SilverBride wrote: »

Players shouldn't miss getting credit for something they did just because they forgot to open Tomes, go to Challenges, go to Seasonal then click on the Challenge. They did it for the daily login rewards so they should be able to do it for this, too.

You don't miss getting credit if you forget to claim it manually for a few days. I did forget to claim it on one account and then just had to click the things a few times, got credit for all days. Same with the resource gathering challenges. If you forget to claim one, it starts counting towards the next one already in the background. Now the auto claim function is of course a different matter.

twisttop138 wrote: »

I'm curious about something. Moving from 50 dailies to 100. I'm gonna be honest here. In almost 10 years of playing ESO, I never knew there was a daily quest limit. Is this per character or account? Is 50 dailies per character something players were in danger of hitting, if it was per toon? Does it just mean all dailies would vanish or not be acceptable? This is fascinating to me. On one hand, if per character, the endurance needed to break 50 dailies on a single toon is wild. If it's per account, with 20 possible toons, you're cooked on crafting writs alone. Why was there a limit to begin with.

It is per character.
I've also never heard of anyone getting in danger of hitting it, and I've been playing for years and can grind a lot (CP 3600 by now). There might be people having this problem if they saved 25 dailies before Jubilee, handed them in at the start and then did 25 more dailies this day, but let's be honest, the people that are this committed have far more than 1 character they do this on, so when they hit the cap they just move on to the next toon.

Way more QOL would have been to increase the amount of quests your journal can hold. Like, double it. But even an increase of 10 or less would be great.

Uhh... you do realize that it is still the first week of PTS, which means there is still rebalancing coming, right?

U50 isn't dropping until June.

Hmm.. thinking about the arachnophobia mode thread, how about a solution based partially on something brought up there?

Allow players to be able to set filters, so that they can filter/change certain emotes/actions to others.

I have seen people complaining about some of the emotes that make noise, and some of the attacks of certain classes.

So, if you don't want to see someone crouching, you can change it to something else. On the end of the person crouching, it would look exactly like they would expect to see, on the end of the person who has it filtered it would look like the player jumping, or an emote, or whatever the developers decide most likely.

Because, just like with spiders in games, I don't feel like people should be subjected to things that might trigger something unpleasant just because 'it has been part of gaming since forever'. The idea that you need to ask someone to NOT do it, and provide evidence that they did, while great for preventing mass false reports, feels more like it is meant to prevent people from reporting actual instances of this behavior.

So, if the action won't go away, give people the ability to change that action on their end. The people who want to T-bag can do so to their hearts content, and the person who doesn't want to see that just gets to see the other character look silly for a moment.

Just please don’t disable gray host. Vengeance was boring after the first big battle

aetherix8 wrote: »

SneaK wrote: »

Hi ZOS,

Stop doing this, the majority of your PvP base does not want this washed game mode. We don’t want to contribute anything to your “testing” because we are against it. Frankly, it’s a waste of time. With all the good that’s being done recently in the studio this is the remaining outlier of a team clinging to one last bad decision. It feels like we’re just being reminded to stay skeptical of the PvP dev team’s vacuum decision making philosophy.


*edit*
Can we test PvE Vengeance on April 20th too?

Basically, your best option is to participate as early as it goes live, and spam dmg aoes en masse.
If all PvPers and their grannies show up and help testing whether the cap of 6 will or will not melt down the servers, we might be done with that test in a couple of days.
Boycotts are pointless now, Vengeance will go live, so if you want to have GH back faster then help test this change.
Not to mention that this test is perhaps the most important - in a megazerg environment such as Vengeance we need bombing more than ever, and a cap of 3 on dmg aoe is ridiculous beyond belief.

Absolutely not. Zos is responsible for listening to the consumer not the other way around. Forcing content on us that we do not want is remnant of their old mentality and whoever is in charge making the decision needs to end this immediately and listen to their player base.

Or it will directly hurt their resurgence efforts. I am not caving in and playing something I have no interest in. They're not paying me, I'm paying them. And that will cease every time I am forced to use my time in the day to play something I do not want and clearly the PvP community doesn't want either.

And, not even the PvE community wants for that matter.

If a community doesn't like beer, you don't try and make beer for people who hate beer, you just make it how the people that do like it, want it. Its so basic its painful.