MLGProPlayer wrote: »We draw the line at gameplay mechanics being separate from RP ones.
And if anything will create a "homogenised gloop of matter" it will be mandatory visual skins (like vampirism). Everyone and their mother is a vampire because of the benefits it provides. It kills aesthetic diversity.
JackWest92 wrote: »We draw the line at the combat. What you 'compare it with' affects the combat system and class design. What skin our character has, doesnt.
mirta000b16_ESO wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »We draw the line at gameplay mechanics being separate from RP ones.
And if anything will create a "homogenised gloop of matter" it will be mandatory visual skins (like vampirism). Everyone and their mother is a vampire because of the benefits it provides. It kills aesthetic diversity.JackWest92 wrote: »We draw the line at the combat. What you 'compare it with' affects the combat system and class design. What skin our character has, doesnt.
However mechanics here ARE NOT separate from appearance. You could have drawn that line all you wanted to before vampires released, but they have been released for years now and appearance goes with your so much needed character optimization.
I am NOT a vampire. I'm NOT going to be a vampire on any of my DPS or healer classes. If everyone and their mother is crying over 2% that badly, that is THEIR personal choice and they also have a choice to NOT do this.
And Jack I do think that you should drop this. Insulting your fellow players, writing things like "drugs have softened your brain" or "drinking all that ale in the Inn obviously made you too dumb" will not help your cause in any way.
Alexandrious wrote: »@Gandrhulf_Harbard
Hmm....annoying end line at the end of all his posts....not knowing what it really means.......
I saw something similar somewhere....
wait......
*Looks at ToR forums*
Darthspuds is that you?
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Alexandrious wrote: »@Gandrhulf_Harbard
Hmm....annoying end line at the end of all his posts....not knowing what it really means.......
I saw something similar somewhere....
wait......
*Looks at ToR forums*
Darthspuds is that you?
@Alexandrious
Yes, that is me.
And I do know EXACTLY what my Sign Off means, I've been using it since I sent my very first e-mail gods know how long ago.
It means I wish you "all the best" in whatever you do, even if we have disagreed over a specific issue.
It would be more than a little naive, and significantly arrogant of me to expect to go through life with everyone sharing my opinions. However, I see no reason that I should wish ill of someone just because we disagree over something.
So the "All The Best" is a sign off, to indicate that even if we have just, possibly vehemently, disagreed over a specific issue I hold no grudges, and think no ill of people because of that.
My concern is that so few people, here or at SWTOR forums, seem capable of understanding that is even possible.
All The Best
I‘m baffled that this warrants a 9 page thread with over 200 comments. But then I remember I’m in the ESO forum and then I’m not surprised at all any longer.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Darkstorne wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »Y'all are wild. I can't believe that people who hate being vampires are vampires because, what, it's 2% more efficient than not being one? I'm sure you could be 2% better if you just spent more time practicing instead of fretting 16 paragraphs at a time over stuff you don't like about the choice you made.
My Templar is not a vampire and doesn't have problems with end game content. It's obviously NOT mandatory because I am over here doing the end game content without it. Look at me go.
Min-maxing means optimizing your build to be the best it can possibly be. That's only possible if you're a vampire.
It's not mandatory. It's 100% doable without it. I am literally doing it right now.
Doable =/= optimised
Okay? Then live with being ugly. You're choosing it. Don't make it sound like you don't have a choice. Be ugly, be a few percentage points better. Or don't. You're not missing out on anything in the game, it is doable without it.
You are missing out on being optimised.
And you are missing out on being pretty.
Where do we draw the line on this? I want to be a healer that doesn't have a destro back bar for Elemental Drain, but I have to for "optimisation". Maybe all weapon skills should be used on all weapons now? Maybe all class skills should be used by any class? Maybe all races should meld together into one homogenised gloop of matter that can fart out all skills and spells in a single instant cast cacophony of chaos. That would be optimised imo.
We draw the line at gameplay mechanics being separate from RP ones.
And if anything will create a "homogenised gloop of matter" it will be mandatory visual skins (like vampirism). Everyone and their mother is a vampire because of the benefits it provides. It kills aesthetic diversity.
Darkstorne wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Darkstorne wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »Y'all are wild. I can't believe that people who hate being vampires are vampires because, what, it's 2% more efficient than not being one? I'm sure you could be 2% better if you just spent more time practicing instead of fretting 16 paragraphs at a time over stuff you don't like about the choice you made.
My Templar is not a vampire and doesn't have problems with end game content. It's obviously NOT mandatory because I am over here doing the end game content without it. Look at me go.
Min-maxing means optimizing your build to be the best it can possibly be. That's only possible if you're a vampire.
It's not mandatory. It's 100% doable without it. I am literally doing it right now.
Doable =/= optimised
Okay? Then live with being ugly. You're choosing it. Don't make it sound like you don't have a choice. Be ugly, be a few percentage points better. Or don't. You're not missing out on anything in the game, it is doable without it.
You are missing out on being optimised.
And you are missing out on being pretty.
Where do we draw the line on this? I want to be a healer that doesn't have a destro back bar for Elemental Drain, but I have to for "optimisation". Maybe all weapon skills should be used on all weapons now? Maybe all class skills should be used by any class? Maybe all races should meld together into one homogenised gloop of matter that can fart out all skills and spells in a single instant cast cacophony of chaos. That would be optimised imo.
We draw the line at gameplay mechanics being separate from RP ones.
And if anything will create a "homogenised gloop of matter" it will be mandatory visual skins (like vampirism). Everyone and their mother is a vampire because of the benefits it provides. It kills aesthetic diversity.
That's a big part of the vampire/werewolf fantasy.
JackWest92 wrote: »Specially considering how both are the main parts of such games, alongside your precious RP, which you can have in any solo player RPG game, without enforcing your preferences on others
JackWest92 wrote: »Exactly. RP. Combat enhancement, which you MUST have if you wanna do vet hm trials as DD
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »JackWest92 wrote: »Exactly. RP. Combat enhancement, which you MUST have if you wanna do vet hm trials as DD
I refuse to accept that all DPSers at end game, doing Vet Trials etc are Vampires.
That is simply not the case.
All The Best
@Minyassa, except a better analogy would be that you initially made a character of *insert race of your choosing* and by making a choice in game (quest ,RP , or min/max purposes) your character then looked like and Orc, more and more the further your stages progressed.If we actually get to be vampires and look like normal humans, then I am also going to expect to get to be one race and look like another. I hate the way orcs look but they are BiS for speed so I've had to accept that either I can be fast or not look like an orc. But if there's a way for me to not look like an orc (without covering up with a mask or helmet because pssh) and still have an orc's racial passives then I am ALL ABOUT THAT. So yeah, let's do this with vampires and then demand it with player races too!
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »A smart marketing group would find a way to capitalize on this.
Merlin13KAGL wrote: »A smart marketing group would find a way to capitalize on this.
Absolutly, but we have to wait for a ZOS solution
Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »the simple solution would be to nerf the vampire skill line
mirta000b16_ESO wrote: »MLGProPlayer wrote: »We draw the line at gameplay mechanics being separate from RP ones.
And if anything will create a "homogenised gloop of matter" it will be mandatory visual skins (like vampirism). Everyone and their mother is a vampire because of the benefits it provides. It kills aesthetic diversity.JackWest92 wrote: »We draw the line at the combat. What you 'compare it with' affects the combat system and class design. What skin our character has, doesnt.
However mechanics here ARE NOT separate from appearance. You could have drawn that line all you wanted to before vampires released, but they have been released for years now and appearance goes with your so much needed character optimization.
I am NOT a vampire. I'm NOT going to be a vampire on any of my DPS or healer classes. If everyone and their mother is crying over 2% that badly, that is THEIR personal choice and they also have a choice to NOT do this.
And Jack I do think that you should drop this. Insulting your fellow players, writing things like "drugs have softened your brain" or "drinking all that ale in the Inn obviously made you too dumb" will not help your cause in any way.
Choose to be a vampire... you're choosing to embrace all the effects, the good the bad and the ugly!
Can't have any one without the others.. this is the only "fact" here.... the rest is 9 pages of opinion!
Just my 2 cents
All the best...
Verbal_Earthworm wrote: »equal rights for werewolves
let them use all the ww skills without transforming
that would only be fair, right?
Gandrhulf_Harbard wrote: »Alexandrious wrote: »@Gandrhulf_Harbard
Hmm....annoying end line at the end of all his posts....not knowing what it really means.......
I saw something similar somewhere....
wait......
*Looks at ToR forums*
Darthspuds is that you?
@Alexandrious
Yes, that is me.
And I do know EXACTLY what my Sign Off means, I've been using it since I sent my very first e-mail gods know how long ago.
It means I wish you "all the best" in whatever you do, even if we have disagreed over a specific issue.
It would be more than a little naive, and significantly arrogant of me to expect to go through life with everyone sharing my opinions. However, I see no reason that I should wish ill of someone just because we disagree over something.
So the "All The Best" is a sign off, to indicate that even if we have just, possibly vehemently, disagreed over a specific issue I hold no grudges, and think no ill of people because of that.
My concern is that so few people, here or at SWTOR forums, seem capable of understanding that is even possible.
All The Best