snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »[quote=snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »
So discuss it. Who was standing in your way of discussing it?
People can post comments about how they like the new regeneration without somehow preventing you from discussing AoE healing. So I don't understand what your point is suppose to be.
There is more to this game than simply healing through some AoE phase during some veteran trial. Not every comment about this subject has to revolve around this one specific circumstance and it's extremely unreasonable to expect that it should.
I personally commented on Regeneration because everyone Talking About healing in this thread is Talking About Trials. So I assumed that you too would talk About Trials and thats the reason for the answer you got from me.
It was a general comment meant to apply to all content.
The new regeneration should work well as a tool to heal DPS in any content - including trials, 4 mans, anything that involves a player taking damage and not having to use vigor themselves. It makes healers more dependable - especially in circumstances where people are spread about and taking damage.
But it literally does not, and that is why trial healers are saying you're wrong. A single-target, unreliable-target HoT does not work for us. Most healers don't run it in trials even as the dual-target HoT it is on live. This is not a thing that helps us, and definitely is not a thing that will account for multiple stacks of illustrious.
I appreciate your input, but it doesn't belong here.
I've healed trials and I disagree with you.
The new regeneration looks nice. And just because you disagree with someone - that doesn't mean their input doesn't "belong here". These forums don't belong to you.
You're right, they don't! But .. this thread is pretty focused on VET trials and the loss healers are experiencing in that context. So you can share all the feedback you want for how this helps you and the content you do .. but that doesn't make it at all applicable to the content we do and the HPS we need.
As I told you - I believe the new regeneration will be an asset to healers in any content - including your veteran trials.
Now it may not not make up the difference for your orb spamming during AoE phases. But my post was not about that - nor does everything I post need to be about that.
I won't engage with the strawman that I "spam" orbs. That's been covered to death here in the last 48hrs and you should know better by now.
Main point being, you absolutely cannot run regen in vet trials as a reliable heal even on live, and much less can you do so after the patch that makes it apply to only one (unpredictable, un-target-able) player at a time. This is just silly to argue about. Focus on the numbers.
The "your" in my post was not meant in reference to you in particular. I have no idea how you play nor do I claim to know. It was meant generally as it relates to the debate as to whether or not orb spamming was the only viable way to heal during AoE phases. So that wasn't meant as a strawman. It was me merely point out that's not a topic I was engaging.
And why on earth can't you run regen in a vet trial?
Because you are looking at (6 on live, 12 on PTS) global cooldowns for an underwhelming HPS number that would require most of your resources and most of your GCD time to keep running. You cannot target it, you cannot control it, and it does not always even apply to people missing the buff because ZoS has such a buggy combat system.
It literally just does not work. It is not worthy of the time required to keep it running even as it exists on live, much less after the target number nerf as it is on PTS. It is inefficient on a good day.
t may not work as an effective replacement for orb or healing spring spamming during an AoE phase in a veteran trial - but as a healing tool generally it's an improvement and should help healers heal other players more effectively outside of that one occurrence you keep bringing up.
"That one occurrence" ... aka, the heal checks we are all concerned about?
You're right. Outside of those heal checks we are all worried about meeting, healing will be fine. It's like you don't understand what we keep saying in plain English: we cannot meet those heal checks with these numbers. And if you don't understand that, or don't interact with that, then your input is irrelevant to this specific subject.
No - it's like you don't understand not everyone else is only concerned with what you are.
I've told you at least 3 times now that one specific circumstance is not what I'm talking about. And if you don't like what I"m talking about - simply ignore my posts. Demanding that I only talk about what you want to talk about otherwise I should get off the forum is ridiculous.
I never, ever said you should get off the forum. Please take a breath.
I said your input is irrelevant to this one specific circumstance if you are not interested in meeting the heal checks we are all concerned about meeting. It's quoted right there above what you said in response. Idk what else to tell ya, bud.
You certainly gave that impression by saying I shouldn't be giving my "input" And I"m perfectly relaxed. I don't need to take a breath. Not sure why you think I'm angry or excited. I'm neither, trust me.
But you don't speak for everyone else. You keep talking as if you speak for "all" when I imagine it's only a tiny minority of people who play this game who even do veteran trials. So this idea unless you are talking about AoE phases during a veteran trial your input is irrelevant is silly.
I also don't know what else to tell you either - other than to suggest you simply ignore my comments if they're not talking about something you want to be talking about.
Okay. Have a nice night, then.
For perspective tho, the reason why people are telling you "don't comment if it doesn't affect you" is ... because you keep telling us it doesn't affect you lol.
This does affect me though - meaning the topic generally.
One of the reasons I quit my healer is I got sick of people demanding that I spam orbs and the lack of an effective heal that was omnidirectional.
These changes fix both of these problems for me. So naturally I'm going to defend them. It may even get me into healing again.
But ... neither of those things are an actual legitimate issue in healing as it exists on live. So I fail to see your point, as a healer main on live.
They were an issue for me. So they are "actual legitimate issues" as far as I am concerned.
Trying to heal pugs with directional frontal heals and stacking positional heals is a nightmare. So this new regeneration is going to be a God sent for me if it works like It appears to me it does. And I no longer have to worry about some member pestering me to spam orbs either. Which will be nice.
Though if it's as buggy as you claim I may end up being disappointed with it.
snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »[quote=snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »
So discuss it. Who was standing in your way of discussing it?
People can post comments about how they like the new regeneration without somehow preventing you from discussing AoE healing. So I don't understand what your point is suppose to be.
There is more to this game than simply healing through some AoE phase during some veteran trial. Not every comment about this subject has to revolve around this one specific circumstance and it's extremely unreasonable to expect that it should.
I personally commented on Regeneration because everyone Talking About healing in this thread is Talking About Trials. So I assumed that you too would talk About Trials and thats the reason for the answer you got from me.
It was a general comment meant to apply to all content.
The new regeneration should work well as a tool to heal DPS in any content - including trials, 4 mans, anything that involves a player taking damage and not having to use vigor themselves. It makes healers more dependable - especially in circumstances where people are spread about and taking damage.
But it literally does not, and that is why trial healers are saying you're wrong. A single-target, unreliable-target HoT does not work for us. Most healers don't run it in trials even as the dual-target HoT it is on live. This is not a thing that helps us, and definitely is not a thing that will account for multiple stacks of illustrious.
I appreciate your input, but it doesn't belong here.
I've healed trials and I disagree with you.
The new regeneration looks nice. And just because you disagree with someone - that doesn't mean their input doesn't "belong here". These forums don't belong to you.
You're right, they don't! But .. this thread is pretty focused on VET trials and the loss healers are experiencing in that context. So you can share all the feedback you want for how this helps you and the content you do .. but that doesn't make it at all applicable to the content we do and the HPS we need.
As I told you - I believe the new regeneration will be an asset to healers in any content - including your veteran trials.
Now it may not not make up the difference for your orb spamming during AoE phases. But my post was not about that - nor does everything I post need to be about that.
I won't engage with the strawman that I "spam" orbs. That's been covered to death here in the last 48hrs and you should know better by now.
Main point being, you absolutely cannot run regen in vet trials as a reliable heal even on live, and much less can you do so after the patch that makes it apply to only one (unpredictable, un-target-able) player at a time. This is just silly to argue about. Focus on the numbers.
The "your" in my post was not meant in reference to you in particular. I have no idea how you play nor do I claim to know. It was meant generally as it relates to the debate as to whether or not orb spamming was the only viable way to heal during AoE phases. So that wasn't meant as a strawman. It was me merely point out that's not a topic I was engaging.
And why on earth can't you run regen in a vet trial?
Because you are looking at (6 on live, 12 on PTS) global cooldowns for an underwhelming HPS number that would require most of your resources and most of your GCD time to keep running. You cannot target it, you cannot control it, and it does not always even apply to people missing the buff because ZoS has such a buggy combat system.
It literally just does not work. It is not worthy of the time required to keep it running even as it exists on live, much less after the target number nerf as it is on PTS. It is inefficient on a good day.
t may not work as an effective replacement for orb or healing spring spamming during an AoE phase in a veteran trial - but as a healing tool generally it's an improvement and should help healers heal other players more effectively outside of that one occurrence you keep bringing up.
"That one occurrence" ... aka, the heal checks we are all concerned about?
You're right. Outside of those heal checks we are all worried about meeting, healing will be fine. It's like you don't understand what we keep saying in plain English: we cannot meet those heal checks with these numbers. And if you don't understand that, or don't interact with that, then your input is irrelevant to this specific subject.
No - it's like you don't understand not everyone else is only concerned with what you are.
I've told you at least 3 times now that one specific circumstance is not what I'm talking about. And if you don't like what I"m talking about - simply ignore my posts. Demanding that I only talk about what you want to talk about otherwise I should get off the forum is ridiculous.
I never, ever said you should get off the forum. Please take a breath.
I said your input is irrelevant to this one specific circumstance if you are not interested in meeting the heal checks we are all concerned about meeting. It's quoted right there above what you said in response. Idk what else to tell ya, bud.
You certainly gave that impression by saying I shouldn't be giving my "input" And I"m perfectly relaxed. I don't need to take a breath. Not sure why you think I'm angry or excited. I'm neither, trust me.
But you don't speak for everyone else. You keep talking as if you speak for "all" when I imagine it's only a tiny minority of people who play this game who even do veteran trials. So this idea unless you are talking about AoE phases during a veteran trial your input is irrelevant is silly.
I also don't know what else to tell you either - other than to suggest you simply ignore my comments if they're not talking about something you want to be talking about.
Okay. Have a nice night, then.
For perspective tho, the reason why people are telling you "don't comment if it doesn't affect you" is ... because you keep telling us it doesn't affect you lol.
This does affect me though - meaning the topic generally.
One of the reasons I quit my healer is I got sick of people demanding that I spam orbs and the lack of an effective heal that was omnidirectional.
These changes fix both of these problems for me. So naturally I'm going to defend them. It may even get me into healing again.
But ... neither of those things are an actual legitimate issue in healing as it exists on live. So I fail to see your point, as a healer main on live.
They were an issue for me. So they are "actual legitimate issues" as far as I am concerned.
Trying to heal pugs with directional frontal heals and stacking positional heals is a nightmare. So this new regeneration is going to be a God sent for me if it works like It appears to me it does. And I no longer have to worry about some member pestering me to spam orbs either. Which will be nice.
Though if it's as buggy as you claim I may end up being disappointed with it.
Give me your thought when you will Just spam Régénération to keep it up on a 12 player party. you are kind of funny, dont want to spam orbs but want to spam Regeneration 😂
snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »[quote=snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »
So discuss it. Who was standing in your way of discussing it?
People can post comments about how they like the new regeneration without somehow preventing you from discussing AoE healing. So I don't understand what your point is suppose to be.
There is more to this game than simply healing through some AoE phase during some veteran trial. Not every comment about this subject has to revolve around this one specific circumstance and it's extremely unreasonable to expect that it should.
I personally commented on Regeneration because everyone Talking About healing in this thread is Talking About Trials. So I assumed that you too would talk About Trials and thats the reason for the answer you got from me.
It was a general comment meant to apply to all content.
The new regeneration should work well as a tool to heal DPS in any content - including trials, 4 mans, anything that involves a player taking damage and not having to use vigor themselves. It makes healers more dependable - especially in circumstances where people are spread about and taking damage.
But it literally does not, and that is why trial healers are saying you're wrong. A single-target, unreliable-target HoT does not work for us. Most healers don't run it in trials even as the dual-target HoT it is on live. This is not a thing that helps us, and definitely is not a thing that will account for multiple stacks of illustrious.
I appreciate your input, but it doesn't belong here.
I've healed trials and I disagree with you.
The new regeneration looks nice. And just because you disagree with someone - that doesn't mean their input doesn't "belong here". These forums don't belong to you.
You're right, they don't! But .. this thread is pretty focused on VET trials and the loss healers are experiencing in that context. So you can share all the feedback you want for how this helps you and the content you do .. but that doesn't make it at all applicable to the content we do and the HPS we need.
As I told you - I believe the new regeneration will be an asset to healers in any content - including your veteran trials.
Now it may not not make up the difference for your orb spamming during AoE phases. But my post was not about that - nor does everything I post need to be about that.
I won't engage with the strawman that I "spam" orbs. That's been covered to death here in the last 48hrs and you should know better by now.
Main point being, you absolutely cannot run regen in vet trials as a reliable heal even on live, and much less can you do so after the patch that makes it apply to only one (unpredictable, un-target-able) player at a time. This is just silly to argue about. Focus on the numbers.
The "your" in my post was not meant in reference to you in particular. I have no idea how you play nor do I claim to know. It was meant generally as it relates to the debate as to whether or not orb spamming was the only viable way to heal during AoE phases. So that wasn't meant as a strawman. It was me merely point out that's not a topic I was engaging.
And why on earth can't you run regen in a vet trial?
Because you are looking at (6 on live, 12 on PTS) global cooldowns for an underwhelming HPS number that would require most of your resources and most of your GCD time to keep running. You cannot target it, you cannot control it, and it does not always even apply to people missing the buff because ZoS has such a buggy combat system.
It literally just does not work. It is not worthy of the time required to keep it running even as it exists on live, much less after the target number nerf as it is on PTS. It is inefficient on a good day.
t may not work as an effective replacement for orb or healing spring spamming during an AoE phase in a veteran trial - but as a healing tool generally it's an improvement and should help healers heal other players more effectively outside of that one occurrence you keep bringing up.
"That one occurrence" ... aka, the heal checks we are all concerned about?
You're right. Outside of those heal checks we are all worried about meeting, healing will be fine. It's like you don't understand what we keep saying in plain English: we cannot meet those heal checks with these numbers. And if you don't understand that, or don't interact with that, then your input is irrelevant to this specific subject.
No - it's like you don't understand not everyone else is only concerned with what you are.
I've told you at least 3 times now that one specific circumstance is not what I'm talking about. And if you don't like what I"m talking about - simply ignore my posts. Demanding that I only talk about what you want to talk about otherwise I should get off the forum is ridiculous.
I never, ever said you should get off the forum. Please take a breath.
I said your input is irrelevant to this one specific circumstance if you are not interested in meeting the heal checks we are all concerned about meeting. It's quoted right there above what you said in response. Idk what else to tell ya, bud.
You certainly gave that impression by saying I shouldn't be giving my "input" And I"m perfectly relaxed. I don't need to take a breath. Not sure why you think I'm angry or excited. I'm neither, trust me.
But you don't speak for everyone else. You keep talking as if you speak for "all" when I imagine it's only a tiny minority of people who play this game who even do veteran trials. So this idea unless you are talking about AoE phases during a veteran trial your input is irrelevant is silly.
I also don't know what else to tell you either - other than to suggest you simply ignore my comments if they're not talking about something you want to be talking about.
Okay. Have a nice night, then.
For perspective tho, the reason why people are telling you "don't comment if it doesn't affect you" is ... because you keep telling us it doesn't affect you lol.
This does affect me though - meaning the topic generally.
One of the reasons I quit my healer is I got sick of people demanding that I spam orbs and the lack of an effective heal that was omnidirectional.
These changes fix both of these problems for me. So naturally I'm going to defend them. It may even get me into healing again.
But ... neither of those things are an actual legitimate issue in healing as it exists on live. So I fail to see your point, as a healer main on live.
They were an issue for me. So they are "actual legitimate issues" as far as I am concerned.
Trying to heal pugs with directional frontal heals and stacking positional heals is a nightmare. So this new regeneration is going to be a God sent for me if it works like It appears to me it does. And I no longer have to worry about some member pestering me to spam orbs either. Which will be nice.
Though if it's as buggy as you claim I may end up being disappointed with it.
Give me your thought when you will Just spam Régénération to keep it up on a 12 player party. you are kind of funny, dont want to spam orbs but want to spam Regeneration 😂
You are taking me out of context.
In one post all I did was suggest maybe someone should try using the new regeneration to compensate for the nerfs to orbs and healing springs. I never suggested anyone should continuously spam it - and I didn't even say it would work. All i did was suggest maybe they should give it a try. So I don't know why people keep obsessing over that one comment.
As I've said multiple times now - none of my comments are really about healing through AoE damage during a veteran trial and that has nothing to do with why I support the changes to regeneration.
In fact - the new design of the spell seems adverse to spamming in all honesty - and seems almost as if it is now meant to be used as a direct single target heal. Which will be nice. But it may or may not be able to help compensate for the other nerfs. It was just an idea I suggested they try. Sue me. What's funny to me is what a big deal people make out of the silliest things.
snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »[quote=snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »snarkomatic wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »
So discuss it. Who was standing in your way of discussing it?
People can post comments about how they like the new regeneration without somehow preventing you from discussing AoE healing. So I don't understand what your point is suppose to be.
There is more to this game than simply healing through some AoE phase during some veteran trial. Not every comment about this subject has to revolve around this one specific circumstance and it's extremely unreasonable to expect that it should.
I personally commented on Regeneration because everyone Talking About healing in this thread is Talking About Trials. So I assumed that you too would talk About Trials and thats the reason for the answer you got from me.
It was a general comment meant to apply to all content.
The new regeneration should work well as a tool to heal DPS in any content - including trials, 4 mans, anything that involves a player taking damage and not having to use vigor themselves. It makes healers more dependable - especially in circumstances where people are spread about and taking damage.
But it literally does not, and that is why trial healers are saying you're wrong. A single-target, unreliable-target HoT does not work for us. Most healers don't run it in trials even as the dual-target HoT it is on live. This is not a thing that helps us, and definitely is not a thing that will account for multiple stacks of illustrious.
I appreciate your input, but it doesn't belong here.
I've healed trials and I disagree with you.
The new regeneration looks nice. And just because you disagree with someone - that doesn't mean their input doesn't "belong here". These forums don't belong to you.
You're right, they don't! But .. this thread is pretty focused on VET trials and the loss healers are experiencing in that context. So you can share all the feedback you want for how this helps you and the content you do .. but that doesn't make it at all applicable to the content we do and the HPS we need.
As I told you - I believe the new regeneration will be an asset to healers in any content - including your veteran trials.
Now it may not not make up the difference for your orb spamming during AoE phases. But my post was not about that - nor does everything I post need to be about that.
I won't engage with the strawman that I "spam" orbs. That's been covered to death here in the last 48hrs and you should know better by now.
Main point being, you absolutely cannot run regen in vet trials as a reliable heal even on live, and much less can you do so after the patch that makes it apply to only one (unpredictable, un-target-able) player at a time. This is just silly to argue about. Focus on the numbers.
The "your" in my post was not meant in reference to you in particular. I have no idea how you play nor do I claim to know. It was meant generally as it relates to the debate as to whether or not orb spamming was the only viable way to heal during AoE phases. So that wasn't meant as a strawman. It was me merely point out that's not a topic I was engaging.
And why on earth can't you run regen in a vet trial?
Because you are looking at (6 on live, 12 on PTS) global cooldowns for an underwhelming HPS number that would require most of your resources and most of your GCD time to keep running. You cannot target it, you cannot control it, and it does not always even apply to people missing the buff because ZoS has such a buggy combat system.
It literally just does not work. It is not worthy of the time required to keep it running even as it exists on live, much less after the target number nerf as it is on PTS. It is inefficient on a good day.
t may not work as an effective replacement for orb or healing spring spamming during an AoE phase in a veteran trial - but as a healing tool generally it's an improvement and should help healers heal other players more effectively outside of that one occurrence you keep bringing up.
"That one occurrence" ... aka, the heal checks we are all concerned about?
You're right. Outside of those heal checks we are all worried about meeting, healing will be fine. It's like you don't understand what we keep saying in plain English: we cannot meet those heal checks with these numbers. And if you don't understand that, or don't interact with that, then your input is irrelevant to this specific subject.
No - it's like you don't understand not everyone else is only concerned with what you are.
I've told you at least 3 times now that one specific circumstance is not what I'm talking about. And if you don't like what I"m talking about - simply ignore my posts. Demanding that I only talk about what you want to talk about otherwise I should get off the forum is ridiculous.
I never, ever said you should get off the forum. Please take a breath.
I said your input is irrelevant to this one specific circumstance if you are not interested in meeting the heal checks we are all concerned about meeting. It's quoted right there above what you said in response. Idk what else to tell ya, bud.
You certainly gave that impression by saying I shouldn't be giving my "input" And I"m perfectly relaxed. I don't need to take a breath. Not sure why you think I'm angry or excited. I'm neither, trust me.
But you don't speak for everyone else. You keep talking as if you speak for "all" when I imagine it's only a tiny minority of people who play this game who even do veteran trials. So this idea unless you are talking about AoE phases during a veteran trial your input is irrelevant is silly.
I also don't know what else to tell you either - other than to suggest you simply ignore my comments if they're not talking about something you want to be talking about.
Okay. Have a nice night, then.
For perspective tho, the reason why people are telling you "don't comment if it doesn't affect you" is ... because you keep telling us it doesn't affect you lol.
This does affect me though - meaning the topic generally.
One of the reasons I quit my healer is I got sick of people demanding that I spam orbs and the lack of an effective heal that was omnidirectional.
These changes fix both of these problems for me. So naturally I'm going to defend them. It may even get me into healing again.
But ... neither of those things are an actual legitimate issue in healing as it exists on live. So I fail to see your point, as a healer main on live.
They were an issue for me. So they are "actual legitimate issues" as far as I am concerned.
Trying to heal pugs with directional frontal heals and stacking positional heals is a nightmare. So this new regeneration is going to be a God sent for me if it works like It appears to me it does. And I no longer have to worry about some member pestering me to spam orbs either. Which will be nice.
Though if it's as buggy as you claim I may end up being disappointed with it.
Give me your thought when you will Just spam Régénération to keep it up on a 12 player party. you are kind of funny, dont want to spam orbs but want to spam Regeneration 😂
You are taking me out of context.
In one post all I did was suggest maybe someone should try using the new regeneration to compensate for the nerfs to orbs and healing springs. I never suggested anyone should continuously spam it - and I didn't even say it would work. All i did was suggest maybe they should give it a try. So I don't know why people keep obsessing over that one comment.
As I've said multiple times now - none of my comments are really about healing through AoE damage during a veteran trial and that has nothing to do with why I support the changes to regeneration.
In fact - the new design of the spell seems adverse to spamming in all honesty - and seems almost as if it is now meant to be used as a direct single target heal. Which will be nice. But it may or may not be able to help compensate for the other nerfs. It was just an idea I suggested they try. Sue me. What's funny to me is what a big deal people make out of the silliest things.
Not talking you out of context, Regeneration is unplayable in trial (EXCEPTION FOR vAS).
This spell got a pve nerf but a pvp buff especially in BG.
The problem, why everyone is fed up of you because you are saying "i dont want to use regeneration for compensate lost of healing springs for aoe heal damage" but the problem with this patch (and why everyone, except People like you Who doesnt know s**t about healing, are sreaming btw) Is that we have NOTHING to compensate the lack of heal without the current live server healing springs.
The silliest thing Hum ? You are the one Who is stuck in repeat mode with no arguments when everyone show you how you are wrong. And you keep spamming the forum with your genius idea of Regeneration, so yeah you pissed off everyone do not be surprise
Jeremy: I’ve healed plenty of normal trials myself, but never Vet. I would never presume that I know what is needed for healing in a Vet trial unless I’ve been in that situation, and neither should you. In most cases, normal trials are fairly easy to heal and you may not need much more than Regen. But I’ve DPS’d Vet trials and I can tell you that going from normal to Vet is a night and day difference. I’m sure the same could be said about the healing requirements.
@Jeremy and how many times did People told you why you Just dont have to give it try because this skills is worthless (in pve trial) ?
Why do you want to use this spell if we dont neet it then ? We want to compensate healing springs heal potency, and you are here claiming that you have something useless to try ?
And Now the worst ? Again you dont have any arguments so "People have to find better way to be pissed off". Dude come on, you are in a dead end so stop this
Jeremy: I’ve healed plenty of normal trials myself, but never Vet. I would never presume that I know what is needed for healing in a Vet trial unless I’ve been in that situation, and neither should you. In most cases, normal trials are fairly easy to heal and you may not need much more than Regen. But I’ve DPS’d Vet trials and I can tell you that going from normal to Vet is a night and day difference. I’m sure the same could be said about the healing requirements.
The problem with your post Ashtaris is that I never did presume to know what is needed - for anything, normal or vet trials. You're simply making things up and accusing me of doing things I never did.
I must be really fun to debate with or something...
Jeremy: I’ve healed plenty of normal trials myself, but never Vet. I would never presume that I know what is needed for healing in a Vet trial unless I’ve been in that situation, and neither should you. In most cases, normal trials are fairly easy to heal and you may not need much more than Regen. But I’ve DPS’d Vet trials and I can tell you that going from normal to Vet is a night and day difference. I’m sure the same could be said about the healing requirements.
The problem with your post Ashtaris is that I never did presume to know what is needed - for anything, normal or vet trials. You're simply making things up and accusing me of doing things I never did.
I must be really fun to debate with or something...
So if you dont know (cause you say you never assumed to) what it is to heal th) end game content (pve trial hm to be clear), why are you even here being your science ?
It s the same if you go talk with doctor Who works on a cancer cure and sayed "hey dont worry ! Try to take this pill !"
So tell me litlle genius, how will you heal vCR+3 execute phase or vHoF HM execute phase with the current pts state ? You dont want your healer to spam healing springs/orb ? OK. But tell me how the hell do i have to burst heal 12 People. And stop saying "Healing is Just about spamming orb" *wine wine wine* if you are a healer you drop 6 orb every 20 seconds (in trials) otherwise it is 3 in dunjeon.
Your post clearly show you know nothing about healing. Spamming orb... What about keeping combat prier up? Elemental punction ? Blockade ? Power of Light ? So stop doing the PGM on subject that you dont even have a damn clue like every noob who is supporting the change.
What you should do Jeremy is bring in your healer next patch and heal a few Vet trials, get a taste of what it’s really like. The only way you will know is to try it yourself. Then if you are successful, you can boast about your achievements and tell the rest of us to eat crow
RogueShark wrote: »@Jeremy
Hey instead of just saying the same thing over and over, why not address action points and questions that you seem to ignore? Do you not have an answer to posts like this? (I don't necessarily agree with the aggressive tone of the poster below, but they make valid points and you... just went on posting the same nonsense to other people instead of giving a valid point in return.)
RogueShark wrote: »@Jeremy
Hey instead of just saying the same thing over and over, why not address action points and questions that you seem to ignore? Do you not have an answer to posts like this? (I don't necessarily agree with the aggressive tone of the poster below, but they make valid points and you... just went on posting the same nonsense to other people instead of giving a valid point in return.)
And what points and questions are those?
If you want me to address specific points and questions - you need to tell me what they are. I'm not a mind reader.
RogueShark wrote: »RogueShark wrote: »@Jeremy
Hey instead of just saying the same thing over and over, why not address action points and questions that you seem to ignore? Do you not have an answer to posts like this? (I don't necessarily agree with the aggressive tone of the poster below, but they make valid points and you... just went on posting the same nonsense to other people instead of giving a valid point in return.)
And what points and questions are those?
If you want me to address specific points and questions - you need to tell me what they are. I'm not a mind reader.
Literally the one I quoted below.
RogueShark wrote: »Because you're in favor of these changes, all the way, no contest. So why not start refuting the points against them? Instead, you just say the same things over and over without actually addressing the clear-cut issues presented in argument.
Do you have no points against the ones made in that post?
RogueShark wrote: »You're right. Maybe I expect too much. People who are against these changes have posted several thoughtful reasons why they are not good, and in which situations they are. Many people who are for these changes never seem to want to address those specific issues, because it doesn't matter to them, so why should they care? I was simply assuming you would be interested in actually making a point or having some kind of idea as to what can be done in these situations, from the depths of your knowledge.
If you're legitimately fine with saying "F everyone else, I'm getting what I want" with zero interest in understanding why it's a legitimate problem for a large number of people, then there's really no point to discuss it further. You're welcome to feel that way. But then it's also kind of senseless to come posting on these threads acting like you know a lick healing and what it requires, just because you're happy you get to spam regen in dungeons now and don't have to be bothered to throw more than one orb at a time.
RogueShark wrote: »@Jeremy
Hey instead of just saying the same thing over and over, why not address action points and questions that you seem to ignore? Do you not have an answer to posts like this? (I don't necessarily agree with the aggressive tone of the poster below, but they make valid points and you... just went on posting the same nonsense to other people instead of giving a valid point in return.)
So tell me litlle genius, how will you heal vCR+3 execute phase or vHoF HM execute phase with the current pts state ? You dont want your healer to spam healing springs/orb ? OK. But tell me how the hell do i have to burst heal 12 People. And stop saying "Healing is Just about spamming orb" *wine wine wine* if you are a healer you drop 6 orb every 20 seconds (in trials) otherwise it is 3 in dunjeon.
Your post clearly show you know nothing about healing. Spamming orb... What about keeping combat prier up? Elemental punction ? Blockade ? Power of Light ? So stop doing the PGM on subject that you dont even have a damn clue like every noob who is supporting the change.
You can be fine with these changes as a normal trial healer, or someone who just likes to do 4man content where healers aren't even needed (even vBRP can be done with 1 Tank + 2dd and dead weight paying for a carry). But how about some acknowledgment for the fact that there is content in this game that may very well be impossible for healers to beat the healcheck now, and that they are making off-meta healers practically worthless due to lack of supplying them with adequate tools to handle these nerfs? Your lack of understanding and 'It's all about me!' mentality with zero compassion for people who prog and do harder end-game content is baffling.
It may not affect you, personally, but it does a LOT of other people, as evident by the 'uproar' over these changes. You don't HAVE to be an endgame trial raider or know anything about it to realize why these changes are unhealthy. People continue to debate and argue with you because you sound like a jerk, gleeful at other's dismay because it won't bother you at all in your normal trials and 4man content.
RogueShark wrote: »I'm hardly angry at you, I am frustrated at people who don't set foot in the kind of content or play the off-meta classes where these tools are vital strutting around celebrating an 'end' to spamming orbs/springs when the reality of it is they're just encouraging you to spam combat prayer now.
The biggest issue with these changes isn't necessarily that they're changing: it's that they're changing now while failing to provide toolkits needed, especially to non-wardens and non-templars, to handle difficult content that was designed around the use and "spam" of healing springs. They're gutting the entire healing process and playstyle and blatantly saying that we're getting a costly stamina heal, and ritual, which is only for templars, to make up for it.
You can dislike the "old" healing style all you want, but what they're doing now is not the way to go about making changes effectively.
I Totally agree with your point Man,
What i said is "there is some fight even the Best optimised group cant beat"
But there is also the problem that a lot of casual player, or mid tier will Just have to much problem to heal if it goes live. Even if the group placement is Nice or whatever, and it is a fair point
RogueShark wrote: »
As for @Jeremy
Awesome. You think they should give other healers more stuff. Cool. But they aren't looking like they're going to do that, are they? Any patch notes about changing skills for DKs/NBs/Sorcs? Any hint that our toolkits will be redone before the patch drops so that we aren't boned for however long it takes them to maybe give us some class skills?
You advocate for these changes without consideration for how poorly it affects others. You can say all you want that 'o yes they should make sure to make up for these nerfs!' but since there is no indication that the devs plan on doing that right now, it's a hollow statement. Your remarks all read as "Yay! I can spam regen and not worry about supplying multiple orbs! Shame about people who do content that requires more, but oooh well! Maybe they'll get something to compensate some day.'
And why on earth can't you run regen in a vet trial?
Why can't you run regeneration in a veteran trial?
That was actually an honest question as it was bizarre to me when people told me you couldn't...
When I used to heal trials I certainly used regeneration. Maybe it would help if you would just answer people's questions instead of trying to insult them.