nemesrichard wrote: »[Snip]
nemesrichard wrote: »I am a casual adult player as the majority of players in this game and who is here to have FUN after work and to treat myself I spend money on this game. As I see we have 2 options to get good dps. HA or 2 bars LA weaving. I dont enjoy LA weaving so I wont play it. If HA wont be good enough after nerf I wont play the game and go spend my money in another game.SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
Pls read through this and the other threads and drink a shot after every negative comment welcoming the nerf and telling negative comments about HA users. Friendly advice call the ambulance before it.
Couple of things, when U35 dropped (or was during PTS) all casuals cheered than endgamers getting *** and if you took a shot for every pro nerf for U35 you'd get an alcohol poising very fast so the tables have turned.
But back to your statement:
First of all you can have 2 bar builds without having to attack with the new mythic as it nerfs all of your LA's so that's a third option for less experienced people.
Second, HA sorcs are getting a 2-3% overall nerf that's it I really don't see the reason to panic almost every build gets slightly nerfed here and then and losing 3% overall dps is peanuts. Don't forget HA is around 40% of your overall damage on oaken HA sorc build, so very small precentage of your damage gets nerfed it's not like your build gets a flat 10% nerf! So anything you did on your sorc will still be available just that a fight will take couple of extra seconds that's it no need to panic. But like always people panic like crazy mostly people that have no idea how the game works (not you specifically but a lot of forum dwellers here) and when you show them facts that what they say is false and the nerf is way less sever they start screeching for no reason.
A lot of people crying that their build is barely working in PTS well few things, PTS has many bugs for example the dummy buffs don't fully work and class passives don't always work either so that can effect parses as well.
So tldr don't worry your build isn't getting gutted just a small tune up that's it.
I have answered your question. I literally answered you in that post. Re read it. Several times if you have to.
It is overpowered. It is going to nerfed. Either we take a small nerf now that fine tunes it, balances it, takes a few % off the top end. Nothing major. And we discuss this properly. We do this in the hopes it doesn't get nerfed into the ground.
Overpowered oakensoul builds effects me, and my game time, because I have said so many damned times now, I play a Ha build. I don't want it to get nerfed into the ground. I can still stand back and say, objectively, for the effort required, it is wildly overpowered.
Every pug I'm in is overwhelmed with heavy attack lightning. Every battleground there's heavy attackers. Heck, I'm one of them. If you can't look at this and realise how dominant it is, how ripe for a major nerf this is, and come to the table to discuss how we can dial from a 10 to a 9, we're going to get slapped down to a 4.
I just... How can you not?... I mean... Urgh...
Rkindaleft wrote: »FrancisCrawford wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
It matters little whether people actually hate my fun, or just want to lovingly and compassionately nerf it away.
No one hates that you have fun, but alot of people don't realize that while they're having fun they may be taking the fun away from others. For alot of players, vet trials are competitive content. And I don't mean whether your group just gets it cleared or not but competing with each other. Maybe its different for console players, I don't know, but as a PC player I always keep looking Hodors (live dps addon) and logs. For sure it's nice to clear, get good score, achievements or whatever, but most endgamers also care about their performance. I personally like to be high up on Hodors list. But since everyone and their mom has adopted oaken HA build, I'm getting out parsed by people who just few months ago were spamming bow light attacks in random dungeons doing 5k dps. Of course it makes me a little salty. I've put in alot of time and effort to farm gear, adapt to changes every patch, learned rotations and weaving and now I'm behind the players who hold down 1 button. I can't parse 130k so now my only option is to switch to oaken also. How is this healthy to the game if everyone uses the same build. Zos should rename the game to Elder HA Online or Elder Oaken Online.
I'm not trying to gatekeep here. I'm not saying that oaken HA should be nerfed to the ground. But the way it currently is on pts, it's still too OP. I have nothing against more people being able to do harder content, I think its great, but currently they are having fun at my expense.
As I have mentioned a couple times in this thread already, I do think Oaken HA is a pretty good thing for the overall health of the game in terms of getting players into veteran content - but even the players who swear by HA have to admit that like 90% of progression style players have picked up this build, not just because of it's "ease of access" but because the build gives substantially more benefits to players who use it compared to the players who are using LA builds and are currently at a similar skill level or even players who are slightly above them.
Let us say that the average LA build user who is progging DLC trial HMs hits anywhere between 80k-100k dps depending on sets and level of practice - and I will say that I'm probably overestimating these numbers - the exact same DPS can be provided on a build that takes 10% of the effort to hit the same numbers as you would do on a LA build, while also having significantly more resistances, 3-4k more health, 100% cleave damage, infinite sustain and all while having a rotation that consists of like 4 buttons. Unless I was trying to get runs with very high scores or trifectas in the newest trials there is literally zero reason to use anything else to complete the content as efficiently as I can on the OakenSorc.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »Rkindaleft wrote: »FrancisCrawford wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
It matters little whether people actually hate my fun, or just want to lovingly and compassionately nerf it away.
No one hates that you have fun, but alot of people don't realize that while they're having fun they may be taking the fun away from others. For alot of players, vet trials are competitive content. And I don't mean whether your group just gets it cleared or not but competing with each other. Maybe its different for console players, I don't know, but as a PC player I always keep looking Hodors (live dps addon) and logs. For sure it's nice to clear, get good score, achievements or whatever, but most endgamers also care about their performance. I personally like to be high up on Hodors list. But since everyone and their mom has adopted oaken HA build, I'm getting out parsed by people who just few months ago were spamming bow light attacks in random dungeons doing 5k dps. Of course it makes me a little salty. I've put in alot of time and effort to farm gear, adapt to changes every patch, learned rotations and weaving and now I'm behind the players who hold down 1 button. I can't parse 130k so now my only option is to switch to oaken also. How is this healthy to the game if everyone uses the same build. Zos should rename the game to Elder HA Online or Elder Oaken Online.
I'm not trying to gatekeep here. I'm not saying that oaken HA should be nerfed to the ground. But the way it currently is on pts, it's still too OP. I have nothing against more people being able to do harder content, I think its great, but currently they are having fun at my expense.
As I have mentioned a couple times in this thread already, I do think Oaken HA is a pretty good thing for the overall health of the game in terms of getting players into veteran content - but even the players who swear by HA have to admit that like 90% of progression style players have picked up this build, not just because of it's "ease of access" but because the build gives substantially more benefits to players who use it compared to the players who are using LA builds and are currently at a similar skill level or even players who are slightly above them.
Let us say that the average LA build user who is progging DLC trial HMs hits anywhere between 80k-100k dps depending on sets and level of practice - and I will say that I'm probably overestimating these numbers - the exact same DPS can be provided on a build that takes 10% of the effort to hit the same numbers as you would do on a LA build, while also having significantly more resistances, 3-4k more health, 100% cleave damage, infinite sustain and all while having a rotation that consists of like 4 buttons. Unless I was trying to get runs with very high scores or trifectas in the newest trials there is literally zero reason to use anything else to complete the content as efficiently as I can on the OakenSorc.
So if progression groups are flocking to HA builds, which builds are they using? I'd hope they include:
- A warden to give AoE Major/Minor Breach, and also the guaranteed Off-Balance from Birds -- or is a non-HA Brittleden taking care of all that?
- A templar for the Minor spell power buff.
- One or more sorcerers rotating in Dark Magic skills for the Minor crit buff.
- One or more sorcerers running Twilight Matriarch for the off-heals.
Anything else, or is the rest free choice?
kringled_1 wrote: »FrancisCrawford wrote: »Rkindaleft wrote: »FrancisCrawford wrote: »SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
It matters little whether people actually hate my fun, or just want to lovingly and compassionately nerf it away.
No one hates that you have fun, but alot of people don't realize that while they're having fun they may be taking the fun away from others. For alot of players, vet trials are competitive content. And I don't mean whether your group just gets it cleared or not but competing with each other. Maybe its different for console players, I don't know, but as a PC player I always keep looking Hodors (live dps addon) and logs. For sure it's nice to clear, get good score, achievements or whatever, but most endgamers also care about their performance. I personally like to be high up on Hodors list. But since everyone and their mom has adopted oaken HA build, I'm getting out parsed by people who just few months ago were spamming bow light attacks in random dungeons doing 5k dps. Of course it makes me a little salty. I've put in alot of time and effort to farm gear, adapt to changes every patch, learned rotations and weaving and now I'm behind the players who hold down 1 button. I can't parse 130k so now my only option is to switch to oaken also. How is this healthy to the game if everyone uses the same build. Zos should rename the game to Elder HA Online or Elder Oaken Online.
I'm not trying to gatekeep here. I'm not saying that oaken HA should be nerfed to the ground. But the way it currently is on pts, it's still too OP. I have nothing against more people being able to do harder content, I think its great, but currently they are having fun at my expense.
As I have mentioned a couple times in this thread already, I do think Oaken HA is a pretty good thing for the overall health of the game in terms of getting players into veteran content - but even the players who swear by HA have to admit that like 90% of progression style players have picked up this build, not just because of it's "ease of access" but because the build gives substantially more benefits to players who use it compared to the players who are using LA builds and are currently at a similar skill level or even players who are slightly above them.
Let us say that the average LA build user who is progging DLC trial HMs hits anywhere between 80k-100k dps depending on sets and level of practice - and I will say that I'm probably overestimating these numbers - the exact same DPS can be provided on a build that takes 10% of the effort to hit the same numbers as you would do on a LA build, while also having significantly more resistances, 3-4k more health, 100% cleave damage, infinite sustain and all while having a rotation that consists of like 4 buttons. Unless I was trying to get runs with very high scores or trifectas in the newest trials there is literally zero reason to use anything else to complete the content as efficiently as I can on the OakenSorc.
So if progression groups are flocking to HA builds, which builds are they using? I'd hope they include:
- A warden to give AoE Major/Minor Breach, and also the guaranteed Off-Balance from Birds -- or is a non-HA Brittleden taking care of all that?
- A templar for the Minor spell power buff.
- One or more sorcerers rotating in Dark Magic skills for the Minor crit buff.
- One or more sorcerers running Twilight Matriarch for the off-heals.
Anything else, or is the rest free choice?
They don't need most of that. AFAIK HA trial runs slot mostly sorcs; there may be matriarchs in there (as opposed to tormentors) but dps off heals are only useful in trials with portals/etc where dps is isolated from healers.
Dark magic yes. Templar no; theres usually a DK tank providing minor brutality.
Warden - AOE breach isnt great from them anyways, necro is better, but not usually needed, depending on the fight. Off balance - when you have so many lightning walls down, and so many sorc pets, off balance time is going to be high anyways.
nemesrichard wrote: »I am a casual adult player as the majority of players in this game and who is here to have FUN after work and to treat myself I spend money on this game. As I see we have 2 options to get good dps. HA or 2 bars LA weaving. I dont enjoy LA weaving so I wont play it. If HA wont be good enough after nerf I wont play the game and go spend my money in another game.SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
Pls read through this and the other threads and drink a shot after every negative comment welcoming the nerf and telling negative comments about HA users. Friendly advice call the ambulance before it.
What I hate about all these posts from both sides is that there is barely any middle ground where a proper discussion can be had.
Heavy attack builds have existed before Oakensoul and worked just fine. No one complained about them in PvE, since they were full two bar builds that required a bit more effort to utilize than one bar iterations. Oakensoul exists and by that logic it should achieve its purpose of making a one bar build functional and it does. If someone goes the one bar route, then that's their choice. As long as they bring their A-game to the content they choose to participate in then it shouldn't matter.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »Most people don't hate HA builds. People just think that an HA build should not be doing as much damage as a build that uses a good rotation, and an HA build certainly shouldn't be doing more damage than a build that uses a good rotation.
If a player wants to just hold one button on their mouse down all the time, they should not be doing as much or more damage than someone who is using a rotation.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »Most people don't hate HA builds. People just think that an HA build should not be doing as much damage as a build that uses a good rotation, and an HA build certainly shouldn't be doing more damage than a build that uses a good rotation.
If a player wants to just hold one button on their mouse down all the time, they should not be doing as much or more damage than someone who is using a rotation.
But why?
Why should rotation difficulty directly connect to DPS? Why can't there be different ways of playing the game with different requirements of timing, APM? Some being strict rotations, some being on demand priorities etc?
Ragnarok0130 wrote: »Because that is the dev's combat vision and they want a form of mastery for the combat
Ragnarok0130 wrote: »Because that is the dev's combat vision and they want a form of mastery for the combat
perhaps it's more of a rhetorical question.
They list reasons why the build is good, like seeing more players doing content. The question I'd ask is more specifically why it's a problem that they "inch too close". So many people have stated they find LA-weaving to be more fun and engaging anyway, isn't fun and engagement the point of games?
edit: messed up my quotation
Ragnarok0130 wrote: »Because that is the dev's combat vision and they want a form of mastery for the combat
perhaps it's more of a rhetorical question.
They list reasons why the build is good, like seeing more players doing content. The question I'd ask is more specifically why it's a problem that they "inch too close". So many people have stated they find LA-weaving to be more fun and engaging anyway, isn't fun and engagement the point of games?
edit: messed up my quotation
People who like traditional builds better are still using HA builds because they feel they have to (they don’t have to, but easiest way to do hardest content mentality) and this is happening at a mass scale. I do not agree with that thought process but there’s no convincing so many people. Only way to fix this is make traditional builds better than HA.
Ragnarok0130 wrote: »Because that is the dev's combat vision and they want a form of mastery for the combat
perhaps it's more of a rhetorical question.
They list reasons why the build is good, like seeing more players doing content. The question I'd ask is more specifically why it's a problem that they "inch too close". So many people have stated they find LA-weaving to be more fun and engaging anyway, isn't fun and engagement the point of games?
edit: messed up my quotation
People who like traditional builds better are still using HA builds because they feel they have to (they don’t have to, but easiest way to do hardest content mentality) and this is happening at a mass scale. I do not agree with that thought process but there’s no convincing so many people. Only way to fix this is make traditional builds better than HA.
I think a good way to look at it is to compare parsing to content.
Say, a two bar build can max out at 130K on a dummy parse. What is that actually in content? Probably much lower due to uptimes being different, group comp being different, following mechanics, which lowers dps and set uptimes, etc. And that 130K is also using parse food, and using zero survival skills.
Translated into trials and 4 man content, those build are going to be drastically different, and hit for far less damage. But require way more effort to maintain.
Now, take an Oakensorc build. On a dummy, that can hit 100K fairly easily. It can hit 80K without casting skills. So, take that 80K parse and apply it to actual content. Like the two bar build, buff uptimes and mechanics are going to impact damage, but, unlike the two bar build, the moment the oakensorc re-engages with a target, they are doing their max damage immediately (for the 80K, heavy attack only). So yeah, they lose out on damage by having a lower maximum DPS, but they gain a lot by being able to immediately get back to a floor level of damage right away.
Add in the zero sustain issues, ranged, and AOE damage, and it's a no brainer build for organized content.
I am all for them though, but it's pretty clear to see where two bar builds are at a disadvantage in content compared to oaken builds.
For example, my solo 2 bar build maxes out, with my skill level with weaving and sustain, at 57K or so. Plenty of DPS to clear pretty much most content outside of trifectas.
My oaken build has a DPS range of 80K-100K. 80K is the floor with me doing nothing but heavy attacks.
Those numbers are on dummy parses, but already, knowing that 2 bar build is going to drop off in DPS in actual content, the worst damage the oaken build is going to do is still 20K more damage than my solo build.
FantasticFreddie wrote: »nemesrichard wrote: »I am a casual adult player as the majority of players in this game and who is here to have FUN after work and to treat myself I spend money on this game. As I see we have 2 options to get good dps. HA or 2 bars LA weaving. I dont enjoy LA weaving so I wont play it. If HA wont be good enough after nerf I wont play the game and go spend my money in another game.SerafinaWaterstar wrote: »Oh my days!
Why are so many people in this thread so angry about HA builds enabling people to participate in more aspects of the game? Why does it matter?
There's far more people complaining about people who hate HA builds than actual people who hate HA builds.
Pls read through this and the other threads and drink a shot after every negative comment welcoming the nerf and telling negative comments about HA users. Friendly advice call the ambulance before it.
If you are a casual player this will not even affect you, stop being so dramatic.
And no, saying "this is too much power for the effort and needs a slight adjustment" is not hate.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »A number of posters have characterized the perceived problem in ways that a "slight adjustment" would be unikely to eliminate. Rather, they fundamentally don't think HA builds should be good for endgame challenges.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »A number of posters have characterized the perceived problem in ways that a "slight adjustment" would be unikely to eliminate. Rather, they fundamentally don't think HA builds should be good for endgame challenges.
The way I see it, people are asking for HA builds in general to be squashed, even though it seems to be one really specific build that is causing the most angst.
And even though I personally despise sorc pets and think Tamriel would be better without them everywhere, I think it's laughable to say that alternative builds shouldn't exist or challenge the status quo. That's why I asked why high APM should unilaterally be the best way to play.
Sorry, but I think the above dev quote is two-faced. To say that it's great more people are in endgame content, but there's too many people getting in there and doing too well, and we don't want that. I mean, pick one. If they weren't doing well, there wouldn't be many of them at all, and the increase in people doing content would not be significant.
nemesrichard wrote: »I read in a lot of comments that HASorc is too strong thats why nerf is good. Maybe you noticed that there are other classes too in this game. For example my Templar who really needs HA because class skills are weak. Do we care other classes than Sorc?
nemesrichard wrote: »I read in a lot of comments that HASorc is too strong thats why nerf is good. Maybe you noticed that there are other classes too in this game. For example my Templar who really needs HA because class skills are weak. Do we care other classes than Sorc?
Templar is getting buffed with Necrom. There are also global skills that can be used. And I know two templars myself who are both still rather good. Templar isn’t writhing in the gutter, it doesn’t NEED HA.
But anyways Sorcerer works really well with HA because it reduces the amount of skills to use even further, buffs shock damage, and has a strong burst heal. Which is why it’s the meta for HA. HA trial teams are often 1 HA support necro and the rest HAsorc.
nemesrichard wrote: »nemesrichard wrote: »I read in a lot of comments that HASorc is too strong thats why nerf is good. Maybe you noticed that there are other classes too in this game. For example my Templar who really needs HA because class skills are weak. Do we care other classes than Sorc?
Templar is getting buffed with Necrom. There are also global skills that can be used. And I know two templars myself who are both still rather good. Templar isn’t writhing in the gutter, it doesn’t NEED HA.
But anyways Sorcerer works really well with HA because it reduces the amount of skills to use even further, buffs shock damage, and has a strong burst heal. Which is why it’s the meta for HA. HA trial teams are often 1 HA support necro and the rest HAsorc.
As I remember Templar will get mainly defensive buffs so not really helpful. And you know 2 Templars who are rather good. (and how many Sorcerers do you know who are not rather good but very good?) Maybe that huge number of good Templars you know explain why they need buff or HA.