Flameweaver1951 wrote: »Two years max, before Amazon close it down.
Flameweaver1951 wrote: »Two years max, before Amazon close it down.
It's thriving NOW, what are you talking about? They are adding new servers, improved graphics for new consoles, etc. They are doing this all the while PVP players are a minority in the game. Furthermore, as I said, I seriously doubt a "huge number" of PVP players are spending a lot of money in the game. If a player is PVP-centric, they don't care about motifs, or mounts, or XP scrolls, costumes, etc... the only thing they do is log in and PVP. No questing, no crafting, etc. Sure there are those who do both PVE and PVP... but I'm speaking of those who ONLY PVP.
propertyOfUndefined wrote: »I don’t just mean the size of the world when I refer to “world building”. I actually refer just as much to the lore and the history of the world — the aedra and daedra — the dragonborn — tiber septim— the tribunal, etc. These are all things that bring the game to life for somebody like me.
One thing that ZOS can make is reduce the respawn time for World Bosses, it's too much right now. It shouldn't be more than 1 minute.
The biggest problem for ESO is that the world content is too easy making quest not interesting (and with awful rewards) particularly if you are a long time player.
Also, the gathering and crafting in New World is more interesting, at least at the start.
Based on what I've seen... it is a completely different game. One that's focused on PVP/Group PVE... one review I read stated it was worse than BDO.
Many players here are playing because of the ES lore, but also because it's a game focusing on solo content. I don't play because of lore or because of PVP or group content... I play because of the solo content. I don't believe it is a threat to ESO, if anything, it's a major threat to WOW and FFXIV.
New world seems to be a whole lot more polished so far than ESO and it's in beta. That's extremely alarming, since it makes ESO feel like it's stuck in Alpha right now and there's like 8 years of difference between the two titles. Devs are actively communicating with their playerbase in New World, updates are logical and sensical and breathe more life into the game with each release. I can't say the same about ESO in all its aspects. You, ZOS, need to start communicating and working on ESO more and listen to player feedback! Cause it's going to geta whole lot worse if you don't. Updates need to improve the game, not set it back.
Just look at player count dropping, everyone talks about it in guild chats + I'm noticing a new trend between ESO youtubers and streamers where they're all dropping ESO content for more New World beta content. Especially PvP.
Please don't let us down, ZOS. This game has the potential to be the best MMO out there if both you and us start to openly communicate and the time to do so is NOW! cause Amazon is breathing down your neck.
Amazing the callous attitude that PvEers have toward people who joined this game for PvP, especially from the beginning, but now can’t play because of ZOS’ inability to improve performance. I love PvP however I don’t take anything anything away from people who hate it.
Many even find the notion of pvping "offensive". I remember reading threads about pvers who found duelling in cities "offensive" and they "didn't want to see it". They could care less how pvpers feel, when we're entitled to enjoy the game just as much as they are. It's pretty upsetting. I'd like it if both sides got along and wished the best for each other, but there's way too much resentment for pvp for that to ever happen.
Yes, here is the link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv1Y3cSChK8I can't wait to play a game described by Josh 'Strife' Hayes (a reviewer I trust) as 'slightly above average'.