Hamburglarjones wrote: »Hopefully ZOS can change PA to affect 12 people, why not?
Hamburglarjones wrote: »Hopefully ZOS can change PA to affect 12 people, why not?
or at least change it to smart target so it's not always the same 6 people getting it
Interessting.
I vaguely remember something similar when i testet a purge bot with meriterious in pvp, years ago
If i remember correct: From 4 targets i used to reapply the buff two two fixed and 2 random group members. I dropped the set soon after and never bothered to investigate or associated it with classes (note that was before warden and necro came out)
Interessted if anyone finds out the reason. Or if its just typically bad code
Princess_Ciri wrote: »It would be nice if Powerful Assault could be changed into a smart buff set that is applied to those who do not have the buff or did not receive it last time.
It's pretty silly playing a Templar DPS in raids and discovering you are missing a buff and the only way to receive it is to banish the other DPS to the opposite end of the room.....
Poor magplars, it's been so long now...no one wants them...two years later we are still in the 'recruiting necromancers - 2 spots'.....now imagine one comes in by chance and gets no PA......give me my tinfoil hat please, Ciri.



Grumble_and_Grunt wrote: »Another raid, another day in the life of a Templar trying to get some PA uptimes.... Last image is also on Nahvi in vSS, where the DDs going into portal still have higher uptimes than the Templar that is in the fight being buffed repeatedly.
Though 3 less DDs going portal did mean the User of the set did get some uptimes (even though tooltip states user should always receive the buff)
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom
CleymenZero wrote: »Grumble_and_Grunt wrote: »Another raid, another day in the life of a Templar trying to get some PA uptimes.... Last image is also on Nahvi in vSS, where the DDs going into portal still have higher uptimes than the Templar that is in the fight being buffed repeatedly.
Though 3 less DDs going portal did mean the User of the set did get some uptimes (even though tooltip states user should always receive the buff)
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom
Can you link me the logs?