TheShadowScout wrote: »
I don't actually find that funny.
There are some, truly sick, individuals who think like that in real life.
...and I don't just mean people in psychiatric hospitals.
I mean people with power.
InvictusApollo wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »InvictusApollo wrote: »I have never enjoyed nor even experienced this as I allways strive to excell in everything I do. And whenever anyone told me l2p I allways took it as an occasion to stop for a moment, contemplate and research how I could improve.
You can strive to excell at everything you do but you CANNOT possibly excell at anything and everything you try. You DO have weak points, probably many, like all of us, and things that you cannot improve even when working on them.
It's not polite for someone else to tell you to go correct and work on those things. It's basic social behaviour and instinctive respect of the Other Person with their differences.
If what you say was true, then all the teachers would be automatically "rude people". And for all the other situations you can allways disagree with the need to improve in a specific field. For example if out of the blue someone told me to learn how to do ballet, then I'd just reject their piece of advice and don't even bother.
However if someone told me the same thing after I ruined a ballet show for everyone, then I would humbly accept my inability to master ballet skills in a timely fashion.
Rarely anyone tells you to learn something without reason. Usually that reason is your very poor performance in an activity that includes other people. When your failure negatively affects others it is in my opinion socially acceptable to advise more education. Otherwise the person who has failed either won't have any incentive to learn or might even stay in delusion of being skillfull. Whatever the case is, the lack of call to education will lead to repetition of failure.
Which is worse? Allowing someone to fail miserably over and over or exposing them to a temporary negative emotion that will have a chance of facilitating success for that person?
She's just saying that it's rude and unnecessary to tell someone to l2p.
I've never heard of a professional dance teacher who has told their students to l2b (l2ballet!), or whatever, so I think we're good...
barney2525 wrote: »Of course it is. Speech (and writing) patterns are always a choice.
For example, you can respond to someone by saying either 'you don't seem to understand'. or by saying 'you are an idiot'.
Generally it's just a lack of respect of person being shown by the rude person.
If someone tells you to "l2p" then messes up themselves, you are then perfectly at liberty to return the compliment, without being the rude one.
Rave the Histborn wrote: »Anyone who would say "l2p" without knowing someone's situation--which we can't, ever--needs to learn to people. Just scrolling past something you think is stupid takes less effort than clicking on it and frothing at someone. Either offer a solution, teach the person the thing you think they don't know, or shut the hell up. L2p makes someone look just as stupid as uneducated nerf calls or whatever else they're having a fit over.
Agreed, you can't ever know someone's situation which is why things like "lived experiences" and situations can't and shouldn't be accounted for during a casual interaction. If someone is that mentally unwell that they shouldn't be in an environment like pvp in the first place. That being said it's easier to say "offer a solution, teach the person the thing you think they don't know, or shut the hell up." but it doesn't just work like that. It's similar to sports, most players don't sit around waiting for people to tell them how to improve they constantly practice and watch film to improve themselves. I'd also like to point out that "l2p" is something people say in every professional sport or game at every conceivable level or play. Unless you can human nature and thousands of years of evolution and tribalism then it's something that people are going to have to learn to deal with and over come like every person before them has.
It's very telling when someone deflects responsibility for their choice of words - words that are well known to be hurtful in their intent - onto the listener. It is wise to steer widely clear of people who do this.
InvictusApollo wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »It's interesting to see OP agreeing so strongly with that post.
Just wondering if the motive behind that poll is to actually discern if that word is inherently derogatory or if it's merely a convoluted way to obtain some endorsement of the continued use of it as well as the convenient opportunity to do so broadly... with, seemingly, the added bonus of giving free reign and encouraging people to use denigrations to theorize on the rationales behind the recipient's interpretation of "L2P" (which are still IMHO completely irrelevant).
My perception is that the OP lives, or desperately wishes to live, in a totally binary representation of the world where there are two categories of people - and only 2 : the ones who know, and the ones who don't know. The former are entitled to (and even must) teach to the latter in any shape or form, and the latter should try and learn by all means from the former in order to belong to them at some stage.
The reality of things is of course far more complicated than that - but that's something the OP is not ready to learn yet.
You do know that talking about someone adn referring to them with third person, while they are next to you, is... rude
Rave the Histborn wrote: »
Friend 1: Man you missed that item
Friend 2: Oh man, how'd I miss that?
Friend 1: LOL You gotta l2p man, you suck at this game
Friend 2: HAHAHA i gotta git gud dude
InvictusApollo wrote: »Honestly what's the point of this poll? It should not even be a poll as you are bashing everyone who thinks it is rude because you think it's not. Learn to take opinions. Otherwise don't make polls
Actually if you read thoroughly it is the selfrigtheous "polite" people who are trying to bash me and others. I have merely uncovered their real faces just by staying calm through their rude insults.
Rave the Histborn wrote: »TheShadowScout wrote: »
I don't actually find that funny.
There are some, truly sick, individuals who think like that in real life.
...and I don't just mean people in psychiatric hospitals.
I mean people with power.
Is asking for personal competence and accountability sick now?
redlink1979 wrote: »People can teach others without being rude or without depreciating them.
We are all newbies at some point, either in game or IRL, aren't we?
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »How do you stop getting notifications from a single thread?
jainiadral wrote: »Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »How do you stop getting notifications from a single thread?
Unclick the star next to the thread title.
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »jainiadral wrote: »Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »How do you stop getting notifications from a single thread?
Unclick the star next to the thread title.
Alas, that does not work (star was never ticked). I just turned off all notifications in the end
Rave the Histborn wrote: »anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »Rave the Histborn wrote: »Why would you add a 5th answer just to be contrarian? The reason there isn't a 5th choice in the original poll is because then you get the redundancy of choices 2 & 3 which are the exact same question in the end. You don't need 8 different choices when the answers should be boiled down to "Yes, No, Other."
I added a 5th answer to 1/ follow the original pattern 2/ offer a neutral option.
Yes the answers could be boiled down to yes/no/other or even yes/no BUT that's exactly what the OP did NOT do. He chose to spread them over several options, full and mild (why not), but he did not do it evenly and chose misleading formulations.Rave the Histborn wrote: »It wasn't until you were informed that you don't seem to understand how to read polls that you got mad at the choices..../...It was pointed out to you that your perception of the answer was wrong and it was explained to you (Yes, but only if there wasn't provided any direction on what to exactly learn. Remember this?)
Yup. That's when OP "explained" that his "No, but" actually means yes that he proved, all by himself, that the poll was biased because 3 answers were meant to mean "no" and only one was meant to be "yes", which makes it a wrongly designed poll. Got it ?Rave the Histborn wrote: »Instead of accepting the advice and taking the loss you've attacked the pollster, the poll, all of the answer choices.
Why do you think people aren't wasting their time explaining things. I'm not here to teach you how to do the things your should know only to be told that I'm wrong.
I'm explaining because the OP expressedly asked me to.
And this poll IS wrongly done, that's an objective fact, whether you like it or not. And yes, you are 100% wrong. Sorry. Time for you to LEARN.
If l2p was really rude it would be a majority consensus and not open for debate. Even your side of "yes, it's like living through the Holocaust" doesn't have majority consensus on it.