LadyNalcarya wrote: »Yes: farming and questing achievements. Who cares which character got that winglet?
No: combat-related achievements. You may be a brilliant tank, but a crap healer.
I don't understand this argument. You can already swap your character's race and role, and nobody will know if you got your titles as tank and not as healer. Not to mention that selling carries is a huge business these days, and many people just buy their fancy titles.
There's also a way to implement account-wide achievements without affecting those who want to earn them on each character: they could just add an extra tab where you could see all of your achievements and which characters have them already.
Nobody is opposed to that, but an account-wide achievement summary isn't what most mean when they argue for account-wide achievements. They just want to roll an endgame alt who already has all the achievements earned by other characters on the account to save them having to repeat the more critical of them.
Much as I dislike the idea of being able to buy a complete alt in the Crown Store I'd prefer that for those that want it rather than messing with the whole character-specific and account-wide balance for the rest of us who don't want a quick route to endgame but want to play all our alts fully and as individual characters with their own separate achievements.
It boils down to whether or not it's the player earning the achievements, or the toon earning the achievements. (a toon the player created and equipped) I look at it as the toon is a tool for the player to use, and it's the player earning the achievement, not the toon. The toon is just the tool the player used to earn the achievement.
It makes a lot more sense to have achievements be account wide. Toons aren't real, players are.
The problem with that argument is that few if any would claim that when a character completes a quest the xp and rewards were earned by the player and should go to all the account's characters, and yet it's exactly the same situation, the player completed the quest and not the character - or so some would argue. Besides which, the achievements aren't real either, so the idea that players are real and characters aren't really doesn't make any sense.
Some players like things to be account-wide, others like things to be character-specific. Some are put off rolling alts because of the need to repeat content, others only roll alts in order to repeat the content. Some players want to do everything on one character, other players want to do some things on one character and other things on a different character. I want to do Thieves Guild and Dark Brotherhood content on my nightblade assassin, and I don't want the achievements for that automatically given to my paladin-style templar who won't go near those guilds (and I'm not even a role-player in any significant way).
Fortunately, ZOS recognise the different approaches and have made a decent balance between them with some things like CPs, collectibles and dye unlocks account-wide and other things like achievements and titles character-specific. It's a fair compromise in my view, and I hope they don't change it- although I'm wholly in favour of an account summary screen showing which characters have earned which achievements.
When the same toon earns the same achievement a second time do they get bonuses for getting it the second time? There are no bonuses that go to any characters specifically for getting an achievement, it's just XP. Mementos are already account wide.
I'm not sure what your point is when achievements can be so easily limited to one instance of a given achievement per account. That limitation is already in place for every toon, it could just be account wide instead.
First, it ruins the point of playing alts for those who want to play them fully and obtain achievements on those characters, and second it also ruins it for those who want some of their characters not to receive certain achievements as I already explained in the case of e.g. the Thieves Guild and/or Dark Brotherhood.
LadyNalcarya wrote: »Yes: farming and questing achievements. Who cares which character got that winglet?
No: combat-related achievements. You may be a brilliant tank, but a crap healer.
I don't understand this argument. You can already swap your character's race and role, and nobody will know if you got your titles as tank and not as healer. Not to mention that selling carries is a huge business these days, and many people just buy their fancy titles.
There's also a way to implement account-wide achievements without affecting those who want to earn them on each character: they could just add an extra tab where you could see all of your achievements and which characters have them already.
LadyNalcarya wrote: »Yes: farming and questing achievements. Who cares which character got that winglet?
No: combat-related achievements. You may be a brilliant tank, but a crap healer.
I don't understand this argument. You can already swap your character's race and role, and nobody will know if you got your titles as tank and not as healer. Not to mention that selling carries is a huge business these days, and many people just buy their fancy titles.
There's also a way to implement account-wide achievements without affecting those who want to earn them on each character: they could just add an extra tab where you could see all of your achievements and which characters have them already.
Nobody is opposed to that, but an account-wide achievement summary isn't what most mean when they argue for account-wide achievements. They just want to roll an endgame alt who already has all the achievements earned by other characters on the account to save them having to repeat the more critical of them.
Much as I dislike the idea of being able to buy a complete alt in the Crown Store I'd prefer that for those that want it rather than messing with the whole character-specific and account-wide balance for the rest of us who don't want a quick route to endgame but want to play all our alts fully and as individual characters with their own separate achievements.
Never gonna happen. Why? Well, they sell skyshards now in Crown Store.
starkerealm wrote: »I honestly just want lore book collecting to be account wide. There are books that are literally impossible to get if you miss them during a quest and I'd love to be able to 100% my lore library on my main.
Editic Memory, not Lore Books. ZOS has been pretty good about getting those out into the world where you can access them after the quest has concluded. It's taken years, and there may still be some that are still missing, but they've been working on this.
what about few books which are at gates of all alliances and these books are different?
if we are in 1 alliance we are unable to get few of these books because they are at enemy alliance bases and there is no way to get access to them unless we wont spentn much money on alliance change tokens which also is not from beginning of the game
Hallothiel wrote: »Still do not understand why this is necessary.
So can someone who wants this please explain why they think this should be implemented, and what benefits they think it will bring?
All I can see it doing is pleasing completists.
Yes, I appreciate the argument that its ‘me’ thats got the shiny not my character, but as has been pointed out, one can can be far more proficient on one char than another. I can do vet trials on stamblade, magsorc & healer, but if I tried with a necro or dk, I’d be hopeless.
I personally do not want achievements shared. I have dond the Master Angler grind on my main - he gets the title. My 17 alts don’t.
It just seems a slippery slope. At least with the skyshards etc in the crown store you have to have done it at least once to unlock. And its not cheap. But at least it is optional.
Once you have account-wide achievements, what next? Where is this leading? As some achievements are for completing quests, does that mean one doesn’t need to bother with them anymore? Will this end with demands for fully-levelled/spec’d out characters who have done everything already? Just for the small % who go for leaderboards in trials?
daemondamian wrote: »Hallothiel wrote: »Still do not understand why this is necessary.
So can someone who wants this please explain why they think this should be implemented, and what benefits they think it will bring?
All I can see it doing is pleasing completists.
Yes, I appreciate the argument that its ‘me’ thats got the shiny not my character, but as has been pointed out, one can can be far more proficient on one char than another. I can do vet trials on stamblade, magsorc & healer, but if I tried with a necro or dk, I’d be hopeless.
I personally do not want achievements shared. I have dond the Master Angler grind on my main - he gets the title. My 17 alts don’t.
It just seems a slippery slope. At least with the skyshards etc in the crown store you have to have done it at least once to unlock. And its not cheap. But at least it is optional.
Once you have account-wide achievements, what next? Where is this leading? As some achievements are for completing quests, does that mean one doesn’t need to bother with them anymore? Will this end with demands for fully-levelled/spec’d out characters who have done everything already? Just for the small % who go for leaderboards in trials?
So what if particular achievements you've achieved on one character could be shared account wide for say tokens in the crown store then? That way the onus would be on you as to whether or not you wanted to accept base game default (character specific) or account wide (crown token)?
Dragonnord wrote: »No: combat-related achievements. You may be a brilliant tank, but a crap healer.
Or you may be great with your easy mode 1 button heavy attack build magsorc or with your meta easy mode execute spam magblade but you may stink with a stamina toon, and so why your stamina toons should have flawless conqueror, x trifecta achievement, x trial hard mode completion and so.
So... no, no account-based achievements.
So can someone who wants this please explain why they think this should be implemented, and what benefits they think it will bring?
Hallothiel wrote: »Still do not understand why this is necessary.
So can someone who wants this please explain why they think this should be implemented, and what benefits they think it will bring?
All I can see it doing is pleasing completists.
Yes, I appreciate the argument that its ‘me’ thats got the shiny not my character, but as has been pointed out, one can can be far more proficient on one char than another. I can do vet trials on stamblade, magsorc & healer, but if I tried with a necro or dk, I’d be hopeless.
I personally do not want achievements shared. I have dond the Master Angler grind on my main - he gets the title. My 17 alts don’t.
It just seems a slippery slope. At least with the skyshards etc in the crown store you have to have done it at least once to unlock. And its not cheap. But at least it is optional.
Once you have account-wide achievements, what next? Where is this leading? As some achievements are for completing quests, does that mean one doesn’t need to bother with them anymore? Will this end with demands for fully-levelled/spec’d out characters who have done everything already? Just for the small % who go for leaderboards in trials?
Hallothiel wrote: »Still do not understand why this is necessary.
So can someone who wants this please explain why they think this should be implemented, and what benefits they think it will bring?
All I can see it doing is pleasing completists.
Yes, I appreciate the argument that its ‘me’ thats got the shiny not my character, but as has been pointed out, one can can be far more proficient on one char than another. I can do vet trials on stamblade, magsorc & healer, but if I tried with a necro or dk, I’d be hopeless.
I personally do not want achievements shared. I have dond the Master Angler grind on my main - he gets the title. My 17 alts don’t.
It just seems a slippery slope. At least with the skyshards etc in the crown store you have to have done it at least once to unlock. And its not cheap. But at least it is optional.
Once you have account-wide achievements, what next? Where is this leading? As some achievements are for completing quests, does that mean one doesn’t need to bother with them anymore? Will this end with demands for fully-levelled/spec’d out characters who have done everything already? Just for the small % who go for leaderboards in trials?
Hallothiel wrote: »And I want true freedom of playing any character at any given time, without feeling that I waste time
Why would playing on alts be a waste of time?
Why would playing on alts be a waste of time?
tomofhyrule wrote: »I prefer my achievements to be by character because I like to see what I've done with each of them. I wouldn't mind a tab that showed how many other characters you had cleared the content, but don't take away my characters' histories.
Every time this thread comes up, it's down to who is earning the achievements? Is it the player, using different tools to do so, or is it the character who's been build in a certain way to get something. I prefer having developed characters as more than tools, so I'd like to be able to see their individual records. Some people only care about progress and the character is nothing more than a set of skill bars to them. Both can be right and both can be wrong.
Besides, I get some of these achievements are painful to get - kill 30 flame colossi in CoA2, when there are only 5 per run and that's if your group doesn't skip any. But if this were account wide, you really think that the 'account wide' version wouldn't still be 30? The account-wide version allows you to do it so much more often, so get ready for "kill 300 flame colossi over the lifetime of your account!" They're not here to reduce the grind.
tomofhyrule wrote: »I prefer my achievements to be by character because I like to see what I've done with each of them. I wouldn't mind a tab that showed how many other characters you had cleared the content, but don't take away my characters' histories.
Every time this thread comes up, it's down to who is earning the achievements? Is it the player, using different tools to do so, or is it the character who's been build in a certain way to get something. I prefer having developed characters as more than tools, so I'd like to be able to see their individual records. Some people only care about progress and the character is nothing more than a set of skill bars to them. Both can be right and both can be wrong.
Besides, I get some of these achievements are painful to get - kill 30 flame colossi in CoA2, when there are only 5 per run and that's if your group doesn't skip any. But if this were account wide, you really think that the 'account wide' version wouldn't still be 30? The account-wide version allows you to do it so much more often, so get ready for "kill 300 flame colossi over the lifetime of your account!" They're not here to reduce the grind.
This is a massive point that most of those who clamour for account-wide achievements are blind to, just as when they clamoured for account-wide skyshards they allowed themselves to be blind to the way it would be introduced through the crown store. As with so many requests in this game, be careful what you wish for!
Besides, I get some of these achievements are painful to get - kill 30 flame colossi in CoA2, when there are only 5 per run and that's if your group doesn't skip any. But if this were account wide, you really think that the 'account wide' version wouldn't still be 30? The account-wide version allows you to do it so much more often, so get ready for "kill 300 flame colossi over the lifetime of your account!"
This is a massive point that most of those who clamour for account-wide achievements are blind to, just as when they clamoured for account-wide skyshards they allowed themselves to be blind to the way it would be introduced through the crown store. As with so many requests in this game, be careful what you wish for!
...Actually, I like that you've mentioned skyshards. They are technically account wide now, but for a high price. Of course, I don't believe that developers would make something like account-wide achievements if there was no profit from it. So, if we earn a title on one character, we should have option to buy this title (for our crowns) for any other alt on our account (no gifting)
It wouldn't improve experience of playing multiple characters who don't progress common goal, but at least it would allow accound-wide titles.
If this would be an option, I would get Deadlands Adept on my tank and then buy this title for my necromancer
joerginger wrote: »Last year I started playing Guild Wars 2 and one of the differences between it and ESO that I absolutely like is that all the achievements are player achievements and thus accountwide.