With DLC fast approaching, I must suggest we close this thread and get ready to test live servers. It makes no sense to waste energy when we must let ZOS work to pull the DLC into the launch phase. Thank you @ZOS_GinaBruno and rest of ZOS for the thread creation and at very least listening to the few points made early on!
Please let's remain constructive in the next thread and keep the verbal abuse to a minimum (myself included).
Templars hold fast, keep up the critique and keep it civil; keep the fire going.
With DLC fast approaching, I must suggest we close this thread and get ready to test live servers. It makes no sense to waste energy when we must let ZOS work to pull the DLC into the launch phase. Thank you @ZOS_GinaBruno and rest of ZOS for the thread creation and at very least listening to the few points made early on!
Please let's remain constructive in the next thread and keep the verbal abuse to a minimum (myself included).
Templars hold fast, keep up the critique and keep it civil; keep the fire going.
Not to be a total jerk, but what, exactly, are we thanking them for? It was one of about a dozen token feedback threads that were created, and one of ones that didn't even get a response, even though this one pretty much has more posts than all of the others combined.
I know Gina is reading this thread, but I also know that she's not allowed to respond in here because just like the other hot button issues of yesteryears, ZOS thinks it's more constructive to let the topic be ignored and hopefully die out than actually address it. So no, I won't be thanking them, not for their pathetic balance work, nor for their misguided approach to engaging the community.
So while it wasn't the patch we wanted, it was still a patch that fellow humans stressed over. And for that I thank them.
With that said, aside from a few weeks to a month of testing the new DLC, I will be using my energy elsewhere. Really nothing we can do except acknowledge the above sentiments, accept them or move on.
With DLC fast approaching, I must suggest we close this thread and get ready to test live servers. It makes no sense to waste energy when we must let ZOS work to pull the DLC into the launch phase. Thank you @ZOS_GinaBruno and rest of ZOS for the thread creation and at very least listening to the few points made early on!
Please let's remain constructive in the next thread and keep the verbal abuse to a minimum (myself included).
Templars hold fast, keep up the critique and keep it civil; keep the fire going.
Not to be a total jerk, but what, exactly, are we thanking them for? It was one of about a dozen token feedback threads that were created, and one of ones that didn't even get a response, even though this one pretty much has more posts than all of the others combined.
I know Gina is reading this thread, but I also know that she's not allowed to respond in here because just like the other hot button issues of yesteryears, ZOS thinks it's more constructive to let the topic be ignored and hopefully die out than actually address it. So no, I won't be thanking them, not for their pathetic balance work, nor for their misguided approach to engaging the community.
bubblebuttboss wrote: »The core of my guild has moved to a new game that shall not be named, but shall be playable to the all on the third.
Im gonna go give her a whirl, ill check in next dlc and see if zeni is ready make the last few, but Crucial changes for this class
and on this time away, I wont be paying my sub, as I wont be paying towards a game that doesnt listen to their community =D
GL ZENI, MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU!
So while it wasn't the patch we wanted, it was still a patch that fellow humans stressed over. And for that I thank them.
With that said, aside from a few weeks to a month of testing the new DLC, I will be using my energy elsewhere. Really nothing we can do except acknowledge the above sentiments, accept them or move on.
They may go through effort while in the bathroom as well, and net the same result, that doesn't mean they should be thanked for said efforts.
Agreed on the last part though, there's nothing to be done at this point but either give up or continue to complain because it's cathartic.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Once the dust settles a bit from this change of direction, you should expect to see increased participation from the developers. They would love to chime into constructive threads and provide some feedback!
nagarjunna wrote: »The sad thing here is that ZOS plan of non-communication is backfiring majorly! A failure to be responsive to people who play a game is the major cause of games packing up and dying!
Even in this thread more and more people are giving up and moving on. That hits ZOS right in their bottom line!
nagarjunna wrote: »The sad thing here is that ZOS plan of non-communication is backfiring majorly! A failure to be responsive to people who play a game is the major cause of games packing up and dying!
Even in this thread more and more people are giving up and moving on. That hits ZOS right in their bottom line!
Normally I agree, especially in a business setting. But based on the TOS, technically they don't owe us any responses or fixes regarding their intellectual property.
While it's great to offer our suggestions, especially when they ask us, I have to now remind the community its best to save your energy enjoying the game as is or purchase a new game.
nagarjunna wrote: »The sad thing here is that ZOS plan of non-communication is backfiring majorly! A failure to be responsive to people who play a game is the major cause of games packing up and dying!
Even in this thread more and more people are giving up and moving on. That hits ZOS right in their bottom line!
Normally I agree, especially in a business setting. But based on the TOS, technically they don't owe us any responses or fixes regarding their intellectual property.
While it's great to offer our suggestions, especially when they ask us, I have to now remind the community its best to save your energy enjoying the game as is or purchase a new game.
They created this feedback thread. Why would I thank them for 72 pages of being ignored? They wanted feedback, they got it. TONS OF IT. Fantastic feedback by the best Templar's in our community. They chose to respond to that with nothing. I really do not understand these devs. What kind of dev asks for feedback then ignores it?
Why is it every class and issue when complained about gets almost immediate fixes but the Templar's are ignored? Blows my mind. We even give them the solutions they are asking for, not OP solutions either, and what do we have to show for it? Nothing. We get a pat on the head and a "keep it civil.". NB's get a response and fix within 4 pages. Don't tell me not to be pissed about that. The least they could have done is a /lurk post, we don't even get that basic consideration.
bubblebuttboss wrote: »The core of my guild has moved to a new game that shall not be named, but shall be playable to the all on the third.
Im gonna go give her a whirl, ill check in next dlc and see if zeni is ready make the last few, but Crucial changes for this class
and on this time away, I wont be paying my sub, as I wont be paying towards a game that doesnt listen to their community =D
GL ZENI, MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU!
I'll just leave this here again.. (from february 2015(!!!))ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Once the dust settles a bit from this change of direction, you should expect to see increased participation from the developers. They would love to chime into constructive threads and provide some feedback!
I'd prefer they do that honestly. Give us a class change token we have to use when we log in.I guess the best I can do is thank ZOS for not deleting the class. Good job on that, guys.
I guess the best I can do is thank ZOS for not deleting the class. Good job on that, guys.
You took the work out of my mouth. In all other companies it would be a matter of fairness toI'd prefer they do that honestly. Give us a class change token we have to use when we log in.
ZOS should just give up the whole "Play the way you want to play" farce they've been running on since launch and just admit that ESO is your typical linear 'holy trinity' class based MMO; you've got the rogue (NB), mage (Sorc) and warrior (DK).
Templars are useless and playing templar is a waste of time. I hate saying that.
SeptimusDova wrote: »As I look at this mega thread I see many names from our last one. Sadly I also miss many names. Where is AbraxusX? This minuet with ZOS has turned into the ouroboros dance.
Thank Zos nahh. Thank my fellow Templars for the discourse and lively conversation. The heated passion in which we have fought the battle. Our solidarity for the common good of all Templars. This is who I thank.Not some corporation who hides behind TOS for no other reason than self protection.
The good that came out of this thread goes beyond our class.
And you mofos got me into composing classical pieces again. Kudos you did what the missus couldnt.
and yolo swagon
I still have that honor the dead gif you made from last year It's our cover now!!!
timidobserver wrote: »I'll just leave this here again.. (from february 2015(!!!))ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Once the dust settles a bit from this change of direction, you should expect to see increased participation from the developers. They would love to chime into constructive threads and provide some feedback!
There isn't really anything for them to say in this thread. With regard to the dlc, other than a few ninja bugs and nerfs that will go in with the last patch that doesn' t go on the pts per usual, the Templar balancing is done and over with for now. Quit, reroll, or deal with it.
There will be no feedback taken from this thread for balancing purposes. If that is what you are expecting, you are wasting your time.
Razorback174 wrote: »I think the part that really kills me is the absolute silence on ZOS' part. There are over 70 pages in this thread, with many meaningful and well-thought out posts. That alone warrants some type of response, does it not? Yet we have received nothing but silence. Not even a simple acknowledgement! And some folk want to actually thank them for this? I don't understand it. As a customer, this is horrendous service. Blatantly (and in some cases flippantly) ignoring your customers is not a good business practice. They will take their business elsewhere.
I know of many who already have...
timidobserver wrote: »I'll just leave this here again.. (from february 2015(!!!))ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Once the dust settles a bit from this change of direction, you should expect to see increased participation from the developers. They would love to chime into constructive threads and provide some feedback!
There isn't really anything for them to say in this thread. With regard to the dlc, other than a few ninja bugs and nerfs that will go in with the last patch that doesn' t go on the pts per usual, the Templar balancing is done and over with for now. Quit, reroll, or deal with it.
How about the four threads asking whether we will get free skill resets or not? I mean, a simple yes/no would suffice and they can't even chime in on that.
I realize the templar balancing is done for now. I also realize that @Wrobel has his ideas of what a templar should be and this entire thread is irrelevant because he will go through with his planned changes no matter what the feedback is. That's a fact and you are true there really isn't anything for them to say in this thread anymore. I already mentioned it in this thread already. If you are a templar, be happy with what you are getting and wait for further changes in Dark Brotherhood. If you are not satisfied, roll an alt or play another game meanwhile. This thread has no point, the entire purpose of it was just to help find what bugs are still in game, and most of those actually are getting fixes. There will be no feedback taken from this thread for balancing purposes. If that is what you are expecting, you are wasting your time. I don't even know why I'm still posting here myself, especially since I haven't launched ESO in about a week .