Cundu_Ertur wrote: »
From another thread. If you want to advocate to retain stealth gameplay in bosmers, I would suggest that second link.
I told them a summary of everything I've stated on these forums. Then I linked to the poll about the bosmers passive and how 80% of 72 votes (now 82 and still at 80%) do not want stealth detect. So, hopefully it's something....
But the fact that stealth detection is now in the race's description makes me soooooooo angry. I hope this backfires so hard on them when it goes live.
I can personally say I'll be absolutely finished with another company that is so bull-headedly ignorant in its refusal to listen to player feedback. It may be a small thing, but it speaks volumes about the future--as I learned the hard way after preordering BfA.
So how does it feel to be ignored by the devs?
Gold Coast and Hew's Bane about to turn into litter box zones, PVP tryhard gankers will race change to cats to continue griefing and the forums are going to be inundated by pissed off players demanding to know why their favorite stealth characters just got gutted.
FUN!
If anyone knows any gaming journalists, maybe bringing outside attention will sway them.
Ask the streamers and the podcasters.
Cundu_Ertur wrote: »In that video one of the people was trying to claim this was lore-friendly, which is an utter joke to anyone who has actually read up on the lore about Bosmer. Well, there's that 'joke' word again, and I'm still not laughing.
In the Kubler Ross model, I make it to 'depression,' but then cycle right back to 'anger.' 'Acceptance' will never, ever, ever happen.
Cundu_Ertur wrote: »Raven, I would have got banned. The level of obtuseness in there was toxic.
Seems legit.And that other one who thinks stealth detect is the same as stealth.Cundu_Ertur wrote: »Raven, I would have got banned. The level of obtuseness in there was toxic.
Cendrillion21 wrote: »Hopefully we won't see these changes go live.