I agree with OP. Having some rigid armors were first okay, but now they spit out these "fixed frames" maybe too much.
I quickly scanned through some photos i have. The alts below wear usually light armor but chest is heavy or medium. Let's see...
Aldmeri Dominion style looks fixed frame (more):
This is a curvy alt, first in Xivkyn, then in AD and Daggerfall:
EDIT: new images
AD (more)
Daggerfall (more)
Ebonheart has no mesh (more):
EDIT: fixed wrong picture
Malacth seems to be decent (full light set):
But Trinimac again fixed frame (full light set):
This is interesting, and i could take a closer look. I'll make some alliance light armors to check them on few different alts. I might test also few males, because i have both athletes and dinner table heros.
Asherons_Call wrote: »Maybe she just has one giant boob that is hump shaped on the front of her body? Not the clothes' fault!
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Hi everyone,
We started following this thread a couple days ago, and digging into why some of the light armor sets look the way they do on female character models. We can confirm that the way certain light armor sets - like the Trinimac's Valor set - look on female character models is not desired or intended. We're still investigating this issue, but we are working on it and will make it better.
Nah, not a hump, she's shapeshifter. You can ogle bigger pics on previous pages.Asherons_Call wrote: »Maybe she just has one giant boob that is hump shaped on the front of her body? Not the clothes' fault!
Asherons_Call wrote: »Jessica, you had me at "boob window"
lordrichter wrote: »But it's more "realistic"... ppptth. This is what so many of you whined and cried about... now you have it. Happy now?
There is a difference between offering more realistic options and making mashes that does not adapt to your character's body.
ZOS didn't do this to make anything more realistic, it was to cut corners. Same mesh for male and female does not equal "realistic".
Oh, I think we all agree that this was done to cut corners @Abeille , but I'm pretty sure the "Excuse" was that they are doing this to appease the small handful off people that found boob armor and femininity in ESO offensive.
I highly doubt this.
Daggerfall light jerkin on female is same kind of balloon as other alliance styles:
FortheloveofKrist wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »I highly doubt this.
I don't doubt it at all. Why should ZoS be forced to make armor that accentuates some 14-year-old kid's new High Elf brick house at 36, 24, 36? Why would a female warrior be forced to wear booby armor just cause it shows off her form? Would a warrior do that? No.
Sorry, but some of us are glad ZoS eschews such confining gender norms you insist on showing off just so you're toon can look "hot."
WalkingLegacy wrote: »
@WalkingLegacy I can't say for sure who started it, but I recall another thread awhile back about this issue and believe I had even commented on it. Like Jessica said.. They can't see everything. Really, this thread growing large which also kept it consistently bumped to recents probably helped ZOS notice it.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Will do, thank you! Reports of what specific armor sets look "off" on female models is especially helpful. Bonus for screenshots of the issue, as that's super useful for the art teams.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »We can confirm that the way certain light armor sets - like the Trinimac's Valor set - look on female character models is not desired or intended. We're still investigating this issue, but we are working on it and will make it better.
MornaBaine wrote: »This was all done in response to the numerous feminists who posted about how "skimpy" the female model armor was. And I suppose ZOS decided that their original armor models for female characters was too sexist. Thus the change. Once again, we have the feminists and forum complainers to blame.
I remember seeing no such posts. Please feel free to link them here for proof. I DO remember seeing MANY posts by women totally ticked off when they took away the old "sexy" Redguard Light.
[Edited to remove naming/shaming]
adriant1978 wrote: »ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Actually, what Gina was referring to in the quote above is something completely different than what is being discussed and reported in this thread. The removal of the "boob window" from certain light armor sets did not result in the odd female torso geometry you're seeing on certain light armor sets, and is not intended behavior. To be clear, when we say we're looking at making improvements to address this issue, we're not talking about putting "boob windows" back on certain light armor sets.
I don't think anyone here is asking for the "boob window" to return, but rather getting concerned about the "we no longer created custom female torsos for armor sets. Rather, we typically used the male torso piece to fit the female with some anatomical changes where they were necessary" part of the quote.
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Hi everyone,
We started following this thread a couple days ago, and digging into why some of the light armor sets look the way they do on female character models. We can confirm that the way certain light armor sets - like the Trinimac's Valor set - look on female character models is not desired or intended. We're still investigating this issue, but we are working on it and will make it better.
Waffennacht wrote: »Boobs or no boobs, the new armor looks horrid compared to the old ones. I thought this game was suppose to be over the top graphics and those look like they're from Turok
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Hi everyone,
We started following this thread a couple days ago, and digging into why some of the light armor sets look the way they do on female character models. We can confirm that the way certain light armor sets - like the Trinimac's Valor set - look on female character models is not desired or intended. We're still investigating this issue, but we are working on it and will make it better.