bottleofsyrup wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »I am suprised, this is actually a damn good list.Out of all the content creators, I'm also happy that Alcast made it in.
also congratz to both @Liofa and @Checkmath. I'm very happy that you guys made it in this list
Edit: Who is representing the stamDk now? is that you Liofa?
I'd like to know this too.
Joy_Division wrote: »
Ragnarock41 wrote: »bottleofsyrup wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »I am suprised, this is actually a damn good list.Out of all the content creators, I'm also happy that Alcast made it in.
also congratz to both @Liofa and @Checkmath. I'm very happy that you guys made it in this list
Edit: Who is representing the stamDk now? is that you Liofa?
I'd like to know this too.
I think it might be liofa since he is very familiar with DK from a tanking perspective, and he also played stamDK in PvP back when it wasn't weak af. Other than him I really have no clue.Joy_Division wrote: »
I have no doubts he is a good Dk. But as far as I can see he is a magicka DK, so should I talk to him about my stamina Dk concerns for example?
Ragnarock41 wrote: »bottleofsyrup wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »I am suprised, this is actually a damn good list.Out of all the content creators, I'm also happy that Alcast made it in.
also congratz to both @Liofa and @Checkmath. I'm very happy that you guys made it in this list
Edit: Who is representing the stamDk now? is that you Liofa?
I'd like to know this too.
I think it might be liofa since he is very familiar with DK from a tanking perspective, and he also played stamDK in PvP back when it wasn't weak af. Other than him I really have no clue.Joy_Division wrote: »
I have no doubts he is a good Dk. But as far as I can see he is a magicka DK, so should I talk to him about my stamina Dk concerns for example?
Hey, Ragnarock!
I'll take in any feedback you have just as any other class rep, regardless of our area of expertise. Even though I'm oriented towards magDK - any proposed changes to whatever class will be discussed as a group with all class reps. We've got very experienced PvPers like @KenaPKK, @Joy_Division, @Hexys and others that even though they might not main stamDK - they will surely have the theoratical knowledge to discuss the class with you!
Thanks!
Ragnarock41 wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »bottleofsyrup wrote: »Ragnarock41 wrote: »I am suprised, this is actually a damn good list.Out of all the content creators, I'm also happy that Alcast made it in.
also congratz to both @Liofa and @Checkmath. I'm very happy that you guys made it in this list
Edit: Who is representing the stamDk now? is that you Liofa?
I'd like to know this too.
I think it might be liofa since he is very familiar with DK from a tanking perspective, and he also played stamDK in PvP back when it wasn't weak af. Other than him I really have no clue.Joy_Division wrote: »
I have no doubts he is a good Dk. But as far as I can see he is a magicka DK, so should I talk to him about my stamina Dk concerns for example?
Hey, Ragnarock!
I'll take in any feedback you have just as any other class rep, regardless of our area of expertise. Even though I'm oriented towards magDK - any proposed changes to whatever class will be discussed as a group with all class reps. We've got very experienced PvPers like @KenaPKK, @Joy_Division, @Hexys and others that even though they might not main stamDK - they will surely have the theoratical knowledge to discuss the class with you!
Thanks!
Thats exactly what I was wondering, thanks for the info!
Oh, and I'm hopeful that you guys make a positive difference for this game, as it really needs it.
I think it's important to note that while we have more expertise with determined classes when compared to others, the general class representatives are not limited to their own class - hence why Gina didn't specifically say who is what.
We will collectively gather feedback from the community regardless of our class of expertise and promote change in needed areas. With that said, some of us do focus on specific classes due to amount of time invested and experienced gained on these classes, so we will have general orientation on what topics we can more reliably gravitate around (as example I'll be deep into Dragonknight discussions).
Basically, we have general class ORIENTATIONS but are not limited to these.
Hope this clarifies things a bit more!
PS.: @Quantum.V is my @ name in the PC-NA server, feel free to send me or any other class rep feedback to be discussed.
Is Alcast that Youtuber? I haven't heard of any of the rest of them but Congrats and thanks for representing us. And thanks to Zos for the player outreach, I hope it makes a positive difference.
For anyone who has good ideas for Sorcerer, you can PM me and I will invite you to our sorcerer discord in which we discuss builds, have a good chat and from today also have some extra discussion regarding balance.
Congrats to everyone who got picked for the program!
While I don't doubt the expertise of anyone on the list, it's easy to lose sight of the forest for the trees when you've played a class in a certain specific manner for years - so I hope you'll all remember to bring forth feedback/concerns regarding non-meta builds as well, and not just what's popular among the classes
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.
This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »There is at least one person listed that I've personally seen being always one of the first abusing about every exploit the game was going through (double/triple mundus, bugged nirn, jumping up keeps and other very questioinable stuff). Very questionable pick, I cannot take any input of such individuums seriously.
This is very concerning I think, I do not feel represented by people displaying such a lack of integrity and fair gameplay.
Gina told us that they did extensive background checks for ingame activity to rule out these things explicitly. So while you may think that whatever person used exploits, ZoS rid not find any clues for abusive behaviour of that person and therefore selected him or her.