Hello, we do not generally discuss suspensions or other player penalties. However, it is not true, suspensions are for simply having a crafting survey in the bank. The criteria was the ratio of surveys and obtained raw materials. And no one who has recovered from a survey 500 resources can tell me that he had simply gotten lucky. I do not exclude that mistakes could be made. It's the opposite. But not everyone who shouts, is innocent.
SourceHello, we do not generally discuss suspensions or other player penalties. However, it is not true, suspensions are for simply having a crafting survey in the bank. The criteria was the ratio of surveys and obtained raw materials. And no one who has recovered from a survey 500 resources can tell me that he had simply gotten lucky. I do not exclude that mistakes could be made. It's the opposite. But not everyone who shouts, is innocent.
carudocb16_ESO wrote: »SourceHello, we do not generally discuss suspensions or other player penalties. However, it is not true, suspensions are for simply having a crafting survey in the bank. The criteria was the ratio of surveys and obtained raw materials. And no one who has recovered from a survey 500 resources can tell me that he had simply gotten lucky. I do not exclude that mistakes could be made. It's the opposite. But not everyone who shouts, is innocent.
Fair enough but for those that broke no rules and are one of the possible mistakes mentioned what ZOS do now is important.
To be told as some have been already that their ban will stand and won't be investigated when they claim their innocence is unacceptable.
carudocb16_ESO wrote: »SourceHello, we do not generally discuss suspensions or other player penalties. However, it is not true, suspensions are for simply having a crafting survey in the bank. The criteria was the ratio of surveys and obtained raw materials. And no one who has recovered from a survey 500 resources can tell me that he had simply gotten lucky. I do not exclude that mistakes could be made. It's the opposite. But not everyone who shouts, is innocent.
Fair enough but for those that broke no rules and are one of the possible mistakes mentioned what ZOS do now is important.
To be told as some have been already that their ban will stand and won't be investigated when they claim their innocence is unacceptable.
If you didn't break a rule, you don't have 500 raw materials from a single crafting survey received.
Love how you visit a prison and every one of the inmates will tell you they are innocent lol, seems like thats going on here and part of human nature. I do writs everyday and get surveys just about everyday and didnt get banned. People will lie their asses off when they know they got caught smh.
[Quoted post removed]
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »So if I've been doing Writs every day for the last month and decided today I was going to clean out my inventory and actually use all those Surveys that have been piling up, I'm safe doing that? *remains skeptical*
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »So if I've been doing Writs every day for the last month and decided today I was going to clean out my inventory and actually use all those Surveys that have been piling up, I'm safe doing that? *remains skeptical*
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »If someone has no clue that this isnt supposed to happen,they shouldnt be banned.Someone might just think they found a glitch and is using it until it is fixed. Not realizing they could be banned for it. I dont think it's cool to exploit a glitch,but everyone did it with the troves until that got fixed and no one got banned.Perhaps this is the same situation,..only they broke rules they had no idea existed.
Ignorance of crime is not a defense. Otherwise people would simply claim they didnt know they couldnt do that and get off every time. As far as the thieves troves they just respawned quickly. There was nothing you had to do to make it respawn quickly. Thats the difference.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »If someone has no clue that this isnt supposed to happen,they shouldnt be banned.Someone might just think they found a glitch and is using it until it is fixed. Not realizing they could be banned for it. I dont think it's cool to exploit a glitch,but everyone did it with the troves until that got fixed and no one got banned.Perhaps this is the same situation,..only they broke rules they had no idea existed.
Ignorance of crime is not a defense. Otherwise people would simply claim they didnt know they couldnt do that and get off every time. As far as the thieves troves they just respawned quickly. There was nothing you had to do to make it respawn quickly. Thats the difference.
I can see your point.Forgive my ignorance.I was offering my thoughts.Sorry.
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »So if I've been doing Writs every day for the last month and decided today I was going to clean out my inventory and actually use all those Surveys that have been piling up, I'm safe doing that? *remains skeptical*
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »carudocb16_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »There is no way a legit person could be banned. This isnt something that could be done on accident. This is something you had to do purposely. I do not buy for a second that anyone was innocent and banned on accident. How do you accidentally get 500 mats from one survey? There has to be action on your part or you will only receive the first set of nodes. So not buying this Im innocent! line.
Are you trolling ?
I'm going to assume not and carry on regardless
ZOS have banned at least 1 person who didn't exploit and didn't receive 500 mats from one survey...it's a mistake and they need to investigate it.
Person who SAYS they didnt exploit. Everyone in jail claims they are innocent.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »If someone has no clue that this isnt supposed to happen,they shouldnt be banned.Someone might just think they found a glitch and is using it until it is fixed. Not realizing they could be banned for it. I dont think it's cool to exploit a glitch,but everyone did it with the troves until that got fixed and no one got banned.Perhaps this is the same situation,..only they broke rules they had no idea existed.
Ignorance of crime is not a defense. Otherwise people would simply claim they didnt know they couldnt do that and get off every time. As far as the thieves troves they just respawned quickly. There was nothing you had to do to make it respawn quickly. Thats the difference.
I can see your point.Forgive my ignorance.I was offering my thoughts.Sorry.
No you right you shouldn't be banned for exploit as exploiting means you intentionaly use a bug to gain an unfair advantage.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Accidents happen:
- A player could've triggered the exploit by accident
- ZOS could've banned a player who didn't exploit
There is no way to trigger this by accident. So there was noone banned for exploiting that didnt not just exploit but multiple times on the same survey. Its ONE survey and you get 500 mats from it then auto ban. There is just no wya possible for them to accidentally do this over and over and over. Come on man.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »If someone has no clue that this isnt supposed to happen,they shouldnt be banned.Someone might just think they found a glitch and is using it until it is fixed. Not realizing they could be banned for it. I dont think it's cool to exploit a glitch,but everyone did it with the troves until that got fixed and no one got banned.Perhaps this is the same situation,..only they broke rules they had no idea existed.
Ignorance of crime is not a defense. Otherwise people would simply claim they didnt know they couldnt do that and get off every time. As far as the thieves troves they just respawned quickly. There was nothing you had to do to make it respawn quickly. Thats the difference.
I can see your point.Forgive my ignorance.I was offering my thoughts.Sorry.
No you right you shouldn't be banned for exploit as exploiting means you intentionaly use a bug to gain an unfair advantage.
Didnt I just apologize for having added my thoughts? Is getting your two cents in worth that much to you? Fine,go ahead.Rant.
Personally.,I prefer the other more intelligent comment to mine,..instead of yours.
(there's 2 "l"s in intentionally,btw.)
The criteria was the ratio of surveys and obtained raw materials
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Accidents happen:
- A player could've triggered the exploit by accident
- ZOS could've banned a player who didn't exploit
There is no way to trigger this by accident. So there was noone banned for exploiting that didnt not just exploit but multiple times on the same survey. Its ONE survey and you get 500 mats from it then auto ban. There is just no wya possible for them to accidentally do this over and over and over. Come on man.
So I take it you never acidentally deposited smth in your bank that you didn't mean to?
Again Im not detailing the exploit but it isnt just woops I stuck this in my bank. So what you are saying is completely irrelevant. There were deliberate steps you had to take to get unlimited mats from ONE survey. You cannot simply accidentally do it.
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »So if I've been doing Writs every day for the last month and decided today I was going to clean out my inventory and actually use all those Surveys that have been piling up, I'm safe doing that? *remains skeptical*
Actually, that's what I did yesterday.
I had a bunch of surveys piled up, and I've moved a bunch to mules because I haven't had the time to go harvest them. When ZOS announced that they'll fix this exploit, I had guessed (incorrectly) that they'll fix it by making it character-bound (seemed like the easiest fix to me). If that was to be their solution, then I can't have my surveys sitting on a mule because then they'll be stuck on that character.
So I relocated all my surveys back to my main and spent a couple of hours collecting the mats from all of them (including some duplicate surveys that were still in their containers).
And everything's fine. I went on a legitimate survey spree yesterday because I thought that they might make it character-bound, and nothing happened.
Finally, I do know a few people who did get suspended (nobody is being banned, BTW; it's all 3-day suspensions), and AFAIK, there were no false positives in any of those suspensions.
(I'm not saying that their system is 100% fool-proof; I'm just saying that with the few data points that I do have access to, there were no false positives amongst them.)