anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Let's not forget that this addon cuts both ways. .../...
For the kind of people who think that 20K is required in for a PUG dungeon, then I can guarantee you that they themselves can't do anywhere near that kind of damage. These are the "wannabes" that you talk about.
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree with everything you said.
BUT...
I believe some people can be jerks enough to kick someone for supposedly low DPS EVEN if it's higher than theirs. And what's even worse than a jerk ? A jerk with the crown...
You can say "ignore them, they're not worth it, just queue up again" but no. I won't queue up again, but drop LFG grouping altogether. I like it because it provides diferent runs with some unexpected, but I know enough people in the game (by far) to avoid it completely.
timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
Then let us opt in.
The current method of sharing combat data (without this addon) is, at best, clunky, inaccurate, inefficient, and does not give us real-time data as the fight progresses. This is something that has consistently not been addressed in this thread: There is no good alternative at the moment.
Let us flag our account so that our data can be picked up and analyzed by someone else's GroupDamage, so that they're not relying on me to manually spit out a single number at the end of a fight. So that they can see my numbers as they change during the fight, for all fights. Don't take this away from us and pretend that this is okay because we have adequate alternatives. Because we don't.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »I believe some people can be jerks enough to kick someone for supposedly low DPS EVEN if it's higher than theirs.
I'm sorry, but that's just preposterous.
First, if someone really does stoop that low, I doubt that the existence or non-existence of this addon would affect their behavior or change anything.
Second, who are these mythical uber-jerks that you keep bringing up? Are they really that common, as you seem to suggest? Your tirades against this addon are premised on the behavior of a tiny, rare minority--people who would continue to be jerks with or without such an addon, I might add.
People I met ingame.
[mylife] I'm over 40. Dungeon Master (1987) was my first game. Skyrim (2011) was my 2nd game. ESO is my 3rd game. [/mylife]
In other words, I'm not used to the rude and violent (though harmless) way the younger generation uses nowadays (generation thing like in any generation). I haven't developed a "thicker skin" like many of you might have in other MMOs, and my "standards" might not exactly match those of the "standard MMO player". I'm not telling you this to bore you or anything, nor to say that my point of view is more valid than anyone else's, but just to put it in some kind of context. Starting ESO, I chose a sorcerer because it sounded cool, had no idea what "class" meant or implied, thought it was some kind of RP-archetype.
I *know* that there's many of us around here with a similar profile : not familiar with MMOs, not even gamers, but so hooked by TES5 that we went to ESO for the sake of "Elder Scrolls" ("Skyrim 2"...). Stayed because I love the game, and because of my guild, which is also a haven for people who, like me, cannot cope or better said, don't want to have to cope with everyday's violence / competition in the game, even though it's "normal" in MMOs ... "just ignore them" is not good enough for people like me, we want to be protected. Tamriel is an escape world, I don't want to be confronted with standard jerkiness ingame.
I know ZOS takes care of people like me : TES fans coming from solo games but potentially scared by "MMO mentality". And there's A LOT of us around. They just aren't all as "big-mouthed" as I am on forums.
In short : what might sound to you as "harmless/just ignore" is a "no/no" to people like me. For me there are A LOT of those "uber-jerks" in the game. But maybe you wouldn't even see them, you'd just widely ignore them. I can't.
If you're kicked out of a group you'd just sigh and join another group.
If I get kicked out of a group I'd probably log off for an entire week.
That leads to a risk/benefit analysis of such an addon as GroupDamage to be positive for you and negative for me. I listened and understood and even agreed to most of pro-arguments you brought. They just, imho, didn't outweight the risk. Your equation was different : you understand the risks, but you think the benefits are greater than the risks.
And I don't care how tiny a "minority" these "jerks" are. I say "don't give them an extra gun to use". And blame them for being jerks, not me for fearing them.
Hope this help understanding my position, which I believe to represent quite a lot of players who don't even dare/bother to read/post on forums.
On a side note, I was very, very eagerly expecting the "PvP part of the justice system" which was cancelled, I am very disappointed about that, which is most certainly due to "carebears like me", so you see, I also have to bow to sensitive people, too...
[Waiting for flames now, as every time anyone says something even remotely sincere and personal].
.
@ZOS_GinaBrunoZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
Wow. I'm taken back by ZOS as a company taking this stance.ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
I guess the next time I see someone hardcasting frags or some dps with 25k HP I'll look away for fear of "spying" on their (not really their) dps numbers. Spying, LOL you guys took the bait. Way to knock your game back to 2005 again.
KallistaBlackheart wrote: »it is a useful tool that lets players evaluate the overall group capability and yes kick if needed those who clearly are not ready for the GROUP content they are participating in. before this as a tank or a dps i would need to guess and kick or leave based on said educated guess. after this addon i could pinpoint just how badly the offending players were and make a judgment to stay/leave or kick/help based on exactly how badly. if this does go away i will be back to the limited options of rough guessing and kicking as unfair as that is. this tool does not violate any privacy as once you are in a group and your contributions matter for the group it is no longer your private information as others rely on your performance. no this is not a job, yes your performance determines if the others will be wasting their time.
Please don't make even more, rather try to lead people to them. Sadly it probably won't be possible to reach a big enough sample size to get results that really show something conclusive.
Perhaps @coolmodi can make an attempt to cannibalize the FTC damage meter and group damage sharing in an effort to keep something useful to groups in active development.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »timidobserver wrote: »Personally, I'd like to know WHY you guys came to this decision and hope it was for a technical limitation and not simply......ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »In our next incremental patch, we'll be including a fix so any addon that assigns names to combat events that don't involve the player will no longer be able to do so.
I agree. @ZOS_GinaBruno How about an explanation? I imagine that even those opposed to the add-on would like to know the reasoning behind your decision.
Though there are good and bad things about this addon, we believe that using this type of addon isn’t in the spirit of our game and encourages spying on other players without their permission. Ultimately, we don’t want players being evaluated and discriminated against based on data they don’t know is being broadcast. You will still be able to use addons that show your own combat data if you so choose to, which you can share with others.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »Yes, your 5k is low. Normal dungeons are doable with that low dps (even though they will take a very long time),
[...]
I often pug for pledges through /z and most of dds I meet pull from ~8 to ~18k. But 2k? My tank pulls more when tanking Axes in AA.
@KoshkaMurka http://cdn.eso.mmoui.com/preview/pvw4081.png (V16 scaled non-vet grotto, my real level was 20-30)
That's how 90% of my V16 scaled LFG dungeons look like, where (for me) 3k is low and 5k the best I can do. And I can count the times I have been 2nd place (by a few single % at best) with my fingers.
The numbers will change on real V16 as it seems, and having all passives and proper gear will also push it a bit, but this is just what I saw over months in LFG while leveling chars.Dunno about lower levels...but my V2-Magicka Sorc was pulling 15k...22k DPS-ST in V16 dungeons without battle-leveling...so maybe 10k+ is realistic
@Destruent And how did you get those numbers? I can also get much over 10k in FTC with the right conditions while actually only doing 4k over the boss fight.
I honestly trust my addon more with telling me that my performance is - compared to the others I run with - very good. If I ever encounter someone doing 15k-22k dps single target while battle leveld I will reconsider
Sadly that won't be possible anymore in the future, so it's back to guessing what numbers are actually real, and which are just made up crap
Edit: And the fun thing is, without my addon I'd now sit here thinking I'm hilariously bad, thankfully that is not the case. I know that I never hold back my groups, the opposite is the case, that's enough for me for now
KoshkaMurka wrote: »I must admit, I havent seen 3:35 min normal dungeon boss fight for a while. Even though I pug regularly. Seriously, I have no words. Is pugging through group finder really that bad? My tank does more dps even when I go full-tanking mode.
For instance, sometimes I raid with my casual/social guild and they kill Mage/Warrior in 3 minutes. And this is not a minmaxed group, some of guild members wear vr12 gear just for style etc.
I dont even know what to say. You're very unlucky with pugs, @coolmodi , I'd just stop using that damn grouping tool if I were you.
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_RichLambert @ZOS_AlanG I had a poll going there...something that isn't provided in this thread. If you guys don't want to see the numbers on the wall that's fine by me but so everyone else can see them here's the results at the time the thought police closed it. Aren't you guys even curious the real data behind this? What's the point of having polls here again?!@ZOS_AlanG wrote:There's already a very active discussion on this topic, including an explanation for the change from the Community team. To keep this discussion focused, we are locking this thread and ask that you continue it over here.
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_RichLambert @ZOS_AlanG I had a poll going there...something that isn't provided in this thread. If you guys don't want to see the numbers on the wall that's fine by me but so everyone else can see them here's the results at the time the thought police closed it. Aren't you guys even curious the real data behind this? What's the point of having polls here again?!@ZOS_AlanG wrote:There's already a very active discussion on this topic, including an explanation for the change from the Community team. To keep this discussion focused, we are locking this thread and ask that you continue it over here.
***GROUP DAMAGE ADDONS - Yes or No?*** 108 votes
Yes - Please explain
68% 74 votes
No - Please explain
24% 26 votes
I came for the sweetrolls (I don't care either way)
7% 8 votes