jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
I am used to all the personal attacks. When people have no argument then they just start calling names like "carebear" etc. Also funk if you are trying to talk to me I have had you on ignore for some time and will probably never remove you. So move along.
Think he ment me..RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
I am used to all the personal attacks. When people have no argument then they just start calling names like "carebear" etc. Also funk if you are trying to talk to me I have had you on ignore for some time and will probably never remove you. So move along.
Don't really know why you have me on ignore as I have been nothing but civl towards you, especially when we have opposing views.
Funkopotamus wrote: »Think he ment me..RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
I am used to all the personal attacks. When people have no argument then they just start calling names like "carebear" etc. Also funk if you are trying to talk to me I have had you on ignore for some time and will probably never remove you. So move along.
Don't really know why you have me on ignore as I have been nothing but civl towards you, especially when we have opposing views.
But be careful if you do not see his side and respond to his post with your views he will indeed block you sooner or later..
He is one of those "Get the last word or die" kinda debate people.
ZOS needs constructive feedback. While i have seen many posts saying how bad it is from you, ive seen little suggestion for improvement.Now what do you want to see that's practical, unexploitable and good for all sides that keeps the atmosphere that PvPers want and deserve with this update (as it is a PvP update)?
RazzPitazz wrote: »Funkopotamus wrote: »Think he ment me..RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
I am used to all the personal attacks. When people have no argument then they just start calling names like "carebear" etc. Also funk if you are trying to talk to me I have had you on ignore for some time and will probably never remove you. So move along.
Don't really know why you have me on ignore as I have been nothing but civl towards you, especially when we have opposing views.
But be careful if you do not see his side and respond to his post with your views he will indeed block you sooner or later..
He is one of those "Get the last word or die" kinda debate people.
Nope, @jamesharv2005sub17_ESO doesn't allow someone to misunderstand who he is talking to lol.
@jamesharv2005ub17_ESO
You still havent replied to:ZOS needs constructive feedback. While i have seen many posts saying how bad it is from you, ive seen little suggestion for improvement.Now what do you want to see that's practical, unexploitable and good for all sides that keeps the atmosphere that PvPers want and deserve with this update (as it is a PvP update)?
Perhaps you could provide a nice logical solution?
I know I'm butting in so forgive me;@jamesharv2005ub17_ESO
You still havent replied to:ZOS needs constructive feedback. While i have seen many posts saying how bad it is from you, ive seen little suggestion for improvement.Now what do you want to see that's practical, unexploitable and good for all sides that keeps the atmosphere that PvPers want and deserve with this update (as it is a PvP update)?
Perhaps you could provide a nice logical solution?
RazzPitazz wrote: »Funkopotamus wrote: »Think he ment me..RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »RazzPitazz wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Celestrael wrote: »I wish the mods would contain all the Imperial City DLC complaining threads to one thread, sticky it, and lock all the other ones. Like how they did for requesting bites, so those threads don't clutter forums. I mean honestly, do we really need several of these trending daily for the next 2 months?
Maybe the devs should rethink the entire idea if there are so many threads with people unhappy about it.
The complainers here aren't many in number, they are just particularly loud. And each one starts a thread like their idea is unique and interesting, but it isn't. Their extraneous noise should be contained to spare the rest of us.
Just saying if there are so many complaint threads about this player looting deal maybe they should rethink that part of it. Not try to silence the people. Asking for a bite isnt even remotely the same.
Considering the majority of each thread has maybe one page worth of actual constructive criticism in it, it's even less useful than bite threads. These threads boiled down to a version of forum PvP in themselves, where players just Jab at each other all day like divorcees.
I am used to all the personal attacks. When people have no argument then they just start calling names like "carebear" etc. Also funk if you are trying to talk to me I have had you on ignore for some time and will probably never remove you. So move along.
Don't really know why you have me on ignore as I have been nothing but civl towards you, especially when we have opposing views.
But be careful if you do not see his side and respond to his post with your views he will indeed block you sooner or later..
He is one of those "Get the last word or die" kinda debate people.
Nope, @jamesharv2005sub17_ESO doesn't allow someone to misunderstand who he is talking to lol.
His statement says 'funk, if you are trying..." meaning Funkopotamus.
RazzPitazz wrote: »I know I'm butting in so forgive me;@jamesharv2005ub17_ESO
You still havent replied to:ZOS needs constructive feedback. While i have seen many posts saying how bad it is from you, ive seen little suggestion for improvement.Now what do you want to see that's practical, unexploitable and good for all sides that keeps the atmosphere that PvPers want and deserve with this update (as it is a PvP update)?
Perhaps you could provide a nice logical solution?
Allow IC dungeons to have TV stone rewards at a redced drop rate? All PvErs would have to do is spend minimal time within the city to discover the dungeon the first time and that is that. The reduced drop rate will make it less appealing for PvPers to grind, no risk of losing your stones, and they are repeatable. Discuss.
ZOS_RichLambert wrote: »I've seen this mentioned a few times in various threads now, so i'll clarify some here. Imperial City is meant for the PVP player - it's their turn for some love. If you love PVE and are clamoring for more of that type of content, the Orsinium DLC will be exactly what you want.
ZOS_RichLambert wrote: »I've seen this mentioned a few times in various threads now, so i'll clarify some here. Imperial City is meant for the PVP player - it's their turn for some love. If you love PVE and are clamoring for more of that type of content, the Orsinium DLC will be exactly what you want.
There you have it, from the Horse's mouth.
If you don't do PVP, then you have no reason to buy Imperial City. It's not for you. period.
there is no point in continuing to complain about the Tel Var Stones. It's not designed for you, so you have no reason to bother with it. Just save your money for Orsinium, and let the PVPers have their expansion.
I feel sorry for the Ganker tryhards who thought they were going to get some easy Carebear prey, but this Expansion is for PVPers, and no PVE Carebear should spend money on it. have fun getting stomped by real PVPers.
[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Bashing & Slanderous Comments]
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »This all could have been avoided by releasing orsinium first. Then noone would have any complaints. Both sides would have stuff to do. Instead the first DLC after waiting months and months alienates 75% or more of the players. How long are us PVE centered people supposed to stick around and wait for something to do? Another 6 months till orsinium IF its that fast? This game is going to sink quicker than the titanic if they dont hurry up and put out new content for EVERYONE.
ZOS_RichLambert wrote: »I've seen this mentioned a few times in various threads now, so i'll clarify some here. Imperial City is meant for the PVP player - it's their turn for some love. If you love PVE and are clamoring for more of that type of content, the Orsinium DLC will be exactly what you want.
Wait now what frack love have PvE community got last 8 month to me info the have got as little love as PvP community we have see no content up for at least last 8 month and ZoS have stomach to say "PvP player - it's their trun for some love" serious ZoS name one thing the PvE community have got in last 8 month and dont come here tell me that item in crown store is thing for PvE community for PvP community benefit as much for those item as well.
So what ZoS PvE communtiy have grind Craglorn to get VR 16 until you guys feel it is time get release Orsinium DLC come on now you add 2 new VR lvl and then you expect half of playerbase grinder those 2 lvl and you hope people wont stop play ESO for the hate grinder??
Hope for you sake ZoS that Orsinium DLC within the next 2 month after that Imperial City DLC is out or i tihnk you will lose more player.
I think the problem that is at the crux of this issue is that ZOS is charging for something that should have been given as an update. If this DLC was free as a "hey we know we left pvp without worthwhile content for a year, and we know everyone is clamoring for some new stuff so to show how grateful we are for our community. DLC for everyone!" The Tel Var stone looting wouldn't be as big of an issue, at all. Now come to find that the only way those who choose not to buy the DLC have to obtain their materials to craft the vr15-16 armor, that is an even bigger annoyance.
It will be interesting to see how things pan out though, should make for a good watch at the least.
I think the problem that is at the crux of this issue is that ZOS is charging for something that should have been given as an update. If this DLC was free as a "hey we know we left pvp without worthwhile content for a year, and we know everyone is clamoring for some new stuff so to show how grateful we are for our community. DLC for everyone!" The Tel Var stone looting wouldn't be as big of an issue, at all. Now come to find that the only way those who choose not to buy the DLC have to obtain their materials to craft the vr15-16 armor, that is an even bigger annoyance.
It will be interesting to see how things pan out though, should make for a good watch at the least.
The Crowns you were awarded at the beginning of the switch to ESOTU when the Crown Store opened up and the game went buy-to-play was ZeniMax's way of telling their players: "Hey. We know you subbed for this content, so here are the Crowns you can use to purchase them when they come out later on."
When the Crown Store was announced, they detailed what the ESO Plus membership was and that DLC would be paid content people will either need to have an active sub or pay in Crowns to unlock the DLC content. Many players who did play since beta, launch, and any other time during v1.X.X decided to save their Crowns for the DLC.
Others, like myself, spent it on various goods available on the Crown Store. (I have this thing for owning all the mounts in MMOs. o3o)
Regardless of what you did with the Crowns obtained through there, ZeniMax did reimburse us for a reason.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »This all could have been avoided by releasing orsinium first. Then noone would have any complaints. Both sides would have stuff to do. Instead the first DLC after waiting months and months alienates 75% or more of the players. How long are us PVE centered people supposed to stick around and wait for something to do? Another 6 months till orsinium IF its that fast? This game is going to sink quicker than the titanic if they dont hurry up and put out new content for EVERYONE.
What PvP content is being included in the Orsinium update?
This is completely new news to me.