There was no need to apologize, comrade. As one wise Vulcan once said, I have no ego to bruise. Anyway, thank you for being such polite person.logarifmik wrote: »@Esha76, if you think, that I'm just flaming here, you are wrong. I posted this quote for only one reason, to show devs, that this thread need an official answer too. Any answer will do, much better, than ignoring, you know.That's exactly my point! Why is it so difficult for devs to post any official answer to all criticism in this thread as well, huh?Sadly though, this thread is devoid of them. And while I understand why (I wouldn't want to paint a target on myself as a CSR), at the same time there are plenty of good natured people in this thread with solid constructive criticism, and real world examples. a friendly "Hey, btw, we are listening and taking your concerns into account on the new customization system" wouldn't be a bad thing.
@logarifmik
I do sincerely apologize, in that case. I have become rather defensive, and protective, after some of the remarks made here by others.
Please accept my apologies, and regret, for my attitude towards you and your post.
A brilliant idea, comrade. If their choice is to keep silence, we should address devs regarding the problem in a way, which is harder to ignore.We may have a chance to see just how far ZOS will go to ignore us. I say we rally to Twitch for the upcoming stream on Friday, where we fill the chat with text so imbued with disappointment and wrath that they'll either make comment on the matter, or show how far they're willing to go with tip-toeing around this, and other, controversies.
Here's to us, lads and ladettes. We must be heard, and this now is the time.
logarifmik wrote: »There was no need to apologize, comrade. As one wise Vulcan once said, I have no ego to bruise. Anyway, thank you for being such polite person.logarifmik wrote: »@Esha76, if you think, that I'm just flaming here, you are wrong. I posted this quote for only one reason, to show devs, that this thread need an official answer too. Any answer will do, much better, than ignoring, you know.That's exactly my point! Why is it so difficult for devs to post any official answer to all criticism in this thread as well, huh?Sadly though, this thread is devoid of them. And while I understand why (I wouldn't want to paint a target on myself as a CSR), at the same time there are plenty of good natured people in this thread with solid constructive criticism, and real world examples. a friendly "Hey, btw, we are listening and taking your concerns into account on the new customization system" wouldn't be a bad thing.
@logarifmik
I do sincerely apologize, in that case. I have become rather defensive, and protective, after some of the remarks made here by others.
Please accept my apologies, and regret, for my attitude towards you and your post.A brilliant idea, comrade. If their choice is to keep silence, we should address devs regarding the problem in a way, which is harder to ignore.We may have a chance to see just how far ZOS will go to ignore us. I say we rally to Twitch for the upcoming stream on Friday, where we fill the chat with text so imbued with disappointment and wrath that they'll either make comment on the matter, or show how far they're willing to go with tip-toeing around this, and other, controversies.
Here's to us, lads and ladettes. We must be heard, and this now is the time.
Does the Pope [snip] in the woods?You realise Vulcan's aren't real right??
I didn't said that it'll necessarily work, but it'll be harder to disregard.If I was on that stream, I'd just ignore the negativity. They will have a message to deliver and then they will go on their merry way.
We may have a chance to see just how far ZOS will go to ignore us. I say we rally to Twitch for the upcoming stream on Friday, where we fill the chat with text so imbued with disappointment and wrath that they'll either make comment on the matter, or show how far they're willing to go with tip-toeing around this, and other, controversies.
Here's to us, lads and ladettes. We must be heard, and this now is the time.
We may have a chance to see just how far ZOS will go to ignore us. I say we rally to Twitch for the upcoming stream on Friday, where we fill the chat with text so imbued with disappointment and wrath that they'll either make comment on the matter, or show how far they're willing to go with tip-toeing around this, and other, controversies.
Here's to us, lads and ladettes. We must be heard, and this now is the time.
lordrichter wrote: »No. When I see people in the Twitch stream chat chanting something to disrupt it, it makes me want to take the other side.
lordrichter wrote: »No. When I see people in the Twitch stream chat chanting something to disrupt it, it makes me want to take the other side.
Voicing our concerns/displeasure here on the boards is fine, but disrupting their Twitch stream won't help our case in the slightest. All you'd accomplish is to drive people to defend ZOS, even if they do agree that the price is too high.
Send them feedback in game, give feedback on the forums but don't ruin ESO live for others.
And what should the community do, when ignored on the forum, may I ask? As Sergei Korolev said, "You criticize someone else's, offer yours."anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »^This^
Anyone wanting to be heard as an adult should act like an adult. Disrupting someone else's stream is childish behavior.
cabbageub17_ESO wrote: »ummmm ... sorta doesn't look so great to bury this thread by pulling it from General discussion. Just PR speaking.
logarifmik wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »No. When I see people in the Twitch stream chat chanting something to disrupt it, it makes me want to take the other side.Voicing our concerns/displeasure here on the boards is fine, but disrupting their Twitch stream won't help our case in the slightest. All you'd accomplish is to drive people to defend ZOS, even if they do agree that the price is too high.
Send them feedback in game, give feedback on the forums but don't ruin ESO live for others.And what should the community do, when ignored on the forum, may I ask? As Sergei Korolev said, "You criticize someone else's, offer yours."anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »^This^
Anyone wanting to be heard as an adult should act like an adult. Disrupting someone else's stream is childish behavior.
OrdoHermetica wrote: »Someone brought something up in a different thread that I hadn't thought of before (and if it was already posted here and I missed it, my bad): it's per character, right? So that means that if you ever delete that character, you lose your unlocked outfit slots. And at 1500 Crowns per slot, that's a TON of Crowns to lose if you fully unlock a character but then decide to retire it.
Wow. I hadn't considered that angle before, but it makes this whole decision even worse in my mind, and I already though it was pretty terrible to begin with.
logarifmik wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »No. When I see people in the Twitch stream chat chanting something to disrupt it, it makes me want to take the other side.Voicing our concerns/displeasure here on the boards is fine, but disrupting their Twitch stream won't help our case in the slightest. All you'd accomplish is to drive people to defend ZOS, even if they do agree that the price is too high.
Send them feedback in game, give feedback on the forums but don't ruin ESO live for others.And what should the community do, when ignored on the forum, may I ask? As Sergei Korolev said, "You criticize someone else's, offer yours."anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »^This^
Anyone wanting to be heard as an adult should act like an adult. Disrupting someone else's stream is childish behavior.
Castiel_Silvermist wrote: »I honestly think its stupid to make them cost so much...as well as not making them account wide. Its like why?. I basically have to pay $15 worth of crowns just to get another outfit slot....thats not ok. Thats just gouging players. Not very smart ZOS.
Unfortunately, it doesnt really matter how much we cry or complain. Theres no feedback or fulfilling the community wishes.
VexingArcanist wrote: »The thread was intentionally moved from General to Crown Store so it would die and they would be able to easily ignore the feedback. Low foot-traffic forum this is.
That's how much they care about the complaint. Locking it would be too obvious.
lordrichter wrote: »This side of the ESO house is steadfast to an extreme. The game devs are stubborn, but have been known to say "Uncle". I cannot think of any time when the Crown Store folks have reversed themselves on a monetization decision.
anitajoneb17_ESO wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »This side of the ESO house is steadfast to an extreme. The game devs are stubborn, but have been known to say "Uncle". I cannot think of any time when the Crown Store folks have reversed themselves on a monetization decision.
They have. When they decided to go F2P + Crown Store. I'm pretty sure that it wasn't the original plan - and that's the reason why the original development leaders left. They believed they'd be free to create artwork and design systems without the pressure of monetizing schemes upon their shoulders.
Unfortunately (for them), not enough people bought, so they changed.
That's the only way a video game company - or ANY company for that matter - will ever change its model : if not enough people buy.
If people are unhappy but still buy => it works
If people are happy but don't buy => it changes.
Of course we could imagine a scenario where people are happy AND buy. BUT... happy customers are never as vocal as unhappy customers. And unhappy customers don't matter much as long as they remain customers.
lordrichter wrote: »The Crown Store people won the battle with the F2P+Crown Store decision back in 2015. They did not have to reverse themselves at all!
lordrichter wrote: »But, what I meant was that when they roll something out, they stand by it no matter what happens. Fires. Plagues. Pestilence.