Rapscallion74 wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »The fact that there is a exploit in the combat system using bash.
What do you mean? I use shield bash all the time. o.o
shield bash(just regular, not the ability power bash), with 2 points in the Deadly Bash passive is severely overpowered to the point of being broken at the moment.
Etchesketch wrote: »How many of you that are bagging on Joe are able to talk to the devs one on one?
http://blip.tv/angryjoeshow/elder-scrolls-online-angry-joe-interview-6204369
Etchesketch wrote: »How many of you that are bagging on Joe are able to talk to the devs one on one?
http://blip.tv/angryjoeshow/elder-scrolls-online-angry-joe-interview-6204369
For god sake could you please stop kissing Joe's ass already?
You've made your damn point like 10 posts ago.
Etchesketch wrote: »This review of his since yesterday.. half a million views.
Etchesketch wrote: »This review of his since yesterday.. half a million views.
You say this as if it means something important.
Rapscallion74 wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »The fact that there is a exploit in the combat system using bash.
What do you mean? I use shield bash all the time. o.o
shield bash(just regular, not the ability power bash), with 2 points in the Deadly Bash passive is severely overpowered to the point of being broken at the moment.
Hmm, regular is what I mean and use all the time.
I will admit, I've simply stopped using my weapon simply because it can't match up to the damage of bash, and yeah, I have deadly bash maxed out, I'd say it does need some work, but for people to call it an exploit is going very far, as I don't believe I am abusing any bugs. o.o
Etchesketch wrote: »How many of you that are bagging on Joe are able to talk to the devs one on one?
http://blip.tv/angryjoeshow/elder-scrolls-online-angry-joe-interview-6204369
For god sake could you please stop kissing Joe's ass already?
You've made your damn point like 10 posts ago.
Etchesketch wrote: »You say this as if it means anything at all.
Etchesketch wrote: »Yeah. it's all fun and games till the guy you choose to review your game gives his honest opinion and it's not that good.
Etchesketch wrote: »Yeah. it's all fun and games till the guy you choose to review your game gives his honest opinion and it's not that good.
Wait, someone chose him to review the game and this is just his honest opinion? He's not like, I dunno, doing it for views and ad revenue?
What a selfless guy, truly a noble heart.
Etchesketch wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Yeah. it's all fun and games till the guy you choose to review your game gives his honest opinion and it's not that good.
Wait, someone chose him to review the game and this is just his honest opinion? He's not like, I dunno, doing it for views and ad revenue?
What a selfless guy, truly a noble heart.
Nobody said this..
Keep it up, you continue to prove the point.
Etchesketch wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Yeah. it's all fun and games till the guy you choose to review your game gives his honest opinion and it's not that good.
Wait, someone chose him to review the game and this is just his honest opinion? He's not like, I dunno, doing it for views and ad revenue?
What a selfless guy, truly a noble heart.
Nobody said this..
Keep it up, you continue to prove the point.
So you're incapable of reading your own posts?
Etchesketch wrote: »Sure I can... but I never said what you said I did. I never said he didn't want views or advertising.
I'm saying, he gave his honest opinion and I agree with almost everything he said. His advertising has nothing to do with it.
But feel free to continue with the typical attacking response instead of actually telling us why you feel he was wrong on his points..
Still waiting.
A second-rate youtube clown grasping at increased exposure BECAUSE of ZOS and ESO.
He used to be entertaining but somewhere along the line it became a little too self-righteous.
Etchesketch wrote: »Sure I can... but I never said what you said I did. I never said he didn't want views or advertising.
I'm saying, he gave his honest opinion and I agree with almost everything he said. His advertising has nothing to do with it.
But feel free to continue with the typical attacking response instead of actually telling us why you feel he was wrong on his points..
Still waiting.
You'll be waiting an awfully long time, because I refuse to give that "entertainer" more views.
You'll be waiting an awfully long time, because I refuse to give that "entertainer" more views.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »Time to give some lessons to people who don't seem to understand how reviewers works.
whooligans wrote: »You know what they say about opinions Anyways, I'm enjoying the game very much and don't agree with many of his points. There are always things that could be improved upon.
I enjoy the quests, i enjoy the choices some of them give and see the outcome, i love the immersion, the world is well done, i love the graphics. This mmo for me is a fresh breath of air. But hey what do i know, obviously people who compain about the textures of rocks are more valid!
Grouping i agree with, that could be improved upon a bit better.
As far as the bugs, funny he was all positive about gw2, while it was exactly the same thing on launch. Events got bugged, quests were bugged, skills didnt work properly. Quess he forgot all about that.
My opinion after watching the video is, that he's just a clown.
Etchesketch wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Etchesketch wrote: »Yeah. it's all fun and games till the guy you choose to review your game gives his honest opinion and it's not that good.
Wait, someone chose him to review the game and this is just his honest opinion? He's not like, I dunno, doing it for views and ad revenue?
What a selfless guy, truly a noble heart.
Nobody said this..
Keep it up, you continue to prove the point.
So you're incapable of reading your own posts?
Sure I can... but I never said what you said I did. I never said he didn't want views or advertising.
I'm saying, he gave his honest opinion and I agree with almost everything he said. His advertising has nothing to do with it.
But feel free to continue with the typical attacking response instead of actually telling us why you feel he was wrong on his points..
Still waiting.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »Time to give some lessons to people who don't seem to understand how reviewers works.
Let me know when he's a reviewer and not an entertainer.
No, they're not the same thing.