PhoenixWing wrote: »PhoenixWing wrote: »
P.S. @ZeroInspiration I think that add-on don't work anymore since the patch that stop allowing you to teleport to yourself.
link:
http://www.esoui.com/downloads/info224-Jumper.html
But for awhile at least it did work.
So it enabled cheating. That is proof enough right there that these add-ons can be used to cheat. Because it has already happened.
I agree with you that add-ons should not be allowed to perform features that do not exist.
However, in this case (Jumper add-on), it is the fault on Zenimax part, not the add-ons' that let this feature slipped.
Also, the fact that they fixed it confirms that they mistakenly made it available, so please do not use these bugs as an argument.
You can't just ignore that it happened for the sake of debate.
The fact remains there has already been at least one add-on that allowed players to cheat. Rather it was Zenimax's fault or not is irrelevant to my argument.
It has already happened and will happen again. It's a legitimate concern and shouldn't be mocked or discounted (I'm not saying you did).
Jumper did not provide a feature that someone who didn't have jumper did not have.
Prior to the fix, any player (both those with & without jumper), could open up their guild screen & teleport to themselves.
Jumper's only function was to save you like...10 seconds of time, so that instead of having to press G & then find your name, right click & click "teleport to player", you could just use the addon to do those things. (note, you can still do it to any other player in a guild you are a member of, the fix was that you can't go to yourself anymore.) (note, I never used jumper, as I rarely want to teleport to the closest wayshrine...instead I just teleport to another guild member in the same zone, which usually puts me back in a city with merchants/crafting/etc).
There was nothing that the addon did, that could not be easily done by someone who did not have the addon.
So...no, there has not been an instance of an addon that provided a feature that did not exist in the game for ESO yet.
As to the whole..."ESO dev's are lazy" nonsense.....no, they just have other priorities.
Do I want a search function for the guild store? Yes.
Do I want ZOS to take a programmer off of fixing quest breaking bugs, and have them work on the guild store UI instead? No.
The problem here is, that many of you seem to believe that ZOS has infinite resources & personnel. They don't...they have to prioritize where to spend their time.
UI fixes are important, so are breaking botting programs, fixing bugs, preparing to move the EU servers actually to EU, finishing content that was promised (i.e. dark brotherhood, crime system, thieves guild, housing, etc), and many many other things. ZOS does not have the money or the personnel to have hundreds of programmers working on everything at once (no company does), so they have to prioritize.
You may disagree with their priorities, but claiming that a company is lazy because they put something you care about lower on the priority list than you would prefer is rather self-centered.
I don't ever remember claiming the company is lazy. But I will, at least when it comes to certain things. And I do believe an over-reliance on addons is at least partly to blame in this regard.
The guild store interface for example is sloppy and lazily put together. It's barely usable in fact. And pointing that out doesn't mean I'm self-centered. It just means I can recognize lazy design.
I like this game. But I'm not going to excuse their mistakes simply because they don't have infinite resources and personal like you seem to suggest. Because no company has infinite resources and personal. That's a cop out and be used to justify anything.
81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
xramirez535b14_ESO wrote: »81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
However, forums are not indicative of a "majority" within a game's population. Would be interesting to see where EVERYONE stands on this. I would say most players don't ever login or post to these forums and have no idea this poll even exists.
xramirez535b14_ESO wrote: »81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
However, forums are not indicative of a "majority" within a game's population. Would be interesting to see where EVERYONE stands on this. I would say most players don't ever login or post to these forums and have no idea this poll even exists.
magic_is_might wrote: »xramirez535b14_ESO wrote: »81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
However, forums are not indicative of a "majority" within a game's population. Would be interesting to see where EVERYONE stands on this. I would say most players don't ever login or post to these forums and have no idea this poll even exists.
I'd hazard a guess and say that most players who don't go to the forums are fine and/or use add-ons. The only time I've ever seen people voice dissent against them are in this thread and have very weak excuses against them. They do not hold up and most people know that.
xramirez535b14_ESO wrote: »81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
However, forums are not indicative of a "majority" within a game's population. Would be interesting to see where EVERYONE stands on this. I would say most players don't ever login or post to these forums and have no idea this poll even exists.
Keep smoking, dude.
Reignskream wrote: »magic_is_might wrote: »xramirez535b14_ESO wrote: »81% to 18%. This thread is the perfect example of the vocal minority. 11 pages of argument when the overwhelming majority are in favor of keeping it the way it is.
However, forums are not indicative of a "majority" within a game's population. Would be interesting to see where EVERYONE stands on this. I would say most players don't ever login or post to these forums and have no idea this poll even exists.
I'd hazard a guess and say that most players who don't go to the forums are fine and/or use add-ons. The only time I've ever seen people voice dissent against them are in this thread and have very weak excuses against them. They do not hold up and most people know that.
All i've seen the nay-sayers do was go to google/yahoo search and bring up defintions and quotes.
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
A large yellow rectangle
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.
I would consider addons that improve functionality advantageous Thomas. If they were of no use why would you even want them to being with? So I think we may be getting bogged down in the semantics about what the word advantage means.
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.
david271749 wrote: »Please state why you voted yes or no below.
magic_is_might wrote: »magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.I would consider addons that improve functionality advantageous Thomas. If they were of no use why would you even want them to being with? So I think we may be getting bogged down in the semantics about what the word advantage means.
Okay. I still do not get how having a more efficient UI is more advantageous. You're still privy to the exact information you should already be seeing. I have yet to see a single thing named that gives me more advantage. Is it me seeing my damage output? Does that make it unfair for the other person? Unless the addon is changing my damage output or changing any other info I see on screen, I receive no more benefit than the other person.
Advantage of ME seeing this information on screen does NOT translate to any visible advantage in-game. I like seeing how much gold I have on-screen, with the use of an add-on. Tell me how this gives me an advantage in the actual game. You can't. Because you're grasping at nothing.
Because add-ons are about personalization. They have ZERO effect on other players. Stop pretending as if knowing how much time I have left on my research timer is unfair to other players. End of.
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.
No matter how nice or pretty the UI is, there will always be people who want to change it to suit their own personal tastes. There will be people who want to be able to rearrange everything. Maybe they want a percentage number instead of a bar or to use a different font, or what-have-you. This is because everybody has different tastes and preferences.
To say that people want addons simply because of the advantage/benefit they bestow is simply naive - people will want what they want, for a multitude of reasons. Some will want to make the UI even more minimalistic to improve immersion. Some just want changes made for aesthetic purposes. Some people want to be able to have rainbow colored text when they type in chat. They do not have to confer any sort of advantage or benefit; it just gives them a better player experience.
.
The main reason way having add-ons is a bad idea is that the quality of the game performance will be less. With that I mean add-ons usually create more bugs, more lag and what not for the user. Having a high quality UI with allot of options for personal prefrences like they did for SWTOR is allot better way to ensure the quality of the game experience for every one is high quality.
And yes so add-ons layers too many advantages. Like those that show on the map where every skyshard and lorebook is. Just to mention two.
...Just the ability to more freely change the way your interface works is in and of itself an advantage....
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.
No matter how nice or pretty the UI is, there will always be people who want to change it to suit their own personal tastes. There will be people who want to be able to rearrange everything. Maybe they want a percentage number instead of a bar or to use a different font, or what-have-you. This is because everybody has different tastes and preferences.
To say that people want addons simply because of the advantage/benefit they bestow is simply naive - people will want what they want, for a multitude of reasons. Some will want to make the UI even more minimalistic to improve immersion. Some just want changes made for aesthetic purposes. Some people want to be able to have rainbow colored text when they type in chat. They do not have to confer any sort of advantage or benefit; it just gives them a better player experience.
.
Well first I was self centered. Then I was a crappy player. Not I am naïve because I said addons give players advantages
What ever the reasons are that player may want a certain addon, they still offer the player advantages. That's just the simple truth. And its time you and others stop being so defensive about this and just admit that plain and basic fact.
Now rather they are unfair or not is a different discussion and I would have to judge that on a case by case basis. I have seen addons that were unfair. I have seen addons that weren't.
magic_is_might wrote: »Wow... Improving functionality = advantageous? You'd have to be a crappy player if having better navigation of a games UI and in-game menus gives me an advantage over you.
That is probably the lamest and weakest reason against addons. Oh no, I can filter my inventory better. Somehow that gives me an advantage.
You are grasping.
This will be my last post for the day
It's not grasping to suggest a more functional and efficient UI is advantageous. I would consider that common sense.
If there was no advantage/benefit (which ever word you prefer) to these types of addons then no one would want them to begin with.
It's mostly the addons that give gameplay advantages I have a problem with. UI customization is alright.
No matter how nice or pretty the UI is, there will always be people who want to change it to suit their own personal tastes. There will be people who want to be able to rearrange everything. Maybe they want a percentage number instead of a bar or to use a different font, or what-have-you. This is because everybody has different tastes and preferences.
To say that people want addons simply because of the advantage/benefit they bestow is simply naive - people will want what they want, for a multitude of reasons. Some will want to make the UI even more minimalistic to improve immersion. Some just want changes made for aesthetic purposes. Some people want to be able to have rainbow colored text when they type in chat. They do not have to confer any sort of advantage or benefit; it just gives them a better player experience.
.
Well first I was self centered. Then I was a crappy player. Not I am naïve because I said addons give players advantages
What ever the reasons are that player may want a certain addon, they still offer the player advantages. That's just the simple truth. And its time you and others stop being so defensive about this and just admit that plain and basic fact.
Now rather they are unfair or not is a different discussion and I would have to judge that on a case by case basis. I have seen addons that were unfair. I have seen addons that weren't.
A few things. First, your assertion that I and others need to "stop being so defensive" is, quite frankly, unfair and a bit arrogant. Don't try assume the moral high ground here. Also, I did not say you were naive for saying addons give people an advantage. I said it was naive to claim people only wanted addons because they gave an advantage, i.e. if they gave no advantages then nobody would want them.
Second, I had more than one point in that post. Which, even with your cherry picking, you did not address anything in my post. You just reasserted your claim. So let me reiterate: Before a meaningful middle ground or any form of mutual understanding can be reached, a single set of terminology needs to be agreed upon. What constitutes something that alters gameplay? What does not? Additionally, you keep throwing around the word "advantage". I would argue that, in order for an add-on to provide a player an advantage, the use of that add on would need to put other players at a disadvantage.
Blackwidow wrote: »Lol, they don't have an "army of programmers" dude. They're a small gaming company, they don't have 200 programmers working day in and day out on one thing (say addon compatibility and universality). It's not easy creating an entire online game.
They have a MMO. If they don't have the programmers to make simple things that single players can do at home, we are in big trouble.