I'm not entirely against the idea of trading guilds, but it's hard to support in it's current state. There's a number of prime locations for guild traders and then there's everyone else. Every so often I'll pass a guild trader in some remote location and think to myself, "Oh, these poor ***".
If ZOS was willing to take a serious look at the current system and improve upon it, I'd be more willing to accept it. But they don't seem to say much on the subject.
Again, I love the idea of guild traders, but the execution, not so much. At this point, I'd be thrilled with a search function.
I love you all.
phaneub17_ESO wrote: »At least here we don't have people undercutting each other for 1 digit less than the previous seller, sometimes you find a bargain in places you least expect. A Global AH would remove a very large gold sink from the game and that's bidding on NPC Traders, but then again there aren't enough traders to go around for every guild out there. Those who are on top are very unlikely to lose their spots and those just starting have a very steep hill to climb to afford a trader.
ARGUMENT FOR A GLOBAL AUCTION HOUSE:
The two main arguments in opposition of a global auction house are:
1. Undercutting the competition, leading to a race to the bottom in terms of pricing
2. Cornering the market, leading to price gouging
These two arguments lack merit.
A global auction house allows supply and demand to take their natural course and lead to an equilibrium of price.
Cornering the market is tough, even with add-ons. This is because the volume of items is so high and every single person in the game has the ability to sell items, resulting in a very large and constant supply - one that can easily outweigh the demand, making it unprofitable to buy every single quantity available. Even with low-volume items and attempts to price gouge, there will come a point where people decide the higher price is not worth it and either forgo the item or farm it on their own, or they will get it off-market. Either way, the price gouging sellers do not make the sale, and no profit results, forcing them to lower the price to the point where it sells at the desired volume (in a way that maximizes total sales dollars).
And then there is undercutting the competition, leading to a race to the bottom in terms of pricing. So this means that within a month of the global auction house going live, every item will be selling for one gold? Of course not. Just as there is a price ceiling set by the buyers, there is a price floor set by the sellers - at some point, they will decide it's not worth selling an item for a lower price. If this were not the case, then every item would be available for one gold.