Will punishments be worse if any of these people were repeat offenders?
As I feel whilst this issue was reversible the fact we often see suspensions only leads people to promote exploiting, cash out before the suspension, take a suspension and enjoy the rewards still.
As I have posted many times in other threads about exploiting I feel ZOS would do well to adopt a strike system (if not already) to make sure first time offended who may not know better learn, but repeat offenders are eventually removed from the game.
No. Just No.
Repeat offenders should not be removed from the game. As long as it is game expirienced-related the punishments should stay ingame related and not account related.
Suspending someone from the game permanently is never to take in action just because someone abusing a bug in game. Permanently bans are reserved for Bots and system hacks ONLY.
Concerned you may be taking a 3 day? Doing much exploiting that makes you fear for a suspension? Exploiters should be perma banned. It's one thing to find an exploit. Things happen. But something this severe or game breaking, should be met with a goodbye note and the locks changed. PERIOD. I watched it ruin several other games. I wont play shooters any more because of all of the aim bots and hacks. If you suck, dont play. You ruin it for the rest of us.
ericprydz82ub17_ESO wrote: »@Smasherx74
"You want ZOS to tell you how the bug works so you can avoid exploiting it? You think PC and Console have the same patches?
My eyes are bleeding right now."
The bug works by defeating the encounter more than once. We have been told how the bug "works" quite clearly. Plenty of bugs have carried over from PC before and we always deal with them the same way: Make it known on the forums and spread the information so others are aware and figure out work-arounds or just plain deal with something being broken until it is fixed weeks or months later.
If it isn't anything to worry about because it isn't bugged on consoles then there is no harm in them telling us which public dungeon it was. If it is bugged, spreading knowledge to others is the best deterrent and will help those not aware to either be very careful or to avoid that public dungeon as to not get caught up.
ericprydz82ub17_ESO wrote: »@Smasherx74
"You want ZOS to tell you how the bug works so you can avoid exploiting it? You think PC and Console have the same patches?
My eyes are bleeding right now."
The bug works by defeating the encounter more than once. We have been told how the bug "works" quite clearly. Plenty of bugs have carried over from PC before and we always deal with them the same way: Make it known on the forums and spread the information so others are aware and figure out work-arounds or just plain deal with something being broken until it is fixed weeks or months later.
If it isn't anything to worry about because it isn't bugged on consoles then there is no harm in them telling us which public dungeon it was. If it is bugged, spreading knowledge to others is the best deterrent and will help those not aware to either be very careful or to avoid that public dungeon as to not get caught up.
necronomniconb14_ESO wrote: »Will punishments be worse if any of these people were repeat offenders?
As I feel whilst this issue was reversible the fact we often see suspensions only leads people to promote exploiting, cash out before the suspension, take a suspension and enjoy the rewards still.
As I have posted many times in other threads about exploiting I feel ZOS would do well to adopt a strike system (if not already) to make sure first time offended who may not know better learn, but repeat offenders are eventually removed from the game.
No. Just No.
Repeat offenders should not be removed from the game. As long as it is game expirienced-related the punishments should stay ingame related and not account related.
Suspending someone from the game permanently is never to take in action just because someone abusing a bug in game. Permanently bans are reserved for Bots and system hacks ONLY.
Concerned you may be taking a 3 day? Doing much exploiting that makes you fear for a suspension? Exploiters should be perma banned. It's one thing to find an exploit. Things happen. But something this severe or game breaking, should be met with a goodbye note and the locks changed. PERIOD. I watched it ruin several other games. I wont play shooters any more because of all of the aim bots and hacks. If you suck, dont play. You ruin it for the rest of us.
They clearly hit a lot of innocents when they do it, and I hope you happen to be one of the first of those 'innocents' if they ever do the permas. So that you could eat your condescending tone. Besides bamco, these are the last devs I would ever trust dishing out permabans. They're very incompetent, and lazy, a dangerous combination when they allow so much collateral since their fanbois never give them any slack in the wallet over it. for now.
necronomniconb14_ESO wrote: »Will punishments be worse if any of these people were repeat offenders?
As I feel whilst this issue was reversible the fact we often see suspensions only leads people to promote exploiting, cash out before the suspension, take a suspension and enjoy the rewards still.
As I have posted many times in other threads about exploiting I feel ZOS would do well to adopt a strike system (if not already) to make sure first time offended who may not know better learn, but repeat offenders are eventually removed from the game.
No. Just No.
Repeat offenders should not be removed from the game. As long as it is game expirienced-related the punishments should stay ingame related and not account related.
Suspending someone from the game permanently is never to take in action just because someone abusing a bug in game. Permanently bans are reserved for Bots and system hacks ONLY.
Concerned you may be taking a 3 day? Doing much exploiting that makes you fear for a suspension? Exploiters should be perma banned. It's one thing to find an exploit. Things happen. But something this severe or game breaking, should be met with a goodbye note and the locks changed. PERIOD. I watched it ruin several other games. I wont play shooters any more because of all of the aim bots and hacks. If you suck, dont play. You ruin it for the rest of us.
They clearly hit a lot of innocents when they do it, and I hope you happen to be one of the first of those 'innocents' if they ever do the permas. So that you could eat your condescending tone. Besides bamco, these are the last devs I would ever trust dishing out permabans. They're very incompetent, and lazy, a dangerous combination when they allow so much collateral since their fanbois never give them any slack in the wallet over it. for now.
Innocents? Pretty easy to tell if some one hit an exploit by accident and had it happen 1 or 2 times vs some one who farmed the hell out of it. Since you obviously have never been a programmer/dev, GM or ran a server, you need to understand that my comments are based as some one who has done all 3. Bans dont hit the innocent. PERIOD. And anyone claiming that they are when the ban hammer hits it lying or has some one playing on their account which is also a no no. Wake up and smell the gimps who need to exploit to get ahead and ruin the game in the process.
necronomniconb14_ESO wrote: »Will punishments be worse if any of these people were repeat offenders?
As I feel whilst this issue was reversible the fact we often see suspensions only leads people to promote exploiting, cash out before the suspension, take a suspension and enjoy the rewards still.
As I have posted many times in other threads about exploiting I feel ZOS would do well to adopt a strike system (if not already) to make sure first time offended who may not know better learn, but repeat offenders are eventually removed from the game.
No. Just No.
Repeat offenders should not be removed from the game. As long as it is game expirienced-related the punishments should stay ingame related and not account related.
Suspending someone from the game permanently is never to take in action just because someone abusing a bug in game. Permanently bans are reserved for Bots and system hacks ONLY.
Concerned you may be taking a 3 day? Doing much exploiting that makes you fear for a suspension? Exploiters should be perma banned. It's one thing to find an exploit. Things happen. But something this severe or game breaking, should be met with a goodbye note and the locks changed. PERIOD. I watched it ruin several other games. I wont play shooters any more because of all of the aim bots and hacks. If you suck, dont play. You ruin it for the rest of us.
They clearly hit a lot of innocents when they do it, and I hope you happen to be one of the first of those 'innocents' if they ever do the permas. So that you could eat your condescending tone. Besides bamco, these are the last devs I would ever trust dishing out permabans. They're very incompetent, and lazy, a dangerous combination when they allow so much collateral since their fanbois never give them any slack in the wallet over it. for now.
Innocents? Pretty easy to tell if some one hit an exploit by accident and had it happen 1 or 2 times vs some one who farmed the hell out of it. Since you obviously have never been a programmer/dev, GM or ran a server, you need to understand that my comments are based as some one who has done all 3. Bans dont hit the innocent. PERIOD. And anyone claiming that they are when the ban hammer hits it lying or has some one playing on their account which is also a no no. Wake up and smell the gimps who need to exploit to get ahead and ruin the game in the process.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »ManwithBeard9 wrote: »LiquidPony wrote: »The first skill point -normal
The second skill point -hmmm interesting
The third skill point -exploiting
Any further explanation required?
Pretty clear in every game I've ever played using bugs and exploits is bannable.
Give your head a shake...
This assumes that players are aware of how Skill Points are granted in Group Dungeons and also puts the responsibility on players to cease normal gameplay because of a bug. I understand that ZOS can put whatever they want in the TOS and shift the burden of responsibility to the players.
But the world isn't black and white. Some "exploits" are more heinous than others. This one is pretty innocent and far to easy to accidentally encounter.
And thats why its only 3 days and not more (assuming they have no previous infractions)
It's still ridiculous. Just revert the skill points and, if necessary, issue a warning. No reason to get ban-happy over something that any random player who decided to kill a Public Dungeon boss twice would be guilty of "exploiting."
I just spent an hour camping a Public Dungeon event last weekend, helping a guildie farm some gear. I was browsing Reddit on my phone while intermittently throwing out Caltrops and Endless Hail. Not sure I would've even noticed I was obtaining multiple skill points until after the fact, and then it would have been a head scratcher ... "did I really have that many unused skill points? Huh. Don't remember. Oh well."
Sounds like you were botting.
Will punishments be worse if any of these people were repeat offenders?
As I feel whilst this issue was reversible the fact we often see suspensions only leads people to promote exploiting, cash out before the suspension, take a suspension and enjoy the rewards still.
As I have posted many times in other threads about exploiting I feel ZOS would do well to adopt a strike system (if not already) to make sure first time offended who may not know better learn, but repeat offenders are eventually removed from the game.
No. Just No.
Repeat offenders should not be removed from the game. As long as it is game expirienced-related the punishments should stay ingame related and not account related.
Suspending someone from the game permanently is never to take in action just because someone abusing a bug in game. Permanently bans are reserved for Bots and system hacks ONLY.
lordrichter wrote: »I have to wonder whether @Montayva ever heard back from them on this issue.
@Spacemonkey
I agree. This exploit didn't harm any other players in any way. This wasn't a pvp exploit. It wasn't an economy exploit. It was even possible to do accidentally.
The proper way to handle something like this is to simply fix the bug and remove the extra skill points. Perhaps issue a warning to people who farmed large numbers of skill points off of it, escalating to a suspension only in extreme cases or individuals who have a history of cheating/exploiting.
The fact that they apparently accused anybody who gained a single extra point of cheating is absolutely atrocious. The fact that they apparently punished people who reported the bug is asinine. The fact that they apparently haven't issued any sort of apology to those they falsely accused of cheating is unnacceptable.
It doesnt help them either, the fact that Customer support is basically unreachable and tbh feels inaccessible. Almost a week of contacting them and I've yet to receive anything but the few automated mails I got while my ban was active.
Fleshreaper wrote: »Bouldercleave wrote: »It sounds like a group boss in one of the public dungeons was bugged giving you a skill point every time you killed him. At least that is what I can decipher from the cryptic posts.
I think is would be easy to determine if a player got more than 1 skill point at a certain place.
I hope this is not the case because this would be IMO unfair. You add items to the game that REQUIRE you to grind for by killing public delve bosses over and over again and then when people actually grind for these items, they get caught up in an bug/exploit and get banned for it. SMH
@Spacemonkey
I agree. This exploit didn't harm any other players in any way. This wasn't a pvp exploit. It wasn't an economy exploit. It was even possible to do accidentally.
The proper way to handle something like this is to simply fix the bug and remove the extra skill points. Perhaps issue a warning to people who farmed large numbers of skill points off of it, escalating to a suspension only in extreme cases or individuals who have a history of cheating/exploiting.
The fact that they apparently accused anybody who gained a single extra point of cheating is absolutely atrocious. The fact that they apparently punished people who reported the bug is asinine. The fact that they apparently haven't issued any sort of apology to those they falsely accused of cheating is unnacceptable.
It doesnt help them either, the fact that Customer support is basically unreachable and tbh feels inaccessible. Almost a week of contacting them and I've yet to receive anything but the few automated mails I got while my ban was active.
Today I witnessed a Terms of Service violation. Normally I would report it. In fact, I was about halfway through doing so. Then I thought of this thread. As I said here, my future interactions with ZOS will be determined by their handling of this situation. I chose not to report the TOS violation. If they are going to punish players for reporting things, they can hire more staff to monitor the game instead of relying on the players to do it for them.
I haven't forgotten that ZOS unfairly punished many innocent players. That some of the players actually reported the bugs they were punished for "exploiting". That even the players whose punishment were lifted were never apologized to, despite the blatantly accusatory nature of the interactions ZOS had with these falsely accused players.
I hope the rest of you haven't forgotten what ZOS did to you and your friends either.
Today I witnessed a Terms of Service violation. Normally I would report it. In fact, I was about halfway through doing so. Then I thought of this thread. As I said here, my future interactions with ZOS will be determined by their handling of this situation. I chose not to report the TOS violation. If they are going to punish players for reporting things, they can hire more staff to monitor the game instead of relying on the players to do it for them.
I haven't forgotten that ZOS unfairly punished many innocent players. That some of the players actually reported the bugs they were punished for "exploiting". That even the players whose punishment were lifted were never apologized to, despite the blatantly accusatory nature of the interactions ZOS had with these falsely accused players.
I hope the rest of you haven't forgotten what ZOS did to you and your friends either.
NobleGuardian wrote: »White wabbit wrote: »
warn off what type of play? the type of play that ZOS punishes players for finding flaws in their game so they can fix it? because its the players that are in the wrong for this being a bug right?