SeptimusDova wrote: »BRRRRofski
"LoS wouldn't completely not punish pugs anyway. Pretty sure that could come into play on a few occasions."
My LoS comment wasn't about punishing pugs, mugs ,bugs, rugs, scalawags, halfwits,dimwits or ***.
It was about preventing the Blind Heal,the hide and heal AP gains in PVP.
That was the issue a single BOL casted from Cover could frustrate a good fight. And not just BOL but all things that work from hiding.
Not the NB cloak hide.. But the I'm behind this wall nay nay nay nay nay you cant touch me ! Crap that went on and will continue to go on this did not fix the issue and that it what it was supposed to do.
I believes they were told this in beta as well. back then it was prolly like .. yeah , yeah oh yeah we will get to that. Then they saw a squirrel and forgot everything.
This is getting absurd.
ZOS, if you're reading this 65-page (and counting) Templar thread, please respond.
At this point, it doesn't even have to be a substantive response. Just say "Hi" so that we know you're here.
david.haypreub18_ESO wrote: »This is getting absurd.
ZOS, if you're reading this 65-page (and counting) Templar thread, please respond.
At this point, it doesn't even have to be a substantive response. Just say "Hi" so that we know you're here.
But they won't, because they have no intention of doing anything about any of the suggestions here. They spent most of their time for this update buffing other classes and nerfing BoL. They refuse to accept the overwhelming feedback from the Templar community that our buggy, slow, channeled, and useless skills need to be fixed, and that Templars currently have no tools to meet the class concept of 'defending the house'. Why aren't the devs listening? I'm not sure whether they're just more interested in fixing other classes because they play them more, or they prefer to watch streamers rants rather than listen to actual Templars, but for whatever reason, it is clear that ZOS is simply not listening to the people who play Templars.
It is sad, but the unequal treatment is staggeringly obvious. ZOS seem to listen a lot to NBs (e.g. recent nerf rollback), to mag Sorcs (healing pet etc.), and to DKs (who were OP for a year and now look to be coming back to the top tier after a while in the wilderness). In regards to Stam Sorcs and Templars, though, they just aren't listening.
Having worked as both a customer service rep and later as a project manager, my sense is that the devs are aware of the conversation going on here, but simply think that their vision for the class is the right one, and that once the fury dies down players will eventually come around and accept it.
david.haypreub18_ESO wrote: »
Having worked as both a customer service rep and later as a project manager, my sense is that the devs are aware of the conversation going on here, but simply think that their vision for the class is the right one, and that once the fury dies down players will eventually come around and accept it.
I think you've hit the nail on the head. It was the same thing with them trying to entice Sorcerers to us Liquid Lightning in PvP: it just isn't very effective. Unfortunately, it has been 2 years for Templars now, and many players are just not buying into their vision. I for example would like to play a Paladin: someone who wears heavy armor, is tanky, and can throw out some buffs and heals to help the group. That is not really possible right now in high end PvP: tanking in general has been nerfed with the changes to blocking, Templars are not particularly tanky or capable of 'protecting a house', and heavy armor is terrible. I don't fit the vision.
And another thing all templar would love to see:
Removal of speed depression upon casting Flare and Radiant Destruction.
@Wrobel
And another thing all templar would love to see:
Removal of speed depression upon casting Flare and Radiant Destruction.
@Wrobel
It would certainly help. Don't forget healing ritual.
This thread has taken on a life of it's own. We seem to have been side tracked and forgot what it's original purpose was - To have people test the new changes on PTS and report. There has been very little of that. I'm curious to know how well Templars are fairing in PvP on the PTS although I don't think we will get any solid information until after things go live. Right now it's a wait and see game, but I do have this feeling we will be in a better place.
timidobserver wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »SemiD4rkness wrote: »Francescolg wrote: »This is how other people, here: Sypher, are flattered by the incoming nurf to Templars, watch 01:32:33...
https://youtu.be/iwNDGTYG3ZE
..no, he's not biased at all! This video is a perfect example to explain how the combat-team is failing to treat the class in a balanced manner..! And to show, that most players don't even understand the class, when later on he is "shocked" about the synergy-heal on Cleansing Ritual.. lol
He's hurting the game so much and it feels like devs are fixing the game around him, pretty sad actually that a game that has "THE ELDER SCROLLS" in it's name is being balanced around a streamer who averges only 700 views in twitch ESO in a nutshell.
I have to agree. The video is pretty disgusting. He even complains about the buff to a synergy because he has so little understanding of the class that he doesn't know it is a synergy. I wonder if the patch next week will include a nerf to the purify synergy. It's kind of disappointing that the devs are actually listening to this guy.
I picture Wrobel watching this video desperately hoping for approval.
Yeah seriously, I almost puked in my mouth watching that.
He also claims to play "all classes". Even though his templar is like VR1 retired something and he doesn't even know what a Purify synergy is. Why would he tho? He only plays mag sorc and stamblade, because currently the strongest(while likely dreaming of 1.5 DK back).
I'm not really shocked that a guy like Sypher, that only plays fotm class/build combinations, for least resistance and easy wins, sits there and gloats when the individually weakest PvP class gets nerfed. More easy kills for him is better. He doesn't play the class, so why care?
The terrifying thing here is rather that devs wants to be hipster and seeks approval from low- to mid ranked streamers(most gamers never even heard of much less watched) over the entire templar community.
Ive heard him say stam templars are fine and not as bad as people think, then he can't even kill 2-3 guys on his templar while he can take on more than 10 on his DK, sorc or NB....
Just have to point the finger at someone huh? You think Zenimax bases their decisions on a guy like me who literally only plays one aspect of the game? (Solo pvp)
Give me a break. I give my OPINIONS on changes, my opinions are just that.. Opinions.
That purify synergy is OP though.
If we could get a Green acknowledgement as post #2,000 in this thread, that'd be pretty awesome. It'd be way cool if they took the opportunity to call out and acknowledge some of the work that's gone into a few of the exceptional pieces of feedback ('leet' post #1337 comes to mind, among others) in this thread.
C'mon green, you can do it...
dennissomb16_ESO wrote: »I feel part of the issue for lack of response from ZOS is that they are not actually looking for feedback on the changes themselves as much as they are looking for bugs/changes working as designed on the PTS. As an example no amount of feedback in this thread is going to change the BOL nerf. That change is going in no matter the thoughts of the community from rage to actual helpful suggestions.
They do look at feedback on things like toppling charge still being bugged as we can see from their repeated updates that it is now working (even though it is not lol). There should be class forums for ongoing discussions and feedback on classes.
Overall I am guessing there could be a better way for letting people know they are reading feedback during these big DLC releases
staracino_ESO wrote: »dennissomb16_ESO wrote: »I feel part of the issue for lack of response from ZOS is that they are not actually looking for feedback on the changes themselves as much as they are looking for bugs/changes working as designed on the PTS. As an example no amount of feedback in this thread is going to change the BOL nerf. That change is going in no matter the thoughts of the community from rage to actual helpful suggestions.
They do look at feedback on things like toppling charge still being bugged as we can see from their repeated updates that it is now working (even though it is not lol). There should be class forums for ongoing discussions and feedback on classes.
Overall I am guessing there could be a better way for letting people know they are reading feedback during these big DLC releases
They did ask us to compile a list of issues at http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/234362/templar-issues-thread back in December.
staracino_ESO wrote: »dennissomb16_ESO wrote: »I feel part of the issue for lack of response from ZOS is that they are not actually looking for feedback on the changes themselves as much as they are looking for bugs/changes working as designed on the PTS. As an example no amount of feedback in this thread is going to change the BOL nerf. That change is going in no matter the thoughts of the community from rage to actual helpful suggestions.
They do look at feedback on things like toppling charge still being bugged as we can see from their repeated updates that it is now working (even though it is not lol). There should be class forums for ongoing discussions and feedback on classes.
Overall I am guessing there could be a better way for letting people know they are reading feedback during these big DLC releases
They did ask us to compile a list of issues at http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/234362/templar-issues-thread back in December.
Which they promptly ignored.
SeptimusDova wrote: »Lest we forget " Templars slower by design" the GCD's that were not supposed to be there. And when found was a bug then a feature. I would like to call them out on lying but they hand out bans for that.
How do we know ZOS isn't taking notes and having fixes scheduled for later patches? Sooner is better than later of course, but they might have a big wad of fixes ready for a couple patches down the line.
How do we know ZOS isn't taking notes and having fixes scheduled for later patches? Sooner is better than later of course, but they might have a big wad of fixes ready for a couple patches down the line.