Do you actually know what the survey map bug was? Because if you do, you are being very disingenuous with this statement. In case you don't know, it required that you approach the survey, and when it appeared, open up your banking assistant and deposit the map in the bank. Then after looting the survey, you leave the area, take the survey map out of the bank, and go back to the survey site. Repeat, repeat, repeat. There is absolutely no way that could be otherwise be considered "normal gameplay".ManwithBeard9 wrote: »It is an exploit the same way the survey writ was an exploit. It was an unintended bug that can be easily avoided and only when repeated becomes an exploit.smackysmacks wrote: »This is literal crazy land. It's not like some technical exploit that some hacker crew is taking advantage of to gold farm or win in pvp or something.
It's killing a dungeon boss in a public dungeon more than once.
Let that sink in.
The fact that is deemed an EXPLOIT rather than a bug that should have just got fixed by an emergency patch is what the issue here. I can only imagine how the banned players must feel about it.
Seriously. Whoever is in charge of this clown show needs to get the boot. I really hope the gaming media pick this up and run with it because this is heinously wrong for so may reasons.
lordrichter wrote: »Unless a moderator steps in and reveals it for what it is, no one is going to know anything different. Hopefully, the moderators are willing to do that. Perhaps we should be using the Report feature when someone posts "proof" and ask them to check on it. I dunno. Really, it isn't any of our business whether it is true or not.
As a legitimate user of this service, it is very much my business whether legitimate users are being punished, despite following the TOS and doing exactly what ZOS asked them to do.
The idea that the veracity of evidence can only be decided by the moderators is extremely dangerous, and anti-consumer. You don't allow companies to investigate themselves if you want to get consistently fair and true results.
SteveCampsOut wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »So from what I've heard it wasn't just a 3 day ban. These accounts are now on a list of known "Exploiters" and have been told if it happens again their accounts will be locked. This is beyond the pale for someone who fell afoul of this unintentionally!
Source please?
I'm sorry? And you are? I am not the person who received the email or the ban. The source would be that particular person's email. I'm just relating what was told to me. I am not going to name names and I couldn't post the email even if I wanted to as I don't have a copy and posting private emails is against the TOS. So pardon me if I don't gratify your need for documentation. Believe it or don't. It's no skin off my back.
Did someone *** in your coffee?
@SteveCampsOut
@Lord_Hev isn't trying to be a jerk. He's been in here arguing against this suspension wave for a while. And he probably finds your claim plausible. A request for proof isn't always an attack.
In this thread, we have somebody that posted proof that they reported this bug, but got suspended for it anyways. People actually providing proof of their claims is unfortunately rare, considering how easy it is to do in a situation like this. I'd like to see more of it. I find your claim plausible, and would love to see evidence of it, if it exists.
SteveCampsOut wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »So from what I've heard it wasn't just a 3 day ban. These accounts are now on a list of known "Exploiters" and have been told if it happens again their accounts will be locked. This is beyond the pale for someone who fell afoul of this unintentionally!
Source please?
I'm sorry? And you are? I am not the person who received the email or the ban. The source would be that particular person's email. I'm just relating what was told to me. I am not going to name names and I couldn't post the email even if I wanted to as I don't have a copy and posting private emails is against the TOS. So pardon me if I don't gratify your need for documentation. Believe it or don't. It's no skin off my back.
Did someone *** in your coffee?
Yeah! ZOS did when they treated my Assistant Guild Leader like crap with this ban and mark on her account as an "Exploiter" when she's not done anything wrong. She is very valued by our guild and it's upsetting that she's probably leaving over this event. So, pardon me if I don't treat your request for "Sources" with the respect you seem to think you deserve.@SteveCampsOut
@Lord_Hev isn't trying to be a jerk. He's been in here arguing against this suspension wave for a while. And he probably finds your claim plausible. A request for proof isn't always an attack.
In this thread, we have somebody that posted proof that they reported this bug, but got suspended for it anyways. People actually providing proof of their claims is unfortunately rare, considering how easy it is to do in a situation like this. I'd like to see more of it. I find your claim plausible, and would love to see evidence of it, if it exists.
The evidence isn't mine to give. I flat out told you in my first post that "I heard" which makes what I said "Hearsay" and I'm well aware of the dubiousness of hearsay but that's ALL I have to give. If anyone else who appealed got the same answer that was reported to me about the "Known Exploiter" list they're free to chime in with evidence as is the person I heard it from.Til then let me just say this whole mess stinks!
@SteveCampsOut
@Lord_Hev isn't trying to be a jerk. He's been in here arguing against this suspension wave for a while. And he probably finds your claim plausible. A request for proof isn't always an attack.
In this thread, we have somebody that posted proof that they reported this bug, but got suspended for it anyways. People actually providing proof of their claims is unfortunately rare, considering how easy it is to do in a situation like this. I'd like to see more of it. I find your claim plausible, and would love to see evidence of it, if it exists.
Bouldercleave wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »SteveCampsOut wrote: »So from what I've heard it wasn't just a 3 day ban. These accounts are now on a list of known "Exploiters" and have been told if it happens again their accounts will be locked. This is beyond the pale for someone who fell afoul of this unintentionally!
Source please?
I'm sorry? And you are? I am not the person who received the email or the ban. The source would be that particular person's email. I'm just relating what was told to me. I am not going to name names and I couldn't post the email even if I wanted to as I don't have a copy and posting private emails is against the TOS. So pardon me if I don't gratify your need for documentation. Believe it or don't. It's no skin off my back.
Did someone *** in your coffee?
Yeah! ZOS did when they treated my Assistant Guild Leader like crap with this ban and mark on her account as an "Exploiter" when she's not done anything wrong. She is very valued by our guild and it's upsetting that she's probably leaving over this event. So, pardon me if I don't treat your request for "Sources" with the respect you seem to think you deserve.@SteveCampsOut
@Lord_Hev isn't trying to be a jerk. He's been in here arguing against this suspension wave for a while. And he probably finds your claim plausible. A request for proof isn't always an attack.
In this thread, we have somebody that posted proof that they reported this bug, but got suspended for it anyways. People actually providing proof of their claims is unfortunately rare, considering how easy it is to do in a situation like this. I'd like to see more of it. I find your claim plausible, and would love to see evidence of it, if it exists.
The evidence isn't mine to give. I flat out told you in my first post that "I heard" which makes what I said "Hearsay" and I'm well aware of the dubiousness of hearsay but that's ALL I have to give. If anyone else who appealed got the same answer that was reported to me about the "Known Exploiter" list they're free to chime in with evidence as is the person I heard it from.Til then let me just say this whole mess stinks!
I'm sure that she can appeal the mark on her account if indeed she did nothing wrong. They have to be able verify those that exploit vs those that found a bug.
Here's a thought.
Whether true or not, I don't know, but people are claiming they had no clue about this and are now on suspension.
We know Zos knew, heck there was a thread on the forums - but it didn't say what dungeon(s).
What IF... when Zos knew, they put a popup in game stating "There is a known exploit pertaining the X and Y dungeons bosses. Please do not defeat these bosses more than once until a fix has been put in place"
That way, anyone who does it after that, is damn sure aware of it.
To be honest, it might stop some from exploiting it... since they know Zos knows.
If ZOS was sure of what he did (a big mistake), it would be for @ZOS_GinaBruno here defending the ZOS action.
ZOS erred in randomly 'distributing' suspensions, so silence in the community.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »If ZOS was sure of what he did (a big mistake), it would be for @ZOS_GinaBruno here defending the ZOS action.
ZOS erred in randomly 'distributing' suspensions, so silence in the community.
Nothing was done randomly. They set up an algorithm to check points earned for the certain group boss. Any accounts that only had the skill point flag once passed. Any accounts that had the skill point flag multiple times, were suspended.
Its absolutely plausible that people had been doing a loot/grind route on the bosses and did not realize at first what was happening. Some reported the issue and moved on, others continued on ignorant or otherwise of the extra skill points they were accumulating.
Users get caught up in suspension/ban waves all the time. If you feel you were incorrectly actioned, file a report using the proper channels and be rational.
lordrichter wrote: »ZOS has defined that disciplinary actions are between the company and the individual. As such, it is officially none of our business. This is why they don't comment.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »If ZOS was sure of what he did (a big mistake), it would be for @ZOS_GinaBruno here defending the ZOS action.
ZOS erred in randomly 'distributing' suspensions, so silence in the community.
Nothing was done randomly. They set up an algorithm to check points earned for the certain group boss. Any accounts that only had the skill point flag once passed. Any accounts that had the skill point flag multiple times, were suspended.
Its absolutely plausible that people had been doing a loot/grind route on the bosses and did not realize at first what was happening. Some reported the issue and moved on, others continued on ignorant or otherwise of the extra skill points they were accumulating.
Users get caught up in suspension/ban waves all the time. If you feel you were incorrectly actioned, file a report using the proper channels and be rational.
only 3 days!!!????? I would ban them for at least a month so that they know what they "should do" next time when they find out about an exploitable bug!!§
Why only so few days ZOS???
But a few that discovered it and DID report it also got banned, despite only gaining a couple sps and leaving the area immediately after reporting and realizing what was going on. Anyone who gained more than one skill point from that Boss, whether intentionally farmed or accidental, has been banned.
So next time i discover a bug or exploit "should" i just keep my mouth shut and get banned? Or report it and get banned?
And...of course the rest of it got truncated.....
But the message is, do you seriously think anyone has actually read this all the way through?
lordrichter wrote: »ZOS has defined that disciplinary actions are between the company and the individual. As such, it is officially none of our business. This is why they don't comment.
That would be nice for ZOS, if they could decide what is and isn't my business.
@altemriel but then they went and auto-unbanned MOST of those people, people who didnt even appeal to have the ban lifted because they knew they were intentionally exploiting it and got caught out.
@itzTJ after trying for 4 days to get in contact with them regarding this matter, I can vouch for the fact that the current appeal process is down the shitter. Customer service too, for that matter.