SilverIce58 wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Really? Every mainline TES game since Morrowind has allowed you to be a necromancer. I can understand not liking the concept of it, but to say it makes it not a TES game anymore is strange since it's had such a history of it.
Yes, you have been able to make necromancers as characters, but if ZOS makes it a character class, ESO will be the first TES game to do that.
So basically like every class in ESO?
Not all of them. Nightblade and Sorcerer go back to Arena, and have been in every main TES game except for Skyrim.
Anyway, I my comment was basically because there seems to be a persistent misunderstanding that other TES games had a necromancer class. I wanted to extend what Robo_Hobo said to make the distinction between allowing the player to be a necromancer and providing a necromancer class.
I see what you mean, but I also want to point out that sorcerers in other tes games wore heavy armor and only used magic...but now that I think about it, its pretty par for the course for pvp...so nevermind.
@SevnStormChaser3000 wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
Lore...lore... Oh, come on! ZOS can make another lorebook which will talk about dragons and this will become a new lore. It's a game and not a real history.
Bring it on! All this stuff sounds too fun.
And this is exactly how cows and whales would comment. Which just confirms my original theory, that you would be very pleased by all of this.
I'm definitely part of the side that finds this news awesome. I love dragons and am indeed very pleased by this. Really glad the devs understand that videogame lore is fictional and can be changed at will.
Sorry I'm not a true Elder Scrolls fan, never played any of them but around an hour of skyrim, but ESO is the best MMO on console so apologies again because I'm sure there are tons of us who have wanted dragons in ESO for a very long time that are not here for the lore but the gameplay. Hoping they go the full mile and figure out how to implement dragon mounts as well!
Don't hype that much and don't think ZOS really changes the lore here to please your uncanon wishes, mate. There were rumors about some living dragons being seen in Alik'r desert, in Vvardenfell and other places long after the Dragon War (when dragons were considered to be extinct) and long before their return in TES V: Skyrim. And lhe living dragons have been mentioned in Daggerfall game (year 1996) which takes place in 3rd era. So, they actually might be found somewhere in ESO's timeline and this posibility was already implemented in the TES lore long before ESO.
Also, I must admit you're completely wrong when you say it's good when developers change the lore. You probably don't understand that and won't understand because you might be one of the new casual gamers generation for whom RPG games are just the same as Dota, but the truth is that the real value of RPGs is their big, consistent and well-thought-out lore. An RPG that has its lore being changed and rebuilt depending on players requests is not a good RPG at all. Loremasters in gamedev are not those who change the lore, but those who improve and expand it.
Dragons or wyverns?
Threemoons wrote: »Le sigh, all this debate RE lore. I just wish people could get this worked up over the huge queues and kickouts from Cyrodil during Midyear Mayhem...
Threemoons wrote: »Le sigh, all this debate RE lore. I just wish people could get this worked up over the huge queues and kickouts from Cyrodil during Midyear Mayhem...
StormChaser3000 wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
Lore...lore... Oh, come on! ZOS can make another lorebook which will talk about dragons and this will become a new lore. It's a game and not a real history.
Bring it on! All this stuff sounds too fun.
lordrichter wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Really? Every mainline TES game since Morrowind has allowed you to be a necromancer. I can understand not liking the concept of it, but to say it makes it not a TES game anymore is strange since it's had such a history of it.
Yes, you have been able to make necromancers as characters, but if ZOS makes it a character class, ESO will be the first TES game to do that.
So basically like every class in ESO?
Not all of them. Nightblade and Sorcerer go back to Arena, and have been in every main TES game except for Skyrim.
Anyway, I my comment was basically because there seems to be a persistent misunderstanding that other TES games had a necromancer class. I wanted to extend what Robo_Hobo said to make the distinction between allowing the player to be a necromancer and providing a necromancer class.
I for my part am VERY curious what explanation might be found when people start raising zombies directly in front of Vanus and MERIDIA.
@SevnStormChaser3000 wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »There goes what was left of lore and logic. Real Dragons in ESO, which never happened and which was confirmed by ZoS to never happen. And undead chilling in all major towns and social hubs.
Glad I'm not the only one that sees this. I mean eso has been playing fast and loose with the lore since inception, but this is truly jumping the shark and disregarding all lore entirely.
Lore...lore... Oh, come on! ZOS can make another lorebook which will talk about dragons and this will become a new lore. It's a game and not a real history.
Bring it on! All this stuff sounds too fun.
And this is exactly how cows and whales would comment. Which just confirms my original theory, that you would be very pleased by all of this.
I'm definitely part of the side that finds this news awesome. I love dragons and am indeed very pleased by this. Really glad the devs understand that videogame lore is fictional and can be changed at will.
Sorry I'm not a true Elder Scrolls fan, never played any of them but around an hour of skyrim, but ESO is the best MMO on console so apologies again because I'm sure there are tons of us who have wanted dragons in ESO for a very long time that are not here for the lore but the gameplay. Hoping they go the full mile and figure out how to implement dragon mounts as well!
Don't hype that much and don't think ZOS really changes the lore here to please your uncanon wishes, mate. There were rumors about some living dragons being seen in Alik'r desert, in Vvardenfell and other places long after the Dragon War (when dragons were considered to be extinct) and long before their return in TES V: Skyrim. And lhe living dragons have been mentioned in Daggerfall game (year 1996) which takes place in 3rd era. So, they actually might be found somewhere in ESO's timeline and this posibility was already implemented in the TES lore long before ESO.
Also, I must admit you're completely wrong when you say it's good when developers change the lore. You probably don't understand that and won't understand because you might be one of the new casual gamers generation for whom RPG games are just the same as Dota, but the truth is that the real value of RPGs is their big, consistent and well-thought-out lore. An RPG that has its lore being changed and rebuilt depending on players requests is not a good RPG at all. Loremasters in gamedev are not those who change the lore, but those who improve and expand it.
Different strokes for different folks man. Believe it or not some of us play videogames for different reasons than others. I don't play videogames for the lore, I play for the gameplay. Some of us just don't care about fictional history.
You are telling me that the Elder Scrolls franchise, over the course of its life, has never had its lore altered? I find that extremely hard to believe.
I've been gaming for over 40 years with a background in RPGs. A new age gamer I am not. I just don't take my hobby as seriously as others. Insisting that fictional history remains unchanged just so my "immersion" isn't broken is taking it too far for me, I have more important matters to concentrate on than worry about why this creature/item/ability/level etc doesn't belong in whatever game I am playing at that moment.
Sorry my opinion doesn't align with yours and other lore lovers, but again, happy the devs like cows and whales and all the new age gamers who are playing videogames for the wrong reasons.
Warden is different. Warden is a new archtype, a new class with new magic, it wasn't in the lore, but now, since ESO is considered a canon, it is in the lore.lordrichter wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Really? Every mainline TES game since Morrowind has allowed you to be a necromancer. I can understand not liking the concept of it, but to say it makes it not a TES game anymore is strange since it's had such a history of it.
Yes, you have been able to make necromancers as characters, but if ZOS makes it a character class, ESO will be the first TES game to do that.
So basically like every class in ESO?
Not all of them. Nightblade and Sorcerer go back to Arena, and have been in every main TES game except for Skyrim.
Anyway, I my comment was basically because there seems to be a persistent misunderstanding that other TES games had a necromancer class. I wanted to extend what Robo_Hobo said to make the distinction between allowing the player to be a necromancer and providing a necromancer class.
What about warden? I dont recall being able to be a warden in any tes game
Warden is different. Warden is a new archtype, a new class with new magic, it wasn't in the lore, but now, since ESO is considered a canon, it is in the lore.lordrichter wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Really? Every mainline TES game since Morrowind has allowed you to be a necromancer. I can understand not liking the concept of it, but to say it makes it not a TES game anymore is strange since it's had such a history of it.
Yes, you have been able to make necromancers as characters, but if ZOS makes it a character class, ESO will be the first TES game to do that.
So basically like every class in ESO?
Not all of them. Nightblade and Sorcerer go back to Arena, and have been in every main TES game except for Skyrim.
Anyway, I my comment was basically because there seems to be a persistent misunderstanding that other TES games had a necromancer class. I wanted to extend what Robo_Hobo said to make the distinction between allowing the player to be a necromancer and providing a necromancer class.
What about warden? I dont recall being able to be a warden in any tes game
People don't realize how disruptive Skyrim was to the TES series. Skyrim was a sales phenom (30 million) that brought TES into the mainstream. It has outsold the rest of the series combined by a HUGE margin. Most TES fans started with Skyrim. Skyrim fans are, largely, the whales.Speaking of whales... Well, I'm one of those who think ESO's real whales are TES fans actually. Not the Skyrim kids, not PvPers, not those who play for grind, but those players who spend money to buy houses and furniture, costumes and dressing slots, mounts and so on.
Every roleplay tryhard in this thread, holy shiet
Get over it and enjoy a new class and all the skills it will bring to the game to learn and master.
Every roleplay tryhard in this thread, holy shiet
Get over it and enjoy a new class and all the skills it will bring to the game to learn and master.
Yep, I'm a lore-RP nerd who didn't notice werewolves, etc. but I'm pretty much sure once we see Necromancer skills, their will be a huge disappointment threads flood all over the forums. And I think I'll love to read them this time.
But we’ve never seen Sanguine or mora in ESO yetJazzyNapkin wrote: »About Meridia, I'm really hoping ZoS doesn't make her an antagonist like the other daedric princes in previous stories... but wouldn't be surprised considering the route they've been taking with most of them. I guess with the upcoming necromancer class, it could hint at her possibly being an antagonist at some point. I hope not bc she's my favorite daedric prince & my khajiit magplar is a priestess of Meridia. Also it would be cool to have a Colored Rooms DLC, like Clockwork City imo.
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
I love you too buddy, but I got my feelings hurt on the forums lol, so I went on a "vacation" from this.
Any how, I don't want to get my hopes up today, do you know where I can get more of this "datamine"? I am looking everywhere right now, but I am falling really hard in finding something "useful".
Seraphayel wrote: »
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
I love you too buddy, but I got my feelings hurt on the forums lol, so I went on a "vacation" from this.
Any how, I don't want to get my hopes up today, do you know where I can get more of this "datamine"? I am looking everywhere right now, but I am falling really hard in finding something "useful".
Everything that's been datamined is written down in the first post in this thread.
Seraphayel wrote: »
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
I love you too buddy, but I got my feelings hurt on the forums lol, so I went on a "vacation" from this.
Any how, I don't want to get my hopes up today, do you know where I can get more of this "datamine"? I am looking everywhere right now, but I am falling really hard in finding something "useful".
Everything that's been datamined is written down in the first post in this thread.
Oh, I though would be something more.... i don't know. Not on the forums I guess? I honestly thought that if Zos caught something like that, they would ban or eliminate the thread because of secrets, secrecy, and all that sh##t '-'
SilverIce58 wrote: »Seraphayel wrote: »
Was wondering where you were when the datamine came up
I love you too buddy, but I got my feelings hurt on the forums lol, so I went on a "vacation" from this.
Any how, I don't want to get my hopes up today, do you know where I can get more of this "datamine"? I am looking everywhere right now, but I am falling really hard in finding something "useful".
Everything that's been datamined is written down in the first post in this thread.
Oh, I though would be something more.... i don't know. Not on the forums I guess? I honestly thought that if Zos caught something like that, they would ban or eliminate the thread because of secrets, secrecy, and all that sh##t '-'
Nah, patches get datamined all the time, and they must not care too much if we see it, as this is still up, and the Summerset datamine never got taken down when that happened.