I_killed_Vivec wrote: »I'danitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »Haha I get it man. I really do but you never lose anything. You might make less...but never lose anything.
Sorry @imnotanother , but if you have 1 apple, customer A is ready to pay 5 dollars for that apple, customer B is ready to pay 10 dollars for that apple, and you choose to sell it to customer A, then you've not earned 5 dollars, you've clearly lost 5 dollars.
That's math. Not opinion.
It's not maths, it's semantics.
In this example, say the apple trader buys apples at wholesale prices of 1g per apple. He sold the apple at 5g to one customer, rather than 10g to another.
His profit IS 4g - that is maths.
His profit could have been 9g - which shows an opportunity loss of 5g.
I_killed_Vivec wrote: »Another example given was crafting armour for someone. If it costs 5g in materials but one crafter sells it for 10g then I might choose to undercut that price and sell for 9g. I will have made a 4g profit, and in this case there isn't even an opportunity loss, because trying to sell at 10g might result in failure to sell at all.
But if everyone took the OP's advice and stopped doing writs, and listed their mats in the guild stores instead, then the mats market would soon be flooded, prices would drop, and writs would suddenly become profitable again.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I_killed_Vivec wrote: »I'danitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »Haha I get it man. I really do but you never lose anything. You might make less...but never lose anything.
Sorry @imnotanother , but if you have 1 apple, customer A is ready to pay 5 dollars for that apple, customer B is ready to pay 10 dollars for that apple, and you choose to sell it to customer A, then you've not earned 5 dollars, you've clearly lost 5 dollars.
That's math. Not opinion.
It's not maths, it's semantics.
In this example, say the apple trader buys apples at wholesale prices of 1g per apple. He sold the apple at 5g to one customer, rather than 10g to another.
His profit IS 4g - that is maths.
His profit could have been 9g - which shows an opportunity loss of 5g.
No. It's not semantics.
Moment A :
You have 1000 gold. Global asset 1000.
Moment B :
You farm 1 apple. Market price of apple is 10g. Global asset 1010.
Moment C :
option C1 : You sell the apple 5g:
Global assets : 1005.
option C2 : you sell the apple for 10g.
Global assets : 1010.
Option C1 shows a 5g LOSS as compared to Moment B.
You can argue that C1 and C2 options BOTH show a gain as compared to moment A, but that's assuming the apple was worth nothing, which is untrue : it was part of your assets before you sold it. No accounting law will let you estimate the value of your assets lower than market price.I_killed_Vivec wrote: »Another example given was crafting armour for someone. If it costs 5g in materials but one crafter sells it for 10g then I might choose to undercut that price and sell for 9g. I will have made a 4g profit, and in this case there isn't even an opportunity loss, because trying to sell at 10g might result in failure to sell at all.
If you cannot sell at 10g it means market price is NOT 10g. Per definition.
imnotanother wrote: »But if everyone took the OP's advice and stopped doing writs, and listed their mats in the guild stores instead, then the mats market would soon be flooded, prices would drop, and writs would suddenly become profitable again.
Shhh don't speak common sense in this thread.anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I_killed_Vivec wrote: »I'danitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »Haha I get it man. I really do but you never lose anything. You might make less...but never lose anything.
Sorry @imnotanother , but if you have 1 apple, customer A is ready to pay 5 dollars for that apple, customer B is ready to pay 10 dollars for that apple, and you choose to sell it to customer A, then you've not earned 5 dollars, you've clearly lost 5 dollars.
That's math. Not opinion.
It's not maths, it's semantics.
In this example, say the apple trader buys apples at wholesale prices of 1g per apple. He sold the apple at 5g to one customer, rather than 10g to another.
His profit IS 4g - that is maths.
His profit could have been 9g - which shows an opportunity loss of 5g.
No. It's not semantics.
Moment A :
You have 1000 gold. Global asset 1000.
Moment B :
You farm 1 apple. Market price of apple is 10g. Global asset 1010.
Moment C :
option C1 : You sell the apple 5g:
Global assets : 1005.
option C2 : you sell the apple for 10g.
Global assets : 1010.
Option C1 shows a 5g LOSS as compared to Moment B.
You can argue that C1 and C2 options BOTH show a gain as compared to moment A, but that's assuming the apple was worth nothing, which is untrue : it was part of your assets before you sold it. No accounting law will let you estimate the value of your assets lower than market price.I_killed_Vivec wrote: »Another example given was crafting armour for someone. If it costs 5g in materials but one crafter sells it for 10g then I might choose to undercut that price and sell for 9g. I will have made a 4g profit, and in this case there isn't even an opportunity loss, because trying to sell at 10g might result in failure to sell at all.
If you cannot sell at 10g it means market price is NOT 10g. Per definition.
You and others keep thinking you value the good at a retail value. In business we use the term Cost of goods sold (COGS).
Cogs = the price it took for the good to be made. (Apple cost 1g but has a retail Value of 10g)
Income = gross revenue.
Profit/NOL = gross revenue - expenses(COGS)
So when an apple is sold for 5g(gross) minus 1g (COGS) you equal a 4g profit.
Now in Eso, I don't have to pay a miner/logger/or farmer to obtain raw goods.
I also don't pay a foundry/sawmill/clothier to refine the goods.
No freight/transportation charges.
No labor cost
So to obtain a stack of materials, you literally have 0 expenses.
Now when I use a stack of materials to complete writs, the COGS are 0.
Take whatever gross revenue - cogs = the profit made from completing writs.
Same in the store, you list the same stack for X amount.
X - cogs- listing fee- house cut = profit.
Never do you factor in the the retail value when determining your profit.
Because if you valued a stack at 5k and sold it for 5k - expenses = you'd be left with a net loss.
imnotanother wrote: »Example
I have thousands of wild blackberry bushes on my property. I go out there in the early summer and am able to pick several pounds (close to 100lbs). This is done on my time for free/fun. My family eats some, we give a lot away to friends/family, and then I sell the rest to my farmers market for money. With your logic, I lost money instead of making a profit. But my heavy wallet says differently.
But like I said, thank you for your concern over my business handling abilities. I'll ensure my employees that you are paying their paychecks this week, since you know more.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I_killed_Vivec wrote: »I'danitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »Haha I get it man. I really do but you never lose anything. You might make less...but never lose anything.
Sorry @imnotanother , but if you have 1 apple, customer A is ready to pay 5 dollars for that apple, customer B is ready to pay 10 dollars for that apple, and you choose to sell it to customer A, then you've not earned 5 dollars, you've clearly lost 5 dollars.
That's math. Not opinion.
It's not maths, it's semantics.
In this example, say the apple trader buys apples at wholesale prices of 1g per apple. He sold the apple at 5g to one customer, rather than 10g to another.
His profit IS 4g - that is maths.
His profit could have been 9g - which shows an opportunity loss of 5g.
No. It's not semantics.
Moment A :
You have 1000 gold. Global asset 1000.
Moment B :
You farm 1 apple. Market price of apple is 10g. Global asset 1010.
Moment C :
option C1 : You sell the apple 5g:
Global assets : 1005.
option C2 : you sell the apple for 10g.
Global assets : 1010.
Option C1 shows a 5g LOSS as compared to Moment B.
You can argue that C1 and C2 options BOTH show a gain as compared to moment A, but that's assuming the apple was worth nothing, which is untrue : it was part of your assets before you sold it. No accounting law will let you estimate the value of your assets lower than market price.I_killed_Vivec wrote: »Another example given was crafting armour for someone. If it costs 5g in materials but one crafter sells it for 10g then I might choose to undercut that price and sell for 9g. I will have made a 4g profit, and in this case there isn't even an opportunity loss, because trying to sell at 10g might result in failure to sell at all.
If you cannot sell at 10g it means market price is NOT 10g. Per definition.
Money vanishes out of your bank account?Waffennacht wrote: »GwwwsaAaaaaAAAAAA!
TIME HAS A VALUE
There is no such thing as, "free"
Every second you spend farming mats to waste on writs you are NOT doing something MORE profitable
SO in the above arguments, the person farming that keeps saying it's "free" is way off.
To me 1 hour is equivalent to 13 - 20k gold. If i go out. It's to grab roughly 200 mats an hour, I get an average of 1 gold item per stack, so if I do anything and don't get 13k worth of gold, I'm losing money.
imnotanother wrote: »
Never do you factor in the the retail value when determining your profit.
Because if you valued a stack at 5k and sold it for 5k - expenses = you'd be left with a net loss.
Not to be rude but are you an accountant?anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »
Never do you factor in the the retail value when determining your profit.
Because if you valued a stack at 5k and sold it for 5k - expenses = you'd be left with a net loss.
LoL. Again, no.
Because if you register your stocks at retail value you have already increased your assets.
I wish you'd build and sell me a house in NYC at the same price as a house in the middle of nowhere. After all, it's the same amount of manhours, bricks and cement.
imnotanother wrote: »Not to be rude but are you an accountant?anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »
Never do you factor in the the retail value when determining your profit.
Because if you valued a stack at 5k and sold it for 5k - expenses = you'd be left with a net loss.
LoL. Again, no.
Because if you register your stocks at retail value you have already increased your assets.
I wish you'd build and sell me a house in NYC at the same price as a house in the middle of nowhere. After all, it's the same amount of manhours, bricks and cement.
An asset, in the books, is valued at the
cost to manufacture. This is the Cost of Goods Sold. You can not list an asset's value for higher than the cost to company.
imnotanother wrote: »But one thing is for certain. These writs are FAR less profitable (in my view now a loss) as compared to the writs pre DLC. So my question is WHY the [snip] is it so? Why were writs effectively nerfed?
Slayer9292_ESO wrote: »imnotanother wrote: »Example
I have thousands of wild blackberry bushes on my property. I go out there in the early summer and am able to pick several pounds (close to 100lbs). This is done on my time for free/fun. My family eats some, we give a lot away to friends/family, and then I sell the rest to my farmers market for money. With your logic, I lost money instead of making a profit. But my heavy wallet says differently.
But like I said, thank you for your concern over my business handling abilities. I'll ensure my employees that you are paying their paychecks this week, since you know more.
I think this analogy is wrong.
Lets say you can sell the blackberries for $1 per pound (sell raw mats). You pick 100 and sell it at the market and make $100 profit.
Or you can make blackberry pies (writs). The pies sell for $2, but each requires 3 lbs of blackberries to make. Your profit is $66.
In both cases you make profit, but in the case of the pies you make less. In this case a loss of $34. Not to mention the time it took to make the pies.
Waffennacht wrote: »GwwwsaAaaaaAAAAAA!
TIME HAS A VALUE
There is no such thing as, "free"
Every second you spend farming mats to waste on writs you are NOT doing something MORE profitable
SO in the above arguments, the person farming that keeps saying it's "free" is way off.
To me 1 hour is equivalent to 13 - 20k gold. If i go out. It's to grab roughly 200 mats an hour, I get an average of 1 gold item per stack, so if I do anything and don't get 13k worth of gold, I'm losing money.
At the end of the day you are up $66 or up $100.
Less is not loss.