ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »
I know you're frustrated, but remember the statement I made earlier was in regards to ability changes and not performance. Now that said, we do have several performance improvements coming in Update 16 (Monday for PC) that will help improve the frame rate and loading screens - this includes Cyrodiil.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »
I know you're frustrated, but remember the statement I made earlier was in regards to ability changes and not performance. Now that said, we do have several performance improvements coming in Update 16 (Monday for PC) that will help improve the frame rate and loading screens - this includes Cyrodiil.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »
I know you're frustrated, but remember the statement I made earlier was in regards to ability changes and not performance. Now that said, we do have several performance improvements coming in Update 16 (Monday for PC) that will help improve the frame rate and loading screens - this includes Cyrodiil.
Joy_Division wrote: »ZoS does listen to our feedback. That doesn't mean that if ZoS chooses not to implement your feedback, they ignored it.
Taking your frustrations out on Gina over issues she has zero control over is a pretty crappy thing to do.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote:Hey guys, just letting you know that we have seen and read this thread, and have brought it to the team's attention.
usmcjdking wrote: »Most of us don't care if you post on these forums or not
I'm actually not sure what the final findings were, but can try to find out. That said, expect to see what's on the PTS to go live with the update on Monday. If we decide to change anything, it won't be until an incremental patch.
@ZOS_GinaBruno can you post the dev team analyzes for the test with no CP campaigns?
The final PTS patch is already live as we're going live with the update on Monday, but there won't be any API changes in that update. A future patch? Very likely. Am actually about to go post in another thread about this after posting here.
Any API changes we can expect in the final PTS patch?
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »I'm actually not sure what the final findings were, but can try to find out. That said, expect to see what's on the PTS to go live with the update on Monday. If we decide to change anything, it won't be until an incremental patch.
The final PTS patch is already live as we're going live with the update on Monday, but there won't be any API changes in that update. A future patch? Very likely. Am actually about to go post in another thread about this after posting here.
Speak for yourself.
The worst thing is not knowing what's going to happen about something. It only sows discord & speculation on the forums & creates an unhealthy community.
The longer the time passes and the longer issues go unaddressed, the more frustrated people get. I firmly believe companies can alleviate these issues by talking to their customers & letting them know what's going on and what's going to happen.
Speak for yourself.
The worst thing is not knowing what's going to happen about something. It only sows discord & speculation on the forums & creates an unhealthy community.
The longer the time passes and the longer issues go unaddressed, the more frustrated people get. I firmly believe companies can alleviate these issues by talking to their customers & letting them know what's going on and what's going to happen.
@ZOS_GinaBruno can you post the dev team analyzes for the test with no CP campaigns?
To be honest, she could at the very least tell us what's going on - isn't that what community managers do?
For example:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376277/is-miats-add-on-cheating-to-you/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/374249/zenimax-restrict-your-api/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/308971/miats-pvp-alerts-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/375200/ban-addons-in-pvp/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376334/would-you-like-add-ons-disabled-for-pvp/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/363016/so-miats-pvp-addon-can-detect-stealth-players-even-when-they-are-in-stealth-state/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376007/interview-with-miat-lets-talk-add-ons-cheating-and-q-a/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/322527/the-addons-cheats-that-allow-you-to-dodge-perfectly/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/371550/rampant-cheating-in-pvp-what-is-being-done-about-it-zos/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/4485065#Comment_4485065
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369568/should-miats-attack-alert-be-allowed/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/368871/add-on-request-miats-pvp-pump-fake#latest
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369455/addons-detecting-attacks-from-stealth/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/360442/miat-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/311028/miats-addon-new-meta
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/360432/why-is-miats-hack-still-around/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/358293/what-add-ons-are-border-line-cheating-to-you/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369455/addons-detecting-attacks-from-stealth/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/343700/so-zos-are-you-going-to-do-something-w-miats-pvp-addon
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/343177/miat-add-on-stealth-detection
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/340047/remove-incoming-projectile-api-notification-please/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/de/discussion/333501/miats-pvp-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/320643/so-why-is-miats-hack-add-on-still-active
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319348/miat-hack-add-on
...etc
Almost a year and all we've got is:
What's being done about it?
Is this being fixed, or are you just leaving it be & hoping these threads stop appearing?
Communication is important.
Avran_Sylt wrote: »
@Bashev @ZOS_GinaBruno
Unfortunately something like that needs to be tested on live. While they can test it on their end, it will be using their computers, and not the hundreds of various systems that are used by the player base.
This is something that is near impossible to test on the PTS, and must be pushed to live with easy access to rollback if it doesn't work. Simply put tests like this need large volumes of data and user stories to accurately test, which the PTS isn't able to provide.
I was talking about the double ap event on live that we had 6 momths ago. Zos didnt publish any results.
I was talking about the double ap event on live that we had 6 momths ago. Zos didnt publish any results.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »
I know you're frustrated, but remember the statement I made earlier was in regards to ability changes and not performance. Now that said, we do have several performance improvements coming in Update 16 (Monday for PC) that will help improve the frame rate and loading screens - this includes Cyrodiil.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »Short answer is DKs likely won't be seeing a ton of changes before we go live; this class is still quite powerful (as it should be being a tank), even after some of the adjustments we've made to other classes and abilities.
What ever happened to the PvP adjustments/improvements response you promised in the Alliance War subforum? It's been 3+ years of the same old "performance improvements are coming" and they either don't come or it isn't articulated what those performance improvements were supposed to be. I understand you don't control the former, but presumably you do the latter.
Early this year Firor made the big "We understand PvP performance is unacceptable, changes are coming" statement and there haven't been any significant changes (certainly, no significant improvements) and we're almost into 2018.
I know you don't control the actual improvements but you are the mouthpiece for the company. What exactly is going on? Why can't we ever get a straight answer on Cyrodiil? Why do we get promised that we'll get more information in "a few days" and then that information never comes?
To be honest, she could at the very least tell us what's going on - isn't that what community managers do?
For example:
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376277/is-miats-add-on-cheating-to-you/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/374249/zenimax-restrict-your-api/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/308971/miats-pvp-alerts-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/375200/ban-addons-in-pvp/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376334/would-you-like-add-ons-disabled-for-pvp/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/363016/so-miats-pvp-addon-can-detect-stealth-players-even-when-they-are-in-stealth-state/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/376007/interview-with-miat-lets-talk-add-ons-cheating-and-q-a/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/322527/the-addons-cheats-that-allow-you-to-dodge-perfectly/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/371550/rampant-cheating-in-pvp-what-is-being-done-about-it-zos/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/4485065#Comment_4485065
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369568/should-miats-attack-alert-be-allowed/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/368871/add-on-request-miats-pvp-pump-fake#latest
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369455/addons-detecting-attacks-from-stealth/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/360442/miat-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/311028/miats-addon-new-meta
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/360432/why-is-miats-hack-still-around/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/358293/what-add-ons-are-border-line-cheating-to-you/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/369455/addons-detecting-attacks-from-stealth/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/343700/so-zos-are-you-going-to-do-something-w-miats-pvp-addon
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/343177/miat-add-on-stealth-detection
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/340047/remove-incoming-projectile-api-notification-please/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/de/discussion/333501/miats-pvp-addon/p1
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/320643/so-why-is-miats-hack-add-on-still-active
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/319348/miat-hack-add-on
...etc
Almost a year and all we've got is:
What's being done about it?
Is this being fixed, or are you just leaving it be & hoping these threads stop appearing?
Communication is important.
Joy_Division wrote: »
That's a lot of Miat add-on threads
I'm not an expert of the hierarchy of occupations in Zenimax so correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't Gina just pass on the information given to her by the people who actually develop the game and make decisions? Does Gina have the authority to communicate the sort of definitive and unequivocal company statement with regard's to Miat's add-on that you seek?
If the answers are yes and then no, i.e., she's just the conveyor of information, then I think it crappy to take out frustrations on her. Just my opinion.
This is no way excuses the lack of meaningful communication on the part of Zenimax.
rhapsodious wrote: »
I'm not Gina, but that's my understanding of it. She, Jessica, Kai, and to a smaller extent the forum moderators (I believe) act as the filter to get the meaningful comments to the right team, to escalate concerns where needed, and act as a liaison between what the developers/project managers want to communicate and what the forum hears. So Gina can tell some guy on the art team "hey, this armor is clipping weird", and link to the forums thread/a ticket, but she doesn't have any insight into the cause of the issue, the nature of the fix, or when it will actually get fixed.
No matter what your frustrations with the /game/, the CMs are the wrong people to blame. The communication, yes, you have some merit there (though you should still be polite and not act like Gina or even Wrobel personally killed your dog).
I work in software development (admittedly, probably why I'm very sympathetic to the developers), and at every company I've been at, there's been items in the backlog that have been there for months. Usually we're good at prioritizing issues or optimizing the customer experience, but some things like net code or performance enhancements are a complete mess and not something you just "fix". Far-reaching decisions like API changes or taking an official stance on unofficial content is pretty high up the tree, as far as who has the power to make those decisions.
Simply put, if a CM doesn't have an answer to give you, they won't give you an answer. It's both easier and more efficient to just not say anything than be like "yo, I still got nothin". The amount of time it takes to get an answer could be drastically decreased, and it's totally frustrating, but them's the breaks.
Joy_Division wrote: »ZoS does listen to our feedback. That doesn't mean that if ZoS chooses not to implement your feedback, they ignored it.
Taking your frustrations out on Gina over issues she has zero control over is a pretty crappy thing to do.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »This isn't correct. The developers do come on the forums almost daily, and they do read the feedback threads we create when we're active on the PTS; we've said this many times in the past. Also, Jess and I (as the Community Managers) frequently bring threads to the attention of devs to make sure they've seen it, and many times, they already have. The moderators are responsible for removing posts that break our forum rules.