Attorneyatlawl wrote: »Oh, if you only knew how wrong you are.... would love to see the look on your face if you ever understood that most of it is due to skill on those top spots, and not something so meaningless as playing 16 hours a day. That isn't why you aren't as good as people in that tier, trust me.
Attorneyatlawl wrote: »Oh, if you only knew how wrong you are.... would love to see the look on your face if you ever understood that most of it is due to skill on those top spots, and not something so meaningless as playing 16 hours a day. That isn't why you aren't as good as people in that tier, trust me.
I disagree and think you are marginalizing how big of a factor play time is in relation to "standings". I consider myself to be average in skill yet I was able to place second on the leaderboard/top in my class in a competitive campaign because I happened to have extra time to spend during that period which directly translated to me gaining a "top spot". I didn't magically improve in skill overnight; time was the deciding factor.
Casuals that use boosts still will remain far behind hardcore players due to less time played and not usually being part of competitive guilds. The argument that boosts will further separate hardcore/casual players (I disagree) isn't even relevant to casuals as a casual gamer tend to be more focused on enjoying their own singular progression instead of constantly comparing their "progression" to others.
The argument of fairness isn't relevant either as MMO's are never fair and somebody is always advantaged/disadvantaged for reasons other than individual skill. If fairness is what matter then moba's are the better games to play.
Most people play games for enjoyment and entertainment. If some people find ESO more enjoyable due to boosts then I don't see anything wrong with it. ESO has far bigger problems right now than some hypothetical conclusions of how boosts may or may not affect the game.
Going pay to win is the only way for new players and casual players to keep up and remain competitive in the current system. If they are willing to pay or hardcore/vet players are willing to pay to maintain their advantage, then I say more power to them.
ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »
liquid_wolf wrote: »50% bonus to XP for two hours?
meaning... that someone could get 4 champion points in two hours instead of 2? And at what... $2/$5 a pop they could get 16 extra skill points in 8 hours for the low low price of $16-$40 dollars?
Doesn't seem worth the cost, if you ask me...
I imagine, like other games, these will be available in game by chance/chests/rewards... I remember getting lots of stuff like this in other games and used them when I had a good XP farming moment to make it worthwhile.
Spottswoode wrote: »PVE grouping lockouts are done by a performance test. You can't fake 30K DPS.
kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »Spottswoode wrote: »PVE grouping lockouts are done by a performance test. You can't fake 30K DPS.
So u are saying that some ppl already got 3600 CP ?
well your lie is bad , i can see it.
kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »
i know the difference , on pvp , mostly you are fighting real person.You need every single dps.
On pve side , none can know that you have 3600 CP or not , you can lie about it and you can join any trial.That is what i meant.
kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »
i know the difference , on pvp , mostly you are fighting real person.You need every single dps.
On pve side , none can know that you have 3600 CP or not , you can lie about it and you can join any trial.That is what i meant.
So, you'd like to have people lying to each other, then the group wiping repeatedly, or not getting a good time because of there not being enough DPS (partly/entirely because of these liars)? I can tell you how that ends: arguments & ignore lists.
Not a very good thing for the PvE community.
kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »ssewallb14_ESO wrote: »
i know the difference , on pvp , mostly you are fighting real person.You need every single dps.
On pve side , none can know that you have 3600 CP or not , you can lie about it and you can join any trial.That is what i meant.
So, you'd like to have people lying to each other, then the group wiping repeatedly, or not getting a good time because of there not being enough DPS (partly/entirely because of these liars)? I can tell you how that ends: arguments & ignore lists.
Not a very good thing for the PvE community.
LOL.
I am simply pointing that PVP is more relevant than PVE on CP points.I know that CP points effect huge different 1 to 3600 CP to the DPS but on trial group you can group with some1 that who has not that much CP.So PVP will be more effected by using XP potions.
I hope this will explain what i really meant.
Craven_Killmore wrote: »Zos wants money, so they will sell xp pots, don't like it, don't buy them.
Craven_Killmore wrote: »thanks for quoting me and stating the obvious?
kherzaheb17_ESO wrote: »
70 CP:
[pic]
3600 CP:
[pic]
i know the difference , on pvp , mostly you are fighting real person.You need every single dps.
On pve side , none can know that you have 3600 CP or not , you can lie about it and you can join any trial.That is what i meant.
50% potion
10% mara
10% buddy
13% cyro
10% subcribe
Total:93%