TelvanniWizard wrote: »
TelvanniWizard wrote: »
lordrichter wrote: »TelvanniWizard wrote: »
They care. My guess is that the legal staff does not want any official statements made, so people like Gina and Jessica have nothing to say on the subject.
TelvanniWizard wrote: »
CloneTrooper699 wrote: »I spend so much time playing this game that I want to support it and keep it going. That being said I'm a super indecisive person who would never want to spend $40 on just one mount, I'd much rather pay $40 and get a bunch of things at random. Leave crates in the game, if you don't like them don't buy them and if it bothers you that much don't play, the people that buy crates are the people that keep the game going. It's all just cosmetic crap anyway.
lordrichter wrote: »TelvanniWizard wrote: »
They care. My guess is that the legal staff does not want any official statements made, so people like Gina and Jessica have nothing to say on the subject.
What indicates to you that they care? I have personally not come across any mention of CC by ZoS employees.
lordrichter wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »TelvanniWizard wrote: »
They care. My guess is that the legal staff does not want any official statements made, so people like Gina and Jessica have nothing to say on the subject.
What indicates to you that they care? I have personally not come across any mention of CC by ZoS employees.
They changed one of their Crown Crate plans for Summerset based on forum feedback. They came up with a nice alternative to the single page motif situation. Of course, that was the Dev team. By the time it passes Executive and Marketing muster, the drop rate for them will be somewhere close to winning the Powerball jackpot.
lordrichter wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »TelvanniWizard wrote: »
They care. My guess is that the legal staff does not want any official statements made, so people like Gina and Jessica have nothing to say on the subject.
What indicates to you that they care? I have personally not come across any mention of CC by ZoS employees.
They changed one of their Crown Crate plans for Summerset based on forum feedback. They came up with a nice alternative to the single page motif situation. Of course, that was the Dev team. By the time it passes Executive and Marketing muster, the drop rate for them will be somewhere close to winning the Powerball jackpot.
Morrowind furnishing recipes
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »huntgod_ESO wrote: »Shouldn't the low odds teach people not to gamble, either in game or in real life?
You clearly don't understand how an addiction or compulsion work.
The issue with the way crates are implemented in many of these game, regardless of whether the items are cosmetic, p2w or whatnot, is they use manipulative and predatory techniques to target a specific and vulnerably portion of the gaming market. Which is fine so long as they play by certain accepted rules, similar to those enforced on casinos and lotteries and that some protections are put in place to dissuade or minimize it's access to minors.
I understand some folks have issues with state intervention with these types of things, I do not.
Ah, yes, people acted irrationally. What a twist to the economic concept that people act rationally. How do we draw the line between a profitable business and exploitive behavior?
Easy, you set a line once it is obvious that they crossed it so that nobody crosses it again. That's all you can do.
That's what this company and others are asking for by their actions.
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »TelvanniWizard wrote: »
They care. My guess is that the legal staff does not want any official statements made, so people like Gina and Jessica have nothing to say on the subject.
What indicates to you that they care? I have personally not come across any mention of CC by ZoS employees.
They changed one of their Crown Crate plans for Summerset based on forum feedback. They came up with a nice alternative to the single page motif situation. Of course, that was the Dev team. By the time it passes Executive and Marketing muster, the drop rate for them will be somewhere close to winning the Powerball jackpot.
Morrowind furnishing recipes
It only took nearly a year...
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »huntgod_ESO wrote: »Shouldn't the low odds teach people not to gamble, either in game or in real life?
You clearly don't understand how an addiction or compulsion work.
The issue with the way crates are implemented in many of these game, regardless of whether the items are cosmetic, p2w or whatnot, is they use manipulative and predatory techniques to target a specific and vulnerably portion of the gaming market. Which is fine so long as they play by certain accepted rules, similar to those enforced on casinos and lotteries and that some protections are put in place to dissuade or minimize it's access to minors.
I understand some folks have issues with state intervention with these types of things, I do not.
Ah, yes, people acted irrationally. What a twist to the economic concept that people act rationally. How do we draw the line between a profitable business and exploitive behavior?
Easy, you set a line once it is obvious that they crossed it so that nobody crosses it again. That's all you can do.
That's what this company and others are asking for by their actions.
And what is the appropriate line to draw? Is it "easy" to define?
Istoppucks wrote: »twitch_zero wrote: »
What a bunch of crap. How about some personal responsibility. Or are you saying people maybe even yourself are not capable of personal responsibility?
Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »Mystrius_Archaion wrote: »huntgod_ESO wrote: »Shouldn't the low odds teach people not to gamble, either in game or in real life?
You clearly don't understand how an addiction or compulsion work.
The issue with the way crates are implemented in many of these game, regardless of whether the items are cosmetic, p2w or whatnot, is they use manipulative and predatory techniques to target a specific and vulnerably portion of the gaming market. Which is fine so long as they play by certain accepted rules, similar to those enforced on casinos and lotteries and that some protections are put in place to dissuade or minimize it's access to minors.
I understand some folks have issues with state intervention with these types of things, I do not.
Ah, yes, people acted irrationally. What a twist to the economic concept that people act rationally. How do we draw the line between a profitable business and exploitive behavior?
Easy, you set a line once it is obvious that they crossed it so that nobody crosses it again. That's all you can do.
That's what this company and others are asking for by their actions.
And what is the appropriate line to draw? Is it "easy" to define?
It's easy enough that lawmakers already have several options. That means they already crossed a line set by quite a large number of people across the globe.
Lawmakers don't just do things, or vote in majority agreement to pass them, without a lot of their lobbyists/constituents asking for it, or some rich buddy of theirs which is unlikely in this case.