robacooperb16_ESO wrote: »What would your poll options have been?
For a relatively unbiased response? A sliding scale one like so:
* I already have cancelled my subscription
* I am unhappy and seriously considering cancelling my subscription
* I am waiting to see if desired fixes are deployed before cancelling
* I am waiting to see if desired fixes are deployed but am keeping subscription
* I am mostly happy with ESO and am continuing subscription
* I am happy and will continue with subscription
But even then the response will still be skewed, as the any poll dealing with whether or not a person is keeping their subscription is already skewed to attract those unhappy.
Yet 56% are unhappy with game you're point?
* I am waiting to see if desired fixes are deployed but am keeping subscription
where the hell are you basing your friggin numbers off of. Are you kidding,? trolling or just throwing numbers out your fingers. First off the game here is thriving all evidence is pointing to a 70% retention 2 months in is absloutley phenomenal. most games are in the 50 to 60% retention. And GW2? really the financial reports are available for all their products. and it got beat by lineage! jesus man do some financial research before you throw those #'s around.Lucifer108 wrote: »
When your game which is 2 months old as the same amount of active players as guild wars 2 (which has no subscription) which is 2 years old then you know something is drastically wrong.
I dont think even F2P will save this game like it did for SWTOR. There are a lot more star wars fans than TES for a start and secondly the base designs in SWTOR were based on a successful formula (WoW) with a star wars skin. I think Zenimax got the base designs for ESO wrong and nothing can be done about that at this point in time.
Nox_Aeterna wrote: »You can be sure...I wont be paying next month.
brisingr90 wrote: »FIX THE GOD DAMN TEMPLAR!!!!!!!!
Wifeaggro13 wrote: »Lucifer108 wrote: »
When your game which is 2 months old as the same amount of active players as guild wars 2 (which has no subscription) which is 2 years old then you know something is drastically wrong.
I dont think even F2P will save this game like it did for SWTOR. There are a lot more star wars fans than TES for a start and secondly the base designs in SWTOR were based on a successful formula (WoW) with a star wars skin. I think Zenimax got the base designs for ESO wrong and nothing can be done about that at this point in time.
where the hell are you basing your friggin numbers off of. Are you kidding,? trolling or just throwing numbers out your fingers. First off the game here is thriving all evidence is pointing to a 70% retention 2 months in is absloutley phenomenal. most games are in the 50 to 60% retention. And GW2? really the financial reports are available for all their products. and it got beat by lineage! jesus man do some financial research before you throw those #'s around.
Zos wont release any info on subscription #'s until the Fiscal qrtr report.
Just to be clear i have kept my sub and i like the game, but i am no fan boi at all they have made plenty of Bad decisions pre and post launch but your making stuff up now.First and foremost Zos needs to re thnk the end game a bit and actually put some real raid zones out. TOR was a horrible game i played it all the way through end game. And just about everyone will who has left can honestly say it was not even an MMO it was a lobby game with multiplayer aspects. even with some of the phasing issues this game is far more an MMO then TOR. but to each his own i dont see ESO going F2P anytime soon . Tor was already having mas exodus by this time on disaterous proportions. so much so they paid for large guild leaders to fly to a convention and round table how to stop the bleeding.
But Bethseda is .and yes rift had a 70% 90 days out and dropped to 60% by one year. Niether of us know .Wifeaggro13 wrote: »Lucifer108 wrote: »
When your game which is 2 months old as the same amount of active players as guild wars 2 (which has no subscription) which is 2 years old then you know something is drastically wrong.
I dont think even F2P will save this game like it did for SWTOR. There are a lot more star wars fans than TES for a start and secondly the base designs in SWTOR were based on a successful formula (WoW) with a star wars skin. I think Zenimax got the base designs for ESO wrong and nothing can be done about that at this point in time.
where the hell are you basing your friggin numbers off of. Are you kidding,? trolling or just throwing numbers out your fingers. First off the game here is thriving all evidence is pointing to a 70% retention 2 months in is absloutley phenomenal. most games are in the 50 to 60% retention. And GW2? really the financial reports are available for all their products. and it got beat by lineage! jesus man do some financial research before you throw those #'s around.
Zos wont release any info on subscription #'s until the Fiscal qrtr report.
Just to be clear i have kept my sub and i like the game, but i am no fan boi at all they have made plenty of Bad decisions pre and post launch but your making stuff up now.First and foremost Zos needs to re think the end game a bit and actually put some real raid zones out. TOR was a horrible game i played it all the way through end game. And just about everyone will who has left can honestly say it was not even an MMO it was a lobby game with multiplayer aspects. even with some of the phasing issues this game is far more an MMO then TOR. but to each his own i dont see ESO going F2P anytime soon . Tor was already having mas exodus by this time on disaterous proportions. so much so they paid for large guild leaders to fly to a convention and round table how to stop the bleeding.
70% retention?? Where are YOU getting YOUR numbers from? There is no way this game has 70% retention. I would be surprised if any MMO, ever, has had 70% retention 2 months after launch.
ZOS will not release information at the "Fiscal Qtr" report either, because it is NOT a public company.
Wifeaggro13 wrote: »But Bethseda is .and yes rift had a 70% 90 days out and dropped to 60% by one year. Niether of us know .Wifeaggro13 wrote: »Lucifer108 wrote: »
When your game which is 2 months old as the same amount of active players as guild wars 2 (which has no subscription) which is 2 years old then you know something is drastically wrong.
I dont think even F2P will save this game like it did for SWTOR. There are a lot more star wars fans than TES for a start and secondly the base designs in SWTOR were based on a successful formula (WoW) with a star wars skin. I think Zenimax got the base designs for ESO wrong and nothing can be done about that at this point in time.
where the hell are you basing your friggin numbers off of. Are you kidding,? trolling or just throwing numbers out your fingers. First off the game here is thriving all evidence is pointing to a 70% retention 2 months in is absloutley phenomenal. most games are in the 50 to 60% retention. And GW2? really the financial reports are available for all their products. and it got beat by lineage! jesus man do some financial research before you throw those #'s around.
Zos wont release any info on subscription #'s until the Fiscal qrtr report.
Just to be clear i have kept my sub and i like the game, but i am no fan boi at all they have made plenty of Bad decisions pre and post launch but your making stuff up now.First and foremost Zos needs to re think the end game a bit and actually put some real raid zones out. TOR was a horrible game i played it all the way through end game. And just about everyone will who has left can honestly say it was not even an MMO it was a lobby game with multiplayer aspects. even with some of the phasing issues this game is far more an MMO then TOR. but to each his own i dont see ESO going F2P anytime soon . Tor was already having mas exodus by this time on disaterous proportions. so much so they paid for large guild leaders to fly to a convention and round table how to stop the bleeding.
70% retention?? Where are YOU getting YOUR numbers from? There is no way this game has 70% retention. I would be surprised if any MMO, ever, has had 70% retention 2 months after launch.
ZOS will not release information at the "Fiscal Qtr" report either, because it is NOT a public company.
seneferab16_ESO wrote: »Yet 56% are unhappy with game you're point?
56% unhappy answers in a poll named "Are you considering or already cancelling your subscription?" with options leaning towards the negative is not really a surprice. Add to that that this is the forum; a place people go to cause drama, complain, argue and troll. There's some helping out other players and bonding as well, but we all know why the majority of us are here.
I'd prefer a poll that was less biased and had more neutral and positive options. This one, I just can't take serious.
I'd check the box next to:* I am waiting to see if desired fixes are deployed but am keeping subscription
terryammon wrote: »Got to love how 58% of the votes, show the customers aren't happy with the game or the service that have had or paid for, also, thats not counting the people that dont even read the forums or the hundreds or thousands of players that have already raged quit the game and im seeing alot of friends/guild members logging off and not coming back daily.