Hippie4927 wrote: »Because this is my favorite costume. More like this would be great!
@Hippie4927 What costume is that, and how/where can I obtain it? I have SO MANY ideas with that costume in mind.GreenSoup2HoT wrote: »
Agreed. Have you ever seen the kunoichi class from the Disgaea series? You'd love it.
ZOS could call it something Akaviri oriented.
ShedsHisTail wrote: »CountEdmondDantes wrote: »It doesn't matter because maturity isn't the issue here. If the PEGI age gate is here to prevent minors from experiencing adult themes (which is a completely ridiculous idea in the age of the Internet) then the amount of skin a character shows doesn't, by itself alone, trigger those adult themes.
A woman going to a yoga class could show a lot of skin. Is it erotic? Not necessarily. Compare that to certain scenes from television shows like Game of Thrones where the actors are completely dressed but still manage to convey a sense of very adult, erotic sensuality.
I agree with you on this: the amount of skin shown is both unrealistic and not lore correct. I'm not thinking of skin tight leather and steel underwear but bare arms and legs on some types of light armor would be realistic. And not just for women. Would it be sensual? That just depends on the person.
[For example: my daughter told me to go see the new Wonder Woman movie. She said it was an inspiring movie for women. So I went to see it. Afterwards, she sent me text and asked me what I thought. "Nice legs," was my answer.]
And none of this has anything to do with how mature anyone is. I'd just want to keep it realistic and lore-friendly.
But yes. The clothing styles are a bit unrealistic in this game for this day and age that the game is set in. UNLESS! Unless if they are: Dwemer, High Elf, Imperial, or Nord societies. Bretons and Dark Elves too somewhat, although they both have their very primal and wild groups of people too. See Ashlanders and Reachmen. Most of the gear should be very... Revealing and rather rag-like. Unless of course armoring and what not.
The only primal "wild groups" likely to wear revealing clothing are those who live in tropical/sub-tropical climes. Folks like the Nords who live up in the damned mountains and snow... Wearing revealing outfits, "wild" or not, is a recipe for freezing to death, even in temperate climates it's really easy to end up sick and dying from exposure if you're not covered up.
Folk most likely to show some skin include, Argonians, Khajit, Altmer, and Bosmer (maybe some really south-dwelling Imperials). Pretty much anyone else living exposed to the elements, as the primal types do, is gonna need to bundle up.
Edit: Incidentally, if you look at the clothing choices designed by ZOS, other than the Nord towel (which is designed for hot spring bathing) they've adhered pretty closely to what I've described above.
Anti_Virus wrote: »ShedsHisTail wrote: »CountEdmondDantes wrote: »It doesn't matter because maturity isn't the issue here. If the PEGI age gate is here to prevent minors from experiencing adult themes (which is a completely ridiculous idea in the age of the Internet) then the amount of skin a character shows doesn't, by itself alone, trigger those adult themes.
A woman going to a yoga class could show a lot of skin. Is it erotic? Not necessarily. Compare that to certain scenes from television shows like Game of Thrones where the actors are completely dressed but still manage to convey a sense of very adult, erotic sensuality.
I agree with you on this: the amount of skin shown is both unrealistic and not lore correct. I'm not thinking of skin tight leather and steel underwear but bare arms and legs on some types of light armor would be realistic. And not just for women. Would it be sensual? That just depends on the person.
[For example: my daughter told me to go see the new Wonder Woman movie. She said it was an inspiring movie for women. So I went to see it. Afterwards, she sent me text and asked me what I thought. "Nice legs," was my answer.]
And none of this has anything to do with how mature anyone is. I'd just want to keep it realistic and lore-friendly.
But yes. The clothing styles are a bit unrealistic in this game for this day and age that the game is set in. UNLESS! Unless if they are: Dwemer, High Elf, Imperial, or Nord societies. Bretons and Dark Elves too somewhat, although they both have their very primal and wild groups of people too. See Ashlanders and Reachmen. Most of the gear should be very... Revealing and rather rag-like. Unless of course armoring and what not.
The only primal "wild groups" likely to wear revealing clothing are those who live in tropical/sub-tropical climes. Folks like the Nords who live up in the damned mountains and snow... Wearing revealing outfits, "wild" or not, is a recipe for freezing to death, even in temperate climates it's really easy to end up sick and dying from exposure if you're not covered up.
Folk most likely to show some skin include, Argonians, Khajit, Altmer, and Bosmer (maybe some really south-dwelling Imperials). Pretty much anyone else living exposed to the elements, as the primal types do, is gonna need to bundle up.
Edit: Incidentally, if you look at the clothing choices designed by ZOS, other than the Nord towel (which is designed for hot spring bathing) they've adhered pretty closely to what I've described above.
Redguards too need to show skin covering up in the baking desert of alik'r will kill ya.
Anti_Virus wrote: »No. Add more Combat appropriate costumes.
Onefrkncrzypope wrote: »They are pixels. Btw it was rated M for the content ESO had in the base. The rating can be changed and if a rating goes higher than M, most stores take the game off the self. Use google or something, does everything have to be sexy now?
Anti_Virus wrote: »No. Add more Combat appropriate costumes.
Is what you deem "combat appropriate", only applicable to armor or does this scrutiny carry over to weaponry as well?
Most of weapons featured in ESO are not combat appropriate, in that at the very least, they'd be too heavy, and obstructively shaped to wield effectively. If a sense of realism is imposed on armor, why then do weapons get a pass?
Malnutrition wrote: »Onefrkncrzypope wrote: »They are pixels. Btw it was rated M for the content ESO had in the base. The rating can be changed and if a rating goes higher than M, most stores take the game off the self. Use google or something, does everything have to be sexy now?
TES started out as a game series with mature themes, it only changed because we live in a ridiculous society afraid of its own sexuality, thus Bethesda felt they could reach a greater audience if they toned things down and simply allowed the player base to add the sexy back via modding tools. Stop being a puritan.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »I would like a pen1s sheath (google for images of it in use):