jad11mumbler wrote: »method__01 wrote: »the sub ppl dont have a prob with community,they are big part of,just want equal treatment
how gifting something i already have is a gift?
1st of all you don't own content even if you are a sub player you don't own it until you buy it in the crown store aka real money and honest I think it is nice that gave away for free and yes I have been sub to this since release back in 2014.
2nd everyone gets equal treatment with this gift for we all well own and the keyword here is owning.
As a sub player, you don't own any content and it is clear to say so if you read the agreement for as soon as you stop sub you will not have DLC the only thing you will have is basic game and expansion you pay for with real money but not DLC.
It even says in-game as well both in the crown store and under DLC/content tab.
Owning its vs renting it is irrelevant for us who don't plan on unsubscribing until we stop playing.
Owning a small zone dlc is also irrelevant because there's no reason to go back there after you complete it in the first week or two, other than the events Zos does for zones every so often.
For us year long subs, "owning it" is worthless.
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »what's actually happening is an 'I am entitled as I have ESO+' in effect caused in part by people assumed they were getting a big reward (advertising was ambiguous and could have been clearer). I also pay yearly in advance plus purchases, and i'm happy if others get gifts, i don't lose anything, and gain a small few extras. My ESO+ gives me crafting bags and ALL DLC for free (not just one) plus quite a few other benefits
Monthly contract owners have lost nothing and are not entitled (or even expect) some kind of compensatory reward.
spartaxoxo wrote: »jad11mumbler wrote: »method__01 wrote: »the sub ppl dont have a prob with community,they are big part of,just want equal treatment
how gifting something i already have is a gift?
1st of all you don't own content even if you are a sub player you don't own it until you buy it in the crown store aka real money and honest I think it is nice that gave away for free and yes I have been sub to this since release back in 2014.
2nd everyone gets equal treatment with this gift for we all well own and the keyword here is owning.
As a sub player, you don't own any content and it is clear to say so if you read the agreement for as soon as you stop sub you will not have DLC the only thing you will have is basic game and expansion you pay for with real money but not DLC.
It even says in-game as well both in the crown store and under DLC/content tab.
Owning its vs renting it is irrelevant for us who don't plan on unsubscribing until we stop playing.
Owning a small zone dlc is also irrelevant because there's no reason to go back there after you complete it in the first week or two, other than the events Zos does for zones every so often.
For us year long subs, "owning it" is worthless.
I am a currently on a year long sub and I find owning it to be a good thing. But then I still play if I let my sub lapse.
I think the only part that sucks was the decision to make it a mystery prize. That did lead to me being a little disappointed. It was the whole waiting around for a huge prize only to get a small one that really curdled my grits, but it was truly free stuff for me anyhow since I already had the achievement. So idc that much
Anyway it's not all the subs that have a problem with this, not even the year longs.
jad11mumbler wrote: »_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »what's actually happening is an 'I am entitled as I have ESO+' in effect caused in part by people assumed they were getting a big reward (advertising was ambiguous and could have been clearer). I also pay yearly in advance plus purchases, and i'm happy if others get gifts, i don't lose anything, and gain a small few extras. My ESO+ gives me crafting bags and ALL DLC for free (not just one) plus quite a few other benefits
Monthly contract owners have lost nothing and are not entitled (or even expect) some kind of compensatory reward.
Then zos shouldn't of marketed as a "Incredible mystery reward" for an event, supposedly, based on the community coming together to achieve a goal, while alienating a large portion of the community.
[snip]
jad11mumbler wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »jad11mumbler wrote: »method__01 wrote: »the sub ppl dont have a prob with community,they are big part of,just want equal treatment
how gifting something i already have is a gift?
1st of all you don't own content even if you are a sub player you don't own it until you buy it in the crown store aka real money and honest I think it is nice that gave away for free and yes I have been sub to this since release back in 2014.
2nd everyone gets equal treatment with this gift for we all well own and the keyword here is owning.
As a sub player, you don't own any content and it is clear to say so if you read the agreement for as soon as you stop sub you will not have DLC the only thing you will have is basic game and expansion you pay for with real money but not DLC.
It even says in-game as well both in the crown store and under DLC/content tab.
Owning its vs renting it is irrelevant for us who don't plan on unsubscribing until we stop playing.
Owning a small zone dlc is also irrelevant because there's no reason to go back there after you complete it in the first week or two, other than the events Zos does for zones every so often.
For us year long subs, "owning it" is worthless.
I am a currently on a year long sub and I find owning it to be a good thing. But then I still play if I let my sub lapse.
I think the only part that sucks was the decision to make it a mystery prize. That did lead to me being a little disappointed. It was the whole waiting around for a huge prize only to get a small one that really curdled my grits, but it was truly free stuff for me anyhow since I already had the achievement. So idc that much
Anyway it's not all the subs that have a problem with this, not even the year longs.
and for those of us who don't let our sub lapse, owning it or not doesn't make a difference.
It'll be even worse for us who also buy the collectors editions if we like the mount and pet.
BalticBlues wrote: »Wow, they probably are giving away an entire DLC for free.
Isn't this awesome... but some people here still do complain?
Why not just be happy for all the people without ESO+ to enjoy it?
If you cannot be happy for other people
you probably won't be happy for a lot of your life...
Because you get the most happiness in life
when the people around you are happy.
BalticBlues wrote: »Wow, they probably are giving away an entire DLC for free.
Isn't this awesome... but some people here still do complain?
Why not just be happy for all the people without ESO+ to enjoy it?
If you cannot be happy for other people
you probably won't be happy for a lot of your life...
Because you get the most happiness in life
when the people around you are happy.
Absolutely happy for the non-subscribers. Then, again, we subscribers are happy for the the ones that aren't, but it seems the ones that aren't have no understanding or empathy with us that are... Feels a bit one directional don't you think?
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »BalticBlues wrote: »Wow, they probably are giving away an entire DLC for free.
Isn't this awesome... but some people here still do complain?
Why not just be happy for all the people without ESO+ to enjoy it?
If you cannot be happy for other people
you probably won't be happy for a lot of your life...
Because you get the most happiness in life
when the people around you are happy.
Absolutely happy for the non-subscribers. Then, again, we subscribers are happy for the the ones that aren't, but it seems the ones that aren't have no understanding or empathy with us that are... Feels a bit one directional don't you think?
i'm sure 'non subscribers' are perfectly happy with the benefits ESO+ players get, in fact guess what we are in the same community. The issues is a sense of entitlement by some subscribers (most are perfectly happy i'm sure)
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »BalticBlues wrote: »Wow, they probably are giving away an entire DLC for free.
Isn't this awesome... but some people here still do complain?
Why not just be happy for all the people without ESO+ to enjoy it?
If you cannot be happy for other people
you probably won't be happy for a lot of your life...
Because you get the most happiness in life
when the people around you are happy.
Absolutely happy for the non-subscribers. Then, again, we subscribers are happy for the the ones that aren't, but it seems the ones that aren't have no understanding or empathy with us that are... Feels a bit one directional don't you think?
i'm sure 'non subscribers' are perfectly happy with the benefits ESO+ players get, in fact guess what we are in the same community. The issues is a sense of entitlement by some subscribers (most are perfectly happy i'm sure)
I'm talking about us subscribers sharing the joy of non-subscribers while non-subscribers show little understanding for the subscriber's point of view. Nothing in your post does either.
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »what's actually happening is an 'I am entitled as I have ESO+' in effect caused in part by people assumed they were getting a big reward (advertising was ambiguous and could have been clearer). I also pay yearly in advance plus purchases, and i'm happy if others get gifts, i don't lose anything, and gain a small few extras. My ESO+ gives me crafting bags and ALL DLC for free (not just one) plus quite a few other benefit.
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »what's actually happening is an 'I am entitled as I have ESO+' in effect caused in part by people assumed they were getting a big reward (advertising was ambiguous and could have been clearer). I also pay yearly in advance plus purchases, and i'm happy if others get gifts, i don't lose anything, and gain a small few extras. My ESO+ gives me crafting bags and ALL DLC for free (not just one) plus quite a few other benefit.
That's just... the ultimate proof they don't care about subbers.
_adhyffbjjjf12 wrote: »what's actually happening is an 'I am entitled as I have ESO+' in effect caused in part by people assumed they were getting a big reward (advertising was ambiguous and could have been clearer). I also pay yearly in advance plus purchases, and i'm happy if others get gifts, i don't lose anything, and gain a small few extras. My ESO+ gives me crafting bags and ALL DLC for free (not just one) plus quite a few other benefits
Think of it this way, A company offers a monthly contract over a year for a tv and film package, it offers additional content over and above what pay as you go customers would get for the same period. 6 months later the company offers a special offer to pay as you go customers that gives access to a bunch of films that were previously only available for purchase or with the contract. Monthly contract owners have lost nothing and are not entitled (or even expect) some kind of compensatory reward.
Of course people are free to voice their own opinions but how does ZOS giving away ONE DLC for free (and not even to everyone, it's people who own Blackwood that get it) diminish YOUR sub rewards? It doesn't take away your access to any other DLCs, it doesn't take your craft bag, it doesn't take your double bank and furniture slots, it doesn't take your monthly Crowns...Sheezabeast wrote: »It's not that you shouldn't be upset, but you're pushing a fallacy. The prizes /are/ equal. Your Plus sub pays for access to DLC. Not owning the DLC. When you stop paying, your access ends. Money comes and goes. An investment in purchasing DLC through the crown store is separate from just accessing them from subbing. You cannot drive the narrative that it is unequal, when it is very much equal. You're only not being given special privilege's for paying for a sub, for an event for a chapter, which is different.
I'm not pushing a fallacy. As an ESO+ subscriber, who has no intention of unsubscribing at this time, I didn't get anything. Also, one of the benefits that I'm PAYING for is now being given away for free, which diminishes the value of my subscription.
Essentially, when the awesome prize is given out, I won't get anything that I don't already have.
trackdemon551 laid it out nicely in the post above this one.
trackdemon5512 wrote: »Those with ESO+ subscriptions pay X amount of real life money with the understanding that the services provided are unique.
spartaxoxo wrote: »trackdemon5512 wrote: »Those with ESO+ subscriptions pay X amount of real life money with the understanding that the services provided are unique.
- An unlimited craft bag
- Access to All DLCs including the newest
- A monthly allotment of crowns
- Various XP/Gold bonuses
There is an understanding for those players that without ESO+ they would have to shell out real world cash to purchase crowns in order access a specific DLC. That without shelling out for ESO+ you actually pay more to own a specific DLC.
I could spend roughly the same amount of real world money and either get 2 months of ESO+ or get 30k crowns. 30k crowns gets me a DLC to keep as long as the servers remain up. ESO+ gets me access to a DLC while my subscription is active AND the currency to purchase it to permanently play within 2 months.
By giving away DEADLANDS you have effectively devalued the utility of a service many prepaid for. The value of the service is unaffected as the amount of crowns rewarded and access to DLCs during a subscription remain unchanged. But specifically the value of the service’s utility does diminish. And those who ZOS encouraged to purchase the product based upon the promises of such a utility are short changed.
Those who pay month-to-month are short changed the least. Those who pay months in advance, and are encouraged to do so with promises of greater discounts for doing so, are short changed the most. This is why subscribers are upset.
Renting the DLC is more expensive than owning it. It's a smaller upfront cost but in the long run it's cheaper to own.
The value in eso+ doesn't lie in the access to the DLC, it lies in all the other perks.
spartaxoxo wrote: »trackdemon5512 wrote: »Those with ESO+ subscriptions pay X amount of real life money with the understanding that the services provided are unique.
Renting the DLC is more expensive than owning it. ESO+ is a smaller upfront cost but in the long run it's cheaper to own.
The value in eso+ doesn't lie in the access to the DLC, it lies in all the other perks.
You also aren't paying for uniqueness when it comes to the DLC, the dlc is available without ESO+. The functionality of ESO+ also doesn't change with this reward, you still get access to this dlc with eso+. If you do not get this from the crownstore for free when it gets pushed out or don't own Blackwood, that becomes very significant.
You're not going to want to access it that way because owning it for free is obviously better, but it's hard to argue that being given a free upgrade to your usual perk devalues it.
This upgrade is of no use to people who never drop sub unless they drop the game entirely, but that's a matter of desire not value.
The monetary value of the sub has not changed. What you get has not changed. You still got Deadlands, it's just been upgraded from rent to own (if you want the upgrade).
BalticBlues wrote: »Wow, they probably are giving away an entire DLC for free.
Isn't this awesome... but some people here still do complain?
Why not just be happy for all the people without ESO+ to enjoy it?
If you cannot be happy for other people
you probably won't be happy for a lot of your life...
Because you get the most happiness in life
when the people around you are happy.
As I am an subscriber myself, I really don't see the problem.Absolutely happy for the non-subscribers. Then, again, we subscribers are happy for the the ones that aren't, but it seems the ones that aren't have no understanding or empathy with us that are... Feels a bit one directional don't you think?
It's not entitlement that a lot of ESO+ subscribers aren't happy with a reward that offers them nothing. I repeat: it's getting an umbrella for Christmas. Yes, it's extremely practical. That doesn't make it a good gift. [snip]
It's not entitlement that a lot of ESO+ subscribers aren't happy with a reward that offers them nothing. I repeat: it's getting an umbrella for Christmas. Yes, it's extremely practical. That doesn't make it a good gift. [snip]
Yes, the hype was that a big mystery prize for a community effort would be revealed. Then it turns out that only part of the community will truly benefit from the big prize: non-subscribers who own Blackwood. Those who don't own Blackwood won't get anything. ESO+ members will get something they already had AND PAY FOR.
No matter how you slice and dice it, giving the big bonus prize for a community effort to only part of the community doesn't make a lot of sense. I can see it from a marketing point of view, but from a community morale point of view, it sucks.
NoxiousBlight wrote: »I am disappointed.
Not that the prize was a free DLC - congrats to the non-subs on your bonus prize by the way - but rather the marketing behind it. They hyped up this mystery prize and then it just left a bitter taste in my mouth.
They should have just announced it to begin with. Then no one would be upset. In fact, even the subs would be excited because it is a cool reward for a lot of players. But by calling it “amazing” and making us tune into a stream, only to tell your most loyal, and most likely highest spending customers, “sorry the bonus prize isn’t really for you” makes me feel bad. And marketing for a game should never make you feel bad.
How about ESO+ members get two extra armory slots as long as they are subscribed? How about subs get 2000 seals of endeavors for being loyal customers? How about ANYTHING?
But I guess it doesn’t matter. They know the vast majority of loyal subs will just keep on subbing.