DieAlteHexe wrote: »
Guess the thinking is cheating is cheating and whether it was "only a little" or "huge amounts"; still cheating.
Also, from what I saw in another thread, since closed, it sounds like they suspended accounts 'til they can research more thoroughly so it might be that those who "only cheated a little" or seem to have just been in the wrong place at the wrong time may yet be exonerated.
magictucktuck wrote: »
these are people who UNDOUBTEDLY exploited. like figured it out and hopped on 5 alts to do it again...
Fixed that for ya.
monktoasty wrote: »
Oh please..cheating is cheating than why are so many bots running around?
They only suspended these people because they know deep down it was the coders fault and they salty about it
Emma_Overload wrote: »
I didn't do anything like that. I have several alts, including many that are under 50 that I haven't gotten around to leveling and, I didn't play them at all that day.
ZOS hasn't published any detailed information about their methodology here, and it isn't in the letter they send you, either.
Emma_Overload wrote: »
You apparently missed the part of my comments where I said I didn't know anything about any unusual XP gain. When you're over the CP cap, there is nothing exciting or interesting about gaining more CP. I simply don't pay any attention to it. Why would I react to something I didn't know about?
DieAlteHexe wrote: »
The one does not preclude the other.
I think your "reasoning" is hogwash, frankly. Yep, bug, and a nasty one at that but even so, cheating. Against ToS. Something being a bug does not excuse exploiting it anymore than an unlocked door is an invitation for theft.
It fascinates me this "oh, it's the devs fault that I took advantage of a bug to cheat". Pretzel logic.
monktoasty wrote: »
Just because something I'd against toss doesn't mean anything..they can choose to take responsibility that it's their fault. This exploit took no extra effort..just play the game. End of story.
It's not pretzel logic it's factual.
Tos also says botting is against the rules..but it's THIS bug they know they messed up and refuse to admit it.
Unsuspend these people and give them 5 million gold each for the inconvenience. Make a public apology for acting unrash.
Have you ever seen them shut the servers to fix a bug that ruins the game for players? Nope because they only care about themselves. Their feelings were hurt because they caused a bug that gave players extra xp and it ENRAGED the staff that players got free stuff.
DieAlteHexe wrote: »
More of the same, although I had to laugh at the bolded. That is exactly what the players need to do. If you have a go at something that you know is dodgy, well, accept the responsibility that "you" chose to do it and you will pay whatever price ZMax decides. Their game, their rules. If those rules are too onerous, then the exit door is open.
And how, pray tell, do you know that their "feelings were hurt" and that they were "enraged"? Mighty fertile imagination you've got there. Yeah, I'm sure they weren't happy about it. No one is when they make a mistake but you've moseyed into a level that I seriously doubt occurred.
Actually they DID admit it was a bug and set about fixing it.
I'm LOLing at your suggestion of giving them 5 million. Now, if someone is suspended for the two weeks ZMax has said they will be investigating and they are found not guilty then it would be a nice thing to offer them some compensation but you are advocating something that is just ridiculous.
Most of those people CHOSE to have a go at exploiting. Too bad, so sad, time to pay the piper.
monktoasty wrote: »
All the players did was play the game. It's zos fault the bug exists..the player didn't go out of their way to break the game and get more zp..they just...killed stuff as nornal.
Sorry but you are in the wrong here as well as zos.
No excited occurred here..just players playing the game.
End of story.
Now unsuspend them and apologize.
DieAlteHexe wrote: »
No, at least some of them chose to cheat. That is the "end of story".
But I see we aren't going to agree here and whilst I give you credit for persistence, your logic is borked.
So, you permanently banned 80+ accounts for exploiting a cosmetic skin & some trash weapons (many of which were first-time offenders), yet you temporarily ban accounts that took part in an exploit that actually gave them a huge advantage over other players?
Okay. So why not go back & reduce the previous permanent bans to temporary? They were clearly unfair. Or is doing that too much effort for you to put forth?
You can take your time to adjust these accounts, but you couldn't with the last offenders?
You only hurt yourself when you permanently ban paying customers for trivial exploits such as these.
This is a step in the right direction, but the way the previous situation was handled was beyond disappointing and seriously needs to be rectified.
Emma_Overload wrote: »
What are you talking about? What "huge advantage" did I get from extra XP when my toon was fully leveled and my CP were way over the cap?
monktoasty wrote: »
Playing the game as intended..ie..killing stuff..is not choosing to cheat. Sorry charlie..no way you can twist this to be the players fault.
There is no rules saying stop play8ng the game and log out if some whacky bug happens. If this were the case..I'd be stop playing all the time as handfuls of bugs happen to me.
It just happens that the one time a bug gives the player something..they get all bent of out shape..I WISH they were get bent out of shape when I get stuck in a chair or can't finish a quest
monktoasty wrote: »
Just because something I'd against toss doesn't mean anything..they can choose to take responsibility that it's their fault. This exploit took no extra effort..just play the game. End of story.
It's not pretzel logic it's factual.
Tos also says botting is against the rules..but it's THIS bug they know they messed up and refuse to admit it.
Unsuspend these people and give them 5 million gold each for the inconvenience. Make a public apology for acting unrash.
Have you ever seen them shut the servers to fix a bug that ruins the game for players? Nope because they only care about themselves. Their feelings were hurt because they caused a bug that gave players extra xp and it ENRAGED the staff that players got free stuff.
Your life can be threatened and they wouldn't do a thing..all tos rules are broken they never do a thing but a few players get free xp WATCH OUT the salty staff take IMMEDIATE action.
Sickening
RIP
cant say im sorry.
it was an unintentional bug. keyword: unintentional. that means, ZOS didnt mean for it to happen, it was a mistake, and that doesnt mean its ok to take advantage of said mistake. taking advantage of a bad situation is exploiting the situation.
obviously, as Gina states, not everyone was exploiting. frankly, seeing people with 1200 + CP is a little head scratchingly suspect
Most MMO companies run a strike system yes. The idea is you might be innocent or not know and need a slap one or two times, if you somehow keep finding yourself exploiting then yeah kiss your account goodbye.
One would hope that's true, for the sake of the people who were mistakenly labeled as offenders here. Seems to me the worst part of all this is the strike against your account... Does ZOS go by baseball rules? 3 strikes and poof goes all your progress/collectibles/etc.? (Read: considerable time, effort, and (for some of us) money spent supporting their product)
Unless you've disabled the UI element there is a rather large and noticeable "You gain a CP" just above the middle of the screen, as well as a sound effect. Even if you don't care about CP you should notice that one CP/kill pull is more than you would normally be getting.Emma_Overload wrote: »You apparently missed the part of my comments where I said I didn't know anything about any unusual XP gain. When you're over the CP cap, there is nothing exciting or interesting about gaining more CP. I simply don't pay any attention to it. Why would I react to something I didn't know about?
You're talking about the differenced between a bug and exploiting a bug. A item which doesn't work and nets you no gain is a bug, one which can be abused to get gains is an exploit (because you're exploiting the bug).monktoasty wrote: »Playing the game as intended..ie..killing stuff..is not choosing to cheat. Sorry charlie..no way you can twist this to be the players fault.
There is no rules saying stop play8ng the game and log out if some whacky bug happens. If this were the case..I'd be stop playing all the time as handfuls of bugs happen to me.
It just happens that the one time a bug gives the player something..they get all bent of out shape..I WISH they were get bent out of shape when I get stuck in a chair or can't finish a quest
VaranisArano wrote: »
Playing the game is not exploiting. Continuing to play the game when you realize that "hey, playing the game by killing mobs is netting way more exp than it should", failing to report and continuing to exploit the bugged exp? That's exploiting.
If you seriously think you wouldn't have noticed the exp gain from 1.9 million a mob over time, take that up with ZOS. Regardless, the TOS and Code of Conduct everyone who plays agreed to is pretty clear the you need to report and stop exploiting bugs when you find them. Does the TOS exist to cover ZOS' behind? Sure, but how does that absolve you and other players of the responsibilities you agreed to?
VaranisArano wrote: »
Playing the game as intended...I.e. Killing stuff...while receiving bugged exp on the order of 1.9 million exp per mob that is obviously not how the the game is intended to work and continuing to kill and playing the game, thus gaining bugged and unintended exp without reporting the bug and stopping the action causing the bug as required by the TOS and COC, is where the cheating came in.
Its not about just killing mobs, its about continuing to do so when the correct course of action is to report the glitch and stop killing mobs. Its about a failure to follow the TOS when players encountered a major bug.
But I don't pay attention to exp - take that up with ZOS.
But its ZOS' fault! - how does that change a player's responsibility to follow the TOS they agreed to?
You forget that some of us played since beta. I'm 1150CP ish and wasnt even online that week. I know legit players who PvE more who are over 2000CP