They may not be interchangeable among games, that is true. However, if ZoS's goal is to sell a lot of them you are going to have a hard time doing that when people coming from other MMOs know these things go for less than a dollar in other MMOs for a single slot and about $3-$7 account wide. The point being that there exists a market baseline price that you are going to have a hard time convincing a lot of players is worth 1800% more in ESO.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
This has been covered to death in this thread. If their goal was to make a lot of profit on an fixed investment item, pricing it in the stratosphere from normal market baseline is a poor way of going about it.
You have flip-flopped on this throughout the thread, first mentioning how high the price is in earlier posts, then defending it later.
I am done running in circles with you on this topic. At this point, you seem to simply be trolling for the heck of it.
420 poll votes so far.
Some figuring: if all 4+ voters actually bought 12, and all 2-3 voters bought 3, then that's 169 slots; at current price zos made 253,500 crowns from 420 people.
However what if pricing the slots at 500 crowns caused all "No" respondents to buy 1 slot (average, some buy more others less) and the other voters bought same number: then they would have sold 537 slots at 500 for total cost of 268,500 crowns from 420 people.
Hmm from a quick glance at the poll one would think there's a bigger gap, but really seems like both pricing points produce similar results. Each has it's own benefit: expensive gives them the option to have a sale in the future and get a big influx of crowns; cheap gives them larger volume of participation in the feature and allows them to remove more gold from the game (appraently that's a goal, given how much gold it costs). Cheap also gives them better user good-will but I guess they don't care about that.
I also think this poll is biased against the current price: if we could poll non-forum goers I bet they bought more than we did so the results would be more in favor of current price.
My conclusion is that ZoS will not make a permenant adjustment to the price, but they will likely offer a sale on slots at some point. Also I doubt they will add account-wide slots.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
This has been covered to death in this thread. If their goal was to make a lot of profit on an fixed investment item, pricing it in the stratosphere from normal market baseline is a poor way of going about it.
You have flip-flopped on this throughout the thread, first mentioning how high the price is in earlier posts, then defending it later.
I am done running in circles with you on this topic. At this point, you seem to simply be trolling for the heck of it.
I'm coming into this thread late, but I made a poll recently and it reflected the results I would expect - vast majority did not purchase slots. https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/406357/have-you-purchased-outfit-slots/p1
Here are my thoughts from that thread:420 poll votes so far.
Some figuring: if all 4+ voters actually bought 12, and all 2-3 voters bought 3, then that's 169 slots; at current price zos made 253,500 crowns from 420 people.
However what if pricing the slots at 500 crowns caused all "No" respondents to buy 1 slot (average, some buy more others less) and the other voters bought same number: then they would have sold 537 slots at 500 for total cost of 268,500 crowns from 420 people.
Hmm from a quick glance at the poll one would think there's a bigger gap, but really seems like both pricing points produce similar results. Each has it's own benefit: expensive gives them the option to have a sale in the future and get a big influx of crowns; cheap gives them larger volume of participation in the feature and allows them to remove more gold from the game (appraently that's a goal, given how much gold it costs). Cheap also gives them better user good-will but I guess they don't care about that.
I also think this poll is biased against the current price: if we could poll non-forum goers I bet they bought more than we did so the results would be more in favor of current price.
My conclusion is that ZoS will not make a permenant adjustment to the price, but they will likely offer a sale on slots at some point. Also I doubt they will add account-wide slots.
Basically, ZoS made their choice purely from a money perspective. They don't care that a lot of people are angry about it. They made about the same amount of money as if they priced them at 500 crowns, plus they reserve the opportunity to have a "sale" for 1k or 750 crowns and make a killing.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »They may not be interchangeable among games, that is true. However, if ZoS's goal is to sell a lot of them you are going to have a hard time doing that when people coming from other MMOs know these things go for less than a dollar in other MMOs for a single slot and about $3-$7 account wide. The point being that there exists a market baseline price that you are going to have a hard time convincing a lot of players is worth 1800% more in ESO.
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
This has been covered to death in this thread. If their goal was to make a lot of profit on an fixed investment item, pricing it in the stratosphere from normal market baseline is a poor way of going about it.
You have flip-flopped on this throughout the thread, first mentioning how high the price is in earlier posts, then defending it later.
I am done running in circles with you on this topic. At this point, you seem to simply be trolling for the heck of it.
I'm coming into this thread late, but I made a poll recently and it reflected the results I would expect - vast majority did not purchase slots. https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/406357/have-you-purchased-outfit-slots/p1
Here are my thoughts from that thread:420 poll votes so far.
Some figuring: if all 4+ voters actually bought 12, and all 2-3 voters bought 3, then that's 169 slots; at current price zos made 253,500 crowns from 420 people.
However what if pricing the slots at 500 crowns caused all "No" respondents to buy 1 slot (average, some buy more others less) and the other voters bought same number: then they would have sold 537 slots at 500 for total cost of 268,500 crowns from 420 people.
Hmm from a quick glance at the poll one would think there's a bigger gap, but really seems like both pricing points produce similar results. Each has it's own benefit: expensive gives them the option to have a sale in the future and get a big influx of crowns; cheap gives them larger volume of participation in the feature and allows them to remove more gold from the game (appraently that's a goal, given how much gold it costs). Cheap also gives them better user good-will but I guess they don't care about that.
I also think this poll is biased against the current price: if we could poll non-forum goers I bet they bought more than we did so the results would be more in favor of current price.
My conclusion is that ZoS will not make a permenant adjustment to the price, but they will likely offer a sale on slots at some point. Also I doubt they will add account-wide slots.
Basically, ZoS made their choice purely from a money perspective. They don't care that a lot of people are angry about it. They made about the same amount of money as if they priced them at 500 crowns, plus they reserve the opportunity to have a "sale" for 1k or 750 crowns and make a killing.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
This sure is logical. But maybe ZOS' goal is not to sell a lot of outfit slots, but to make a lot of profit on them.
This has been covered to death in this thread. If their goal was to make a lot of profit on an fixed investment item, pricing it in the stratosphere from normal market baseline is a poor way of going about it.
You have flip-flopped on this throughout the thread, first mentioning how high the price is in earlier posts, then defending it later.
I am done running in circles with you on this topic. At this point, you seem to simply be trolling for the heck of it.
I'm coming into this thread late, but I made a poll recently and it reflected the results I would expect - vast majority did not purchase slots. https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/406357/have-you-purchased-outfit-slots/p1
Here are my thoughts from that thread:420 poll votes so far.
Some figuring: if all 4+ voters actually bought 12, and all 2-3 voters bought 3, then that's 169 slots; at current price zos made 253,500 crowns from 420 people.
However what if pricing the slots at 500 crowns caused all "No" respondents to buy 1 slot (average, some buy more others less) and the other voters bought same number: then they would have sold 537 slots at 500 for total cost of 268,500 crowns from 420 people.
Hmm from a quick glance at the poll one would think there's a bigger gap, but really seems like both pricing points produce similar results. Each has it's own benefit: expensive gives them the option to have a sale in the future and get a big influx of crowns; cheap gives them larger volume of participation in the feature and allows them to remove more gold from the game (appraently that's a goal, given how much gold it costs). Cheap also gives them better user good-will but I guess they don't care about that.
I also think this poll is biased against the current price: if we could poll non-forum goers I bet they bought more than we did so the results would be more in favor of current price.
My conclusion is that ZoS will not make a permenant adjustment to the price, but they will likely offer a sale on slots at some point. Also I doubt they will add account-wide slots.
Basically, ZoS made their choice purely from a money perspective. They don't care that a lot of people are angry about it. They made about the same amount of money as if they priced them at 500 crowns, plus they reserve the opportunity to have a "sale" for 1k or 750 crowns and make a killing.
They may not be interchangeable among games, that is true. However, if ZoS's goal is to sell a lot of them you are going to have a hard time doing that when people coming from other MMOs know these things go for less than a dollar in other MMOs for a single slot and about $3-$7 account wide. The point being that there exists a market baseline price that you are going to have a hard time convincing a lot of players is worth 1800% more in ESO.
In other words, a good many people will go without rather than pay such a high price for an outfit slot - so everyone loses. The player in not getting the slots they want at a reasonable price and ZoS is not selling a lot of outfit slots they otherwise could of.
Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
OlafdieWaldfee wrote: »They may not be interchangeable among games, that is true. However, if ZoS's goal is to sell a lot of them you are going to have a hard time doing that when people coming from other MMOs know these things go for less than a dollar in other MMOs for a single slot and about $3-$7 account wide. The point being that there exists a market baseline price that you are going to have a hard time convincing a lot of players is worth 1800% more in ESO.
In other words, a good many people will go without rather than pay such a high price for an outfit slot - so everyone loses. The player in not getting the slots they want at a reasonable price and ZoS is not selling a lot of outfit slots they otherwise could of.
This.
I came from SWTOR and was expecting a similar pricing. Well, not totally similar, because I always paid for my SWTOR-outfit-slots solely with ingame-curremcy.
But roughly in the same ballpark.
But 1500 per slot is not the same ballpark, it's not even remotely the same sport!
Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
How many different avenues of monetisation do they need to reach? How many different features or bits of content need to be split up and put behind their own paywall? How many hundreds of dollars do people need to spend before they can feel like they deserve the complete experience without people sneering at them and calling them entitled or cheap?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »OlafdieWaldfee wrote: »They may not be interchangeable among games, that is true. However, if ZoS's goal is to sell a lot of them you are going to have a hard time doing that when people coming from other MMOs know these things go for less than a dollar in other MMOs for a single slot and about $3-$7 account wide. The point being that there exists a market baseline price that you are going to have a hard time convincing a lot of players is worth 1800% more in ESO.
In other words, a good many people will go without rather than pay such a high price for an outfit slot - so everyone loses. The player in not getting the slots they want at a reasonable price and ZoS is not selling a lot of outfit slots they otherwise could of.
This.
I came from SWTOR and was expecting a similar pricing. Well, not totally similar, because I always paid for my SWTOR-outfit-slots solely with ingame-curremcy.
But roughly in the same ballpark.
But 1500 per slot is not the same ballpark, it's not even remotely the same sport!
And... ? Are you going to stop playing ESO because of the price of outfit slots ? Are you going back to or starting another game based on the price of outfit slots ?
In terms of business, what matters is not what you think as a customer, it's how what you think translates in your purchasing/consuming behaviour.
You have flip-flopped on this throughout the thread, first mentioning how high the price is in earlier posts, then defending it later.
There is a reason they are called "microtrasactions" to begin with.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
I'd rather say : don't buy if you think it's too expensive (either because you think it's not worth it, or because you cannot afford it).
Why do so many people seem to think that they *have to buy* in order to play the game ?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
I'd rather say : don't buy if you think it's too expensive (either because you think it's not worth it, or because you cannot afford it).
Why do so many people seem to think that they *have to buy* in order to play the game ?
lordrichter wrote: »It's actually not a question of "too expensive, then just don't buy it." I see that as a given. It is like asking what is in a room and having someone repeatedly say "air". Completely accurate, and not at all helpful.
lordrichter wrote: »I don't see the issue as being one of price. It is a matter of value. If the outfit slots are worth 10,000 Crowns, then that is the right price for them. They are not worth 10,000 Crowns, and that is the reason why they are not priced at 10,000 Crowns.
So, why 1500 Crowns?
Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »It's actually not a question of "too expensive, then just don't buy it." I see that as a given. It is like asking what is in a room and having someone repeatedly say "air". Completely accurate, and not at all helpful.
I get your point but there's still a big difference : you cannot live without breathing air, while you can play ESO without buying outfit slots - or any crown store stuff for that matter.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »I don't see the issue as being one of price. It is a matter of value. If the outfit slots are worth 10,000 Crowns, then that is the right price for them. They are not worth 10,000 Crowns, and that is the reason why they are not priced at 10,000 Crowns.
So, why 1500 Crowns?
Value is not something objective. I "value" a watch at around $100 maximum but some people will see in a Rolex watch a value of tens of thousands of dollars and pay for it.
ZOS set the price of outfit slots at 1500 crowns because they think (rightfully or wrongfully, we don't know about that) that enough people according to their objectives will see their value at 1500 crowns. They did not set the price at 10000 crowns because they did not think enough people would value them that high. Simple as that.
If they realise that 1500 crowns is too high to meet their sales objectives, they will lower the price. Lowering a price is always an option, while raising them is always difficult.
lordrichter wrote: »Again, completely accurate, not at all helpful. Restating the obvious. I still see this as a given.
lordrichter wrote: »That tells me that there is more involved than number of outfit slots sold. To that end, 1500 Crowns was as low as they could go and still meet the other objectives.
Charliff1966 wrote: »I just dont see why everybody should be able to buy everything available in this game. You dont want to pay 1500 crowns because you dont think its the right price is your choice, i just think its cheap and fun when needed.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Charliff1966 wrote: »I just dont see why everybody should be able to buy everything available in this game. You dont want to pay 1500 crowns because you dont think its the right price is your choice, i just think its cheap and fun when needed.
It's true that it's not very expensive if you just look at 1500 crowns, but most of us here are long-term players with many characters, and also completionists. As a result we don't look at 1500 crowns but at 1500*15 characters*9 slots... and the total amount looks quite horrendous.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »
And... ? Are you going to stop playing ESO because of the price of outfit slots ? Are you going back to or starting another game based on the price of outfit slots ?
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Again, completely accurate, not at all helpful. Restating the obvious. I still see this as a given.
Yes it sounds too obvious or simplistic, but it is also more helpful than you think. After all, not buying a product at a given price is the most efficient way to have said price lowered by the company - and if I get most people in this thread correctly, this is what you, what we want, isn't it ?
I mean :
- complain + not buy = prices are lowered
- not complain + not buy = prices are lowered
- not complain + buy = prices remain high
- complain + buy = prices remain high.
( in all cases, provided that enough people react similarly).
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »That tells me that there is more involved than number of outfit slots sold. To that end, 1500 Crowns was as low as they could go and still meet the other objectives.
Agree 100%. We don't know what the equation precisely looks like at ZOS, but there's more than raw sales numbers involved. There's also the attractivity of costumes that needs to be preserved, the issue of the crown sink for ESO+ members, the overall image of the game and the crown store, the long-term goals needed for player retention, and probably tons of other criteria I can't think of right now.
Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
Then nobody plays it and the game dies. They need a whole boatload of players to break even on the cost of a game like this, and then a lot of consistent spenders to keep the lights on(which all the flickering lights on their livestreams should prove is necessary, lol).
Seriously, if you just want to pay whatever a company demands without ever wanting it for less and never arguing for less then they will milk you die because you're the sucker P.T. Barnum spoke of. They LOVE you because you're easy to con.
Charliff1966 wrote: »Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »Charliff1966 wrote: »Nothing wrong 1500 crowns. Dont play a game when you cant afford it.
Then nobody plays it and the game dies. They need a whole boatload of players to break even on the cost of a game like this, and then a lot of consistent spenders to keep the lights on(which all the flickering lights on their livestreams should prove is necessary, lol).
Seriously, if you just want to pay whatever a company demands without ever wanting it for less and never arguing for less then they will milk you die because you're the sucker P.T. Barnum spoke of. They LOVE you because you're easy to con.
I pay what i think is ok. If i think its not ok i dont buy it. I cant help it if others dont have the financial security i have. I love spending money on things others cant without ever having to worry about how my bankaccount looks at the end of the month. Thats life and for me its a good one.