It's a options that I believe is not needed it's not a options that is needed like damage numbers something that's need more attention and have bigger impact on the game then text chat but I see hardly any of you their asking for something that is more desperately needed then text chat.
How am I discriminating against people who want text chat?
What evidence a poll that can not be used yea that's not really contradicting me.Am not flailing and I do not need to hide behind the majority claim also whenever someone post something against you all claim to add text chat you all just say it's more options.When it's a options that isn't needed when you can do everything you want to do with text chat with voice.
Sure ask what you're unclear on. Shoot me a PM
Can you back up your claims with simple quotes? Pm them to me if you need to.
Well when you're saying things like this...How am I discriminating against people who want text chat?
ts not needed you can do everything in the game without text chat you all just choice not to use it.its not ZOS fault your anti-social and don't want to talk to people like normal human beings.
I stand by my original statement that you don't want to talk with people because.You will rather hide behind a keyboard and type a message Instead of having a conversation with a person using your Vocal cords.
... it's pretty obvious you've got a bias.So again Sir I have read each and every post and I have drawn to the conclusion that most would rather become anti-social and they wonder why they can't find a group to run a dungeon or PvP with.
Well when you're saying things like this...
... it's pretty obvious you've got a bias.
It's a options that I believe is not needed it's not a options that is needed like damage numbers something that's need more attention and have bigger impact on the game then text chat but I see hardly any of you their asking for something that is more desperately needed then text chat.
Mirra_Halfelven wrote: »
That's great for you, but wait till you get up in the VR levels & you end up sitting around for hours & days on end trying to get groups for dungeons & craglorn quests with no luck. Then tell us how "great" the lack of text chat is ....
Moderators have absolutely zero control over the development of the game, all they can do is report what a developer might have said about something. ZOS_Racheal edited that post 3 posts before this one, and is a moderator, not a developer.Duragon_Darko wrote: »I love how moderators jump in and edit language but refuse to reply to anything on the thread. @ZOS, shady way to run a forums..... oh, wait. You run your game like that too.....
Kleptobrainiac wrote: »
I'll be sure to come back & let y'all know.
I'll just do guild runs using voice chat like I do in every other mmo I've ever played.
Looking forward to it!
Moderators have absolutely zero control over the development of the game, all they can do is report what a developer might have said about something. ZOS_Racheal edited that post 3 posts before this one, and is a moderator, not a developer.
The thing is, there's no evidence anywhere that any developer has actually read ANY of the posts here at all since maybe page 8 or so, or even skimmed the thread. I really and truly feel like they're just lumping us into a single thread so they can more effectively ignore us.
-
Moderators have absolutely zero control over the development of the game, all they can do is report what a developer might have said about something. ZOS_Racheal edited that post 3 posts before this one, and is a moderator, not a developer.
The thing is, there's no evidence anywhere that any developer has actually read ANY of the posts here at all since maybe page 8 or so, or even skimmed the thread. I really and truly feel like they're just lumping us into a single thread so they can more effectively ignore us.
-
If it's truly to reduce forum clutter then why has there never one been another thread on any other hot issue reduced into one thread? There have been other smaller issues that they limit to one thread, saying it's to "more easily read feedback", but those issues always vanish after 2-3 weeks, and I have a feeling they knew they would vanish if ignored for a while since they were minor issues.
I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt. There have been multiple threads about it, but keeping it contained to one reduces forum clutter. It also centralizes discussion to one place. This way players or Devs from that matter only have to look through one thread rather then multiple. However which narrative is true is debatable.
The issue is about how do you set those runs up. Since you are only able to be in one chat at a time your ability to speak with others is limited. You cannot be in both Guild Chat and Area Chat for example, making simultaneous communication across multiple venues impossible.
Kleptobrainiac wrote: »
Sound like a non issue imo.
Having said that, I would like to bow out of this "discussion" for now. Thanks for reading my thoughts.
I'll just leave with my final thought (ala Jerry Springer).
My experience in game has been extremely positive (using voice chat has so far been really pleasant. Joined a guild, yada-yada... met some folks & friended etc.) but after reading this thread (text based) I'm a little concerned about the quality of the community here in this game. I think text is easier to hide behind. So I'll just go on my merry way. I'm not really interested in being involved in a toxic thread that I'm surprised (after reading it in it's entirety) is not locked.
Oh well, back to the game where the fun is happening!
Good luck with your demands & such! Toodles.
See you all in game!
AaronLannister wrote: »
It isn't the fact that it's easier to hide behind, it's because it's less intrusive, some people just aren't in the mood to talk or play better when not hearing voices, you are completely missing the point, but you're also quoting Jerry Springer sooooo....
Which is also a reason why text chatting is still a pervasive form of communication in real life. Hence the reason why these forums exist is not to communicate through VOICE. But through Text.
Kleptobrainiac wrote: »
No need for insults. I'll just leave.
You kinda just proved my point about this thread not really being a discussion at all. It's just flaming & baiting, trolling. Sad.
At any rate. Good day, mates.
OK, so i asked @NewBlacksmurf to provide clarification on;
"There are quite a few actually. You may have only joined this thread and neglected to read each page.
The other threads also from April till now contain members of the game who do not want voice chat on the game."
So, im unclear if that's "on in the game period" or "in the game at all" either way, I could not see anyone asking for that in these threads he linked me in explanation. Please help me find them. there was one PC player who didnt want it included in the pc version....
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/181957/let-us-turn-off-area-voice-chat-permanently
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/167454/voice-chat
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/188612/console-feedback-i-am-embracing-voice-chat-only-however-several-fixes-tweaks-are-needed
I am obviously missing something he wants me to see.
OK, so i asked @NewBlacksmurf to provide clarification on;
"There are quite a few actually. You may have only joined this thread and neglected to read each page.
The other threads also from April till now contain members of the game who do not want voice chat on the game."
So, im unclear if that's "on in the game period" or "in the game at all" either way, I could not see anyone asking for that in these threads he linked me in explanation. Please help me find them. there was one PC player who didnt want it included in the pc version....
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/181957/let-us-turn-off-area-voice-chat-permanently
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/167454/voice-chat
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/188612/console-feedback-i-am-embracing-voice-chat-only-however-several-fixes-tweaks-are-needed
I am obviously missing something he wants me to see.
Kleptobrainiac wrote: »
Sound like a non issue imo.
Having said that, I would like to bow out of this "discussion" for now. Thanks for reading my thoughts.
I'll just leave with my final thought (ala Jerry Springer).
My experience in game has been extremely positive (using voice chat has so far been really pleasant. Joined a guild, yada-yada... met some folks & friended etc.) but after reading this thread (text based) I'm a little concerned about the quality of the community here in this game. I think text is easier to hide behind. So I'll just go on my merry way. I'm not really interested in being involved in a toxic thread that I'm surprised (after reading it in it's entirety) is not locked.
Oh well, back to the game where the fun is happening!
Good luck with your demands & such! Toodles.
See you all in game!
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
So you PM me and ask for info...I begin sharing and you cut me off with an ALL caps reply cause you were and are too lazy to read. Are there more, yes but it's not worth anyone's time to pull an off topic conversation off this thread and then for you to decide to tag me and leave out that you didn't even read the first links.
Then ask me to go to another forum to name shame ppl....cmon man
Prob haven't bothered to read up on older threads I shared with you on this same topic
You've closed your eyes and ears to anything that doesn't agree with your opinion and are quick to side with anyone who seemingly supports your opinion.
What's so hard about seeing people who don't want voice chat at all.
Is it unbelievable...?
AND the reality of it all, while playing tonight I have literally 4 ppl come up and say. oooohhhhh. It's NewBlacksmurf!!
I'm reading your stuff on the forums about text chat...you're right man, keep it up and don't let them get to you.
There are people who don't feel the need to post but do read these topics and some agree with you while others agree with my position.
Then there are those, like the group I just joined in the grouping tool that do not use voice chat or party chat but respond to my PM when I ask them to party or voice chat saying...nah bro. I just play, don't want to chat sry
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
So you PM me and ask for info...I begin sharing and you cut me off with an ALL caps reply cause you were and are too lazy to read. Are there more, yes but it's not worth anyone's time to pull an off topic conversation off this thread and then for you to decide to tag me and leave out that you didn't even read the first links.
Then ask me to go to another forum to name shame ppl....cmon man
Prob haven't bothered to read up on older threads I shared with you on this same topic
You've closed your eyes and ears to anything that doesn't agree with your opinion and are quick to side with anyone who seemingly supports your opinion.
What's so hard about seeing people who don't want voice chat at all.
Is it unbelievable...?
AND the reality of it all, while playing tonight I have literally 4 ppl come up and say. oooohhhhh. It's NewBlacksmurf!!
I'm reading your stuff on the forums about text chat...you're right man, keep it up and don't let them get to you.
There are people who don't feel the need to post but do read these topics and some agree with you while others agree with my position.
Then there are those, like the group I just joined in the grouping tool that do not use voice chat or party chat but respond to my PM when I ask them to party or voice chat saying...nah bro. I just play, don't want to chat sry
So, what is your idea of an anti-text post? you wont say who and when, so generalize a quote.
the simple truth is you keep saying things that you simply do not back up.
Yes, it's a typo. I hang my head in shame. Of course I could have said it's asking you to be introspective, but I'm sarcastic, not clever. I'll go sit in the corner now....NewBlacksmurf wrote: »
What is my idea of an anti-text post...is that a typo?
Let's assume you're asking what defines anti-voice chat.
I ask in all seriousness is that a bad thing? Not everyone is even physically capable of using voice chat. And this is what I'm asking examples for. But why not both? Is there a problem with that? There are people who never will use a voice chat only option, yet they want to be social and communicate in a social game. So I guess they are out in the cold, huh? Does this make them anti-voice? To me they just have a different preference.A: Players who will utilize voice chat only if it's the only choice but otherwise want text chat and if added will default to text chat as this is their preferred method of in-game communication.
meaning??? Does that make them anti-voice in your mind? You said primary. That means they will still use it does it not?This also is a group who will party chat outside of the game but for in-game their primary method of cummunication is text chat.
fair enough. They don't want it, they won't use it. This sub group will exist no matter the communication system in place.This group also has those who play this game solo only and do not wish to talk to anyone via voice chat or text chat.
so "my way or the highway?" No second option, no way to communicate other than something they do not like? For instance, in other games, the women in my life have been harassed for talking in console games. So they have no recourse but to either face said harassment or cower from its possibility?People who do not like or want to use voice chat or who often times say they feel forced to use voice chat because they would rather text chat primarily or all the time.
Yup. I am. Which is what I was asking for in a strictly between us private message that would have stayed private had I not felt insulted by you posting links to discussions I had been a part of. And then had the gall to say I hadn't read them. I'm sorry if you took my sarcastic "so i didnt have the time to look yet" as serious after you accused me of not reading them. but lets not drag that up.You're asking me to name and specifically identify ppl
That type of comment can fall into name shaming. Which happens to against the code of conduct...I have generalized because that is allowed in the code and I began sharing threads that involve conversations about ppl who are anti voice chat.
Secondly...naming or providing you with a list does nothing but throw those people under the rug for some thread they don't want to be a part of.
here's one (I didn't even have to look in a different comment):And again as I've wrote now a few times...please specify exactly what it is you're claiming that I can't back up.
The majority of my comments were from ESO live information...
How about this...to make it easy on you...cite what specific things I'm saying that are wrong and please feel free to cite proof.
From you, all I see is an opinion based on a small group of other opinions where you're then claiming that that small sample size somehow is a majority and that's why your opinion should be addressed by Zenimax in this thread even tho it's been addressed a few times on ZOS live.