possible any more and I want assurances that this is so. I want to be sure my game is safe and other players and I are working under the same rules.
Trust. Regaining trust once lost is very very difficult.
AnnieBeGood wrote: »I don't want to know names. I don't want to know punishments.
I do want to know that the 3rd party programmes are not possible any more and I want assurances that this is so. I want to be sure my game is safe and other players and I are working under the same rules.
Trust. Regaining trust once lost is very very difficult.
A question to everyone in the community, and some honest answers please.
Would you be angry if ZOS had said the vMSA player who is back was suspended for 2 weeks only, but had all vMSA related items removed form the account and some gold removed due to previous sales of items? Their account is on it's final strike and they gained nothing but were allowed one last chance.
?
I have been playing since shortly after launch and am very confused about this topic. I see people cheating and exploiting and using macros in PvP ALL the time and nothing ever seems to happen. ]
I've seen an exploit used. camping unattended areas you can steal from. And there's a specific detail to it that I think would be a violation to add in so ... not adding that in unless asked.
But since it's unattended by any NPC, wouldnt this be an intended situation?
I have been playing since shortly after launch and am very confused about this topic. I see people cheating and exploiting and using macros in PvP ALL the time and nothing ever seems to happen. ]
how do you know they are cheating or using macros? 90% of my time in the game is on PvP, and i haven't seen more than a very few players that produce me some suspicious. I find odd that you suffer the cheats so much, maybe is just a matter of learning the game mechanics to understand what those players are doing better than you
MuddledMuppet wrote: »I don't understand why we need a no naming shaming policy anyway. Most people can tell the difference between grudge naming and legitimate, consensus and peer review do the rest, zos can be judge.
In most civilised societies, those who break the rules are made known, it is considered in the public intrerest to do so.
There is a direct corrolation here, it is in the gaming communities interest to know who the cheats are, equally, to know those who sling unjustifiable accusations. We can avoid/refuse to team with both groups, that majority who believe in fair play in both gaming and those who are ever ready to accuse and attempts to destroy someone's good name with no evidence.
Personally I want to play with neither group, I suspect most people are the same.
If a person goes out of their way knowingly breaking rules to cheat...... they should be named and shamed! In the real world if you break the law you are fingerprinted, sent to court and publicly talked about through news outlets. If found guilty you are also punished. So far I have not seen anything close to this for those willingly breaking serious rules.
If this type of hacking continues it will create and has created an unwanted environment in the game. Learn from Trion's mistake and take action quickly and harshly to prevent a backlash.
Again naming and shaming brings nothing but to appease some community members desire to point fingers, validate their opinions etc.
What the game needs if for there to actually be an enforcement system we can get trust and believe in. You'll soon know if x member of the community is banned because they won't be in the game again.
For me personally I don't care about who was banned, only that they are actually banned or have actions taken against their accounts, right now it doesn't feel like that's happening which is why do many of us are angry about it.
A question to everyone in the community, and some honest answers please.
Would you be angry if ZOS had said the vMSA player who is back was suspended for 2 weeks only, but had all vMSA related items removed form the account and some gold removed due to previous sales of items? Their account is on it's final strike and they gained nothing but were allowed one last chance.
Is the anger here over the fact ZOS failed to communicate and hand out a punishment which penalised the player, or that they give people a second chance? Basically would you all be happy if ZOS had an account strike system as long as they were also backing it up with item removals etc?
MuddledMuppet wrote: »I don't understand why we need a no naming shaming policy anyway. Most people can tell the difference between grudge naming and legitimate, consensus and peer review do the rest, zos can be judge.
In most civilised societies, those who break the rules are made known, it is considered in the public intrerest to do so.
There is a direct corrolation here, it is in the gaming communities interest to know who the cheats are, equally, to know those who sling unjustifiable accusations. We can avoid/refuse to team with both groups, that majority who believe in fair play in both gaming and those who are ever ready to accuse and attempts to destroy someone's good name with no evidence.
Personally I want to play with neither group, I suspect most people are the same.
Sounds simple, doesn't it?xANTIxMATTERx wrote: »Unbanning these few cheaters is going to cause a lot more harm than if you just kept them banned. Many loyal players who have never cheated are losing faith in the game. This problem is not only about specific players exploiting. Its the fact that there are no actual repercussions for people who do cheat and that hurts the games integrity