Blackwidow wrote: »The only problem I have with the banking system is it's inability to properly stack items. I have several items in my account that are not stacked as they should be. For instance, my Edora Rune Stones. Instead of having a stack of 22 stones, I have a stack of 6, a stack of 12, and a stack of4. Now I'm using three bank slots for these stones when I should only have one. We should at least have the ability to stack these items ourselves. I have 14 wasted bank slots because the game is not stacking items as it should.
That has to do with the duping bug. Until ZOS can find a way to fix this, you will not see auto stacking.
Blackwidow wrote: »The only problem I have with the banking system is it's inability to properly stack items. I have several items in my account that are not stacked as they should be. For instance, my Edora Rune Stones. Instead of having a stack of 22 stones, I have a stack of 6, a stack of 12, and a stack of4. Now I'm using three bank slots for these stones when I should only have one. We should at least have the ability to stack these items ourselves. I have 14 wasted bank slots because the game is not stacking items as it should.
That has to do with the duping bug. Until ZOS can find a way to fix this, you will not see auto stacking.
Why can't they add the ability to stack items to our controls? We already have the ability to divide stacks.
Some people like everything easy for them some people like to feel like they earned it. To each their own.khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »
I replied to you because you spoke of me. Surely that is understandable. Try to recognize your remarks about me for what they are... passive aggressiveness. My mention of your passive aggressiveness before it was moderated is probably what got it the insightful but we'll probably never know for sure. Don't be so sore about it. Forum stats mean nothing.I did read the thread and even responded to it.fredarbonab14_ESO wrote: »"Inventory is unmanageable" - for the pack rat; keep less. Simple.
Read the actual thread, not just the title.
@Allyah, the post in question did not address or have anything to do with you, nor was it inflammatory.
He had no intentions of reading the thread. He is one of the less committed dissenters, who charge in, grunt once or twice to make a blanket statement, with derogatory tone, and move on.
Had a few here, and about 3 or so committed objectors, who just repeat the same things over again, with same put downs. None of which are worth getting wound up over or engaging. Tempting though it can be I do accept.
Moderator edit: edited for personal attacks.
This comment got an insightful? Odd. He replied to this when I was not even speaking to him, and was referring to another poster. That is insight?
Besides, I already said there were people I was not speaking to anymore as looking at their inflammatory posts, and cyclic arguments, and even advised others (@Blackwidow for on) not engage in that, as they were not here for a discussion. In that regard, I advise you not waste your time speaking to me as I will not respond further.
And thank you @Thorwil. Much appreciated. I wonder if you also feel, a simple patch in the near future, to make trophies and pets no take up actual bank and bag space, would be a great token gesture. Even better if urn containers and maps were included
PS I wonder if the detractors in the thread dare flame or insult you, claiming your point is illogical.
I have pointed out what I have noticed about your responses not only from this thread but from numerous others. If you haven't learned how to figure out your own mistakes, it is about time you learned. Choose to take my word for it or don't. It won't affect me either way. As I mentioned, I usually just ignore your posts because I've seen how crappy you can be at communicating.Blackwidow wrote: »I don't ask you questions because I already know the answer I get back will make no sense. It's the same reason I never actually get into disagreements with you. I was trying to be nice with my response by not explaining to you what you do wrong with your arguments but since you seem so offended already I might as well let you know why I said what I said.Blackwidow wrote: »It's (Blackwidow) a troll. I refuse to believe anyone is intentionally this off topic and illogical on accident.Blackwidow wrote:Are you calling me a Troll?Don't take it as a personal attack.
Why would I do that? I'm sure you would not take it as a personal attack if I called you a A-hole for saying it, so I'm sure we are all good.I really just don't understand how you form your responses.
Well, by all means call me a troll instead of asking me a question.They certainly don't follow any pattern of logic or communication that I'm used to.
That I can believe.Could be you, could be me.
You are half right.
I don't know why mods let people like you and Badmojo constantly make personal attacks and never remove your posts.
Well, that is not really true, they have a dog in this fight. You are fighting to blinding defend them.
I'm sure this post defending myself will get removed, while your attack stays up.
Based off all the responses I have seen you make:
You constantly make personal attacks on people because they don't agree with you. Your arguments are unstructured and illogical. You don't communicate effectively. You twist words to what you want them to mean. You make huge assumptions. Your immovable in your thoughts. All of these are huge problems that indicate you are either here to shove your beliefs down peoples throats about certain subjects or that you are here to mess with people.
Oh, and several of my posts have already been edited by moderators because of personal attacks. Your point has been proven wrong. Again.
You constantly make personal attacks on people because they don't agree with you.
No, I don't.Your arguments are unstructured and illogical.
Just because you can't understand something does not mean it's illogical.You don't communicate effectively.
I pretty sure I explain myself quite clearly.You twist words to what you want them to mean.
No, I just respond to what is said as I perceive them, just like anyone else does. If I get something wrong, feel free to correct me, just don't backpeddle and lie and we will get along just fine.You make huge assumptions.
Like?Your immovable in your thoughts.
If you can't prove something to change my mind then yes, however if you can use logic to sway me, I'm open minded.
Prove your first statement. Can't? How surprising.Blackwidow wrote: »All of these are huge problems that indicate you are either here to shove your beliefs down peoples throats about certain subjects or that you are here to mess with people.
Or I just disagree and you can't stand the fact that I have a different opinion than yours.And you call me the troll.Oh, and several of my posts have already been edited by moderators because of personal attacks.Your point has been proven wrong. Again.
Yep, my bad, you do have a lot of insults removed.
Yet, you tell me you are tired of me personally attacking others?
Go figure.
khele23eb17_ESO wrote: »
Blackwidow wrote: »
QFT.
The system is broken.
The only ones who fight to keep it this way are the ones who have your own personal guild bank, or have no problem with using mules.
Blackwidow wrote: »
QFT.
The system is broken.
The only ones who fight to keep it this way are the ones who have your own personal guild bank, or have no problem with using mules.
Kinda like people unhappy with a game coming onto the forums to complain about it in a non constructive manner?
One of the internets biggest ironies. That people insist on bumping a thread, instead of leaving it alone if they don't like it.
I don't like Lady Gaga or Twilight, but I don't go over to their fan sites and such just to make it clear. THAT is what is useless.
Kinda like people unhappy with a game coming onto the forums to complain about it in a non constructive manner?
One of the internets biggest ironies. That people insist on bumping a thread, instead of leaving it alone if they don't like it.
I don't like Lady Gaga or Twilight, but I don't go over to their fan sites and such just to make it clear. THAT is what is useless.
Kinda like people unhappy with a game coming onto the forums to complain about it in a non constructive manner?[/quote]
The solution to the inventory issues is simple.
Limit the amount of crafting skills you can have on your account. This would eliminate hording, encourage more trading, and boost the economy. In the grand scheme of things, it also will help YOU as a crafter and adventurer.... less time spent on micromanaging your bags, and more time for questing, adventuring and exploration.
Come to think of it, most MMOs DO limit the amount of crafts you can learn -- for the very reasons listed in this thread as arguments to expand the inventory system.
Who is posting in an unconstructive manner except for the guys saying "wow I just love having stupidly limited space and spending five days organising my bags, this makes me sooo happy and you should be happy too".
I don't believe I ever accused you of that in my post. But since you bring up the post about the lollipop... I believe I recall you being a smartass and cursing at someone in the same post. Maybe it was a joke, maybe it wasn't. But I don't think it's that hard to understand why they took it down and why that could be considered nonconstructive. Cry victim all you want. Everyone who saw your posts know why they were edited.Kinda like people unhappy with a game coming onto the forums to complain about it in a non constructive manner?One of the internets biggest ironies. That people insist on bumping a thread, instead of leaving it alone if they don't like it.
I don't like Lady Gaga or Twilight, but I don't go over to their fan sites and such just to make it clear. THAT is what is useless.
Considering I do not actually do that, is evidence of glaring inaccuracies that they are not the same.
Especially as I have never bought anything to do with those particular things, and they do not have an ongoing project, that I pay regularly for, that has forums asking for feedback.
Not much the same at all. In fact MILES OFF!
I have said nothing @thorwil has not said. Yet you are such a coward as to accuse me of being illogical, and make flaming and insulting posts, aimed at me that are required to be edited frequently, yet not to do the same to a mod.
I on the other hand have not gone anywhere near. I had two posts edited by over reactions, one for asking a poster pages back, what flavour lollipop they wanted (yes that was moderated for flaming), and one that was also misunderstood, where I was telling someone (may have been you), I was done with engaging them, and recommended they do the same.
Since twice you never got the message, that means you. And if you don't claim to care if I respond, why are you still engaging me, with petty attempts at cut downs?
That's called an (exaggerated-by-you) alternate opinion. Not a non constructive post. Learn the difference.Kinda like people unhappy with a game coming onto the forums to complain about it in a non constructive manner?
One of the internets biggest ironies. That people insist on bumping a thread, instead of leaving it alone if they don't like it.
I don't like Lady Gaga or Twilight, but I don't go over to their fan sites and such just to make it clear. THAT is what is useless.
Who is posting in an unconstructive manner except for the guys saying "wow I just love having stupidly limited space and spending five days organising my bags, this makes me sooo happy and you should be happy too".