It was all fun and games till someone dun messed up and put our recaptured scroll back in Glademist. Kinda went downhill from there. =/
Lag spiked only a few times since the battles were happening all over. Hope that ZoS was paying attention.
Edit: post your screenshots from the day!
Lag spiked only a few times since the battles were happening all over. Hope that ZoS was paying attention.
Edit: post your screenshots from the day!
I had just posted in another thread that the EP guys that cause 5 fps have been emp farming in Haderus, and that I was wondering how the lag has been in Thornblade since those guys have been in Haderus. Guess that answers that. Pretty crazy how one group can bring the server to its knees.
LonePirate wrote: »It was all fun and games till someone dun messed up and put our recaptured scroll back in Glademist. Kinda went downhill from there. =/
Surely you do not think that scroll would have remained under DC control for more than a hour longer if it had stayed at Rayles. Glade would have fallen and all of EP would have assaulted Rayles a few minutes afterwards. At least you maintained control of both Glademist and Rayles once we retrieved our stolen scroll.
That's the thing, though. 11 PST isn't crazy late for people like my guild, who live on the west coast. Not even talking different countries here, just East/West coast it looks like. And for that there will never be a solution, you can't hold it against West Coast people for gaming before midnight.
Regardless, were some very fun fights up until the usual log-off time.
Pretty sure we'd be whooping you good if the pops were all equal, because EP can't handle being outnumbered.
Darnathian wrote: »
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
Yep this graph is very clear:
- EP becomes population locked earlier than both other factions, and exits population lock later than both other factions
- EP has significant activity levels at times when both other factions do not
- EP spends greater than 95% of the time with higher population than AD, and 100% of the time with higher population than DC
- In a few cases EP has had as much as double the population of AD, and frequently doubles the population of DC
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
Yep this graph is very clear:
- EP becomes population locked earlier than both other factions, and exits population lock later than both other factions
- EP has significant activity levels at times when both other factions do not
- EP spends greater than 95% of the time with higher population than AD, and 100% of the time with higher population than DC
- In a few cases EP has had as much as double the population of AD, and frequently doubles the population of DC
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
Yep this graph is very clear:
- EP becomes population locked earlier than both other factions, and exits population lock later than both other factions
- EP has significant activity levels at times when both other factions do not
- EP spends greater than 95% of the time with higher population than AD, and 100% of the time with higher population than DC
- In a few cases EP has had as much as double the population of AD, and frequently doubles the population of DC
Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
LonePirate wrote: »Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
What is there to worm out of here? I don't think anyone from EP denies they are typically the highest pop in Thorn NA. If anything, AD and DC want people to believe their populations are constantly in the valley range and never in the peak range.
LonePirate wrote: »Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
What is there to worm out of here? I don't think anyone from EP denies they are typically the highest pop in Thorn NA. If anything, AD and DC want people to believe their populations are constantly in the valley range and never in the peak range.
LonePirate wrote: »Darnathian wrote: »
Here you go, mate:ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We cannot give specific numbers as to population caps and what each bar means, however here is a graph of Thornblade's (US) recent population which echos the statement above regarding the populations of each Alliance within that campaign:
Awesome post let's see EP worm their way out this one.
What is there to worm out of here? I don't think anyone from EP denies they are typically the highest pop in Thorn NA. If anything, AD and DC want people to believe their populations are constantly in the valley range and never in the peak range.
You guys claim a lot of your wins are down to skill, now there is proof from Wheeler that's purely down to numbers, A lot you think this is in AD/DC's heads or it's no where near as bad as it actually is. Refer to Tripwyr's bullet points to see just how out of hand and stupid it has gotten. If you were a semi decent player that enjoyed a challenge you would have rerolled by now. This just highlights the fact how trashy most EP are and the proof is in the pudding, all your back patting, high fives, and leet talk is now worth a whole bucket full of nothing and lols.