ESO Class Reps

UppGRAYxDD

For the love of the old gods and new, give magplar a better cc oh mighty magplar rep. Maybe an unblockable/undodgeable one? Maybe bring back blinding light? Please give ZoS a view of our broke-down van by the river we call "our house"...

Savos_Saren

Congrats to the DK crew.

Now lets see if you can convince ZOS to put our Major Expedition on something other than a gap closer.

Make sure to represent our class well... especially keeping in mind that the game has evolved from DKs just being tanks.

We're DDs, Tanks, and Healers. Stamina and Magicka based.

rfennell_ESO

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Checkmath wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Hexys wrote: »

As I didn't ask anyone to nominate myself I'm very honored to see I made it to the list of 170 and eventually got picked out to join the team. A thank you to those who nominated me! I'm looking forward to work with the team and to gather feedback from the community to make sure that in the coming time we can work together to make good improvements.

@Blobsky And no I'm not here to buff Magsorc or Stamblade, I'm not biased at all when it comes to balance, you don't have to worry.

For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.

Once again thanks @ZOS_GinaBruno and everyone willing to put effort into improving the gameplay!

I worry greatly about the truth of that after some of the things you write about me, PvP, PvE, these classes and the game. I hope you can surprise me as it will benefit the game significantly if nobody abuses their role, but only time will tell.

nobody of the reps is buffing anything on his own and nobody can do as he likes. we all will represent the feedback and voices we get and we wont just hand in our own suggestions. in the end it will be in the hands of the devs to implement anything. now i would be cool if we can stop spreading salt and go to the constructive part of this program. hope you all will participate soon in the already existing and the coming class discords, we gladly will read any constructive feedback regarding ALL classes.

Isn't exploiting the most legit of concerns when it is about being representative for anything? Dont't try to put that into "salt" category. Because I am for sure very concerned to have someone being selected that has repeatedly chosen to abuse any shady or outright exploity mechanic to his advantage over the course of 4 years.

I do get that you guys feel somehow responsible for defending your newly founded inner circle and its integrity. But blindly defending due to being uninformed is not the way to go, you are in fact further undermining said integrity. I do hope that it is unintentional and you are indeed not aware what has happened.

It's an insult to anyone who has chosen to not abuse any exploit and values fair-play.

I do not know everyone in the group nor the specific details of their past gameplay or potential exploits. However, I do know many of the members and can assure you that the majority consensus of the group is to play with integrity, avoid using known exploits, and fix them when possible in order to protect the fairness and integrity of the game. Your concern is entirely valid, but please believe me when I say that the group will actively and aggressively work with you in opposition of exploits. Members looking to preserve unfair advantages for themselves or defend shady or questionable tactics won't get far in our discussions. I'll see to that myself, and I know many other members will be equally diligent as well.

Masel92 wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.

This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.

Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.

By extensive you must mean "didn't do a thing".

https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/profile/KenaPKK

Not saying anything by that, just pointing out that my "extensive" background check that wasn't very extensive came back with a result. I don't know, nor am I implying anything by that, just pointing out the word "extensive" must have many meanings.

Torbschka

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Torbschka wrote: »

Uhuh, I have bad feelings for magicka warden regarding pvp, knowing some of those guys and their (lacking) understanding/opinion of the class.

Yeah, Masel seems to be purely PvE, can't find anyone on that list that is excelling at magwarden PvP.

I play magden, my friend and the officer of Legend, Lyser, is probably the most active PvP magden player on NA, and the Legend Discord contains several other passionate magden players who discuss it all the time. Magden doesn't have as many players as other classes, but the feedback of those loyal and learned in the class will be heard.

Well, we'll see how this works out. As a magicka warden I dont feel represented at all, nor do I have high hopes - regarding pvp.

The good thing is, to make it even more worse u guys would have the *** it up so hard lol. The thing with magicka warden is, that IMO its not about changing numbers/adjust "existing" skills, more like implement some unique ways how u can play the class.

NightbladeMechanics

rfennell_ESO wrote: »

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Checkmath wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Hexys wrote: »

As I didn't ask anyone to nominate myself I'm very honored to see I made it to the list of 170 and eventually got picked out to join the team. A thank you to those who nominated me! I'm looking forward to work with the team and to gather feedback from the community to make sure that in the coming time we can work together to make good improvements.

@Blobsky And no I'm not here to buff Magsorc or Stamblade, I'm not biased at all when it comes to balance, you don't have to worry.

For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.

Once again thanks @ZOS_GinaBruno and everyone willing to put effort into improving the gameplay!

I worry greatly about the truth of that after some of the things you write about me, PvP, PvE, these classes and the game. I hope you can surprise me as it will benefit the game significantly if nobody abuses their role, but only time will tell.

nobody of the reps is buffing anything on his own and nobody can do as he likes. we all will represent the feedback and voices we get and we wont just hand in our own suggestions. in the end it will be in the hands of the devs to implement anything. now i would be cool if we can stop spreading salt and go to the constructive part of this program. hope you all will participate soon in the already existing and the coming class discords, we gladly will read any constructive feedback regarding ALL classes.

Isn't exploiting the most legit of concerns when it is about being representative for anything? Dont't try to put that into "salt" category. Because I am for sure very concerned to have someone being selected that has repeatedly chosen to abuse any shady or outright exploity mechanic to his advantage over the course of 4 years.

I do get that you guys feel somehow responsible for defending your newly founded inner circle and its integrity. But blindly defending due to being uninformed is not the way to go, you are in fact further undermining said integrity. I do hope that it is unintentional and you are indeed not aware what has happened.

It's an insult to anyone who has chosen to not abuse any exploit and values fair-play.

I do not know everyone in the group nor the specific details of their past gameplay or potential exploits. However, I do know many of the members and can assure you that the majority consensus of the group is to play with integrity, avoid using known exploits, and fix them when possible in order to protect the fairness and integrity of the game. Your concern is entirely valid, but please believe me when I say that the group will actively and aggressively work with you in opposition of exploits. Members looking to preserve unfair advantages for themselves or defend shady or questionable tactics won't get far in our discussions. I'll see to that myself, and I know many other members will be equally diligent as well.

Masel92 wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.

This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.

Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.

By extensive you must mean "didn't do a thing".

https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/profile/KenaPKK

Not saying anything by that, just pointing out that my "extensive" background check that wasn't very extensive came back with a result. I don't know, nor am I implying anything by that, just pointing out the word "extensive" must have many meanings.

If you did an "extensive" check, you'd learn that the reasoning behind that forum ban is a technicality and no big deal. ZOS allows me to use this account because they recognize that. Careful making your assumptions.

ezio45

rfennell_ESO wrote: »

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Checkmath wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Hexys wrote: »

As I didn't ask anyone to nominate myself I'm very honored to see I made it to the list of 170 and eventually got picked out to join the team. A thank you to those who nominated me! I'm looking forward to work with the team and to gather feedback from the community to make sure that in the coming time we can work together to make good improvements.

@Blobsky And no I'm not here to buff Magsorc or Stamblade, I'm not biased at all when it comes to balance, you don't have to worry.

For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.

Once again thanks @ZOS_GinaBruno and everyone willing to put effort into improving the gameplay!

I worry greatly about the truth of that after some of the things you write about me, PvP, PvE, these classes and the game. I hope you can surprise me as it will benefit the game significantly if nobody abuses their role, but only time will tell.

nobody of the reps is buffing anything on his own and nobody can do as he likes. we all will represent the feedback and voices we get and we wont just hand in our own suggestions. in the end it will be in the hands of the devs to implement anything. now i would be cool if we can stop spreading salt and go to the constructive part of this program. hope you all will participate soon in the already existing and the coming class discords, we gladly will read any constructive feedback regarding ALL classes.

Isn't exploiting the most legit of concerns when it is about being representative for anything? Dont't try to put that into "salt" category. Because I am for sure very concerned to have someone being selected that has repeatedly chosen to abuse any shady or outright exploity mechanic to his advantage over the course of 4 years.

I do get that you guys feel somehow responsible for defending your newly founded inner circle and its integrity. But blindly defending due to being uninformed is not the way to go, you are in fact further undermining said integrity. I do hope that it is unintentional and you are indeed not aware what has happened.

It's an insult to anyone who has chosen to not abuse any exploit and values fair-play.

I do not know everyone in the group nor the specific details of their past gameplay or potential exploits. However, I do know many of the members and can assure you that the majority consensus of the group is to play with integrity, avoid using known exploits, and fix them when possible in order to protect the fairness and integrity of the game. Your concern is entirely valid, but please believe me when I say that the group will actively and aggressively work with you in opposition of exploits. Members looking to preserve unfair advantages for themselves or defend shady or questionable tactics won't get far in our discussions. I'll see to that myself, and I know many other members will be equally diligent as well.

Masel92 wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.

This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.

Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.

By extensive you must mean "didn't do a thing".

https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/profile/KenaPKK

Not saying anything by that, just pointing out that my "extensive" background check that wasn't very extensive came back with a result. I don't know, nor am I implying anything by that, just pointing out the word "extensive" must have many meanings.

that is kenapkk, the one on the list is kenapk? is this an alt? someone impersonating them or what?

MaxwellC

@Joy_Division
I don't know if Quantum is a Stam DK PvPer, he/she may be a good Mag DK (although I'm not sure either since I don't play PC anymore).
If I saw a few players from NA console who were DKs I'd be like "Eyy we'll finally be heard" but unfortunately I don't recognize any NA xbox player if there is even one.

NightbladeMechanics

Torbschka wrote: »

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Torbschka wrote: »

Uhuh, I have bad feelings for magicka warden regarding pvp, knowing some of those guys and their (lacking) understanding/opinion of the class.

Yeah, Masel seems to be purely PvE, can't find anyone on that list that is excelling at magwarden PvP.

I play magden, my friend and the officer of Legend, Lyser, is probably the most active PvP magden player on NA, and the Legend Discord contains several other passionate magden players who discuss it all the time. Magden doesn't have as many players as other classes, but the feedback of those loyal and learned in the class will be heard.

Well, we'll see how this works out. As a magicka warden I dont feel represented at all, nor do I have high hopes - regarding pvp.

The good thing is, to make it even more worse u guys would have the *** it up so hard lol. The thing with magicka warden is, that IMO its not about changing numbers/adjust "existing" skills, more like implement some unique ways how u can play the class.

That's fair. And I agree that magden -- and warden in general -- could use some more interesting and complicated mechanics to play around. It's a very simple class mechanically. Join the warden feedback discord, get in on the discussions, and tell us your concerns.

ezio45 wrote: »

rfennell_ESO wrote: »

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Checkmath wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Hexys wrote: »

As I didn't ask anyone to nominate myself I'm very honored to see I made it to the list of 170 and eventually got picked out to join the team. A thank you to those who nominated me! I'm looking forward to work with the team and to gather feedback from the community to make sure that in the coming time we can work together to make good improvements.

@Blobsky And no I'm not here to buff Magsorc or Stamblade, I'm not biased at all when it comes to balance, you don't have to worry.

For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.

Once again thanks @ZOS_GinaBruno and everyone willing to put effort into improving the gameplay!

I worry greatly about the truth of that after some of the things you write about me, PvP, PvE, these classes and the game. I hope you can surprise me as it will benefit the game significantly if nobody abuses their role, but only time will tell.

nobody of the reps is buffing anything on his own and nobody can do as he likes. we all will represent the feedback and voices we get and we wont just hand in our own suggestions. in the end it will be in the hands of the devs to implement anything. now i would be cool if we can stop spreading salt and go to the constructive part of this program. hope you all will participate soon in the already existing and the coming class discords, we gladly will read any constructive feedback regarding ALL classes.

Isn't exploiting the most legit of concerns when it is about being representative for anything? Dont't try to put that into "salt" category. Because I am for sure very concerned to have someone being selected that has repeatedly chosen to abuse any shady or outright exploity mechanic to his advantage over the course of 4 years.

I do get that you guys feel somehow responsible for defending your newly founded inner circle and its integrity. But blindly defending due to being uninformed is not the way to go, you are in fact further undermining said integrity. I do hope that it is unintentional and you are indeed not aware what has happened.

It's an insult to anyone who has chosen to not abuse any exploit and values fair-play.

I do not know everyone in the group nor the specific details of their past gameplay or potential exploits. However, I do know many of the members and can assure you that the majority consensus of the group is to play with integrity, avoid using known exploits, and fix them when possible in order to protect the fairness and integrity of the game. Your concern is entirely valid, but please believe me when I say that the group will actively and aggressively work with you in opposition of exploits. Members looking to preserve unfair advantages for themselves or defend shady or questionable tactics won't get far in our discussions. I'll see to that myself, and I know many other members will be equally diligent as well.

Masel92 wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.

This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.

Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.

By extensive you must mean "didn't do a thing".

https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/profile/KenaPKK

Not saying anything by that, just pointing out that my "extensive" background check that wasn't very extensive came back with a result. I don't know, nor am I implying anything by that, just pointing out the word "extensive" must have many meanings.

that is kenapkk, the one on the list is kenapk? is this an alt? someone impersonating them or what?

haha nah, Gina just left off one K

Aliyavana

@Alcast grats, represent us stam bois

Camb0Sl1ce

Just joined the sorcerer discord, unauthorized to send messages?

DirkRavenclaw

Gratz to all

Chufu

Congrats to everyone!

rfennell_ESO

ezio45 wrote: »

rfennell_ESO wrote: »

NightbladeMechanics wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

Checkmath wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Hexys wrote: »

As I didn't ask anyone to nominate myself I'm very honored to see I made it to the list of 170 and eventually got picked out to join the team. A thank you to those who nominated me! I'm looking forward to work with the team and to gather feedback from the community to make sure that in the coming time we can work together to make good improvements.

@Blobsky And no I'm not here to buff Magsorc or Stamblade, I'm not biased at all when it comes to balance, you don't have to worry.

For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.

Once again thanks @ZOS_GinaBruno and everyone willing to put effort into improving the gameplay!

I worry greatly about the truth of that after some of the things you write about me, PvP, PvE, these classes and the game. I hope you can surprise me as it will benefit the game significantly if nobody abuses their role, but only time will tell.

nobody of the reps is buffing anything on his own and nobody can do as he likes. we all will represent the feedback and voices we get and we wont just hand in our own suggestions. in the end it will be in the hands of the devs to implement anything. now i would be cool if we can stop spreading salt and go to the constructive part of this program. hope you all will participate soon in the already existing and the coming class discords, we gladly will read any constructive feedback regarding ALL classes.

Isn't exploiting the most legit of concerns when it is about being representative for anything? Dont't try to put that into "salt" category. Because I am for sure very concerned to have someone being selected that has repeatedly chosen to abuse any shady or outright exploity mechanic to his advantage over the course of 4 years.

I do get that you guys feel somehow responsible for defending your newly founded inner circle and its integrity. But blindly defending due to being uninformed is not the way to go, you are in fact further undermining said integrity. I do hope that it is unintentional and you are indeed not aware what has happened.

It's an insult to anyone who has chosen to not abuse any exploit and values fair-play.

I do not know everyone in the group nor the specific details of their past gameplay or potential exploits. However, I do know many of the members and can assure you that the majority consensus of the group is to play with integrity, avoid using known exploits, and fix them when possible in order to protect the fairness and integrity of the game. Your concern is entirely valid, but please believe me when I say that the group will actively and aggressively work with you in opposition of exploits. Members looking to preserve unfair advantages for themselves or defend shady or questionable tactics won't get far in our discussions. I'll see to that myself, and I know many other members will be equally diligent as well.

Masel92 wrote: »

Mojomonkeyman wrote: »

There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.

This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.

Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.

By extensive you must mean "didn't do a thing".

https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/profile/KenaPKK

Not saying anything by that, just pointing out that my "extensive" background check that wasn't very extensive came back with a result. I don't know, nor am I implying anything by that, just pointing out the word "extensive" must have many meanings.

that is kenapkk, the one on the list is kenapk? is this an alt? someone impersonating them or what?

I was just pointing out that ZOS doesn't randomly ban accounts for no reason.

But hey, it was a technicality it seems. Plus a name drop to prove it's totally a-ok.

Shad0wfire99

This is a pretty shrewd move by ZoS. Just take 90% of the stuff people cry about on the forums and move it into Discord so other people can deal with it. lol

Cinbri

Blobsky wrote: »

Great selection in general, though 1 name is deeply concerning... Dont let me down with magblade @KenaPKK please nerf cloak and give it a more balanced but more solid survivability buff

Brace for Stamblade buffs xD

A shame @Cinbri isnt there too but I guess it mostly looks good

Expectable result, given what I replied to my nomination mail. Prefer to spend summer at the seashore, instead of getting whispers from strangers all the time.

Dragonnord

Congrats all!
 

Rickter

If anyone is worried about past integrity of the members of this feedback team, i say: give them the benefit of the doubt. Especially if you do t know them. No one deserves to be held back by sins from years ago (were talking about a video game here not family or criminal issues) and people can change. A lot of people mature and develop over time and i have confidence in this program and the people chosen.

Additionally: theyre in the spotlight now. Officially. Any funny business would be the end of their career. Id say that was accountability enough.

Gprime31

This is a sad day for eso when you need help to fix this mess of a game.

ezio45

Gprime31 wrote: »

This is a sad day for eso when you need help to fix this mess of a game.

i think its a positive day, maybe thi will help the devs push the game in a good direction

NightbladeMechanics

Shad0wfire99 wrote: »

This is a pretty shrewd move by ZoS. Just take 90% of the stuff people cry about on the forums and move it into Discord so other people can deal with it. lol

The Discords were our idea. We are looking to facilitate serious discussion on any topic people want to talk about, and it will be easier to organize them using Discord's tools. Also, simple complainers with nothing constructive to add will not likely take the extra steps to find and join these discords, and then we can kick repeat griefers easily.

Trust me, ZOS has the best of intentions with this program. Give them a chance, and we'll see together what kind of action they actually take following our work.

Gprime31 wrote: »

This is a sad day for eso when you need help to fix this mess of a game.

No devs in any game are infallible or omniscient. It's common practice for games, especially multiplayer ones, to illicit feedback and advice from hardcore players because players play more than the devs. Devs are too busy working way more than full time hours building the game!

Honestly, ZOS should have implemented this program long ago. You should celebrate their action here and work to help make this program successful.

Liofa

Shad0wfire99 wrote: »

This is a pretty shrewd move by ZoS. Just take 90% of the stuff people cry about on the forums and move it into Discord so other people can deal with it. lol

This wasn't a decision from ZOS. I personally suggested it. The reason is exactly what you said, ''Crying''. This makes everything much easier for us. Try to understand, we already are working hard to prepare our own reports for the Dev team. Imagine reading through all of the forums filled with counterproductive threads and comments on top of that. Instead, I'll pay full attention to the tank discussion channel and read through feedback that actually matters and given by people who care about the games future.

Shad0wfire99

Liofa wrote: »

Shad0wfire99 wrote: »

This is a pretty shrewd move by ZoS. Just take 90% of the stuff people cry about on the forums and move it into Discord so other people can deal with it. lol

This wasn't a decision from ZOS. I personally suggested it. The reason is exactly what you said, ''Crying''. This makes everything much easier for us. Try to understand, we already are working hard to prepare our own reports for the Dev team. Imagine reading through all of the forums filled with counterproductive threads and comments on top of that. Instead, I'll pay full attention to the tank discussion channel and read through feedback that actually matters and given by people who care about the games future.

Oh, I'm with the idea. Having a place where actual conversations can happen about stuff that actually matters (balance, gameplay, etc.) is great. The forums can be left for conversations about how someone's Nord Stam Healer needs more hat options in the Crown Store.

Rickter

Gprime31 wrote: »

This is a sad day for eso when you need help to fix this mess of a game.

Hardly the first mmorpg that has brought in dedicated members of its game to help with making their game better. In fact its exactly what you want. Direct influence from the users of your product to improve. Like duh.

GreenhaloX

ESO Nerds.. oh sorry, my bad. Congrats, all you ESO-passionate gamers. Go forth and do great things for ESO.. and youtube.

usmguy1234

Savos_Saren wrote: »

Congrats to the DK crew.

Now lets see if you can convince ZOS to put our Major Expedition on something other than a gap closer.

Make sure to represent our class well... especially keeping in mind that the game has evolved from DKs just being tanks.

We're DDs, Tanks, and Healers. Stamina and Magicka based.

I would say put it on wings but that would be too one sided to mag.

Vaoh

I like this list!

ak_pvp

Whilst I don't disagree with any of the choices, and know that their entire point is to show pain points of classes, not offer suggestions.

I really hate that this idea exists. Why don't ZOS just listen to the complaints via the PTS threads, or the subforums, anything. Pawning of that job to 10 players instead of those who actually do the class changes, meaning we will probably end up with similar ZOS-y changes.

Blobsky

Cinbri wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Great selection in general, though 1 name is deeply concerning... Dont let me down with magblade @KenaPKK please nerf cloak and give it a more balanced but more solid survivability buff

Brace for Stamblade buffs xD

A shame @Cinbri isnt there too but I guess it mostly looks good

Expectable result, given what I replied to my nomination mail. Prefer to spend summer at the seashore, instead of getting whispers from strangers all the time.

Haha fair enough

Anhedonie

Whoever is representing wardens, please, make sure devs know that Shalks animation is effin lazy and godawful.

Masel

Cinbri wrote: »

Blobsky wrote: »

Great selection in general, though 1 name is deeply concerning... Dont let me down with magblade @KenaPKK please nerf cloak and give it a more balanced but more solid survivability buff

Brace for Stamblade buffs xD

A shame @Cinbri isnt there too but I guess it mostly looks good

Expectable result, given what I replied to my nomination mail. Prefer to spend summer at the seashore, instead of getting whispers from strangers all the time.

Well you can definetely combine both, I know I will