Maintenance for the week of January 6:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 8, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 13:00 UTC (8:00AM EST)

The "Balance" of Mag Sorcs

  • Frozen_Heart246
    Frozen_Heart246
    ✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    He fight against players who dont even know how to break free. this is a pve zerg. Try to fight agains a real pvp group and sorc will die in less then a minute.
  • Thogard
    Thogard
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Ok but negate is probably the most important ult (or at least it was until necro) for medium scale and large scale organized PvP

    Not objecting that. Still it´s the only reason to bring sorcs because everything else is performed better by other classes. Which was kinda my point.

    I’m not exactly part of the “sorcs are super OP team” but I feel like you aren’t really thinking about the arguments you make before you make them.

    “Yeah sorcs arent OP they just do the single most important thing and if they didn’t have that thing that makes them OP we’d bring other classes who are better in ways that aren’t nearly as important”

    Yup.

    Oh but why would someone bring a magsorc for that single most important thing we´re talking about - and this is a magsorc topic after all...

    I don´t really feel going into the discussion anymore as it´s basically history repeating itself. Sorc OP bc it´s a negate bot is sth people were arguing in 2014 about :smiley:
    Seraphayel wrote: »
    Thraben wrote: »
    WoppaBoem wrote: »

    Vigor can be applied twice. 1 by yourself and 1 the AoE of someone else. You cannot have 6 vigors active.

    ?

    The OLD cap was at 3 vigors of each type that could stack.


    They abolished the cap at some point in the past, though.

    Sure about that? I think I have never seen more than one Vigor HoT active at a time on my character.
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    Stam classes have to be on the target to do dmg. Mag sorcs can stay at range. This crafty positioning allows them to thin out enemy players far more effectively than Stam can. The flip side is that Stam can LOS better. But only slightly better.

    Mag sorc doesn’t have to commit to a fight the same way that a Stam / melee build has to. And that is extremely strong for both 1vX and BG play.
    PC NA - @dazkt - Dazk Ardoonkt / Sir Thogalot / Dask Dragoh’t / Dazk Dragoh’t / El Thogardo

    Stream: twitch.tv/THOGARDvsThePeasants
    YouTube: http://youtube.com/c/thogardpvp


  • Illuvatarr
    Illuvatarr
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    All of the other classes are better than sorcs in the hands of equally skilled players. Sorcs appear strong because they eradicate unsuspecting players or inexperienced players.
  • Derra
    Derra
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Ok but negate is probably the most important ult (or at least it was until necro) for medium scale and large scale organized PvP

    Not objecting that. Still it´s the only reason to bring sorcs because everything else is performed better by other classes. Which was kinda my point.

    I’m not exactly part of the “sorcs are super OP team” but I feel like you aren’t really thinking about the arguments you make before you make them.

    “Yeah sorcs arent OP they just do the single most important thing and if they didn’t have that thing that makes them OP we’d bring other classes who are better in ways that aren’t nearly as important”

    Yup.

    Oh but why would someone bring a magsorc for that single most important thing we´re talking about - and this is a magsorc topic after all...

    I don´t really feel going into the discussion anymore as it´s basically history repeating itself. Sorc OP bc it´s a negate bot is sth people were arguing in 2014 about :smiley:
    Seraphayel wrote: »
    Thraben wrote: »
    WoppaBoem wrote: »

    Vigor can be applied twice. 1 by yourself and 1 the AoE of someone else. You cannot have 6 vigors active.

    ?

    The OLD cap was at 3 vigors of each type that could stack.


    They abolished the cap at some point in the past, though.

    Sure about that? I think I have never seen more than one Vigor HoT active at a time on my character.
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    Stam classes have to be on the target to do dmg. Mag sorcs can stay at range. This crafty positioning allows them to thin out enemy players far more effectively than Stam can. The flip side is that Stam can LOS better. But only slightly better.

    Mag sorc doesn’t have to commit to a fight the same way that a Stam / melee build has to. And that is extremely strong for both 1vX and BG play.

    And in what way is that relevant to negating in a larger group???
    <Noricum>
    I live. I die. I live again.

    Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
    Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 50

  • Malamar1229
    Malamar1229
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Not trying to downplay Faso or Malcom but I can farm horrible players as well. I had an entire raid chase me around for a good 5 minutes before killing me. So that means nerfs right?
  • Malamar1229
    Malamar1229
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the pet issue is addressed and gutted to a point magsorcs arent slotting prts, the class would need adjustments. Non pet magicka sorc is no where near pet sorc
    Edited by Malamar1229 on June 27, 2019 9:51PM
  • Thogard
    Thogard
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Ok but negate is probably the most important ult (or at least it was until necro) for medium scale and large scale organized PvP

    Not objecting that. Still it´s the only reason to bring sorcs because everything else is performed better by other classes. Which was kinda my point.

    I’m not exactly part of the “sorcs are super OP team” but I feel like you aren’t really thinking about the arguments you make before you make them.

    “Yeah sorcs arent OP they just do the single most important thing and if they didn’t have that thing that makes them OP we’d bring other classes who are better in ways that aren’t nearly as important”

    Yup.

    Oh but why would someone bring a magsorc for that single most important thing we´re talking about - and this is a magsorc topic after all...

    I don´t really feel going into the discussion anymore as it´s basically history repeating itself. Sorc OP bc it´s a negate bot is sth people were arguing in 2014 about :smiley:
    Seraphayel wrote: »
    Thraben wrote: »
    WoppaBoem wrote: »

    Vigor can be applied twice. 1 by yourself and 1 the AoE of someone else. You cannot have 6 vigors active.

    ?

    The OLD cap was at 3 vigors of each type that could stack.


    They abolished the cap at some point in the past, though.

    Sure about that? I think I have never seen more than one Vigor HoT active at a time on my character.
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    Stam classes have to be on the target to do dmg. Mag sorcs can stay at range. This crafty positioning allows them to thin out enemy players far more effectively than Stam can. The flip side is that Stam can LOS better. But only slightly better.

    Mag sorc doesn’t have to commit to a fight the same way that a Stam / melee build has to. And that is extremely strong for both 1vX and BG play.

    And in what way is that relevant to negating in a larger group???

    What?
    PC NA - @dazkt - Dazk Ardoonkt / Sir Thogalot / Dask Dragoh’t / Dazk Dragoh’t / El Thogardo

    Stream: twitch.tv/THOGARDvsThePeasants
    YouTube: http://youtube.com/c/thogardpvp


  • PhoenixGrey
    PhoenixGrey
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    There are clips of stam dk's and nightblades doing it as well. That's no justification in nerfing a class

    Only average players or potatoes would scream nerf looking at 1vx videos posted by top tier players
  • Derra
    Derra
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Ok but negate is probably the most important ult (or at least it was until necro) for medium scale and large scale organized PvP

    Not objecting that. Still it´s the only reason to bring sorcs because everything else is performed better by other classes. Which was kinda my point.

    I’m not exactly part of the “sorcs are super OP team” but I feel like you aren’t really thinking about the arguments you make before you make them.

    “Yeah sorcs arent OP they just do the single most important thing and if they didn’t have that thing that makes them OP we’d bring other classes who are better in ways that aren’t nearly as important”

    Yup.

    Oh but why would someone bring a magsorc for that single most important thing we´re talking about - and this is a magsorc topic after all...

    I don´t really feel going into the discussion anymore as it´s basically history repeating itself. Sorc OP bc it´s a negate bot is sth people were arguing in 2014 about :smiley:
    Seraphayel wrote: »
    Thraben wrote: »
    WoppaBoem wrote: »

    Vigor can be applied twice. 1 by yourself and 1 the AoE of someone else. You cannot have 6 vigors active.

    ?

    The OLD cap was at 3 vigors of each type that could stack.


    They abolished the cap at some point in the past, though.

    Sure about that? I think I have never seen more than one Vigor HoT active at a time on my character.
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    Stam classes have to be on the target to do dmg. Mag sorcs can stay at range. This crafty positioning allows them to thin out enemy players far more effectively than Stam can. The flip side is that Stam can LOS better. But only slightly better.

    Mag sorc doesn’t have to commit to a fight the same way that a Stam / melee build has to. And that is extremely strong for both 1vX and BG play.

    And in what way is that relevant to negating in a larger group???

    What?

    Oh you quoted me aswell so i thought your reply was meant for everyone quoted.
    <Noricum>
    I live. I die. I live again.

    Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
    Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 50

  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    What sort of moronic argument is this? You think anyone cares what an average player can do? You think we're trying to get sorcs nerfed because of players like me with less than 2 days played on my sorc?
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    He fight against players who dont even know how to break free. this is a pve zerg. Try to fight agains a real pvp group and sorc will die in less then a minute.

    That's what 1vx is. You people are clearly not familiar with it. You can barely 1v1 good players in the current meta, let alone 1vx.
    Edited by MaxJrFTW on June 26, 2019 9:31PM
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.
    Edited by MaxJrFTW on June 26, 2019 9:36PM
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Emma_Overload
    Emma_Overload
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the pet issue is addressed and gutted to a point magsorcs arent slotting let's, the class would need adjustments. Non pet magicka sorc is no where near pet sorc

    To me the issue is simple: with pets I can put a lot of pressure on opponents and without pets I can't. I've tried so many schemes and weird builds trying to make non-pet work, but there are a lot of tough guys out there i just can't kill without the extra oomph from the pets.
    #CAREBEARMASTERRACE
  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Name one.
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Amdar_Godkiller
    Amdar_Godkiller
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    How is this even a debate? Sorc is absolute cheese this current patch and has made Cyrodil unplayable. Damage shields should be crittable as they currently are, but with no benefit gained from resistances, and max shield strength needs to be hard-capped (in fact just make the sorc shield a non-scalable flat amount). Also light attack damage should go back to being heavily weighted towards spell damage and weapon damage, and melee light attacks should deal bonus damage to shielded targets, because there needs to be counterplay for ranged combatants. This is where the developers started to go wrong and its been a descent into balance madness ever since that change was implemented.
  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Name one.

    Thorin, asnd, bulletproof, and climbs trees for magplars, vixx and truefrost for magdks.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Name one.

    Thorin, asnd, bulletproof, and climbs trees for magplars, vixx and truefrost for magdks.

    I've played countless times with and against all those players, except climbs trees idk who that is. According to you they perform just as well in bgs as players like TheYKcid, Irylia, Nimmy(i think that's the name), i think iCaliban is another solid one. That's just laughable...wait i got the perfect gif for this.

    giphy.gif

    Edited by MaxJrFTW on June 27, 2019 12:16AM
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Lord-Otto
    Lord-Otto
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    How is this even a debate? Sorc is absolute cheese this current patch and has made Cyrodil unplayable. Damage shields should be crittable as they currently are, but with no benefit gained from resistances, and max shield strength needs to be hard-capped (in fact just make the sorc shield a non-scalable flat amount). Also light attack damage should go back to being heavily weighted towards spell damage and weapon damage, and melee light attacks should deal bonus damage to shielded targets, because there needs to be counterplay for ranged combatants. This is where the developers started to go wrong and its been a descent into balance madness ever since that change was implemented.

    So, just nerf sorc into the ground?
  • Thogard
    Thogard
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.
    PC NA - @dazkt - Dazk Ardoonkt / Sir Thogalot / Dask Dragoh’t / Dazk Dragoh’t / El Thogardo

    Stream: twitch.tv/THOGARDvsThePeasants
    YouTube: http://youtube.com/c/thogardpvp


  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Name one.

    Thorin, asnd, bulletproof, and climbs trees for magplars, vixx and truefrost for magdks.

    I've played countless times with and against all those players, except climbs trees idk who that is. According to you they perform just as well in bgs as players like TheYKcid, Irylia, Nimmy(i think that's the name), i think iCaliban is another solid one. That's just laughable...wait i got the perfect gif for this.

    giphy.gif

    Is that a joke? I've been in tons of games where they've had just as much or more damage and around the same kills depending on the enemy team compositions. Of course sorcs will often end up with more kills overall just from the execute, but magplars are definitely a contender with their beam against certain types of players. Overall though, dk and magplar damage is just as good.
  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thogard wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.

    For kills, yeah dks will be lower than sorcs generally since they don't have an execute. If you look at overall damage though, magdks at least just as high or higher.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.

    For kills, yeah dks will be lower than sorcs generally since they don't have an execute. If you look at overall damage though, magdks at least just as high or higher.

    Deluded
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.

    For kills, yeah dks will be lower than sorcs generally since they don't have an execute. If you look at overall damage though, magdks at least just as high or higher.

    Deluded

    I literally queue regularly with people who have damage numbers like this. You're looking at the top end of players here, not your average player. Also, sorcs will tend to do better with solo queuing compared to dks, but dks shine with a group and a healer.
  • pieratsos
    pieratsos
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Derra wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Ok but negate is probably the most important ult (or at least it was until necro) for medium scale and large scale organized PvP

    Not objecting that. Still it´s the only reason to bring sorcs because everything else is performed better by other classes. Which was kinda my point.

    I’m not exactly part of the “sorcs are super OP team” but I feel like you aren’t really thinking about the arguments you make before you make them.

    “Yeah sorcs arent OP they just do the single most important thing and if they didn’t have that thing that makes them OP we’d bring other classes who are better in ways that aren’t nearly as important”

    Yup.

    Oh but why would someone bring a magsorc for that single most important thing we´re talking about - and this is a magsorc topic after all...

    I don´t really feel going into the discussion anymore as it´s basically history repeating itself. Sorc OP bc it´s a negate bot is sth people were arguing in 2014 about :smiley:
    Seraphayel wrote: »
    Thraben wrote: »
    WoppaBoem wrote: »

    Vigor can be applied twice. 1 by yourself and 1 the AoE of someone else. You cannot have 6 vigors active.

    ?

    The OLD cap was at 3 vigors of each type that could stack.


    They abolished the cap at some point in the past, though.

    Sure about that? I think I have never seen more than one Vigor HoT active at a time on my character.
    pieratsos wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    Any other stamina class played by a good player would finish the fight in the tower with dawnbreakers left right and centre. So yeah plenty of classes can do similar 1vX videos. Key word is good player. Knowing ur class and how to play it. You are showing Malcolm, he is one of the best sorcs in the game. If you actually believe that you can perform on the same lvl as him simply because of the class then by all means hop on a sorc and show us.

    Stam classes have to be on the target to do dmg. Mag sorcs can stay at range. This crafty positioning allows them to thin out enemy players far more effectively than Stam can. The flip side is that Stam can LOS better. But only slightly better.

    Mag sorc doesn’t have to commit to a fight the same way that a Stam / melee build has to. And that is extremely strong for both 1vX and BG play.

    Yes they stay at range and use streak from Los to Los to split people up and kill them. That's how sorcs play. Just because they don't fight like Stam builds it doesn't mean they don't commit to the fight. They don't fight like Stam cause they are not a brawler class. Just because Malcolm didn't stay in the tower to fight all of them in there it doesn't he didn't commit. He didn't stay in there cause he is not playing a freaking Stam build and he would probably die trying to play that way.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.

    For kills, yeah dks will be lower than sorcs generally since they don't have an execute. If you look at overall damage though, magdks at least just as high or higher.

    Deluded

    I literally queue regularly with people who have damage numbers like this. You're looking at the top end of players here, not your average player. Also, sorcs will tend to do better with solo queuing compared to dks, but dks shine with a group and a healer.

    You mean like literally everyone else.

    It's ok though, you win. If you have to keep lying to yourself to sleep better at night, so be it.
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Urvoth
    Urvoth
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    Thogard wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    Urvoth wrote: »
    MaxJrFTW wrote: »
    I can't find Faso's clip so this one will do. Not quite 15, but close enough. Now try doing that with any other class.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqKDrybeFYY

    If you're 1vXing, the other players pretty much have to be bots by default, so that's hardly a justification for a class to be nerfed. It's much better to look at BGs, where top tier stamsorcs, dks, and magplars can all end up with very similar scores as sorcs.

    Did you just say dks and magplars are as good as sorcs in bgs??? Where are these so called top tier templars and dks that perform as good as magsorcs in bgs? Dks are trash tier for bgs, and magplars are only good for healing.

    If you think that, you've clearly haven't played enough BGs or with good teammates on those respective classes. The magplars/dks I run with pull just as much or higher dmg than sorcs and the magplars can get just as many or even more kills depending on what sort of opponents you're facing. They're nowhere near trash tier.

    Magplars? Sure

    DKs? Absolutely not.

    For kills, yeah dks will be lower than sorcs generally since they don't have an execute. If you look at overall damage though, magdks at least just as high or higher.

    Deluded

    I literally queue regularly with people who have damage numbers like this. You're looking at the top end of players here, not your average player. Also, sorcs will tend to do better with solo queuing compared to dks, but dks shine with a group and a healer.

    You mean like literally everyone else.

    It's ok though, you win. If you have to keep lying to yourself to sleep better at night, so be it.

    I mean you're the one that apparently hasn't PvP'd in the last 5 weeks so I'm not sure how you can comment on the class balance in Elsweyr.
  • MaxJrFTW
    MaxJrFTW
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Lord-Otto wrote: »
    How is this even a debate? Sorc is absolute cheese this current patch and has made Cyrodil unplayable. Damage shields should be crittable as they currently are, but with no benefit gained from resistances, and max shield strength needs to be hard-capped (in fact just make the sorc shield a non-scalable flat amount). Also light attack damage should go back to being heavily weighted towards spell damage and weapon damage, and melee light attacks should deal bonus damage to shielded targets, because there needs to be counterplay for ranged combatants. This is where the developers started to go wrong and its been a descent into balance madness ever since that change was implemented.

    So, just nerf sorc into the ground?

    That's the plan.
    "I don't know you, and I don't care to know you."
    ―Ulrich Leland, 3E 433
  • Amdar_Godkiller
    Amdar_Godkiller
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lord-Otto wrote: »
    How is this even a debate? Sorc is absolute cheese this current patch and has made Cyrodil unplayable. Damage shields should be crittable as they currently are, but with no benefit gained from resistances, and max shield strength needs to be hard-capped (in fact just make the sorc shield a non-scalable flat amount). Also light attack damage should go back to being heavily weighted towards spell damage and weapon damage, and melee light attacks should deal bonus damage to shielded targets, because there needs to be counterplay for ranged combatants. This is where the developers started to go wrong and its been a descent into balance madness ever since that change was implemented.

    So, just nerf sorc into the ground?

    Honestly, they've never been nerfed once, so doing so would be a welcome change. Everytime ZOS tries, the sorc community whines so much that the nerf they were going to receive is turned into a buff, while the other class balance changes go ahead as planned (most egregiously was when dodge roll's duration was gutted while shields were at first slightly nerfed, then buffed to a ridiculous level during the same PTS cycle), further expanding the gap.

    This also happened this past patch with Stamblade , where they took away some common and semi-rare buffs and debuffs and then replaced them with several extremely rare ones inexplicably. With Nightblade though, usually they just get micronerfed, while mag-sorc has gotten nerfed-into-a-buff basically every other patch since OT.
  • pieratsos
    pieratsos
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Lord-Otto wrote: »
    How is this even a debate? Sorc is absolute cheese this current patch and has made Cyrodil unplayable. Damage shields should be crittable as they currently are, but with no benefit gained from resistances, and max shield strength needs to be hard-capped (in fact just make the sorc shield a non-scalable flat amount). Also light attack damage should go back to being heavily weighted towards spell damage and weapon damage, and melee light attacks should deal bonus damage to shielded targets, because there needs to be counterplay for ranged combatants. This is where the developers started to go wrong and its been a descent into balance madness ever since that change was implemented.

    So, just nerf sorc into the ground?

    Honestly, they've never been nerfed once, so doing so would be a welcome change. Everytime ZOS tries, the sorc community whines so much that the nerf they were going to receive is turned into a buff, while the other class balance changes go ahead as planned (most egregiously was when dodge roll's duration was gutted while shields were at first slightly nerfed, then buffed to a ridiculous level during the same PTS cycle), further expanding the gap.

    This also happened this past patch with Stamblade , where they took away some common and semi-rare buffs and debuffs and then replaced them with several extremely rare ones inexplicably. With Nightblade though, usually they just get micronerfed, while mag-sorc has gotten nerfed-into-a-buff basically every other patch since OT.

    Kinda ironic to talk about class balance and advocate at the same time for a class to be nerfed to the ground.

    I'm curious tho about those buffs that sorcs get every single patch. Care to elaborate?
Sign In or Register to comment.