DuskMarine wrote: »
yall seriously miss the point that if they balance certain things they have to balance everything else at the same time right? their not ignoring the feedback on class balance either their working on it what yall are expecting aint possible to happen its gonna take them a while to finally push that out.
DuskMarine wrote: »
yall seriously miss the point that if they balance certain things they have to balance everything else at the same time right? their not ignoring the feedback on class balance either their working on it what yall are expecting aint possible to happen its gonna take them a while to finally push that out.
It’s sad a lot of good suggestions were not taken up. It’s over 2,000 posts on all the class threads and not all of them were QQ.
Sneaking it in on the last iteration.
Who would of seen that coming ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Emma_Overload wrote: »
Some people might call this a nerf, I call it a BUFF. I would much rather be able to control when Acuity procs than to have it proc off some random DOT.
The Uninvited wrote: »
They could at least increase the proc percentage than. I know, wishful thinking but I just golded out a set on a dot-damage build...
I don't know how you didn't see that coming. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that the nerf was so lenient. Even in its new state, it is likely to over perform and might end up getting nerfed again.
I don't know how you didn't see that coming. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that the nerf was so lenient. Even in its new state, it is likely to over perform and might end up getting nerfed again.
Sneaking it in on the last iteration.
Who would of seen that coming ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Update 23Ice Furnace: This item set now grants Spell Damage, rather than Weapon Damage for the 4 piece bonus
rosendoichinoveb17_ESO wrote: »Well BSW was in par with acuity so I guess that we will be running that instead, and for a second set we will use either Master Architect or Mantle of Siroria. So i wont call this a nerf, maybe just a lack of diversity
The Crystal Tower: Fixed an issue that would prevent your followers from actually following you if you reclogged while in the Tower.
rosendoichinoveb17_ESO wrote: »Well BSW was in par with acuity so I guess that we will be running that instead, and for a second set we will use either Master Architect or Mantle of Siroria. So i wont call this a nerf, maybe just a lack of diversity
SevenPacer wrote: »
You can already control your Acuity proc if u're somewhat familiar to your rotation or even with Acuity Timer. I see zero points in calling this a buff, lul.
Dude no this game has been out for years and weve been fed the same line every single patch. It literally makes no sense that we have TWO trials favoring one sorc and 7 magblades. Sorcerer in general needs more sustain and more damage. Templar both MAG AND STAM need more sustain and more damage, otherwise they will just stay the buff and healing class. Stam dks need a homeXD The list goes on and on.
There are PLENTY of base game things that needs fixing. Elfbane doesnt even buff all flame sets it only buffs zaan and its not even an ability lmao. Trillions of item sets that need to be reworked or even looked at. There are lots of things that need to be done before fixing this new content or putting things in the crown store like theyve been doing. I already know, though that end game players never see any love anyways. Its always the casuals since they provide the most money to the game which is smart businesswise.
Theres no point in having a cake with just all icing, but failing to actually have a good base to it
Still no fix to overload light attack scaling, and interactions with the new empower.
One-shotting people with it is going to be absolutely hilarious.
Still no fix to overload light attack scaling, and interactions with the new empower.
One-shotting people with it is going to be absolutely hilarious.
A little disappointed to say the least.
You can’t simply release PTS 1 (4.0.0) with several class balance changes and then ignore the player feedback on thouse changes and don’t review them.