Integral1900 wrote: »(Hides head in hands) they are going to choose a bunch of meta addicts aren’t they, the kind of ninjas that regard soloing vet dungeons as a fair bench mark....
Oh god please no............
Integral1900 wrote: »(Hides head in hands) they are going to choose a bunch of meta addicts aren’t they, the kind of ninjas that regard soloing vet dungeons as a fair bench mark....
Oh god please no............
No.. they’re going to choose diplomatic people who understand that there are two or more sides to every issue. They are going to choose people who know that sometimes the best comment or response is no comment or response at all. And most of all, they’re going to choose people who won’t *** post or get baited into flame wars on the message boards...
This rules out like 95%+ of top tier PvE and PvP players lol
Hope it's not just a group of dps representatives
Malamar1229 wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Set an age limit.
Oh and obviously about half the names listed already I'm pretty sure have been banned at some point.
Quite honestly not keen about this community representation being in the hands of a bunch of 19 year olds.
Lord of the Flies online IMO.
#SorcLivesMatter is exactly the kind of thing I'd expect from a 19 year old's signature
Not really. I've got at least 17 years on that assumption. That is an old Sig from the dark brotherhood era when sorc was arguably at it's lowest point. Not at all indicative of maturity or age...don't be bitter. Millennials are well known for their "what are you going to do for me" attitude and the kids in this game have as much integrity as a Ford. No thank you,
attacking a playerbase for their assumed age is pretty indicative of maturity. literally zero reason to insert your anti-millenial agenda in here when it has nothing to do with the topic at hand?
Well it does. Don't miss the carpet next time. Quite clearly stated we don't want a bunch of 19 yr old representatives. It's also quite clear you don't PvP because there's an age group that brings toxicity to a new level...and I'll give you a guess at that age group.
Less complicated?cjhhickman39 wrote: »One thing you should consider adding an extra voice,the brand new player.
Reason to invite one would be to understand how they see the game and to help make the mechanics of the game easier to pick up and quest lines less complicated
This isn’t for balance and wish-list items.
This is for bugs and pain points. Things like the Nightblade shade not working, or DK leap dmg ceasing to exist if target runs outside of leap range mid leap, or stamden having to place trees three or four times due to GCD lag on ground targets, or how shimmering shield interacts with force pulse, or the weird animation glitch when you petrify someone using blessed meridia, how FM doesn’t work on immov poisons, or any of the million weird little animation glitches with WW form or overload... It’s bugs and frustrations specific to classes and roles, not what’s OP and what needs buffs.
Im just a nobody who wants the game to be better but there are quite a few posters on the forum who take time to test problems, can identify the problems and articulate the problems and identity solutions.
With that being said im guessing this is the developers way of saying "you have a problem with this class, well go deal with the representative"
I doubt they are willing to take input from us and furthermore i believe they already identified 10 people they want to deal with these problems.
With that being said i hope fengrush is far away from this.
zParallaxz wrote: »Im just a nobody who wants the game to be better but there are quite a few posters on the forum who take time to test problems, can identify the problems and articulate the problems and identity solutions.
With that being said im guessing this is the developers way of saying "you have a problem with this class, well go deal with the representative"
I doubt they are willing to take input from us and furthermore i believe they already identified 10 people they want to deal with these problems.
With that being said i hope fengrush is far away from this.
What’s wrong with Fengrush? People like Fengrush and me leave due to the same reasons that are fixable but ignored
zParallaxz wrote: »Im just a nobody who wants the game to be better but there are quite a few posters on the forum who take time to test problems, can identify the problems and articulate the problems and identity solutions.
With that being said im guessing this is the developers way of saying "you have a problem with this class, well go deal with the representative"
I doubt they are willing to take input from us and furthermore i believe they already identified 10 people they want to deal with these problems.
With that being said i hope fengrush is far away from this.
What’s wrong with Fengrush? People like Fengrush and me leave due to the same reasons that are fixable but ignored
zParallaxz wrote: »Im just a nobody who wants the game to be better but there are quite a few posters on the forum who take time to test problems, can identify the problems and articulate the problems and identity solutions.
With that being said im guessing this is the developers way of saying "you have a problem with this class, well go deal with the representative"
I doubt they are willing to take input from us and furthermore i believe they already identified 10 people they want to deal with these problems.
With that being said i hope fengrush is far away from this.
What’s wrong with Fengrush? People like Fengrush and me leave due to the same reasons that are fixable but ignored