Callous2208 wrote: »I thought I was supposed to ignore the pts and then come here to complain about things that made it to live once DB drops.
Callous2208 wrote: »I thought I was supposed to ignore the pts and then come here to complain about things that made it to live once DB drops.
demonaffinity wrote: »I would but I still don't trust Zenimax when it comes to taking feedback serious. Which is hard for me to say at this point. It seems obvious based on Dark Brotherhood's current state, that Zenimax has indeed done a lot, based on player feedback. But their lack of communication, and neglect to take the playerbase serious in the past, overshadows what we ASSUME is going to be a step forward.
If Dark Brotherhood goes well, and they listen to the feedback, I will definately take the next PTS more serious. But for now, I just don't see the point for me personaly. I wouldn't feel like Zenimax actually cared about what I would be testing anyways.
Not trying to bash Zenimax here, but that's what lack of communication does to some, if not most players.
demonaffinity wrote: »I would but I still don't trust Zenimax when it comes to taking feedback serious. Which is hard for me to say at this point. It seems obvious based on Dark Brotherhood's current state, that Zenimax has indeed done a lot, based on player feedback. But their lack of communication, and neglect to take the playerbase serious in the past, overshadows what we ASSUME is going to be a step forward.
If Dark Brotherhood goes well, and they listen to the feedback, I will definately take the next PTS more serious. But for now, I just don't see the point for me personaly. I wouldn't feel like Zenimax actually cared about what I would be testing anyways.
Not trying to bash Zenimax here, but that's what lack of communication does to some, if not most players.
We actually got ZOS to make an Enchanting change with the upcoming new PTS patch fix - they were trying to make Potency runes only sellable/tradeable with no harvesting option. Anyone interested can see the official Enchanting Feedback thread, page 9 or 10 has Gina's answer that they are reconsidering things to be closer to what players want.
Testing and providing feedback matters
I like this guy! ^^^^rotaugen454 wrote: »Exactly! I would rather curse the darkness than light a candle! Then again, I tend to rush in where angels fear to tread.
mzapkeneb18_ESO wrote: »What the title says
demonaffinity wrote: »I would but I still don't trust Zenimax when it comes to taking feedback serious. Which is hard for me to say at this point. It seems obvious based on Dark Brotherhood's current state, that Zenimax has indeed done a lot, based on player feedback. But their lack of communication, and neglect to take the playerbase serious in the past, overshadows what we ASSUME is going to be a step forward.
If Dark Brotherhood goes well, and they listen to the feedback, I will definately take the next PTS more serious. But for now, I just don't see the point for me personaly. I wouldn't feel like Zenimax actually cared about what I would be testing anyways.
Not trying to bash Zenimax here, but that's what lack of communication does to some, if not most players.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Id rather not spoil everything. I dont want to get tired of it before it even comes out. plus to be frank its too late for any real drastic changes anyways. They are 30 days from pushing this live basically. So I dont really see the point of jumping on there.