They launched it in beta stage. Easily 6 months too early. I could care less about loosing my characters thought. Was planning to start a new character anyway as soon as the bugs which bother me most are fixed.Fairydragon3 wrote: »Malediktus wrote: »Of course I would. I am on the fence of cancelling sub today because my free days run out today and all the bugs which bother me most are not fixed yet (not fixed in 1.1 according to patchnotes, too)Fairydragon3 wrote: »Malediktus wrote: »No surprise, PC players are getting abused as paying beta testers for console release.
Would you rather wait the 8 months then(counting 2 between early access and the original console release date), cuz Ill have like 3 VR12' (Craglorn, hoping is soon) and all my research done by then.
To be honest the game in the current state is an impudence for buy and sub to play. They should remove sub fees until it truly leaves beta stage.
To each his own, butthat will never happen. And if it was still in beta, guess what happens to your characters WHEN IT LAUNCHED. BYEBYE
Nazon_Katts wrote: »@fairydragon3
I think we can agree on having different standards. If you do not have a problem with this, that's fine for you and I won't question you for it. Me and others are not content with this, so how about not questioning us in turn?
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »GossiTheDog wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »GossiTheDog wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »GossiTheDog wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »What does that prove? Noone said it was a fake screenshot. Relax wait for ZOS to address it I say. Im not saying it is not true but also not saying it is true. If it was true why would they remove it?
Because they hadn't announced it yet. On the site they linked to a blog post about the delay which wasn't live yet. Hence, delete. They're also deleting all posts by customers on their Facebook page about it.
This is not true I was just reading the facebook page. This is all over it including about 40 diff screenshots of it before it was deleted. personally it looks like someone wrote it who didnt know what they were doing. Like I said calm down take a deep breath and wait for ZOS to address it.
I am calm. It is true, they deleted posts about it. I did not say all (it's also before 8am East Coast US time, where teh community managers work).Also I mean none of us are console customers anyways.
I have PC version and an XB1. I am not bothered by the delay - the PC version should have been delayed too.
The PC version is fine. I would much rather be playing. I am VR5 have yet to run into anything game stopping.
Proof positive there's no main quests broken, hanging at loading screens on PVP, bots, gold sellers, bugs etc.
Ive done all of the main questline. No problems. I have no problems loading into PVP nor do anyone I know of. 100s and 100s of people. Gold sellers are part of mmos. All of them have gold sellers. Also ALL games have bugs at launch. Even single player games.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »Couldn't care less about a press release, would have been nice for a change if someone - anyone - cared about the community and talked to us here directly instead of hiding behind PR.
Aw well, but thanks for sharing @GossiTheDog !
Malediktus wrote: »They launched it in beta stage. Easily 6 months too early. I could care less about loosing my characters thought. Was planning to start a new character anyway as soon as the bugs which bother me most are fixed.Fairydragon3 wrote: »Malediktus wrote: »Of course I would. I am on the fence of cancelling sub today because my free days run out today and all the bugs which bother me most are not fixed yet (not fixed in 1.1 according to patchnotes, too)Fairydragon3 wrote: »Malediktus wrote: »No surprise, PC players are getting abused as paying beta testers for console release.
Would you rather wait the 8 months then(counting 2 between early access and the original console release date), cuz Ill have like 3 VR12' (Craglorn, hoping is soon) and all my research done by then.
To be honest the game in the current state is an impudence for buy and sub to play. They should remove sub fees until it truly leaves beta stage.
To each his own, butt that will never happen. And if it was still in beta, guess what happens to your characters WHEN IT LAUNCHED. BYEBYE
GossiTheDog wrote: »Quick update - Bethesda's PR department say a press release is coming about console release later today.
Also, they should be keeping us in the know HERE, on their OFFICIAL site, not on Reddit. As many faults that people think SWTOR has, at least they keep their fans in the know on what they are doing, and working on, on their official web site.Nazon_Katts wrote: »Having close ties to your community is the best damage control you could ever wish for. Just feeding us PR does not help forming those ties. Just keeping us informed does not help keeping such ties. Open discussion and transparent communication does.
If all of us here knew about this before, were told the reasoning behind it and been kept in the known of progress made, we'd have spread out and answered all questions out there before they could have even assigned a PR meeting.
It's not so much about what is happening, but how it is handled.
lee.vanderlipub17_ESO wrote: »LOL, if this is true then be thankful. TESO needed another 6-12 months of development time and testing. Yet all I see is ZOS posting about how their new Craglorn zone will be amazing... Blah, blah, blah... The game is at best an early beta build which needed more time. ZOS wanted to get it out the door before Wildstar, how's that working out?
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Why do you think even if it is delayed it is delayed because of problems with the PC version?
It's because a) we played the game on PC for more then 2 hours and b) have (open) eyes.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Why do you think even if it is delayed it is delayed because of problems with the PC version?
It's because a) we played the game on PC for more then 2 hours and b) have (open) eyes.
What does that have to do with anything? You are ASSuming the same issues happen on all three platforms. Also the PC version has had pretty much all the bugs fixed with the latest patch. So ya guess your argument really doesnt stand up when you actually think for a minute.
GossiTheDog wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Why do you think even if it is delayed it is delayed because of problems with the PC version?
It's because a) we played the game on PC for more then 2 hours and b) have (open) eyes.
What does that have to do with anything? You are ASSuming the same issues happen on all three platforms. Also the PC version has had pretty much all the bugs fixed with the latest patch. So ya guess your argument really doesnt stand up when you actually think for a minute.
1.0.7 does not have "pretty much all the bugs fixed".
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Why do you think even if it is delayed it is delayed because of problems with the PC version?
It's because a) we played the game on PC for more then 2 hours and b) have (open) eyes.
What does that have to do with anything? You are ASSuming the same issues happen on all three platforms. Also the PC version has had pretty much all the bugs fixed with the latest patch. So ya guess your argument really doesnt stand up when you actually think for a minute.
Fairydragon3 wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »Why do you think even if it is delayed it is delayed because of problems with the PC version?
It's because a) we played the game on PC for more then 2 hours and b) have (open) eyes.
What does that have to do with anything? You are ASSuming the same issues happen on all three platforms. Also the PC version has had pretty much all the bugs fixed with the latest patch. So ya guess your argument really doesnt stand up when you actually think for a minute.
There are always bugs young one, but you are right, the stability on consoles should be better since there is less tech to test, a issue that needs to be address greatly in PC testing. However This Push back is a bit much, to be unrelated, I will look forward to an official announcement, but then again, I dont even own a next gen
Since it's obvious that the game developers agree that this game is currently in no state to be released I think the very first step would be to give all PC-players 6 months of free game time. Or why exactly should we be paying $15 a month for the honor of playing a game that the devs themselves admit isn't fit for release?
If I'm being abused as an involuntary beta tester then that beta at the very least should be free!
No, stop complaining. I know you enjoy the game.. You scoundrel. Stop assuming you have more rights than you do
GossiTheDog wrote: »Here's the announcement: http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2014/05/08/eso-on-consoles--update
They're delaying for six months.
jamesharv2005ub17_ESO wrote: »GossiTheDog wrote: »Here's the announcement: http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2014/05/08/eso-on-consoles--update
They're delaying for six months.
Note how it says it is unrelated to any PC issues.
And us PC players don't deserve an experience that fans would expect? Or what are you trying to say exactly?
This game would have profited a lot by only being released in 6 months.
Since it's obvious that the game developers agree that this game is currently in no state to be released I think the very first step would be to give all PC-players 6 months of free game time. Or why exactly should we be paying $15 a month for the honor of playing a game that the devs themselves admit isn't fit for release?
If I'm being abused as an involuntary beta tester then that beta at the very least should be free!