Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »
These were players that were never actually going into PvP. They took advantage of a quick and easy PvP ability that they didnt have to PvP for. So its no shock that when confronted with having to actually participate in the zone to obtain the ability they would do everything they can to avoid it. Not because of the standalone issues PvP is currently experiencing but because they are pure PvEers.
Oh, you mean like Vigor is now?
ZOS thought it was enough of a grind that they made it easier for PvEers to obtain it. I guess ZOS is encouraging them to take "advantage of a quick and easy PvP ability that they didnt have to PvP for" then.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »
These were players that were never actually going into PvP. They took advantage of a quick and easy PvP ability that they didnt have to PvP for. So its no shock that when confronted with having to actually participate in the zone to obtain the ability they would do everything they can to avoid it. Not because of the standalone issues PvP is currently experiencing but because they are pure PvEers.
Oh, you mean like Vigor is now?
ZOS thought it was enough of a grind that they made it easier for PvEers to obtain it. I guess ZOS is encouraging them to take "advantage of a quick and easy PvP ability that they didnt have to PvP for" then.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Any word from ZOS on the change back?
unpopular and unecessary thingNomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Any word from ZOS on the change back?
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »unpopular and unecessary thingNomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Any word from ZOS on the change back?
So unpopular that the rest of the community has already moved on
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »So unpopular that the rest of the community has already moved on while a dozen or so posters spam this thread to keep the topic relevant.
Yup. Real unpopular.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Better the masses that will put it to good use than players too inept to set up bot trains.
SilverBride wrote: »Actually, there aren't. Every time it drops to page 2 or 3, one of the same few people posts the same things they've been posting for 40 pages just to keep it bumped.
TineaCruris wrote: »TineaCruris wrote: »Donny_Vito wrote: »[Removed quote]
vigor is only good for stamina toons. This change screws anyone trying to level an alt.
It might be usable by everyone leveling an alt, but I bet you dollars to donuts that Vigor will be more valuable than Rapid Maneuvers for most PVE players, and that is what this change looks to be addressing.
How many mag toons use vigor? What percentage of the player base are on mag toons?
Outside of Cyrodiil, where Assault 5 is going to be common, I rarely see anyone using Rapid Maneuvers except for a few higher level crafting resource farmers. i would suggest that fewer people are using it for PVE, as a percentage of the total population, than the percentage of people running Stamina.
JoeCapricorn wrote: »That would require doing that kind of a grind on 11 additional characters. It isn't as easy as doing just the tutorial quests either, Assault rank 5 requires 98,000 AP. That takes hours.
I don't have the time, motivation and energy to do that kind of grind on 11 characters.
I play ESO as an escape from reality, to destress, and Rapid Maneuver is a long-standing part of my gameplay. It's how I move around whenever I am on a mount. I have it on every bar on every character.
I have done the tutorial quests and it got me to Assault Level: 2. Whoop dee doo. If they required Assault level 3 for Rapids, maybe it wouldn't be so bad. But it is Assault level 5.
I don't have the time or mental energy to grind that out on all of my other alts. I am not going to. So I hope they change it back or find a compromise that makes everyone happy.
Many of my characters aren't built for PVP, they are mules and have no skillpoints allocated to weapons or armor. Just crafting. There is no way they would be able to get Assault to 5. But Rapid Maneuver forms a basic method of mobility. It allows me to get to a bank NPC (and when applicable) an Outlaw Hideout just to unload stuff or sell stuff on a guild trader.
It allows new characters to move around without feeling like their mounts are made of molasses. It will be 55 days before my lowbie gets 60 in speed.
Even then, 60 speed feels too slow. I like Rapids just to go faster. I just like going faster. You know what I would rather do? Grind for 11 other Rings of the Wild Hunt
[Edited for removed content] [Further edited to fix some grammar issues caused by previous edit]
Goregrinder wrote: »We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
Goregrinder wrote: »
We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
allhailskippy wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
I had a Ferrari. ZoS stole my keys.
Goregrinder wrote: »allhailskippy wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
I had a Ferrari. ZoS stole my keys.
Didn't they refund skill points for it? If you already had Rapids unlocked, then your alliance rank should be like level 1 or 2 right? So you're already halfway back to rapids!
Goregrinder wrote: »
We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
Replace "Rapids" with "Vigor" and ask ZOS why they disagree with you.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »unpopular and unecessary thingNomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Any word from ZOS on the change back?
So unpopular that the rest of the community has already moved on
Yep. Almost 20% of the Steam players have moved on since this change went live. The number has recovered less than 1% so far, but that's likely because of the free house event. Once the artificial excitement wears off, I would expect the downward spiral to continue.
Unfortunate, because it didn't have to be this way.
https://steamcharts.com/app/306130
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Better the masses that will put it to good use than players too inept to set up bot trains.
You realise that this still makes no sense.
You will now have players that are "too inept to set up a bot train" getting Vigor, just the same way that players that are "too inept to set up a bot train" were able to get Rapids, but you still haven't explained why one is ok and the other isn't.
On top of this, all those players that are "too inept to set up a bot train" that are willing to follow your previous advice to go and join a group and leech AP, can go into Cyrodiil, get enough AP for both Vigor and Rapids without ever once needing to hit an enemy player. So on one hand you are unhappy with non-PVPers getting one "PVP Skill" (in your words) without PVPing, yet perfectly happy with them getting two???
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »If your incapable of understanding why someone would think one important skill being available to the many is rather than a skill not important at all being locked behind a higher tier of a skill tree.
Thats also your problem.
Goregrinder wrote: »Just unlock rank 5 and you will get rapids back!
Vigor requires rank 1 right? Rapids requires rank 5 right? You should have at least Rank 2 unlocked right? [snip]allhailskippy wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »allhailskippy wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »We all like driving in Ferrari's but if you want that luxury you gotta grind for it like everyone else who drives a Ferrari. Rapids is a luxury that is rewarded to you for spending the time and effort farming it. It's not required in order to play, you can play perfectly fine without it. But if you want it, then go out and unlock it.
I had a Ferrari. ZoS stole my keys.
Didn't they refund skill points for it? If you already had Rapids unlocked, then your alliance rank should be like level 1 or 2 right? So you're already halfway back to rapids!
Halfway? I wish. Wouldn't be a discussion if it was halfway.
It's more like 1/80th of the way. Per character.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »unpopular and unecessary thingNomadic_Atmoran wrote: »Any word from ZOS on the change back?
So unpopular that the rest of the community has already moved on
Yep. Almost 20% of the Steam players have moved on since this change went live. The number has recovered less than 1% so far, but that's likely because of the free house event. Once the artificial excitement wears off, I would expect the downward spiral to continue.
Unfortunate, because it didn't have to be this way.
https://steamcharts.com/app/306130
Are you being serious? Its a new school year. There is always a drop off in activity in all MMOs this time of year. You have no evidence that these two things are even connected.
Nomadic_Atmoran wrote: »If your incapable of understanding why someone would think one important skill being available to the many is better than a skill not important at all being locked behind a higher tier of a skill tree. Thats your problem.