https://youtu.be/ThZtwhYkKSsrager82b14_ESO wrote: »You could not post this in other thread? but I will clearly say it again.
Developers said it was not intended, that means it is a exploit.
Developers also said that they are balance around it because it is something players do. Since we exploited it so much, they have to balance around it.
To say that it is not a exploit because devs want us to do it now is just silly. It was not intended, we found out. They lack the skill, time, or willingness to fix a exploit that was not in the vision of combat when it was made. So now they support it.
It looks bad on them for supporting it, but things are changing. I heard we got a new team working on combat, and now is the time for our voices to be heard after years and years of asking them to fix it.
A game is a structured form of play, usually undertaken for enjoyment and sometimes used as an educational tool.[1] Games are distinct from work, which is usually carried out for remuneration, and from art, which is more often an expression of aesthetic or ideological elements.
Gambling is the wagering of money or something of value (referred to as "the stakes") on an event with an uncertain outcome, with the primary intent of winning money or material goods. Gambling thus requires three elements to be present: consideration (an amount wagered), risk (chance), and a prize.
No evidence. Ignored.
That's why the devs are working on removing it, right?
Im totally wrong, yeah. Even though the devs have LITERALLY said it's an exploit and causes de-syncs and they are working on removing it.
That's why the devs are working on removing it, right?
Im totally wrong, yeah. Even though the devs have LITERALLY said it's an exploit and causes de-syncs and they are working on removing it.
Title. There isn’t any true, plausible argument against animation cancelling. Every argument made has been proven to be baseless and heresay. Devs have already said it’s not an exploit, and have encouraged doing it.https://youtu.be/ThZtwhYkKSs
Furthermore, it’s been in the game 5+ years, at this point in time it is clearly a feature and anyone who says otherwise simply has a dearth of game knowledge. You have my answer, and if I am wrong, your business is to take up the argument and refute me(Meno l88). - have at it. Bring logical claims and back them with proof or else you commit fallacy and will be ignored. RIP to the Goat Socrates. Also RIP to the Goat Cassius Clay. Also RIP Kobe, Nip, and Snupe.
MrBrownstone wrote: »I don't really understand how is it gonna be better without AC. We have to light attack constantly to gain ultimate. They're gonna have to change that I guess. Because if AC is gone, light attack weaving has to go.
I think only the light weaving was not intended but block cancel and bar swap cancel was intended to make combat more reactive. I also think that light weaving is a bit lame but the other cancels are crucial. I'd love to see those anti-AC people play tank without block cancel.
Animation canceling is worst exploit in this game, you can just combine 3 abilities in one broken combo and you cant even react unless you lucky dodge roll. So you cant react if you cant see, might as well remove dodge and block at this point. Why you think builds with permablock were made, because this unskilled ac exploit...
Animation canceling is worst exploit in this game, you can just combine 3 abilities in one broken combo and you cant even react unless you lucky dodge roll. So you cant react if you cant see, might as well remove dodge and block at this point. Why you think builds with permablock were made, because this unskilled ac exploit...
@relentless_turnip its mental illness.
Truth doesnt matter only how they can twist it to fit their needs or agenda.
Rly? Why than nerfed incap? Incap, light, bash, surprise attack, selene that is 1 sec combo? Will not speak for other abilities on different classes bcs abuse.

rager82b14_ESO wrote: »You could not post this in other thread? but I will clearly say it again.
Developers said it was not intended, that means it is a exploit.
Developers also said that they are balance around it because it is something players do. Since we exploited it so much, they have to balance around it.
To say that it is not a exploit because devs want us to do it now is just silly. It was not intended, we found out. They lack the skill, time, or willingness to fix a exploit that was not in the vision of combat when it was made. So now they support it.
It looks bad on them for supporting it, but things are changing. I heard we got a new team working on combat, and now is the time for our voices to be heard after years and years of asking them to fix it.
Heresay. Provide proof of the following
1. Developers stating AC is unintended.

No evidence. Ignored.
Fails to even attempt to refute my claims. Ignored.
Derailing comment. Ignored.